La transposition de la valeur discursive

References

1. Austen, Jane & Amy Amstrong
   2012 Pride and Prejudice. New York: Totally Bound Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Austen, Jane & Seth Graham Smith
   2009 Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. Philadelphie: Quirk books.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baddeley, Alan
   1992 La mémoire humaine. Théorie et pratique. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barsalou, Lawrence W.
   1999 “Perceptual symbol systems”. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22: 577–660
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barthes, Roland
   1966 “Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits”. Communications, 8 (8): 1–27. doi: 10.3406/comm.1966.1113
   https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1966.1113 [Google Scholar]
6. Bartlett, Elsa Jaffe
   1981 Learning to write: Some cognitive and linguistic components. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bitgood, Stephen
   2006 “An analysis of visitor circulation: movement patterns and the general value principle”. Curator, 49(4): 463–475. doi: 10.1111/j.2151‑6952.2006.tb00237.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00237.x [Google Scholar]
8. Bitgood, Stephen
   2011 “Social design in museums: the psychology of visitor studies”. Journal of Interpretation Research, 5(2): 31–45.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bitgood, Stephen , Stephany Dukes , & Layla Abbey
   2006 “Interest and effort as predictors of reading: A test of the general value principle”. Current Trends in Audience Research, 19/20: 5–10.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Blais, André , Elisabeth Gidengil , Neil Nevitte , & André Nadeau
    Blais, André , Elisabeth Gidengil , Neil Nevitte , & André Nadeau 2004 “Where does turnout decline come from?” European Journal of Political Research, 43: 221–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2004.00152.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00152.x [Google Scholar]
11. Blyton, Enid
    2006 Le club des cinq et le trésor de l’île. Paris: Hachette
    [Google Scholar]
12. Blyton, Enid
    1962 Le club des cinq et le trésor de l’île. Paris: Hachette
    [Google Scholar]
13. Blyton, Enid
    1942 Five on a Treasure Island. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bonin, Patrick , Alain Méot , Lydie Aubert , Nathalie Malardier , Paula Niedenthal , & Marie-Christine Capelle-Toczek
    2003 “Normes de concrétude, de valeur d’imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 866 mots”. L’année psychologique, 103 (4): 655–694. doi: 10.3406/psy.2003.29658
    https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2003.29658 [Google Scholar]
15. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1979 La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bruner, Jerome
    1960 The Process of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Campbell, Maragaret C.
    1995 “When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: the importance of balancing benefits and investments”. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3): 225–254. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0403_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0403_02 [Google Scholar]
18. Cauchard, Fabrice
    2008 Empan perceptif en lecture et en recherche d’information dans un texte: influence des signaux visuels. Thèse de doctorat en psychologie cognitive. Toulouse: Université Toulouse-le-Mirail.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Charolles, Michel
    2011 “Cohérence et cohésion du discours”. In Klaus Hölker , & Carla Marello (Éds.), Dimensionen der Analyse Texten und Diskursivent – Dimensioni dell’analisi di testi e discoursi (153–173). Münster: Lit Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cicéron D. Robert
    Cicéron 1991 Première Tusculane (Devant la mort). (Trad. D. Robert ). Paris: Arléa.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Coirier, Pierre , Daniel Gaonac’h , and Jean-Michel Passerault
    1996 Psycholinguistique textuelle. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Daneman, Meredyth , & Murray Stainton
    1993 “The generation effect in reading and proofreading: Is it easier or harder to detect errors in one’s own writing?” Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5: 297–313. doi: 10.1007/BF01027393
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027393 [Google Scholar]
23. Dewey, John
    1913 Interest and Effort in Education. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin. doi: 10.1037/14633‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/14633-000 [Google Scholar]
24. Duault, Alain
    2012 “Lever de rideau: l’opéra, une passion?” In Bertrand Dermoncourt (Dir.) L’univers de l’opéra: oeuvres, scènes, compositeurs, interprètes. Paris: Robert Laffont.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Dunwoody, Sharon
    1996 “Science writing offers a model for critical thinking”. SEJournal, 6 (1): 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Durieux, Christine
    2009 Vers une théorie décisionnelle de la traduction. LISA, 7(3), p.350–367.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Engel, Pascal
    2007 “Belief and normativity”. Disputatio, II, 23: 179–205.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Faigley, Lester , & Stephen Witte
    1981 “Analyzing revision”. College Composition and Communication, 32(4): 400–414. doi: 10.2307/356602
    https://doi.org/10.2307/356602 [Google Scholar]
29. Festinger, Leon
    1957 A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Fincher-Kiefer, Rebecca
    2001 “Perceptual components of situation models”. Memory & Cognition, 29(2): 336–343. doi: 10.3758/BF03194928
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194928 [Google Scholar]
31. Flesch, Rudolf
    1949 The art of readable writing. New York: Harper & Brothers.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Fletcher, Charles R.
    1981 “Short-term memory processes in text comprehension”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5): 564–574. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(81)90183‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90183-3 [Google Scholar]
33. Flower, Linda S. , John R. Hayes , Linda Carey , Karen A. Schriver , & James Stratman
    1986 “Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision”. College Composition and Communication37(1): 16–55. doi: 10.2307/357381
    https://doi.org/10.2307/357381 [Google Scholar]
34. Franck, Georg
    Franck, Georg 1999 “Scientific communication – a vanity fair?” Science, 286: 53–55. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5437.53
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5437.53 [Google Scholar]
35. Froeliger, Nicolas
    2010 “De la centralité du compromis en traduction et en traductologie”. In T. Milliaressi (Ed.) La traduction: de la linguistique à la didactique. Lille: Université de Lille III, 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gibson, Edward
    1998 “Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies”. Cognition, 681–76. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(98)00034‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1 [Google Scholar]
37. Goldman, Susan R. , Richard M. Golden , & Paul van den Broek
    2007 “Why are computational models of text comprehension useful?” In Franz Schmalhofer , & Charles A. Perfetti . (Eds.), Higher-level language processes in the brain (27–51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gordon, Peter C. , Randall Hendrick , & Marcus Johnson
    2001 “Memory interference during language processing”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27(6): 1411–1423.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Graesser, Arthur C. , Keith K. Millis , & Rolf A. Zwaan
    1997 “Discourse comprehension”. Annual review of psychology. 48(1): 163–189. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163 [Google Scholar]
40. Graesser, Arthur C. , Murray Singer , & Tom Trabasso
    1994 “Constructing inferences during narrative comprehension”. Psychological Review, 101: 371–395. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.101.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371 [Google Scholar]
41. Grutman, Rainier
    2009 “Le virage social dans les études sur la traduction: une rupture sur fond de continuité”. Texte, revue de critique et de théorie littéraire, 45/46: 135–152.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Guillemin-Flescher, Jacqueline
    2003 “Théoriser la traduction”. Revue française de linguistique appliquée (8)2, 7–18.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hachette, Catulle
    1879 Les poésies de Catulle. (Trad. E. Rostand). Paris: Hachette.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hecht, Emmanuel
    2011 “Historique et haut de gamme”. L’Express, 3118 (1604 2011): 117.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hermans, Theo
    1996 “Norms and the determination of translation: A theoretical framework”. In Román Álvarez & Carmen África Vidal (Eds.), Translation, power, subversion (24–51). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hidi, Suzanne
    1990 “Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning”. Review of educational research, 60(4): 549–571. doi: 10.3102/00346543060004549
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549 [Google Scholar]
47. Hidi, Suzanne
    2001 “Interest, reading, and learning: theoretical and practical considerations.” Educational Psychology Review, 13(3): 191–209. doi: 10.1023/A:1016667621114
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016667621114 [Google Scholar]
48. Hidi, Suzanne , & William Baird
    1986 “Interestingness – a neglected variable in discourse processing”. Cognitive Science, 10(2): 179–194.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Johnson-Laird, Philip Nicholas
    1983 Mental Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Kintsch, Walter
    1998 Comprehension; a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, Ma: Cambridge University press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kintsch, Walter , & Praful Mangalath
    2011 “The Construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3: 346–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2010.01107.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01107.x [Google Scholar]
52. Labasse, Bertrand
    1999 “La lisibilité rédactionnelle: fondements et perspectives”. Communication & langages, 121: 86–103. doi: 10.3406/colan.1999.2951
    https://doi.org/10.3406/colan.1999.2951 [Google Scholar]
53. Labasse, Bertrand
    2003 Une dynamique de l’insignifiance; Les médias, les citoyens et la chose publique dans la « société de l’information ». Villeurbanne: Presses de l’Ecole nationale supérieure des sciences de l’information et des bibliothèques.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Labasse, Bertrand
    2004 “Lisibilité et pertinence”. Études de Presse, 3: 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Labasse, Bertrand
    2008 “Modeling the communication of complexity in an information saturated society”, in Céline Beaudet , Pamela Grant-Russell & Doreen Starke-Meyerring (Éds), Research Communication in the Social and Human Sciences: From Dissemination to Public Engagement (pp.60–84). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Labasse, Bertrand
    Labasse, Bertrand 2012a “Structures narratives et congruence cognitive: cas du summary lead et de la pyramide inversée”. Rédactologie – Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing, 24 (1): 65–83.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Labasse, Bertrand
    2012b “Un trou noir dans la galaxie: la compétence opératoire dans les recherches en communication”. Canadian Journal of Media Studies, 10(2): 176–214.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Labasse, Bertrand
    2012c “Sexe, sang et physique des particules: le « sensationnalisme » est-il partout… ou nulle part?” Les Cahiers du Journalisme, 24: 114–149.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Labasse, B.
    2015 “Les déterminants cognitifs et sociaux de l’adéquation communicationnelle”. In Céline Beaudet & Véronique Rey (Eds.), Écriture expertes en question. Aix: Presses universitaires de Provence, 39–68.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Markowicz, André
    1985 Le livre de Catulle. Paris: L’âge d’homme.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Martins, Daniel
    1993 Les facteurs affectifs dans la compréhension et la mémorisation des textes. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. doi: 10.3917/puf.marti.1993.01
    https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.marti.1993.01 [Google Scholar]
62. McKoon, Gail , & Roger Ratcliff
    1992 “Inference during reading”. Psychological Review, 99: 440–466. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.99.3.440
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.440 [Google Scholar]
63. Jeon, Mi-Yeon , & Annie Brisset
    2006 “La notion de culture dans les manuels de traduction: domaines allemand, anglais, coréen et français”. Meta: journal des traducteurs (51)2: 389–409. doi: 10.7202/013264ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/013264ar [Google Scholar]
64. Mikk, Jaan
    2008 “Sentence length for revealing the cognitive load reversal effect in text comprehension”. Educational Studies, 34(2): 119–127. doi: 10.1080/03055690701811164
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690701811164 [Google Scholar]
65. Munsters, Wil
    1991 La poétique du pittoresque en France de 1700 à 1830. Genève: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Nietzsche, Friedrich
    1990 Par-delà le bien et le mal, in Œuvres (t. II). Paris: Robert Laffont.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Olivier, Séverine
    2007 “Lecture d’un “mauvais genre: le “roman sentimental”. In Laurence Rosier & Marie-Christine Pollet (Éds), Les mauvais genres en classe de français?: retour sur la question. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur, 55–68
    [Google Scholar]
68. Paivio, Allan
    1991 “Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status”. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45: 255–287. doi: 10.1037/h0084295
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295 [Google Scholar]
69. Parodi, Giovanni
    2007 “Reading-writing connections: Discourse-oriented research”. Reading and Writing, 20: 225–250. doi: 10.1007/s11145‑006‑9029‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9029-7 [Google Scholar]
70. Pascal, Blaise
    1826 Les pensées de Bl. Pascal, suivies d’une nouvelle table analytique. Paris: Lefèvre.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Quintilien Henri Bornecque
    Quintilien 1933 Institution oratoire, Livres IV-VI. (Trad. Henri Bornecque ). Paris: Garnier.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Radvansky, Gabriel A. , Rolf A. Zwaan , Jacqueline M. Curiel , & David E. Copeland
    2001 “Situation models and aging”. Psychology and Aging, 16(1): 145–160. doi: 10.1037/0882‑7974.16.1.145
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.145 [Google Scholar]
73. Richard, Jean-François
    1990 Les activités mentales: comprendre, raisonner, trouver des solutions. Paris: A. Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Sadoski, Mark , & Allan Paivio
    2007 “Toward a unified theory of reading”. Scientific studies of reading, 11(4): 337–356. doi: 10.1080/10888430701530714
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530714 [Google Scholar]
75. Sadoski, Mark , Ernest T. Goetz , & Maximo Rodriguez
    2000 “Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1): 85–95. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.92.1.85
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.85 [Google Scholar]
76. Sapiro, Gisèle
    2008 “Normes de traduction et contraintes sociales”. In Anthony Pym , Miriam Shlesinger & Daniel Simeoni (Eds.) Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies: Investigations in homage to Gideon Toury. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing: 199–208. doi: 10.1075/btl.75.16sap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.75.16sap [Google Scholar]
77. Savin, Harris B. , & Ellen Perchonock
    1965 “Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4: 348–353. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(65)80070‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80070-6 [Google Scholar]
78. Schank, Roger C.
    Schank, Roger C. 1979 “Interestingness: controlling inferences”. Artificial Intelligence, 12: 273–297. doi: 10.1016/0004‑3702(79)90009‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(79)90009-2 [Google Scholar]
79. Schäffner, Christina
    1998 “The concept of norms in translation studies”. Current Issues in Language and society, 5(1–2): 1–9. doi: 10.1080/13520529809615500
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529809615500 [Google Scholar]
80. Schramm, Wilbur
    1954 “How communication works”. In Wilbur Schramm (Ed.), The process and effects of mass communication (3–26). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Schraw, Gregory , & Stephen Lehman
    2001 “Situational interest: a review of the literature and directions for future research”. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1): 23–52. doi: 10.1023/A:1009004801455
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009004801455 [Google Scholar]
82. Seleskovitch, Danica
    1976 “Traduire: de l’expérience aux concepts”. Études de linguistique appliquée, 24: 64–91
    [Google Scholar]
83. Shannon, Claude E. , & Warren Weaver
    1948 The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Silvia, Paul J.
    2006 Exploring the psychology of interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
85. Simon, Herbert
    1971 “Designing organizations for an information-rich world”. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications and the public interest (40–41). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Sperber, Dan , & Deirdre Wilson
    1989 La pertinence. Paris: Editions de minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Sperber, Dan , & Deirdre Wilson
    1997 “Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences”. Multilingua16: 145–151 doi: 10.1515/mult.1997.16.2‑3.145
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1997.16.2-3.145 [Google Scholar]
88. Thornton, Robert , Maryellen C. MacDonald , & Jennifer E. Arnold
    2000 “The concomitant effects of phrase length and informational content in sentence comprehension”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29: 195–203. doi: 10.1023/A:1005197012421
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005197012421 [Google Scholar]
89. Tinker, Miles Albert
    1963 Legibility of print. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Toury, Gideon
    1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4 [Google Scholar]
91. Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus , & Walter Kintsch
    1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Vinay, Jean-Paul
    1975 “Regards sur l’évolution des théories de la traduction depuis vingt ans”. Meta: journal des traducteurs, 20 (1): 7–27. doi: 10.7202/004569ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/004569ar [Google Scholar]
93. Whitney, Pau , Desiree Budd , Robert S. Bramucci , & Robert S. Crane
    1995 “On babies, bath water, and schemata: A reconsideration of top-down processes in comprehension”. Discourse Processes, 20: 135–166. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544935
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544935 [Google Scholar]
94. Whitney, P. , Ritchie, B. G. , & Clark, M. B.
    1991 “Working-memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension”. Discourse Processes, 14: 133–145. doi: 10.1080/01638539109544779
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544779 [Google Scholar]
95. Wilson, Deirdre . & Sperber, Dan
    1992 “Ressemblance et communication”. In Daniel Andler (Ed.), Introduction aux sciences cognitives (219–238). Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Zaid, Gabriel
    2005 Bien trop de livres? Lire et publier à l’ère de l’abondance. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Zipf, George Kingsley
    1935 The psycho-biology of language: an introduction to dynamic philology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Zwaan, Rolf A.
    1994 “Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4): 920–933.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Zwaan, Rolf A. , & Gabriel A. Radvansky
    1998 “Situation models in language comprehension and memory”. Psychological bulletin, 123(2): 162–185. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.123.2.162
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 [Google Scholar]