Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Relying on the analysis of naturally occurring interaction recordings, this article proposes the moment-by-moment description of a specific type of focused interaction, the interaction of the martial art Aikido. In Aikido encounters, participants exchange moves of attack, defense, avoidance also using a “weapon”. These “Aikido movements”, as I shall call them, are articulated by the whole body and serve as projectable interactional units. Aikido movements appear as highly ordered minimal units of the practitioners’ activity which are coordinated between them in space and time. Central in this account is the description of the interactional space elaborated through the moving transactional segments of the practitioners. I suggest that the description of the visible bodily actions of Aikido opens a range of questions concerning the social and interactional construction of human perception in any activity involving whole body movements. As visible actions, Aikido movement and gesture share the property of becoming units of the social activity they organize.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Clayman, Steven E. & Douglas W. Maynard
    (1995) Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. In Paul ten Have & George Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp.1–30). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Coates, Sally
    (1999) Analysing the physical: An ethnomethodological study of boxing. Ethnographic Studies, 4, 14–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Garfinkel, Harold
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Garfinkel, Harold & Harvey Sacks
    (1970) On formal structures of practical actions. In John C. McKinney & Edward A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp.337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Garfinkel, Harold & D. Lawrence Wieder
    (1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In Graham Watson & Robert M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: studies in ethnomethodology (pp.175–206). Newbury Park: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goffman, Erving
    (1963) Behavior in public places. Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodwin, Charles
    (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Harness Goodwin
    (2004) Participation. In Alessandro Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp.222–244). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Haddington, Pentti , Lorenza Mondada , & Maurice Nevile
    (2013) Being mobile: Interaction on the move. In Pentti Haddington , Lorenza Mondada , & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and body in motion (pp.3–61). Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110291278
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110291278 [Google Scholar]
  12. Haddington, Pentti , Tiina Keisanen , Lorenza Mondada , & Maurice Nevile
    (2014) Towards multiactivity as a social and interactional phenomenon. In Pentti Haddington , Tiina Keisanen , Lorenza Mondada , & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp.3–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.187.01had
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.01had [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayashi, Makoto
    (2004) Projection and grammar: Notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1337–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  14. Heath Christian , Jon Hindmarsh , & Paul Luff
    (2010) Video in qualitative research. Analysing social interaction in everyday life. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heritage, John & J. Maxwell Atkinson
    (1984) Introduction. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp.1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Herrigel, Eugen
    (1953) Zen in the art of archery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kendon, Adam
    (1990) Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lefebvre, Augustin
    (2011) Approche ethnométhodologique de l’accomplissement d’une figure à deux: spatialité et temporalité dans la pratique de l’aïkido. PhD Thesis, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris3.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lerner, Gene H
    (2002) Turn-sharing: the choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In Cecilia E. Ford , Barbara Fox , & Sandra Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp.225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mauss, Marcel
    ([1934] 1950) Les techniques du corps. In Marcel Mauss (Ed.), Anthropologie et sociologie (pp.365–386). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McNeill, David
    (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92 (3), 350–371. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.92.3.350
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 [Google Scholar]
  23. (Ed.) (2000) Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620850
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mead, George Herbert
    (1934) Mind, self and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Charles W. Morris (Ed.). Chicago: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mondada, Lorenza
    (2006a) Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8 ( Special issue on Discourse, Interaction and Cognition ), 117–129. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059561 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2006b) Video recording as the reflexive preservation-configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In Hubert Knoblauch , Bernt Schnettler , Jürgen Raab , & Hans-Georg Soeffner (Eds.), Video analysis. Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis (pp.51–68). Bern: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2009) Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1977–1997. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2013) Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-interaction. In Peter Auer , Martin Hilpert , Anja Stukenbrock , & Bernd Szmrecsanyi , (Eds.), Space in language and linguistics: Geographical, interactional and cognitive perspectives (pp.247–275). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sacks, Harvey
    (1984) Notes on methodology. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp.21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (1992) Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , & Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  32. Saotome, Mitsugi
    (1993) Aikido and the harmony of nature. Boston & London: Shambhala.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schindler, Larissa
    (2009) The production of “vis-ability”: An ethnographic video analysis of a martial arts class. In Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann (Ed.), Video interaction analysis. Methods and methodology (pp.135–153). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Schütz, Alfred
    (1962) Collected papers: The problem of social reality. Maurice Natason (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2009a) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2009b) Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46 (2–3), 161–179. doi: 10.1080/01638530902728793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 [Google Scholar]
  39. ten Have, Paul
    (2002) The notion of member is the heart of the matter: On the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3 (3), Art. 21, nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203217
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error