1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Functions of Language
  4. Volume 32, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 32, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Grammaticalization is often conceived of as a change from less to more grammatical, with loss of semantic content and the acquisition of a more grammatical status. However, the roles of discourse and prosody in grammaticalization processes are not often taken into consideration. This paper describes seven syntactic and two discourse functions of forms historically related to the noun meaning ‘thing’ in Sà’án Sàvǐ ñà Ñuù Xnúvíkó (Mixtepec Mixtec, Otomanguean). At the level of discourse, these forms, pervasive in unplanned speech, may function as hesitation markers and floor-keeping devices. The floor-keeping function, in turn, serves as a clause-combining device in discourse. The spoken nature of the corpus analyzed here allows us to see how information is distributed over Intonation Units (IU) and their combinations. This paper offers structural and prosodic evidence that some syntactic functions of these forms developed from discourse structures.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24082.bel
2026-02-03
2026-03-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/fol.24082.bel
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amiridze, Nino, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan
    eds. Fillers, pauses and placeholders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.93
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.93 [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, Peter
    2005 Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text25(1). 7–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Auwera, Johan van der & Olga Krasnoukhova
    2021 How to do words with ‘things’. Multiple grammaticalization from ‘thing’ in Tupi-Guarani. Italian Journal of Linguistics33(2). 69–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bache, Carl & Leif Kvistgaard Jakobsen
    1980 On the distinction between restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses in Modern English. Lingua521. 243–267. 10.1016/0024‑3841(80)90036‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(80)90036-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baunaz, Lena & Eric Lander
    2018 Syncretisms with the nominal complementizer. Studia Linguistica72(3). 537–570. 10.1111/stul.12076
     https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12076 [Google Scholar]
  6. Belmar, Guillem
    2024 Community-informed documentary linguistics and community-led participatory research: describing Sà’án Sàvǐ ñà Ñuù Xnúvíko and analyzing speakers’ insights on intelligibility with Tlahuapa Mixtec. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Belmar, Guillem, Jeremías Salazar & Eric W. Campbell
    2024 Marking focus in Sà’án Sàvǐ ñà Ñuù Xnúvíko (Mixtepec Mixtec). Paper presented atSyntax of the World’s Languages IX, Lima, 23–26 July 2024.
  8. Belmar, Guillem, Alonso Vásquez-Aguilar & Jeremías Salazar
    2021 Agent hierarchy and pronominal allomorphy in Sà’án Sàvǐ ñà Yukúnanǐ. InCaitie Coons, Gabriella Chronis, Sofia Pierson & Venkat Govindarajan (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Meeting of the Texas Linguistic Society, 21–38. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, Department of Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
    2022 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. www.praat.org
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell, Eric W.
    2017 Otomanguean historical linguistics: past, present and prospects for the future. Language & Linguistics Compass111. e1224. 10.1111/lnc3.12240
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12240 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chafe, Wallace L.
    (ed.) 1980 The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, Herbert H. & Jean E. Fox Tree
    2002 Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition54(1). 73–11. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00017‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Craig, Colette Grinevald
    1986 Jacaltec noun classifiers. Lingua701. 241–284. 10.1016/0024‑3841(86)90046‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(86)90046-X [Google Scholar]
  15. De León, Lourdes
    1988 Noun and numeral classifiers in Mixtec and Tzotzil: A referential view. Sussex: University of Sussex PhD Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Du Bois, John W.
    2003 Discourse and grammar. InMichael Tomasello (ed.). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Vol. 2, 47–87. London: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Du Bois, John W. & Stefan Schuetze-Coburn
    1993 Representing hierarchy: Constituent structure for discourse databases. InJane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research, 221–260. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Duncan, Starkey & George Niederehe
    1974 On signalling that it’s your turn to speak. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology10(3). 234–247. 10.1016/0022‑1031(74)90070‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90070-5 [Google Scholar]
  19. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fenning
    (eds.) 2019 Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 22nd edn. Dallas, TX: SIL. www.ethnologue.com
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ELAN
    ELAN 2022 ELAN. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fox Tree, Jean E. & Herbert H. Clark
    1997 Pronouncing ‘the’ and ‘thee’ to signal problems in speaking. Cognition621. 151–167. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(96)00781‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00781-0 [Google Scholar]
  22. Graham, Lamar A.
    2013 Comparing hesitation markers in Sanjuanero Spanish. Diálogo de LenguaV1. 66–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Heine, Bernd & Kyung-An Song
    2010 On the genesis of personal pronouns: Some conceptual sources. Language and Cognition2(1). 117–147. 10.1515/langcog.2010.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.005 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hills, Robert A.
    1990 A syntactic sketch of Ayutla Mixtec. InHenry Bradley & Barbara Hollenbach (eds.), Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan Languages, Vol. 2, 1–260. Arlington, TX: SIL.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2022 Prosodic phrasing and the emergence of phrase structure. Linguistics60(3). 715–743. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0135
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0135 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hollenbach, Elena E. de
    1995 Cuatro morfemas funcionales en las lenguas Mixtecanas. InRamón Arzápalo Marín & Yolanda Lastra (eds.), Vitalidad e influencia de las lenguas indígenas en Latinoamérica. II coloquio Mauricio Swadesh, 284–293. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Josserand, Judy Kathryn
    1983 Mixtec dialect history. Tulane, LA: Tulane University PhD Thesis.
  28. Keevalik, Leelo
    2010 The interactional profile of a placeholder: The Estonian demonstrative see. InNino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), 139–172. 10.1075/tsl.93.07kee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.93.07kee [Google Scholar]
  29. Kirjavainen, Minna, Ludivine Crible & Kare Beeching
    2022 Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effects of exposure on the perception and production of ‘um’. Language and Speech65(2). 263–289. 10.1177/00238309211011201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211011201 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019 World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316479704
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lai, Ryan Ka Yau, Guillem Belmar, Martín Gabriel Ruiz & Eric W. Campbell
    2025 Clarifying reference: Discourse functions of postnominal ambe in P’urhépecha spontaneous monologic speech. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas. Online: 24–26 January 2025.
  32. Macaulay, Monica
    1996 A grammar of Chacaltongo Mixtec. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mendoza, Inî G.
    2020 Syntactic sketch of San Martín Peras Tu’un Savi. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara BA Honours Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Mithun, Marianne
    (ed.) 1996 Prosody, grammar, and discourse in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Palancar, Enrique L., Roberto Zavala Maldonado & Claudine Chamorreau
    2021 A typological overview of relative clause structure in Mesoamerican languages. InEnrique L. Palancar, Roberto Zavala Maldonado & Claudine Chamorreau (eds.), Relative clause structure in Mesoamerican languages, 1–52. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004467842_002
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004467842_002 [Google Scholar]
  36. Paschen, Ludger, Susanne Fuchs & Frank Seifart
    2022 Final lengthening and vowel length in 25 languages. Journal of Phonetics941. 1–22. 10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101179
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101179 [Google Scholar]
  37. Podlesskaya, Vera I.
    2010 Parameters for typological variation of placeholders. InNino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), 11–32. 10.1075/tsl.93.02pod
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.93.02pod [Google Scholar]
  38. Reyes Basurto, Griselda, Carmen Hernández Martínez & Eric W. Campbell
    2021 What is community? Perspectives from the Mixtec diaspora in California. InJustyna Olko & Julia Sallabank (eds.), Revitalising endangered languages: A practical guide, 100–102. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Salazar, Jeremías, Guillem Belmar, Catherine Scanlon, Giorgia Troiani & Eric Campbell
    2021 Bridging diaspora: Technology in the service of the revitalization of Sà’án Sàvǐ ñà Yukúnanǐ. InEda Derhemi (ed.), Endangered languages and diaspora — XXVI Annual Conference Proceedings, 176–185. Tirana: Foundation for Endangered Languages & QSPA.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Salazar, Jeremías, Guillem Belmar, Alonso Vásquez-Aguilar & Eric W. Campbell
    2022 Pronombres personales en Sà’án Sàvǐ ñà Yukúnanǐ. InJordan A. G. Douglas-Tavani & Guillem Belmar (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Workshop on American Indigenous Languages, 1–48. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sloetjes, Han & Peter Wittenburg
    2008 Annotation by category — ELAN and ISO DCR. InNicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis & Daniel Tapias (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 816–820. Paris: ELRA.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ventayol-Boada, Albert
    2021 From classifiers to subordination: Nominal origins of relativizers and subordinators in Tù’un na Ñuu Sá Mátxíí Ntxè’è (Mixtec). Amerindia431. 177–210. 10.56551/JKFG5183
     https://doi.org/10.56551/JKFG5183 [Google Scholar]
  43. Watanabe, Michiko
    2002 Fillers as indicators of discourse segment boundaries in Japanese monologues. InProceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody, 691–694. Aix-en-Provence: ISCA. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002‑158
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002-158 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24082.bel
Loading
The many things that thing can become
Functions of Language 32, 285 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24082.bel
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24082.bel
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24082.bel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse; discourse and grammar; discourse markers; grammaticalization; intonation units; Mixtec; prosody and grammar; Sà’án Sàvǐ

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error