Eye-tracking the processing of visual input of live transcripts in remote simultaneous interpreting

References

1. Agrifoglio, Marjorie
   2004 “Sight translation and interpreting: A comparative analysis of constraints and failures.” Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting6.11: 43–67. 10.1075/intp.6.1.05agr
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.6.1.05agr [Google Scholar]
2. Alonso Bacigalupe, L.
   1999 “Visual contact in simultaneous interpreting: Results of an experimental study.” InAnovar/Anosar Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación, ed. byA. Álvarez Lugrís & A. Fernández Ocampo. 123–137. Vol.11. Vigo: Servicio de Publicacións da Universidade de Vigo.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Amos, Rhona M., Kilian G. Seeber, and Martin J. Pickering
   2022 “Prediction during simultaneous interpreting: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.” Cognition2201: 104987. 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104987
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104987 [Google Scholar]
4. Anderson, Linda
   1979 Simultaneous interpretation: Contextual and translation aspects. Doctoral dissertation. Concordia University.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Balzani, Maurizio
   1990 “Le contact visuel en interprétation simultanée: resultats d’une expérience (Français–Italien).” InAspects of Applied and Experimental Research on Conference Interpretation, ed. byL. Gran & C. Taylor. 93–100. Udine: Campanotto.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brady, Mark
   1989 “Case studies in sight translation.” The Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Teaching Interpretation: 141–243.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bühler, Hildegund
   1985 “Conference interpreting: A multichannel communication phenomenon.” Meta30 (1): 49–54. 10.7202/002176ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/002176ar [Google Scholar]
8. Chen, Sijia
   2017 “The construct of cognitive load in interpreting and its measurement.” Perspectives, 25(4): 640–657. 10.1080/0907676X.2016.1278026
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2016.1278026 [Google Scholar]
9. Chmiel, Agnieszka, and Iwona Mazur
   2013 “Eye tracking sight translation performed by trainee interpreters.” Way, C.; S. Vandepitte; R. Meylaerts & M. Bartłomiejczyk. (eds.): 189–205. 10.1075/btl.108.10chm
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.108.10chm [Google Scholar]
10. Chmiel, Agnieszka, Przemysław Janikowski, and Agnieszka Lijewska
    2020 “Multimodal processing in simultaneous interpreting with text: Interpreters focus more on the visual than the auditory modality.” Target32(1): 37–58. 10.1075/target.18157.chm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.18157.chm [Google Scholar]
11. Defrancq, Bart, and Claudio Fantinuoli
    2021 “Automatic speech recognition in the booth: Assessment of system performance, interpreters’ performances and interactions in the context of numbers.” Target33(1): 73–102. 10.1075/target.19166.def
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.19166.def [Google Scholar]
12. Desmet, Bart, Mieke Vandierendonck, and Bart Defrancq
    2018 “Simultaneous interpretation of numbers and the impact of technological support.” InInterpreting and technology, 13–27. Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Doherty, S., Martschuk, N., Goodman-Delahunty, J., and Hale, S.
    2022 “An eye-movement analysis of overt visual attention during consecutive and simultaneous interpreting modes in a remotely interpreted investigative interview.” Frontiers in psychology: 1182. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.764460
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.764460 [Google Scholar]
14. Ehrensberger-Dow, M., Albl-Mikasa, M., Andermatt, K., Hunziker Heeb, A., and Lehr, C.
    2020 “Cognitive load in processing ELF: Translators, interpreters, and other multilinguals.” Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 9(2): 217–238. 10.1515/jelf‑2020‑2039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2020-2039 [Google Scholar]
15. Gerver, David
    1969 “The effects of source language presentation rate on the performance of simultaneous conference interpreters.” InProceedings of the 2nd Louisville Conference on rate and/or frequency controlled speech. Louisville (Kty), 162–184. University of Louisville.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gieshoff, Anne Catherine
    2018 The impact of audio-visual speech input on work-load in simultaneous interpreting. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universität Mainz.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gieshoff, Anne Catherine, and Andrea Hunziker Heeb
    2023 “Cognitive load and cognitive effort: Probing the psychological reality of a conceptual difference.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior. 10.1075/tcb.00073.gie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00073.gie [Google Scholar]
18. Gile, Daniel
    2009 Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
19. Gile, Daniel, and Victoria Lei
    2020 Translation, effort and cognition. InThe Routledge handbook of translation and cognition, 263–278. 10.4324/9781315178127‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127-18 [Google Scholar]
20. Gile, Daniel, and Anne Catherine Gieshoff
    2023 Effort in interpreting: A framework and its implications for empirical research. Presented at theMinds between Languages: An inner look into translation and interpreting, July 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Holmqvist, Kenneth
    2011 Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ivanov, Konstantin, Kate Davies, and Boris Naimushin
    2014 “Teaching simultaneous interpreting with text.” Fighting the Fog of Multiculturalis. A Festschrift in Honour of Irina S. Alekseeva: 48–61.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jesse, Alexandra, Nick Vrignaud, Michael M. Cohen, and Dominic W. Massaro
    2000 “The processing of information from multiple sources in simultaneous interpreting.” Interpreting5(2): 95–115. 10.1075/intp.5.2.04jes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.5.2.04jes [Google Scholar]
24. Just, M. A., and Carpenter, P.
    1984 Using eye fixations to study reading comprehension. InNew methods in reading comprehension research, ed. byD. E. Kieras and M. A.151–182. Hillsdale, MI, USA: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Korpal, Paweł, and Katarzyna Stachowiak-Szymczak
    2018 “The whole picture: Processing of numbers and their context in simultaneous interpreting.” Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics54(3): 335–354. 10.1515/psicl‑2018‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2018-0013 [Google Scholar]
26. Korpal, Paweł, and Katarzyna Stachowiak-Szymczak
    2020 “Combined problem triggers in simultaneous interpreting: Exploring the effect of delivery rate on processing and rendering numbers.” Perspectives28(1): 126–143. 10.1080/0907676X.2019.1628285
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1628285 [Google Scholar]
27. Kruger, Haidee
    2013 “Child and Adult Readers’ Processing of Foreignised Elements in Translated South African Picturebooks: An Eye-Tracking Study.” Target: International Journal of Translation Studies25(2): 180–227. 10.1075/target.25.2.03kru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.2.03kru [Google Scholar]
28. Kuang, Huolingxiao, and Binghan Zheng
    2022 “Note-taking effort in video remote interpreting: effects of source speech difficulty and interpreter work experience.” Perspectives: 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ma, Xingcheng
    2021 “Coping with syntactic complexity in English-Chinese sight translation by translation and interpreting students: An eye-tracking investigation.– Across Languages and Cultures22(2): 192–213.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ma, Xingcheng, and Dechao Li
    2021 “A cognitive investigation of ‘chunking and ‘reordering for coping with word-order asymmetry in English-to-Chinese sight translation: Evidence from an eye-tracking study.” Interpreting23(2): 192–221. 10.1075/intp.00057.ma
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00057.ma [Google Scholar]
31. Ma, Xingcheng, Dechao Li, and Yu-Yin Hsu
    2021 “Exploring the impact of word order asymmetry on cognitive load during Chinese–English sight translation: Evidence from eye-movement data.” Target: International Journal of Translation Studies33(1): 103–131. 10.1075/target.19052.ma
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.19052.ma [Google Scholar]
32. Martin, Ann
    1993 “Teaching sight translation to future interpreters.” Translation: The vital link: 6–13.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rennert, Sylvi
    2008 “Visual input in simultaneous interpreting.” Meta53 (1): 204–207. 10.7202/017983ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/017983ar [Google Scholar]
34. Seeber, Kilian G.
    2011 “Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Existing theories – new models.” Interpreting13(2): 176–204. 10.1075/intp.13.2.02see
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.13.2.02see [Google Scholar]
35. Seeber, Kilian G.
    2012 “Multimodal input in simultaneous interpreting: An eye-tracking experiment.” InProceedings of the 1st International Conference TRANSLATA, Translation and Interpreting Research: Yesterday–today–tomorrow, ed. byL. Zybatov, A. Petrova & M. Ustaszewski. 341–347. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Seeber, Kilian G.
    2013 “Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Measures and methods.” Target. International Journal of Translation Studies25(1): 18–32. 10.1075/target.25.1.03see
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.03see [Google Scholar]
37. Seeber, Kilian G.
    2017 “Multimodal processing in simultaneous interpreting.” InThe handbook of translation and cognition, 461–475. 10.1002/9781119241485.ch25
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch25 [Google Scholar]
38. Seeber, Kilian G., Laura Keller, and Alexis Hervais-Adelman
    2020 “When the ear leads the eye–the use of text during simultaneous interpretation.” Language, Cognition and Neuroscience35(10): 1480–1494. 10.1080/23273798.2020.1799045
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1799045 [Google Scholar]
39. Seubert, Sabine
    2019 Visuelle Informationen beim Simultandolmetschen: Eine Eyetracking-Studie (Vol.471). Frank & Timme GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Stachowiak-Szymczak, Katarzyna, and Paweł Korpal
    2019 “Interpreting accuracy and visual processing of numbers in professional and student interpreters: An eye-tracking study.” Across Languages and Cultures20(2): 235–251. 10.1556/084.2019.20.2.5
    https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2019.20.2.5 [Google Scholar]
41. The Leeds Interpreting Team
    The Leeds Interpreting Team 2020 Marking Criteria for Consecutive Interpreting. University of Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wang, Binhua
    2023 “Exploring information processing as a new research orientation beyond cognitive operations and their management in interpreting studies: taking stock and looking forward.” Perspectives: 1–18. 10.1080/0907676X.2023.2219850
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2219850 [Google Scholar]
43. Wehrmeyer, Jennifer
    2014 “Eye-tracking Deaf and hearing viewing of sign language-interpreted news broadcasts.” Journal of Eye Movement Research, 7(1). Academic Press. 10.16910/jemr.7.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.7.1.3 [Google Scholar]
44. Wickens, Christopher D.
    1984 Processing resources in attention. InVarieties of attention, ed. byRaja Parasuraman & David R. Davies. 63–102. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wickens, Christopher D.
    2002 “Multiple resources and performance prediction.” Theoretical issues in ergonomics science3(2): 159–177. 10.1080/14639220210123806
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806 [Google Scholar]