oa Joint attention, interaction-management, and other factors

References

1. Bishop, Jason
   2017 Focus projection and prenuclear accents: Evidence from lexical processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience(). –. 10.1080/23273798.2016.1246745
   https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1246745 [Google Scholar]
2. Bladel, John P.
   2005 Against Polanyi-centrism: Hayek and the re-emergence of ‘spontaneous order.’The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics(). –. 10.1007/s12113‑005‑1001‑x
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-005-1001-x [Google Scholar]
3. Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
   2012 A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2012.0020
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020 [Google Scholar]
4. Chafe, Wallace
   1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chafe, Wallace
   2008 Aspects of discourse analysis. Brno Studies in English(). –.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chater, Nick & Morten H. Christiansen
   2022 Grammar through spontaneous order. InShalom Lappin & Jean-Philippe Bernardy (eds.), Algebraic structures in natural language, –. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. 10.1201/9781003205388‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003205388-3 [Google Scholar]
7. Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Tyler P. Utt
   2017 The syntax and semantics of spatial reference in Lamkang verbs. Himalayan Linguistics(). –. 10.5070/H916130760
   https://doi.org/10.5070/H916130760 [Google Scholar]
8. Chun, Marvin M., Julie D. Golomb & Nicholas B. Turk-Browne
   2011 A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology(). –. 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427 [Google Scholar]
9. Cohen Priva, Uriel & T. Florian Jaeger
   2018 The interdependence of frequency, predictability, and informativity in the segmental domain. Linguistics Vanguard(). . 10.1515/lingvan‑2017‑0028
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0028 [Google Scholar]
10. DeLancey, Scott
    1997 Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. InJoan L. Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: dedicated to T. Givón, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.07del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.07del [Google Scholar]
11. Diessel, Holger
    2019 The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108671040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
12. Divjak, Dagmar, Petar Milin, Srdan Medimorec & Maciej Borowski
    2022 Behavioral signatures of memory resources for language: Looking beyond the lexicon/grammar divide. Cognitive Science(). . 10.1111/cogs.13206
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13206 [Google Scholar]
13. Du Bois, John W.
    1987 The discourse basis of ergativity. Language(). –. 10.2307/415719
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415719 [Google Scholar]
14. Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer & Sandra A. Thompson
    (eds.) 2000 Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Du Bois, John W.
    2003 Argument Structure: Grammar in use. InJohn W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.14.04dub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.14.04dub [Google Scholar]
16. Givón, Talmy
    1984 Prolegomena to discourse-pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90039‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90039-0 [Google Scholar]
17. Goldin-Meadow, Susan
    2014 Widening the lens: What the manual modality reveals about language, learning and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences(). . 10.1098/rstb.2013.0295
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0295 [Google Scholar]
18. Gussenhoven, Carlos
    1992 Sentence accents and argument structure. InIggy M. Roca (ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar, –. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110872613.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872613.79 [Google Scholar]
19. Haig, Geoffrey & Stefan Schnell
    2016 The discourse basis of ergativity revisited. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2016.0049
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0049 [Google Scholar]
20. Hopper, Paul J.
    2011 Emergent Grammar and temporality in Interactional Linguistics. InPeter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.). Constructions: Emerging and emergent, –. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110229080.22
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229080.22 [Google Scholar]
21. Hopple, Paulette M.
    2005 Topicalisation in Burmese expository discourse. InJustin Watkins (ed.), Studies in Burmese linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 10.15144/PL‑570.163
    https://doi.org/10.15144/PL-570.163 [Google Scholar]
22. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    1993 The structure of the intonation unit in Japanese. InSoonja Choi (ed.), Japanese and Korean Linguistics, –. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kuzar, Ron & Hadar Netz
    2010 Empirical support for the principle of the separation of reference and role. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.003 [Google Scholar]
24. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
25. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1993 Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
26. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2024 The dark matter of pragmatics: Known unknowns. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781009489584
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009489584 [Google Scholar]
27. Linders, Guido M. & Stefan Schnell
    . This issue. A cross-linguistic computational study of one new idea per clause. Functions of Language().
    [Google Scholar]
28. McKinley, Geoffrey L., Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Aaro S. Benjamin
    2017 Memory for conversation and the development of common ground. Memory & Cognition. –. 10.3758/s13421‑017‑0730‑3
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0730-3 [Google Scholar]
29. Meister, Clara I., Tiago Pimentel, Patrick Haller, Lena Jäger, Ryan Cotterell & Roger Levy
    2021 Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesis. InMarie-Francine Moens, Xuanjing Huang, Lucia Specia & Scott Wen-tau Yih (eds.), Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on empirical methods in Natural Language Processing, –. Punta Cana: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp‑main.74
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.74 [Google Scholar]
30. Meyerhoff, Hauke S., Frank Papenmeier & Markus Huff
    2017 Studying visual attention using the Multiple Object Tracking Paradigm: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics(). –. 10.3758/s13414‑017‑1338‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1338-1 [Google Scholar]
31. Netz, Hadar & Ron Kuzar
    2007 Three marked theme constructions in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.007 [Google Scholar]
32. Nordlinger, Rachel, Gabriela Garrido Rodriguez & Evan Kidd
    2022 Sentence planning and production in Murrinhpatha, an Australian ‘free word order’ language. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2022.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0008 [Google Scholar]
33. O’Madagain, Cathal & Michael Tomasello
    2021 Joint attention to mental content and the social origin of reasoning. Synthese(). –. 10.1007/s11229‑019‑02327‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02327-1 [Google Scholar]
34. Ozerov, Pavel
    2015 Information Structure without topic and focus: Differential Object Marking in Burmese. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.39.2.04oze
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.2.04oze [Google Scholar]
35. Ozerov, Pavel
    2018 A community-driven documentation of natural discourse in Anal, an endangered Tibeto-Burman language. London: ELAR.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Reinhart, Tanya
    1981 Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics in pragmatics and philosophy I. Philosophica(). –. 10.21825/philosophica.82606
    https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82606 [Google Scholar]
37. Reinöhl, Uta & Naomi Peck
    . This issue. The ‘idea’ in the one–new–idea constraint. Functions of Language().
    [Google Scholar]
38. Roediger, Henry L. & Teresa A. Blaxton
    1987 Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion. Memory & Cognition. –. 10.3758/BF03197728
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197728 [Google Scholar]
39. Schnell, Stefan, Geoffrey Haig, Nils N. Schiborr & Maria Vollmer
    2023 Are referent introductions sensitive to forward planning in discourse?InAlessandra Barotto & Simone Mattiola (eds.), Discourse phenomena in typological perspective, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.227.09sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.227.09sch [Google Scholar]
40. Schnell, Stefan, Nils N. Schiborr & Geoffrey Haig
    2021 Efficiency in discourse processing: Does morphosyntax adapt to accommodate new referents?Linguistics Vanguard(). . 10.1515/lingvan‑2019‑0064
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0064 [Google Scholar]
41. Siposova, Barbora & Malinda Carpenter
    2019 A new look at joint attention and common knowledge. Cognition. –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.019 [Google Scholar]
42. Su, Danjie
    2016 Grammar emerges through reuse and modification of prior utterances. Discourse Studies(). –. 10.1177/1461445616634551
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616634551 [Google Scholar]
43. Vigliocco, Gabriella, David P. Vinson, Judit Druks, Horacio Barber & Stefano F. Cappa
    2011 Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews(). –. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007 [Google Scholar]
44. Zormpa, Eirini, Antje S. Meyer & Laurel E. Brehm
    2023 In conversation, answers are remembered better than the questions themselves. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition() 1971.
    [Google Scholar]