Developing and validating involvement in translation scale and its relationship with translation ability

References

1. Baker, M.
   1992 In other words: A course book on translation. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203327579
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203327579 [Google Scholar]
2. Basile, E.
   2005 Responding to the enigmatic address of the other: A psychoanalytical approach to the translator’s labor. New Voices in Translation Studies1, 12–30.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biel, L., & Engberg, J.
   2013 Research models and methods in legal translation. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 12, 1–11.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Campbell, S. & Wakim, B.
   2007 Methodological questions about translation research: A model to underpin research into the mental processes of translation. Target19 (1), 1–19. 10.1075/target.19.1.02cam
   https://doi.org/10.1075/target.19.1.02cam [Google Scholar]
5. Cayirdag, N.
   2011 Attribution and creativity. InM. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., pp.96–100). Cambridge: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑375038‑9.00018‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00018-2 [Google Scholar]
6. Chafe, W.
   1982 Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. InD. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy: Advances in discourse processes (pp.35–53). Norwood/ New Jersey: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chesterman, A.
   2000 Memetics and translation studies. Synapse5, 1–17.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cohen, J.
   1992 Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletins, 112 (1), 155–159. 10.1037/0033‑2909.112.1.155
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 [Google Scholar]
9. Delisle, J., & Woodsworth, J.
   1995 Translators through history. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, UNESCO Publishing. 10.1075/btl.13
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.13 [Google Scholar]
10. Dörnyei, Z.
    2007 Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A.
    1984 Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Farhadi, H., Jafarpur, A. & Birjandi, P.
    1994 Testing language skills: From theory to practice. Tehran: SAMT.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F.
    2012 Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non–English major university students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 197–211. 10.1177/0261927X12438538
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438538 [Google Scholar]
14. Gile, D.
    2001 Getting started in interpreting research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.33 [Google Scholar]
15. Gile, D.
    2008 Hypotheses and research questions in empirical TS research. RetrievedNovember 17, 2017from: www.est-translationstudies.org
    [Google Scholar]
16. Göpferich, S.
    2010 Data documentation and data accessibility in translation process research. The Translator16 (1), 93–124. 10.1080/13556509.2010.10799295
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2010.10799295 [Google Scholar]
17. Jääskeläinen, R.
    2002 Think-aloud protocol studies into translation. An annotated bibliography. Target14 (1), 107–36. 10.1075/target.14.1.05jaa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.14.1.05jaa [Google Scholar]
18. Jääskeläinen, R.
    2009 Think-aloud protocols. InM. Baker & G. Saldanha (Eds.), Routledge Encylopedia of translation studies (pp.290–293). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kim, M.
    2009 Meaning-oriented translation assessment. InC. V. Angelelli & H. E. Jacobson (Eds.), Testing and assessment in translation and interpreting studies (pp.123–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ata.xiv.08kim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xiv.08kim [Google Scholar]
20. Kline, R. B.
    2011 Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kussmaul, P. & Tirkkonen-Condit, S.
    1995 Think-aloud protocol analysis in translation studies. TTR8 (1), 177–99. 10.7202/037201ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/037201ar [Google Scholar]
22. Laviosa, S.
    2008 Translation. InR. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp.474–489). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LeCompete, M. & Preissle, J.
    1993 Ethnography and qualitative design in education research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. MacIntyre, P., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z. & Noels, K.
    1998 Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb05543.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x [Google Scholar]
25. Mason, I.
    2008 Text parameters in translation: Transitivity and institutional cultures. InL. Venuti (Ed.), The translation studies reader (pp.470–482). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mees, I., Fabio, A. & Susanne, G.
    2010 Methodology, technology and innovation in translation process research. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mirzaee, M.
    1997 Intermediate reading comprehension. Rahnama Publication: Tehran.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.
    1998 Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. InA. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp.339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Munday, J.
    2016 Introducing translation studies: Theories and applications (4nd ed.). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315691862
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315691862 [Google Scholar]
30. Muñoz, M. R.
    2012 Cognitive and psycholinguistic approaches. InM. C. Millán & F. Bartrina (Eds.), Handbook of translation studies (pp.241–256). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. O’Brien, S.
    2011 Cognitive explorations of translation. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
32. PACTE F. Alves
    PACTE 2003 Building a translation competence model. InF. Alves (Ed.), Triangulating translation: Perspectives in process-oriented research (pp.43–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.45 [Google Scholar]
33. PACTE
    PACTE 2005 Investigating translation competence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Meta50 (2), 609–19. 10.7202/011004ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/011004ar [Google Scholar]
34. PACTE
    PACTE 2009 Results of the validation of the PACTE translation competence model: Acceptability and decision making. Across Languages and Cultures10 (2), 207–230. 10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.3 [Google Scholar]
35. Pallant, J.
    2005 SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Quinney, A.
    2004 Translation as transference: A psychoanalytic solution to a translation problem. The Translator10 (1), 109–28. 10.1080/13556509.2004.10799170
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2004.10799170 [Google Scholar]
37. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S.
    (1995) Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sanchez, M. T.
    2017 The pragmatics of translator training in the 21th century. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, 5 (2), 81–85.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tannen, D.
    1993 Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. InD. Olson, N. Torrance, & Hildyard, S. (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp.124–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Toury, G.
    1992 A rationale for descriptive translation studies. Dispositio, 7, 23–39.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Tseng, W. T., & Schmitt, N.
    2008 Toward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58, 357–400. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00444.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00444.x [Google Scholar]
42. Tymoczko, M.
    2007 Why European translators should want to de-westernize translation studies. Paper presented at the5th European Society for Translation Studies Congress, Slovenia.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Venuti, L.
    1995 The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203360064
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360064 [Google Scholar]
44. Yashima, T.
    2002 Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 54–66. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136 [Google Scholar]