What do interpreters expect of digital literacy training?

References

1. Berber-Irabien, Diana
   2010 Information and communication technologies in conference interpreting: A survey of their usage in professional and educational settings. PhD diss.Universitat Rovira i Virgili.
2. Bilgen, Baris
   2010 Investigating terminology management for conference interpreters. PhD diss. University of Ottawa. 10.20381/ruor‑12424
   https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12424
3. Braun, Sabine
   2019 Technology and interpreting. InRoutledge handbook of translation and technology, ed. byMinako O’Hagan, 1–20. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315311258‑16
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315311258-16 [Google Scholar]
4. Chang, Ai-Li
   2021 “Study on interpreting competence needed in the age of distance interpreting.” Interpretation and Translation, 23(1): 213–236. 10.20305/it202101213236
   https://doi.org/10.20305/it202101213236 [Google Scholar]
5. Choi, Moon Sun
   2021 “Interpreting 4.0: Remote interpreting norms and practices.” The Journal of Translation Studies, 22(1): 279–312. 10.15749/jts.2021.22.1.011
   https://doi.org/10.15749/jts.2021.22.1.011 [Google Scholar]
6. Choi, Moon Sun
   2022 “Human-machine collaboration in interpreting: A review of the state of the art in computer-assisted interpreting (CAI) research.” Interpreting and Translation Studies, 26(2): 133–163. 10.22844/its.2022.26.2.133
   https://doi.org/10.22844/its.2022.26.2.133 [Google Scholar]
7. Chun, Hyunju
   2017 “The 4th Industrial Revolution and the Status of Korean Translation Industry, and the Future of Interpretation and Translation Education.” The Journal of Interpretation and Translation Education, 15(3): 235–261.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Corpas Pastor, Gloria, and Lily May Fern
   2016 A survey of interpreters’ needs and practices related to language technology. Technical paper [FFI2012-38881-MINECO/TI-DT-2016-1]. The University of Malaga. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303685153_A_survey_of_interpreters%27_needs_and_practices_related_to_language_technology
   [Google Scholar]
9. Corpas Pastor, Gloria
   2017 “VIP: Voice-text integrated system for interpreters.” Proceedings of the 39th Conference Translating and the Computer: 7–10.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Corpas Pastor, Gloria
    2018 “Tools for interpreters: The challenges that lie ahead.” Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning, E(5): 157–182. 10.5281/zenodo.5940648
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5940648 [Google Scholar]
11. Corpas Pastor, Gloria
    2021 “Technology solutions for interpreters: The VIP system.” Hermeneus, 231: 91–123.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Costa, Hernani, Gloria Corpas Pastor, and Isabel Durán Muñoz
    2014 “Technology-assisted interpreting.” Multilingual, 1431: 27–32. https://eden.dei.uc.pt/~hpcosta/docs/papers/201404-MultiLingual-published_version.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
13. Desmet, Bart, Mieke Vandierendonck, and Bart Defrancq
    2018 Simultaneous interpretation of numbers and the impact of technological support. InInterpreting and Technology, ed. byClaudio Fantinuoli, 13–27. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Djafri, Fatmawati, and Lufi Wahidati
    2022 “Examining digital technology literacy of professional Japanese language translator and interpreter.” Lingua Cultura, 16(1): 89–96. 10.21512/lc.v16i1.7768
    https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i1.7768 [Google Scholar]
15. Donovan, Clare
    2006 “Trends -Where is interpreting heading and how can training courses keep up.” A Contribution at the EMCI conference: The Future of Conference Interpreting: Training, Technology and Research.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fantinuoli, Claudio
    2018 “Computer-assisted interpreting: Challenges and future perspectives.” InTrends in E-Tools and Resources for Translators and Interpreters, ed. byCorpas Pastor, Gloria, and Isabel Durán Muñoz, 153–74. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004351790_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351790_009 [Google Scholar]
17. Fantinuoli, Claudio
    2019 “The Technological Turn in Interpreting: The Challenges That Lie Ahead.” AccessedApril 24, 2024. https://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/fantinuo/download/publications/The%20technological%20turn%20in%20interpreting%20-%20the%20challenges%20that%20lie%20ahead.pdf
18. Fantinuoli, Claudio, and Vorya Dastyar
    2022 “Interpreting and the emerging augmented paradigm.” Interpreting and Society, 2(2): 185–194. 10.1177/27523810221111631
    https://doi.org/10.1177/27523810221111631 [Google Scholar]
19. Hamidi, Miriam, and Franz Pöchhacker
    2007 “Simultaneous consecutive interpreting: A new technique put to the test.” Meta, 52(2): 276–289. 10.7202/016070ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/016070ar [Google Scholar]
20. Im, Sei-inn
    2020 “Interpreter training in a post-human world: A techne-humanities approach.” Interpreting and Translation Studies, 24(2): 159–179.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jin, Silhee
    2016 An Action Research on the Application of Constructivism in an Interpreting Classroom: Focused on an ICT-based Experiential Learning Environment. PhD diss. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
22. Jin, Silhee
    2017 “Applying Educational Technology to Interpreting Pedagogy: Considerations for Instructional Design in CAIT.” Interpreting and Translation Studies, 21 (2): 133–162.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jin, Silhee
    2019 “A Case of Technology Integration in T&I Curriculum.” The Journal of Translation Studies, 20 (4): 189–218.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jin, Silhee
    2020 “A model of live interlingual subtitling using respeaking.” Babel, 66 (4–5): 733–749. 10.1075/babel.00182.jin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00182.jin [Google Scholar]
25. Kalina, Sylvia
    2005 “Quality assurance for interpreting processes.” Meta, 50(2): 768–784. 10.7202/011017ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/011017ar [Google Scholar]
26. Kalina, Sylvia
    2010 “New technologies in conference interpreting.” Am Schnittpunkt von Philologie und Translationswissenschaft: Festschrift zu Ehren von Martin Forstner, ed. byLee-Jahnke, Hannelore, and Erich Prunc, 79–96. Lausanne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lee, Jong Kwan
    2015 “A future of humanity toward post-humanity?” Future Horizon. 261: 4–9.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lee, Juriae
    2022 “A study of interpreter training in the changing digital environment: Focused on the use of automatic speech recognition.” The Korean Journal of Japanology, 1331: 95–114. 10.15532/kaja.2022.11.133.95
    https://doi.org/10.15532/kaja.2022.11.133.95 [Google Scholar]
29. Lee, Juriae, Hae Kyung Park, and SungJoo Park
    2017 “Using smart learning technology in consecutive interpreting class: Focusing on the Korean-Japanese language pair.” Journal of Japanese Language and Culture, 411: 227–251.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lee, Juriae, Hae Kyung Park, and Woo Yon Sang
    2018 “App Design for an Assistive Tool for Simultaneous Interpretation Courses.” The Korea Journal of Japanese Education, 421: 99–116. 10.21808/KJJE.42.07
    https://doi.org/10.21808/KJJE.42.07 [Google Scholar]
31. Mellinger, Christopher
    2017 “Translators and machine translation: Knowledge and skill gaps in translator pedagogy.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 11(4): 280–293. 10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359760
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359760 [Google Scholar]
32. Mellinger, Christopher
    2019 “Computer-assisted interpreting technologies and interpreter cognition: A product and process-oriented perspective.” Revista Tradumàtica, 171: 32–44. 10.5565/rev/tradumatica.228
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.228 [Google Scholar]
33. Mihalache, Iulia
    2021 Human and non-human crossover: Translators partnering with digital tools. InWhen translation goes digital: Case studies and critical reflections, ed. byDesjardins, Renée, Claire Larsonneur, and Philippe Lacour, 19–43. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑51761‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51761-8_2 [Google Scholar]
34. Prandi, Bianca
    2020 “The use of CAI tools in interpreter training: Where are we now and where do we go from here.” inTRAlinea: 1–10. https://www.intralinea.org/specials/article/2512
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ortiz, Luis Eduardo Schild, and Patrizia Cavallo
    2018 “Computer-assisted interpreting tools (CAI) and options for automation with automatic speech recognition.” TradTerm, 321: 9–31. 10.11606/issn.2317‑9511.v32i0p9‑31
    https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-9511.v32i0p9-31 [Google Scholar]
36. Sang, Woo Yon
    2020 “Educational suggestions based on the current situations of remote interpreting and demands for interpreters.” The Journal of Translation Studies, 21(5): 129–159. 10.15749/jts.2020.21.5.005
    https://doi.org/10.15749/jts.2020.21.5.005 [Google Scholar]
37. Son, Ji-Bong
    2019 “The Current State and Meanings of the Content of Interpretation and Translation Education in South Korea.” The Journal of Translation Studies, 20 (4): 115–140.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tripepi Winteringham, Sarah
    2010 “The usefulness of ICTs in Interpreting Practice.” Interpreters Newsletter, 151, 87–99.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Will, Martin
    2020 “Computer aided interpreting (CAI) for conference interpreters. Concepts, content and prospects.” Journal for Communication Studies, 131: 37–71.
    [Google Scholar]