1887
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the intimate link between hands and minds – or rather: How the hands are a means for exploring thoughts in collaboration with others. Specifically, this study investigates a series of locally occurring instances of gestural reuse in naturally occurring psychotherapeutic interaction. The repetition of gestural sequences and formats in interaction has been researched as serving pragmatic functions of building cohesion (McNeill & Levy, 1993) and managing different aspects of turn-taking (Koschmann & LeBaron, 2002). Taking a micro-analytic approach to the study of gesture, we show how reusing other participants’ gestures in the context of psychotherapy serves additional functions: As affordances for shared, embodied cognition. The study contributes to the growing body of research on gesture as a co-participated, co-operative (Goodwin, 20132018) and embodied phenomenon that criss-cross the boundaries of inside-the-skull, individual-centered and socially distributed cognition.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.00031.phi
2020-09-11
2021-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alač, Morana & Edwin Hutchins
    (2004) I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal of cognition and culture, 4 (3), 629–661. 10.1163/1568537042484977
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537042484977 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alibali, Martha W., Miriam Bassok, Karen Olseth Solomon, Sharon E. Syc, & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    (1999) Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science, 10 (4), 327–333. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00163
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00163 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alibali, Martha W. & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    (1993) Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468–523. 10.1006/cogp.1993.1012
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1012 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ardito, Rita B. & Daniela Rabellino
    (2011) Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 270. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270 [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnold, Lynnette
    (2012) Dialogic embodied action: Using gesture to organize sequence and participation in instructional interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45 (3), 269–296. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699256
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699256 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bordin, Edward S.
    (1979) The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16 (3), 252–260. 10.1037/h0085885
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bressem, Jana, Silva H. Ladewig, & Cornelia Müller
    (2018) Ways of expressing action in multimodal narrations – the semiotic complexity of character viewpoint depictions. InErika Hübl & Markus Steinbach (Eds.), Linguistic foundations of narration in spoken and sign languages (pp.223–250). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.247.10bre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.247.10bre [Google Scholar]
  8. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    (1999) Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. InWolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk, & Eija Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp.11–32). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.63.05cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63.05cou [Google Scholar]
  9. Craig, Arthur D.
    (2002) How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3 (8), 655–666. 10.1038/nrn894
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cuffari, Elena & Jürgen Streeck
    (2017) Taking the world by hand. InChristian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck, & J. Scott Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp.173–202). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Du Bois, John W.
    (2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25 (3), 359–410. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ekman, Paul, & Wallace V. Friesen
    (1969) The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98. 10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49 [Google Scholar]
  13. Galbusera, Laura, Michael T. Finn, & Thomas Fuchs
    (2016) Interactional synchrony and negative symptoms: An outcome study of body-oriented psychotherapy for schizophrenia. Psychotherapy Research, 28 (3), 457–469. 10.1080/10503307.2016.1216624
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1216624 [Google Scholar]
  14. Garfinkel, Sarah N., Anil K. Seth, Adam B. Barrett, Keisuke Suzuki, & Hugo D. Critchley
    (2015) Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 65–74. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  15. Geller, Shari M. & Stephen W. Porges
    (2014) Therapeutic presence: Neurophysiological mechanisms mediating feeling safe in therapeutic relationships. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 24 (3), 178–192. 10.1037/a0037511
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037511 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibson, James J.
    (1962) Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69 (6), 477–491. 10.1037/h0046962
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046962 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, Charles
    (1994) Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2000a) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (10), 1489–1522. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  19. (2000b) Practices of color classification. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7 (1/2), 19–36. 10.1080/10749039.2000.9677646
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2000.9677646 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2003) Pointing as situated practice. InSotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp.217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2011) Contextures of action. InJürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, & Curtis LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction. Language and body in the material world (pp.182–193). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2013) The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 8–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2017) Why multimodality? Why co-operative action?Paper presented at the3rd Multimodality Day, Copenhagen. 10.1017/9781139016735
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2018) Co-operative action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Asta Cekaite
    (2018) Embodied family choreography: Practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315207773
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207773 [Google Scholar]
  26. Günthner, Susanne
    (1999) Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 31 (5), 685–708. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00093‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00093-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh, & Paul Luff
    (2010) Video in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hollan, James, Edwin Hutchins, & David Kirsh
    (2000) Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7 (2), 174–196. 10.1145/353485.353487
    https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487 [Google Scholar]
  29. Holt, Elizabeth
    (1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social nteraction, 29 (3), 219–245. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hutchins, Edwin
    (1995a) Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1995b) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19 (3), 265–288. 10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2010) Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2 (4), 705–715. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2010.01089.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x [Google Scholar]
  33. (2014) The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27 (1), 34–49. 10.1080/09515089.2013.830548
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.830548 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ingold, Tim
    (2013) Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203559055
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jamalian, Azadeh, Valeria Giardino, & Barbara Tversky
    (2013) Gestures for thinking. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Meeting (pp.645–650).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kendon, Adam
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  37. Koschmann, Timothy & Curtis LeBaron
    (2002) Learner articulation as interactional achievement: Studying the conversation of gesture. Cognition and Instruction, 20 (2), 249–282. 10.1207/S1532690XCI2002_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2002_4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lerner, Gene H.
    (2002) Turn-sharing. InCelia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp.225–256). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Linell, Per
    (2007) Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: is there a convergence between dialogism and neuro-biology?Language Sciences, 29 (5), 605–620. 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: IAP, Information Age Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2014) Interactivities, intersubjectivities and language: On dialogism and phenomenology. Language and Dialogue, 4 (2), 165–193. 10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin [Google Scholar]
  42. Linell, Per & Ivana Marková
    (2013) Dialogical approaches to trust in communication. Charlotte, NC: IAP, Information Age Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. McNeill, David
    (1992) Hand and mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2008) Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. McNeill, David & Elena T. Levy
    (1993) Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes, 16 (4), 363–386. 10.1080/01638539309544845
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544845 [Google Scholar]
  46. McQuown, Norman A.
    (1971) The natural history of an interview: Foreword, Chapters 1–5. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Meyer, Christian, Jürgen Streeck, & J. Scott Jordan
    (2017) Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction: New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Müller, Cornelia
    (2004) Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family. InCornelia Müller & Roland Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp.233–256). Berlin: Weidler.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2017) How recurrent gestures mean. Gesture, 16 (2), 277–304. 10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul [Google Scholar]
  50. Müller, Cornelia, Jana Bressem, & Silva H. Ladewig
    (2013) Towards a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. InCornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill, Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Volume1, pp.707–733). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Napier, John
    (1993) Hands. Revised byRussell H. Tuttle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Norris, Sigrid
    (2004) Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203379493
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203379493 [Google Scholar]
  53. Pedersen, Sarah Bro
    (2015) The cognitive ecology of human errors in emergency medicine: An interactivity-based approach. PhD Dissertation, University of Southern Denmark.
  54. Philipsen, Johanne S.
    (2017) Creative synergies: On how ideas grow in interaction. Aarhus University, Aarhus University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Philipsen, Johanne S. & Lasse V. Jensen
    (2018) ”How do signs come to mean?” Reflections on the Goodwinian interactional approach to empirical investigations of the human semiotic ecology. InDonald Favareau (Ed.), Co-operative engagements in intertwined semiosis: Essays in honour of Charles Goodwin (pp.355–358). Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Philipsen, Johanne S. & Kristian Tylén
    . (Submitted). Gestural diagram exploration in collaborative creativity.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Prior, Paul, Julie Hengst, Kevin Roozen, & Jody Shipka
    (2006) ‘I’ll be the sun’: From reported speech to semiotic remediation practices. Text & Talk, 26 (6), 733–766. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.030 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ramseyer, Fabian, & Wolfgang Tschacher
    (2011) Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 79 (3), 284–295. 10.1037/a0023419
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023419 [Google Scholar]
  59. (2016) Movement coordination in psychotherapy: Synchrony of hand movements is associated with session outcome. A single-case study. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 20 (2), 145–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Safran, Jeremy, J. Christopher Muran, Anthony Demaria, Catherine Boutwell, Catherine Eubanks-Carter, & Arnold Winston
    (2014) Investigating the impact of alliance-focused training on interpersonal process and therapists’ capacity for experiential reflection. Psychotherapy Research, 24 (3), 269–285. 10.1080/10503307.2013.874054
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.874054 [Google Scholar]
  61. Salgado, João
    (2014) Searching for trust in psychotherapy: The developmental dynamics of trust within a dialogical perspective. InPer Linell & Ivana Marková (Eds.), Dialogical approaches to trust in communication (pp.101–124). Charlotte, NC: IAP, Information Age Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Scheflen, Albert E.
    (1964) The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 27 (4), 316–331. 10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403 [Google Scholar]
  63. (1973) How behavior means. New York: Gordon and Breach.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Seth, Anil K.
    (2013) Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17 (11), 565–573. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  65. Steffensen, Sune V.
    (2013) Human interactivity: problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. InStephen J. Cowley & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain. (pp.195–221). London: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑5125‑8_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_11 [Google Scholar]
  66. Steffensen, Sune V., Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau, & Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
    (2016) Cognitive events in a problem-solving task: a qualitative method for investigating interactivity in the 17 Animals problem. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28 (1), 79–105. 10.1080/20445911.2015.1095193
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1095193 [Google Scholar]
  67. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2009) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2013) Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 69–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  69. Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, & Curtis LeBaron
    (2011) Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Trasmundi, Sarah Bro & Per Linell
    (2017) Insights and their emergence in everyday practices. Pragmatics & Cognition, 24 (1), 62–90. 10.1075/pc.17002.tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17002.tra [Google Scholar]
  71. Tversky, Barbara
    (2011) Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 499–535. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2010.01113.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x [Google Scholar]
  72. Tylén, Kristian, Riccardo Fusaroli, Johanne S. Bjørndahl, Johanna Raczaszek-Leonardi, Svend Østergaard, & Frederik Stjernfelt
    (2014) Diagrammatic reasoning: Abstraction, interaction, and insight. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22 (2), 264–283. 10.1075/pc.22.2.06tyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.06tyl [Google Scholar]
  73. Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric
    (2014) Insight, interactivity and materiality. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22 (1), 27–44. 10.1075/pc.22.1.02val
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.1.02val [Google Scholar]
  74. Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric & Andrea Krüsi Penney
    (2005) The impact of external representation in a rule discovery task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17 (6), 820–834. 10.1080/09541440440000249
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440440000249 [Google Scholar]
  75. Varela, Francisco J., Elanor Rosch, & Evan Thompson
    (1993) The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann, & Han Sloetjes
    (2006) ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. Paper presented at the5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.00031.phi
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error