Master’s students’ post-editing perception and strategies

References

1. Cadwell, Patrick, Sheila Castilho, Sharon O’Brien, and Linda Mitchell
   2016 “Human Factors in Machine Translation and Post-Editing among Institutional Translators.” Translation Spaces5 (2): 222–243. 10.1075/ts.5.2.04cad
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.5.2.04cad [Google Scholar]
2. Carl, Michael, Barbara Dragsted, Jakob Elming, Daniel Hardt, and Arnt L. Jakobsen
   2011 “The Process of Post-Editing: a Pilot Study.” Proceedings of the 8th international NLPSC workshop.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carl, Michael, Silke Gutermuth, and Silvia Hansen-Schirra
   2015 “Post-editing machine translation: Efficiency, strategies, and revision processes in professional translation settings.” InPsycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting, ed. byAline Ferreira and John W. Schwieter, 145–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   [Google Scholar]
4. DGT-Spanish Language Department
   DGT-Spanish Language Department 2010 Manual de revisión. Brussels / Luxembourg.
   [Google Scholar]
5. EMT expert group
   EMT expert group 2017 “Competence framework 2017”. European Commission, Brussels.
6. Fiederer, Rebecca, and Sharon O’Brien
   2009 “Quality and Machine Translation: a Realistic Objective?” The Journal of Specialised Translation11: 52–74.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Forcada, Mikel
   2017 “Making Sense of Neural Machine Translation.” Translation Spaces6 (2): 291–309. 10.1075/ts.6.2.06for
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.6.2.06for [Google Scholar]
8. Garcia, Ignacio
   2011 “Translating by Post-Editing: Is It the Way Forward?” Machine Translation25: 217–237. 10.1007/s10590‑011‑9115‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-011-9115-8 [Google Scholar]
9. Guerberof Arenas, Ana
   2009 “Productivity and Quality in the Post-Editing of Outputs from Translation Memories and Machine Translation.” Localisation Focus – The International Journal of Localisation7 (1): 11–21.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Jia, Yanfang, Michael Carl, and Xiangling Wang
    2019 “How Does the Post-Editing of Neural Machine Translation Compare with From-Scratch Translation? A Product and Process Study.” The Journal of Specialised Translation31: 60–86.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Koponen, Maarit
    2012 “Comparing Human Perceptions of Post-editing Effort with Post-editing Operations.” Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation: 181–190.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Koponen, Maarit, Wilker Aziz, Luciana Ramos, and Lucia Specia
    2012 “Post-Editing Time as a Measure of Cognitive Effort.” Proceedings of the AMTA 2012 Workshop on Post-editing Technology and Practice: 11–20.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Krings, Hans
    2001 Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes. Kent (Ohio): The Kent State University Press, Kent.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Laurian, Anne-Marie
    1984 “Machine Translation : What Type of Post-editing on What Type of Documents for What Type of Users.” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 236–238.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mesa-Lao, Bartolomé
    2014 “Gaze Behaviour on Source Texts: an Exploratory Study Comparing Translation and Post-Editing.” InPost-editing of Machine Translation: Processes and applications, ed. bySharon O’Brien, Laura Winther Balling, Michael Carl, Michel Simard, and Lucia Specia, 219–245. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. O’Brien, Sharon
    2002 “Teaching Post-editing: a Proposal for Course Content.” 6th EAMT Workshop – Teaching Machine Translation: 99–106.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Plitt, Mirko, and François Masselot
    2010 “A Productivity Test of Statistical Machine Translation Post-Editing in a Typical Localisation Context.” The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics93: 7–16. 10.2478/v10108‑010‑0010‑x
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10108-010-0010-x [Google Scholar]
18. Robert, Anne-Marie
    2010 “La post-édition : l’avenir incontournable du traducteur  ?” Traduire – Revue française de la traduction222: 137–144.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Robert, Anne-Marie
    (2013) “Vous avez dit post-éditrice ? Quelques éléments d’un parcours personnel.” The Journal of Specialised Translation19: 29–40.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Rossi, Caroline
    2019 “L’apprenti traducteur et la machine : des connaissances aux perceptions de la traduction automatique.” Des mots aux actes8: 93-105.
    [Google Scholar]
21. TAUS
    TAUS 2010 “MT Post-editing Guidelines”. AccessedJuly 11, 2019https://www.taus.net/academy/best-practices/postedit-best-practices/machine-translation-post-editing-guidelines
22. Toral, Antonio, Martin Wieling, and Andy Way
    2018 “Post-editing Effort of a Novel With Statistical and Neural Machine Translation”. Frontiers in Digital Humanities5 (9): 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Valero-Garcés, Carmen
    2018 “Interview with Spanish Language Department. Directorate-General for Translation (DGT) European Commission. José Luis Vega (Head of Department); Alberto Rivas (Quality Officer) and Luis González (Terminologist).” FITISPos International Journal5 (1): 114–122.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Vieira, Lucas N.
    2017 “From Process to Product: Links between Post-Editing Effort and Post-Edited Quality.” InTranslation in transition: between cognition, computing and technology, ed. byArnt L. Jakobsen, and Bartolomé Mesa-Lao, 162–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.133.06vie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.133.06vie [Google Scholar]
25. Wagner, Emma
    1985 “Post-Editing SYSTRAN – A Challenge for Commission Translators.” Terminologie et Traduction3: 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]