1887
image of Constructing humour through the use of English in Chinese stand-up comedy
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Representing a comedic genre where language, identity, ideology are performed and negotiated through discursive strategies, stand-up comedy provides a socially revealing site for studying humour as a discourse practice. This study focuses on the phenomenon of English as bilingual creativity in Chinese stand-up comedy performances, exploring how it operates as a speech style in the Chinese context. Drawing upon theoretical insights from sociolinguistics, discourse pragmatics and humour studies, this paper examines how the use of English serves as a resource for audience engagement and humour construction in Chinese stand-up comedy discourse. The study identifies linguistic mechanisms and discursive strategies of bilingual creativity featured in the Chinese context. Linguistically, the practice of bilingual creativity includes intra-/inter-sentential code mixing and three types of English usage: unmarked, marked, and referential. These various uses of English perform two major discursive functions: they may function as direct punchlines or discursive mockery to entertain the audience, or they can alternatively deliver judgmental or appreciative comments to align with the audience. Finally, this paper discusses social issues associated with bilingual creativity, such as language style, emotionality, and multicultural identity branding in contemporary Chinese cultural discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.25009.zhu
2026-05-08
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander, Richard
    1997Aspects of verbal humour in English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alim, Samy
    2009 Translocal style communities: Hiphop youth as cultural theorists of style, language and globalization. Pragmatics. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Afidah, Lia & Ribut Wahyudi
    2014 How it starts and ends: A study of Indonesian stand-up comedy. Bahasa & Sastra(). –. 10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v14i2.716
    https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v14i2.716 [Google Scholar]
  4. Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
    2005 Analyzing conversational data in GTVH terms: A new approach to the issue of identity construction via humor. Humor(). –. 10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.41
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.41 [Google Scholar]
  5. Attardo, Salvatore
    2010Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2009Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219029 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017 The general theory of verbal humor. InSalvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humour, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-10 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2009The linguistics of humor: An introduction. Oxford: OUP. 10.1515/9783110219029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219029 [Google Scholar]
  9. Attardo, Salvatore & Victor Raskin
    1991 Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor(). –. 10.1515/humr.1991.4.3‑4.293
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293 [Google Scholar]
  10. Auer, Peter
    1998Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Michael Holquist (ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell, Allan
    1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society(). –. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
  13. Bell, Alan
    2001 Back in style: Reworking audience design. InPenelope Eckert & John Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, –. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bell, Nancy
    2011 Humour scholarship and TESOL: Applying findings and establishing a research agenda. TESOL Quarterly. –. 10.5054/tq.2011.240857
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240857 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2012 Formulaic language, creativity, and language play in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. –. 10.1017/S0267190512000013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000013 [Google Scholar]
  16. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    1997 Discourse pragmatics. Discourse as Social Interaction. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana & Michal Hamo
    2011 Discourse pragmatics. Discourse Studies(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1995 Structures, habitus, practices. InJames D. Faubion (ed.), Rethinking the subject, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brodie, Ian
    2014A vulgar art: A new approach to stand-up comedy. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi. 10.14325/mississippi/9781628461824.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781628461824.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chauvin, Catherine
    2017 Callbacks in stand-up comedy: Constructing cohesion at the macro level within a specific genre. InKarin Aijmer & Diana Lewis (eds.), Contrastive analysis of discourse-pragmatic aspects of linguistic genres, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑54556‑1_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54556-1_8 [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen, Matthew Y. (陈渊泉)
    2000Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ermida, Isabel
    2008The language of comic narratives: Humor construction in short stories. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110208337
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208337 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chovanec, Jan & Villy Tsakona
    2018 Investigating the dynamics of humor: Towards a theory of interactional humor. InJan Chovanec & Villy Tsakona (eds.), The dynamics of interactional humor, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.7.01cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.01cho [Google Scholar]
  24. Coulson, Seana
    2001Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511551352
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551352 [Google Scholar]
  25. Coupland, Nikolas
    2007Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511755064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755064 [Google Scholar]
  26. Crystal, David
    1998Language play. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Da Silva, Emanuel
    2015 Humor (re)positioning ethnolinguistic ideologies: “You tink is funny?”. Language in Society(). –. 10.1017/S0047404515000044
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000044 [Google Scholar]
  28. Dynel, Marta
    2013 A view on humour theory. InMarta Dynel & Marianna Švecová (eds.), Developments in linguistic humour theory, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.1.00intro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.00intro [Google Scholar]
  29. Ermida, Isabel & Jan Chovanec
    2012Humor, language and the media: Language and humour in the media. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fallatah, Wafaa
    2017 Bilingual creativity in Saudi stand-up comedy. World Englishes(). –. 10.1111/weng.12239
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12239 [Google Scholar]
  31. Furukawa, Toshiaki
    2015 Localizing humour through parodying white voice in Hawaii’s stand-up comedy. Text & Talk(). –. 10.1515/text‑2015‑0022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0022 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fetzer, Anita & Elda Weizman
    2006 Political discourse as mediated and public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.014 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fetzer, Anita
    2018 Discourse analysis. InAndreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Methods in pragmatics, –. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110424928‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-016 [Google Scholar]
  34. García, Ofelia & Wei Li
    2015 Translanguaging, bilingualism, and bilingual education. InWayne E. Wright, Sovicheth Boun & Ofelia García (eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education, –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118533406.ch13
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118533406.ch13 [Google Scholar]
  35. Giles, Howard & Andrew Billings
    2004 Assessing language attitudes: Speaker evaluation studies. InAlan Davies & Catherine Elder (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics, –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757000.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gregory, Michael & Susanne Carroll
    1978/2018Language and situation: Language varieties and their social contexts. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gu, Yang
    2023 顾阳, “海归”人数再创新高!https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2023-02/11/1303280584.html. Last accessed on11 March 2026.
  38. Guo, Xiaoyan & Lifeng Miao
    2021 From capital to habitus: Understanding urban overseas returnees’ class identity construction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Heidari-Shahreza, Mohammad Ali
    2017 A rhetorical analysis of humour styles and techniques used in persian stand-up comedy. Humour(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hockett, Charles Francis
    1977The view from language: Selected essays, 1948–1974. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Holcomb, Christopher
    1992 Nodal humor in comic narrative: a semantic analysis of two stories by Twain and Wodehouse. Humor(). –. 10.1515/humr.1992.5.3.233
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1992.5.3.233 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hymes, Dell
    1971 Sociolinguistics and the ethnography of speaking. InEdwin Ardener (ed.), Social anthropology and language, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Jaffe, Alexandra
    2015 Staging language on Corsica: Stance, improvisation, play, and heteroglossia. Language in Society(). –. 10.1017/S0047404515000032
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000032 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jakobson, Roman
    1996/1960 Linguistics and poetics. InThomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, –). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Juckel, Jennifer, Steven Bellman & Duane Varan
    2016 A humour typology to identify humour styles used in sitcoms. Humour(). –. 10.1515/humor‑2016‑0047
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0047 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kachru, Braj B.
    1985 The bilinguals’ creativity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. –. 10.1017/S0267190500003032
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003032 [Google Scholar]
  47. Koven, Michèle & Isabelle Simões Marques
    2015 Performing and evaluating (non)modernities of Portuguese migrant figures on YouTube: The case of Antonio de Carglouch. Language in Society(). –. 10.1017/S0047404515000056
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000056 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kyratzis, Sakis
    2003 Laughing metaphorically: Metaphor and humour in discourse. Paper presented at the8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Logroñu, 20–25 July 2003.
  49. Labov, William
    1966/2006The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, Wei
    2018 Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics(). –. 10.1093/applin/amx039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 [Google Scholar]
  51. Limon, John
    2000Stand-up comedy in theory, or, abjection in America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Milliken, Stuart, Guang-Ping Zhang, Xue-Yi Zhang, Zhi-Qiu Li & Ying Lü
    1997/2013 Resolving the paradox of Tianjin tone sandhi. InJialing Wang & Norval Smith (eds.) Studies in Chinese phonology, –. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Milroy, Lesley
    2004 Language ideologies and linguistic change. InCarmen Fought (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections, –. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780195170399.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195170399.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  54. Montgomery, Martin
    1999 Televised talk: Face work, politeness and laughter. InMalcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill & Frances Rock (eds.), Dialogue analysis vii: Working with dialogue: Selected papers from the 7th IADA Conference, Birmingham, –. Berlin: Max Niemeyer Verlag
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Moriarty, Mairead
    2011 Minority languages and performative genres: The case of Irish language stand-up comedy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development(). –. 10.1080/01434632.2011.604420
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2011.604420 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mullan, Kerry
    2023 Humour and creativity in a family of strangers on Facebook. InBéatrice Priego-Valverde (ed.), Interactional humor: Multimodal design and negotiation, –. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Myers-Scotton, Carol
    1993Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198240594.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198240594.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Nash, Margaret Boles
    1985 Using humour with care. AJN The American Journal of Nursing(). .
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Nguyen, Hoa
    2017 A discursive construction of identities through verbal humor. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies().–.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Norrick, Neal
    1993 Repetition in canned jokes and spontaneous conversational joking. Humor(). –. 10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.385
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.385 [Google Scholar]
  61. Norrick, Neal & Delia Chiaro
    2009Humor in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.182
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182 [Google Scholar]
  62. Norrick, Neal & Cornelia Ilie
    2018Pragmatics and its interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.294
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294 [Google Scholar]
  63. O’Keeffe, Anne
    2006Investigating media discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203015704
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015704 [Google Scholar]
  64. Palmer, Jerry
    1994 Jokes, narrative, and pragmatics. Semiotica(). –. 10.1515/semi‑1994‑981‑215
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi-1994-981-215 [Google Scholar]
  65. Palmieri, Giacinto
    2017 Oral self-translation of stand-up comedy and its (mental) text: A theoretical model. Humour(). –. 10.1515/humor‑2016‑0092
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0092 [Google Scholar]
  66. Partington, Alan
    (2006) The linguistics of laughter: A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203966570
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966570 [Google Scholar]
  67. Perrino, Sabina
    (2015) Performing extracomunitari: Mocking migrants in Veneto barzellette. Language in Society(). –. 10.1017/S0047404515000020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000020 [Google Scholar]
  68. Piller, Ingrid
    2015 Language ideologies. InKaren Tracy, Cornelia Ilie & Todd Sandel (eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, –. West Sussex: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi140
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi140 [Google Scholar]
  69. Raffa, Giovanni
    2022 Broadcast stand-up comedy and its translation. Między Oryginałem a Przekładem(). –. 10.12797/MOaP.28.2022.55.07
    https://doi.org/10.12797/MOaP.28.2022.55.07 [Google Scholar]
  70. Raskin, Victor
    1985Semantic script theory of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Ritchie, Graeme
    2004The linguistic analysis of jokes. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203406953
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203406953 [Google Scholar]
  72. Rivlina, Alexandra
    2015 Bilingual creativity in Russia: English-Russian language play. World Englishes(). –. 10.1111/weng.12153
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12153 [Google Scholar]
  73. Ross, Alison
    2005The language of humour. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203984567
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984567 [Google Scholar]
  74. Rutter, Jason
    1997 Stand-up as interaction: Performance and audience in comedy venues. Salford: University of Salford PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 2000 The stand-up introduction sequence: Comparing comedy comperes. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00059‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00059-4 [Google Scholar]
  76. Santiago, Marina & Sarah Seewoester Cain
    2017 Audience affiliation, membership categories, and the construction of humour in stand-up comedy. Humorous Discourse. –. 10.1515/9781501507106‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507106-008 [Google Scholar]
  77. Scarpetta, Fabiola & Anna Spagnolli
    2009 The interactional context of humor in stand-up comedy. Research on Language and Social Interaction(). –. 10.1080/08351810903089159
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903089159 [Google Scholar]
  78. Schneider, Klaus & Anne Barron
    2014Pragmatics of discourse. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214406
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406 [Google Scholar]
  79. Schwarz, Jeannine
    2009 Linguistic aspects of verbal humour in stand-up comedy. Saarland: Saarlands University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Silverstein, Michael
    1979 Language structure and linguistic ideology. InPaul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks & Carol L. Hofbauer (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, –. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Stebbins, Robert
    1990Laugh-makers: Stand-up comedy as art, business, and life-style. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press. 10.1515/9780773562325
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773562325 [Google Scholar]
  82. Simpson, Paul
    2003On the discourse of satire. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.2 [Google Scholar]
  83. Stevenson, Angus
    2010Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Swain, Merrill
    2006 Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. InHeidi Byrnes (ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky, –. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Tan, Ruiwei
    2015Tianjin dialect and Tanggu culture. Beijing: China International Radio Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Thomas, James
    2015 Laugh through it: Assembling difference in an American stand-up comedy club. Ethnography(). –. 10.1177/1466138114534336
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138114534336 [Google Scholar]
  87. Tsang, Wai King & Matilda Wong
    2004 Constructing a shared ‘Hong Kong identity’ in comic discourses. Discourse & Society(). –. 10.1177/0957926504046504
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504046504 [Google Scholar]
  88. Vigouroux, Cecile
    2015 Genre, heteroglossic performances, and new identity: Stand-up comedy in modern French society. Language in Society(). –. 10.1017/S0047404515000068
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000068 [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang, Huiyao., David Zweig & Howard Lin
    2011 Returnee entrepreneurs: Impact on China’s globalization process. Journal of Contemporary China(). –. 10.1080/10670564.2011.565174
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.565174 [Google Scholar]
  90. Wardhaugh, Ronald
    1986/1992An Introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Yus, Francisco
    2023 Humour in messaging interactions. InFrancesco Barbieri, Alessandro Capuano & Jannis Androutsopoulos (eds.), Pragmatics of internet humour, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑31902‑0_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31902-0_5 [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhang, Hang
    2002 Bilingual creativity in Chinese English: Ha Jin’s in the pond. World Englishes(). –. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00250
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00250 [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhang, Qing
    2008 Rhotacization and the ‘Beijing smooth operator’: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics(). –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00362.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00362.x [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhou, Qi
    2018 Exclusive interview with the head writer of Saturday Night Live Cheng Lu: How to scientifically produce comedy. Baidu. (周琦:专访《周六夜现场》总编剧程璐:如何科学地生产喜剧.) https://baike.baidu.com/tashuo/browse/content?id=e6d27944c4eea9735dd29bc3. Last accessed on11 March 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.25009.zhu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.25009.zhu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: the use of English ; humour ; style ; Chinese cultural discourse ; stand-up comedy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error