Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1598-7647
  • E-ISSN: 2451-909X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Despite a remarkable growth of translation and interpreting studies (TS), little attention has been paid to doctoral students and their experiences of doctoral studies. This paper investigates TS doctoral experiences based on a survey of 73 doctoral students and graduates from the two largest and oldest TS doctoral programmes in South Korea. The survey includes questions about their personal backgrounds, overall doctoral experiences, research competencies, regrets and suggestions for the doctoral programmes. The analysis reveals the challenges they encountered and examines their assessments of TS research competencies. Research competence and time management were the greatest challenges in their doctoral studies. The paper also highlights the factors for successful doctorate completion by statistically analysing the participants’ variables, including their age, marital status, years of practice and personal motives for undertaking doctoral studies. The paper concludes by discussing its implications for TS doctoral programmes and research.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baek, Won-Young, Chang-Yong Song, Joo-Hong Min, Hee-Jeon Sohn, Hye-Jeong Kim, and Jong-Hyuk Yoon
    20202020 Survey of New Doctoral Degree Holders. Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training. Seoul: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barros, Elsa Huertas
    2011 “Collaborative Learning in the Translation Classroom: Preliminary Survey Results.” The Journal of Specialised Translation16: 42–60. AccessedAugust 10, 2021. https://www.jostrans.org/issue16/art_barros.php
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brailsford, Ian
    2010 “Motives and Aspirations for Doctoral Study: Career, Personal, and Inter-personal Factors in the Decision to Embark on a History PhD.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies5: 15–27. 10.28945/710
    https://doi.org/10.28945/710 [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi, Yoon-Mi, Min-Seong Kim, Yoon-Kyoung Hong, and Chang-Woo Nam
    2010 “Understanding Research Competence at Graduate Level: Different Conceptions from Graduate Students, Graduates, and Professors.” Asia Journal of Education11(2): 1–27. 10.15753/aje.2010.11.2.001
    https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2010.11.2.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis, Diana Fagan
    2019 “Students’ Perceptions of Supervisory Qualities: What Do Students Want? What Do They Believe They Receive?” International Journal of Doctoral Studies14: 431–464. 10.28945/4361
    https://doi.org/10.28945/4361 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gardner, Susan K.
    2008 “What’s Too Much and What’s Too Little?”: The Process of Becoming an Independent Researcher in Doctoral Education.” The Journal of Higher Education79(3): 326–350. 10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilbert, Robert, Jo J. Balatti, Phil Turner, and Hilary Whitehouse
    2004 “The Generic Skills Debate in Research Higher Degrees.” Higher Education Research & Development23(3): 375–388. 10.1080/0729436042000235454
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235454 [Google Scholar]
  8. Golde, Chris M.
    2000 “Should I Stay or Should I Go: Student Descriptions of the Doctoral Attrition Process.” Review of Higher Education23(2): 199–227. 10.1353/rhe.2000.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2000.0004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Golde, Chris M., and Timothy M. Dore
    2001At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today’s Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Göpferich, Susanne
    2013 “Translation Competence: Explaining Development and Stagnation from a Dynamic Systems Perspective.” Target25(1): 61–76. 10.1075/target.25.1.06goe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.06goe [Google Scholar]
  11. Green, Bill, and Alison Lee
    1995 “Theorising Postgraduate Pedagogy.” Australian Universities’ Review38(2): 40–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Green, Bill
    2005 “Unfinished Business: Subjectivity and Supervision.” Higher Education Research and Development24(2): 151–163. 10.1080/07294360500062953
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062953 [Google Scholar]
  13. Halverson, Sandra
    2009 “Elements of Doctoral Training.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer3(1): 79–106. 10.1080/1750399X.2009.10798782
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2009.10798782 [Google Scholar]
  14. Humphrey, Robin, and Peter McCarthy
    1999 “Recognising Difference: Providing for Postgraduate Students.” Studies in Higher Education24(3): 371–386. 10.1080/03075079912331379955
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379955 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ives, Glenice, and Glenn Rowley
    2005 “Supervisor Selection or Allocation and Continuity of Supervision: Ph.D. Students’ Progress and Outcomes.” Studies in Higher Education30(5): 535–555. 10.1080/03075070500249161
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelly, Dorothy
    2002 “Un Modelo de Competencia Traductora: Bases para el Diseño Curricular. Puentes.” Hacia nuevas investigaciones en la mediación intercultural1: 9–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelly, Martha J. M., and Jill D. Salisbury-Glennon
    2016 “The Role of Self-regulation in Doctoral Students’ Status of All but Dissertation (ABD).” Innovative Higher Education41:87–100. 10.1007/s10755‑015‑9336‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9336-5 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, Jieun
    2017 “Professional Interpreters’ Job Satisfaction and Relevant Factors: A Case Study of Trained Interpreters in South Korea.” Translation and Interpreting Studies12 (3): 427–448. 10.1075/tis.12.3.04lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.12.3.04lee [Google Scholar]
  19. 2021 “Conference Interpreting in South Korea.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Conference Interpreting, ed. byMichaela Albl-Mikasa and Elisabet Tiselius. London: Routledge, 159–168. 10.4324/9780429297878‑17
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297878-17 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, Hyang, and Won Jun Nam
    2019 “The Past and Future of Translation Studies in South Korea.” Perspectives27(3): 419–430. 10.1080/0907676X.2018.1533986
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1533986 [Google Scholar]
  21. Leonard, Diana, Rosamunde Becker, and Kelly Coate
    2005 “To Prove Myself at the Highest Level: The Benefits of Doctoral Study.” Higher Education Research & Development24(2): 135–149. 10.1080/07294360500062904
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062904 [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Defeng, and Chunling Zhang
    2011 “Knowledge Structure and Training of Translation Teachers: An Exploratory Study of Doctoral Programmes of Translation Studies in Hong Kong.” Meta56(3): 693–712. 10.7202/1008340ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1008340ar [Google Scholar]
  23. Lovitts, Barbara E.
    2005 “Being a Good Course-Taker Is Not Enough: A Theoretical Perspective on the Transition to Independent Research.” Studies in Higher Education30(2): 137–154. 10.1080/03075070500043093
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043093 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2008 “The Transition to Independent Research: Who Makes It, Who Doesn’t, and Why.” The Journal of Higher Education79(3): 296–325. 10.1080/00221546.2008.11772100
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772100 [Google Scholar]
  25. Moreno, Maria del Carmen Calatrava, and Sami Kollanus
    2013 “On the Motivations to Enroll in Doctoral Studies in Computer Science – A Comparison of PhD Program Models.” 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training1–8. 10.1109/ITHET.2013.6671028
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2013.6671028 [Google Scholar]
  26. Olohan, Maeve, and Mona Baker
    2009 “Coherence and Clarity of Objectives in Doctoral Projects.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer3(1): 143–164. 10.1080/1750399X.2009.10798785
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2009.10798785 [Google Scholar]
  27. PACTE
    PACTE 2003 “Building a Translation Competence Model.” InTriangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research, ed. byFabio Alves, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.45.06pac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.45.06pac [Google Scholar]
  28. PACTE
    PACTE 2005 “Investigating Translation Competence: Conceptual and Methodological Issues.” Meta50(2): 609–619. 10.7202/011004ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/011004ar [Google Scholar]
  29. Park, Hyun-Jeong, and Tacksoo Shin
    2007 “Developing and Applying Competitive Power Index of Core Competencies in Higher Education: Based on Graduate Course of Department of Education at ‘S’ University.” Asian Journal of Education8(3): 2–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Petersen, Eva Bendix
    2007 “Negotiating Academicity: Postgraduate Research Supervision as Category Boundary Work.” Studies in Higher Education32(4): 475–487. 10.1080/03075070701476167
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476167 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2010 “Interpreting studies.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, vol, 1. ed byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 158–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.1.int2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.int2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pratt, Nick, Michael Tedder, Ruth Boyask, and Peter Kelly
    2015 “Pedagogic Relations and Professional Change: A Sociocultural Analysis of Students’ Learning in a Professional Doctorate.” Studies in Higher Education40(1): 43–59. 10.1080/03075079.2013.818640
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818640 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pym, Anthony
    2013 “Research Skills in Translation Studies: What We Need Training in.” Across Languages and Cultures14(1): 1–14. 10.1556/Acr.14.2013.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.14.2013.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sambrook, Sally, Jim Stewart, and Clair Roberts
    2008 “Doctoral Supervision… A View from Above, Below and the Middle.” Journal of Further and Higher Education32(1): 71–84. 10.1080/03098770701781473
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701781473 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sverdlik, Anna, Nathan C. Hall, Lynn McAlpine, and Kyle Hubbard
    2018 “The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-being.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies13: 361–388. 10.28945/4113
    https://doi.org/10.28945/4113 [Google Scholar]
  36. Trafford, Vernon, and Shosh Leshem
    2009 “Doctorateness as a Threshold Concept.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International46(3): 305–316. 10.1080/14703290903069027
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903069027 [Google Scholar]
  37. Vandepitte, Sonia
    2013 “Research Competences in Translation Studies.” Babel59(2): 125–148. 10.1075/babel.59.2.01van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.59.2.01van [Google Scholar]
  38. Wright, Toni
    2003 “Postgraduate Research Students: People in Context?” British Journal of Guidance and Counselling31(2): 209–227. 10.1080/0306988031000102379
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0306988031000102379 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error