1887
image of Analysis of student interpreters’ self-assessment from the perspective of self-regulated
learning
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to examine the significance of self-assessment in interpreter training from the perspective of self-regulated learning. To this end, this study first explores the three cyclical stages of self-regulated learning as conceptualized by Zimmerman, while also examining the significance of self-evaluation in interpreter training. Based on this theoretical framework, the study analyzes self-evaluations from both high-performing and low-performing students at a graduate school of translation and interpretation. The findings of the study reveal three key points: first, the effective use of self-assessment enhances learning effectiveness in interpreter training; second, significant differences exist between high-performing and low-performing students in their self-assessment practices; third, these differences highlight the need for incorporating self-assessment into interpreter training programs. Finally, the study suggests that enhancing self-regulated learning capabilities by actively incorporating self-evaluation into interpreter training can improve educational outcomes in interpreter training, leveraging the cyclical and positive impact of self-regulated learning processes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/forum.24006.woo
2025-02-03
2025-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrade, Heidi L.
    2019 “A critical review of research on student self-assessment.” Frontiers in education. Vol. 4. Frontiers Media SA. 10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
    https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartłomiejczyk, M.
    2007 “Interpreting quality as perceived by trainee interpreters: Self-evaluation.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer(): –. 10.1080/1750399X.2007.10798760
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2007.10798760 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cauley, Kathleen M., and James H. McMillan
    2010 “Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement.” The clearing house: A journal of educational strategies, issues and ideas(): –. 10.1080/00098650903267784
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903267784 [Google Scholar]
  4. Crooks, Terence J.
    1988 “The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students.” Review of educational research(): –. 10.3102/00346543058004438
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dweck, Carol S.
    1998 “Motivational processes affecting learning.” American psychologist(): –. 10.1037/0003‑066X.41.10.1040
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040 [Google Scholar]
  6. Han, C., and Fan, Q.
    2020 “Using self-assessment as a formative assessment tool in an English-Chinese interpreting course: student views and perceptions of its utility.” Perspectives(): –. 10.1080/0907676X.2019.1615516
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1615516 [Google Scholar]
  7. Klenowski, V.
    1995 “Student self-evaluation processes in student-centred teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice(): –. 10.1080/0969594950020203
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594950020203 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee-Jahnke, H.
    2001 “Aspects pédagogiques de l’évaluation des traductions.” Meta(): –. 10.7202/003447ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/003447ar [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee, J. Y.
    2022 “Comparing student self-assessment and teacher assessment in Korean-English consecutive interpreting: Focus on fidelity and language.” INContext: Studies in Translation and Interculturalism(): –. 10.54754/incontext.v2i3.27
    https://doi.org/10.54754/incontext.v2i3.27 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee, S. B.
    2018 “Exploring a relationship between students’ interpreting self-efficacy and performance: Triangulating data on interpreter performance assessment.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer(): –. 10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359763
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359763 [Google Scholar]
  11. McMillan, James H., and Hearn, J.
    2008 “Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement.” Educational horizons(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Panadero, E., Brown, Gavin. T., and Strijbos, J. W.
    2016 “The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions.” Educational psychology review: –. 10.1007/s10648‑015‑9350‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Paris, Scott G., and Newman, Richard S.
    1990 “Development aspects of self-regulated learning.” Educational psychologist(): –. 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_7
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_7 [Google Scholar]
  14. Park, J.
    2013 “Resurgence of formative assessment and the educational implication.” Journal of Educational Evaluation(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Postigo Pinazo, E.
    2008 “Self-assessment in teaching interpreting.” Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction(): –. 10.7202/029690ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/029690ar [Google Scholar]
  16. Ross, John A.
    2006 “The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation(): .
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Russo, M.
    1995 “Self-evaluation: the awareness of one’s own difficulties as a training tool for simultaneous interpretation.” Interpreter’s Newsletter: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sang, W. Y.
    2019 “Action research on the learner-centered interpretation education: Focusing on self-assessment portfolio model.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  19. Schunk, Dale H., and Rice, Jo M.
    1987 “Enhancing comprehension skill and self-efficacy with strategy value information.” Journal of Reading Behavior(): –. 10.1080/10862968709547605
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968709547605 [Google Scholar]
  20. Shin, M. H.
    1998 “Promoting learner’s self-regulation ability in learner controlled computer based instruction.” Journal of Educational Technology(): –. 10.17232/KSET.14.3.177
    https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.14.3.177 [Google Scholar]
  21. Shin, N. J.
    2017 “Action research on pedagogical effects of self-assessment as a self-directed learning tool in interpreter training.” Interpreting and Translation Studies(): –. 10.20305/it201702079100
    https://doi.org/10.20305/it201702079100 [Google Scholar]
  22. Stiggins, R.
    2005 “From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools.” Phi Delta Kappan(): –. 10.1177/003172170508700414
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414 [Google Scholar]
  23. Woo, K. J.
    2021 “Analysis of self-assessment by interpreting students.” Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2023 “A Case Study on Student Interpreters’ Self-assessment Interpreting Training.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Korean Interpreting, ed. ByRiccardo Moratto and Hyang-Ok Lim, –. Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, D., and Zhang, L. J.
    2019 “Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) in second/foreign language teaching.” Second handbook of English language teaching–. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑02899‑2_47
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_47 [Google Scholar]
  26. Zimmerman, B. J.
    2002 “Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview.” Theory into practice(): –. 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar]
  27. Zimmerman, B. J., and Kitsantas, A.
    1997 “Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals.” Journal of educational psychology(): . 10.1037/0022‑0663.89.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  28. Zimmerman, B. J., and Schunk, D. H.
    2001 “Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement.” Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. 2nd ed.–. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zimmerman, B. J.
    1989 “A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.” Journal of educational psychology(): . 10.1037/0022‑0663.81.3.329
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/forum.24006.woo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/forum.24006.woo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error