1887
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

A comparison of size gestures made during object descriptions by Anyi speakers from the Ivory Coast and Dutch speakers in the Netherlands reveals considerable formational differences. Firstly, whereas all Anyi speakers make use of body parts to depict size and shape, none of the Dutch speakers do. Secondly, Dutch gestures outlining a size and shape in space are more varied than their Anyi counterparts in the number and distribution of the different handshapes, orientations, and movements. In addition, we report comparisons among Anyi speakers in which body parts are used as a way of showing the size of objects with signs for sizes employed in the sign language used by deaf and hearing signers in Adamorobe, a village community in Ghana that is linguistically and culturally related to the Anyi communities in Côte d’Ivoire. This comparison reveals significant similarities as well as differences, suggesting how co-speech gestures may have been adapted for use in this sign language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.15.2.02nys
2016-07-08
2018-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bavelas, Janet , Jennifer Gerwing , Chantelle Sutton , & Danielle Prevost
    (2008) Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 495–520. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beattie, Geoffrey & Heather Shovelton
    (2002) An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power. British Journal of Psychology, 93 (2), 179–192. doi: 10.1348/000712602162526
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162526 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2006) When size really matters: How a single semantic feature is represented in the speech and gesture modalities. Gesture, 6 (1), 63–84. doi: 10.1075/gest.6.1.04bea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.6.1.04bea [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergman, Brita & Lars Wallin
    (2003) Noun and verbal classifiers in Swedish Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp.35–51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergmann, Kirsten , Florian Hahn , Stefan Kopp , Hannes Rieser , & Insa Röpke
    (2013) Integrating gesture meaning and verbal meaning for German verbs of motion: Theory and simulation. In Proceedings of the Tilburg Gesture Research Meeting (TiGeR 2013) , Tilburg, NL.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergmann, Kirsten & Stefan Kopp
    (2009) Increasing the expressiveness of virtual agents: Autonomous generation of speech and gesture for spatial description tasks. In Keith S. Decker (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (Volume 1, pp.361–368). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2010) Systematicity and idiosyncrasy in iconic gesture use: empirical analysis and computational modeling. In Stefan Kopp & Ipke Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (pp.182–194). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑12553‑9_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12553-9_16 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyes-Braem, Penny
    (1981) Features of the handshape in American Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Claessen, A
    (1984) Investigation into the patterns of non-verbal communication behavior related to conversational interaction between mother tongue speakers of Swahili. In Joan Maw & David Parkin (Eds.), Swahili language and society. Papers from the Workshop held at the School of Oriental and African Studies in April 1982 (pp.159–193). Vienna: Afro-Pub.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes
    (2008) Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In Onno Crasborn , Eleni Efthimiou , Thomas Hanke , Ernst-Daniel Thoutenhoofd , & Inge Zwitserlood (Eds.), Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora. 3rd workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages (pp.39–43). Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Creider, Chet A
    (1977) Towards a description of East African gestures. Sign Language Studies, 14, 1–20. doi: 10.1353/sls.1977.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1977.0014 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dehaene, Stanislas , Véronique Izard , Pierre Pica , & Elizabeth Spelke
    (2006) Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian Indigene group. Science, 311, 381–384. doi: 10.1126/science.1121739
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121739 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hochegger, Hermann
    (1978) Le langue gestuel en Afrique Centrale. Bandundu: Publications CEEBA.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Holler, Judith & Geoffrey Beattie
    (2002) A micro-analytic investigation of how iconic gestures and speech represent core semantic features in talk. Semiotica, 142, 31–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Holler, Judith & Rachel Stevens
    (2007) The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26 (1), 4–27. doi: 10.1177/0261927X06296428
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06296428 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hummels, Caroline
    (2000) Gestural design tools: prototypes, experiments and scenarios. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jorio, Andrea de
    ([1832] 2000) Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. Adam Kendon (Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kendon, Adam
    (1980) A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Part II: The semiotic functioning of Enga signs. Semiotica, 32 (2), 98–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kita, Sotaro
    (2009) Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 145–167. doi: 10.1080/01690960802586188
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802586188 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kita, Sotaro & Aslı Özyürek
    (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
    (1979) The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kooij, Els van der
    (2002) Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mandel, Mark
    (1977) Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Lynn A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp.57–107). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McNeill, David
    (1986) Iconic gestures of children and adults. Semiotica, 62 (1–2), 107–128. doi: 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.107
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.107 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nyst, Victoria
    (2007a) A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2007b) Simultaneous constructions in Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). In Myriam Vermeerbergen , Lorraine Leeson , & Onno Crasborn (Eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages (pp.127–145). Amsterda: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.281.06nys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.281.06nys [Google Scholar]
  29. (2016) Size and shape depictions in the manual modality: A taxonomy of iconic devices in Adamorobe Sign Language. Semiotica, 210, 1–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Padden, Carol A. , Irit Meir , So-One Hwang , Ryan Lepic , Sharon Seegers , & Tory Sampson
    (2013) Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture, 13 (3), 287–308. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad [Google Scholar]
  31. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    (2006) Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages. Linguistics in Potsdam, 24, 3–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Roberson, Debi , Jules Davidoff , & Laura Shapiro
    (2002) Squaring the circle: The cultural relativity of good shape. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 29–51. doi: 10.1163/156853702753693299
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853702753693299 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sadeghipour, Amir & Stefan Kopp
    (2014) Learning a motor grammar of iconic gestures. In Markus Knauff , Michael Pauen , Natalie Sebanz , & Ipke Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013) (pp.1341–1346). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sáfár, Anna , Onno Crasborn , & Ellen Ormel
    (2010) Handedness in the Corpus NGT. Poster presented at the 10th Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR10) .
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sowa, Timo & Ipke Wachsmuth
    (2002) Interpretation of shape-related iconic gestures in virtual environments. In Ipke Wachsmuth & Timo Sowa (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp.21–33). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/3‑540‑47873‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47873-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2003) Coverbal iconic gestures for object descriptions in virtual environments: An empirical study. In Monica Rector , Isabella Poggi , & Nadine Trigo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference “Gestures. Meaning and Use” (pp.365–376). Porto, Portugal: Universidade Fernando Pessoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2005) A model for the representation and processing of shape in coverbal iconic gestures. In Klaus Opwis & Iris K. Penner (Eds.), Proceedings of KogWis 05: The German Cognitive Science Conference2005 (pp.183–188). Basel, Switzerland: Schwabe Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2008) Depicting by gestures. Gesture, 8 (3), 285–301. doi: 10.1075/gest.8.3.02str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.02str [Google Scholar]
  39. Taub, Sarah F
    (2001) Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
  40. Zwitserlood, Inge E.P
    (2003) Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.15.2.02nys
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error