1887
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The study describes certain structural modifications employed on the citation forms of ISL during signing for intensification purposes. In Signed Languages, citation forms are considered relatively immune to modifications. Nine signers signed several scenarios describing some intense quality. The signers used conventional adverbs existing in ISL for intensification purposes. Yet, they also employed idiosyncratic modifications on the formational components of adjectives simultaneously to form realization. These optional modifications enriched the messages conveyed merely by the conventional forms. They show that signers can incorporate gradient modes of expressions directly into the production of the lexical items to communicate more diverse and explicit messages in context. Using a comparative semiotic approach allowed us to describe the synergetic cooperation manifested at the stage of utterance construction between formational elements which were more suited to convey gradient and analog meanings in context and those that were less suited and thus not modified.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.15.2.03fuk
2016-07-08
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aronoff, Mark , Irit Meir , Carol Padden , & Wendy Sandler
    (2003) Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp.53–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolinger, Dwight
    (1986) Intonation and its parts: Melody in spoken English. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brennan, Mary
    (1992) The visual world of BSL: An introduction. In David Brien (Ed.), Dictionary of British Sign Language/English (pp.1–133). London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brentari, Diana , Maria Coppola , Laura Mazzoni , & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    (2012) When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 30 (1), 1–31. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9145‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9145-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cienki, Alan & Cornelia Müller
    (Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. doi: 10.1075/gs.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, Nathaniel , Marcus Perlman , & Marlene Johansson Falck
    (2013) Iconic pitch expresses vertical space.In Mike Borkent , Barbara Dancygier , & Jennifer Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind: New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp.393–410). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cormier, Kearsy , David Quinto-Pozos , Zed Sevcikova , & Adam Schembri
    (2012) Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language & Communication, 32 (4), 329–348. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cormier, Kearsy , Sandra Smith , & Martin Zwets
    (2013) Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 119–139. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cormier, Kearsy , Sandra Smith , & Zed Sevcikova
    (2013) Predicate structures, gesture, and simultaneity in the representation of action in British Sign Language: Evidence from deaf children and adults. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 18 (3), 370–390. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ent020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ent020 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler
    (2009) Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech, 52 (2–3), 287–314. doi: 10.1177/0023830909103175
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909103175 [Google Scholar]
  11. Duncan, Susan
    (2005) Gesture in signing: A case study from Taiwan sign language. Language and Linguistics, 6 (2), 279–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Emmorey, Karen
    (1999) Do signers gesture?In Lynn S. Messing & Ruth Campbell (Eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign (pp.133–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524519.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524519.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  13. Emmorey, Karen & Melissa Herzig
    (2003) Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages (pp.259–268). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
    (1993) Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferré, Gaëlle , Roxane Bertrand , Philippe Blache , Robert Espesser , & Stéphane Rauzy
    (2007) Intensive gestures in French and their multimodal correlates. Interspeech, 690–693, Antwerp, Belgium.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Flecha-García, María L
    (2010) Eyebrow raises in dialogue and their relation to discourse structure, utterance function and pitch accents in English. Speech Communication, 52 (6), 542–554. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2009.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fontana, Sabina
    (2008) Mouth actions as gesture in sign language. Gesture, 8 (1), 104–123. doi: 10.1075/gest.8.1.08fon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.1.08fon [Google Scholar]
  18. Fuks, Orit
    (2014) Gradient and categorically: Handshape’s two semiotic dimensions in Israeli Sign Language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 207–225. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.023 [Google Scholar]
  19. Granström, Björn & David House
    (2005) Audiovisual representation of prosody in expressive speech communication. Speech Communication, 46 (3), 473–484. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.017 [Google Scholar]
  20. Guaïtella, Isabelle , Serge Santi , Benoît Lagrue , & Christian Cavé
    (2009) Are eyebrow movements linked to voice variations and turn-taking in dialogue? An experimental investigation. Language and speech, 52 (2–3), 207–222. doi: 10.1177/0023830909103167
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909103167 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hockett, Charles F
    (1978) In search of Jove’s brow. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage, 53 (4), 243–313. doi: 10.2307/455140
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455140 [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnston, Trevor
    (2013) Towards a comparative semiotics of pointing actions in signed and spoken languages. Gesture, 13 (2), 109–142. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.2.01joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.2.01joh [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, Trevor & Adam Schembri
    (2007) Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607479 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kendon, Adam
    (1972) Some relationships between body movement and speech: an analysis of an example. In Aron Wolfe Siegman & Benjamin Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp.177–210). New York: Pergamon Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑015867‑9.50013‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1980) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In: Ritchie Key Mary (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp.207–228). The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2008) Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture, 8 (3), 348–366. doi: 10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken [Google Scholar]
  28. (2012) Language and kinesic complexity. Reflections on “Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language” by Wendy Sandler. Gesture, 12 (3), 308–326. doi: 10.1075/gest.12.3.02ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.3.02ken [Google Scholar]
  29. Liddell, Scott K
    (2003) Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
  30. Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson
    (1989) American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 64, 195–277. doi: 10.1353/sls.1989.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1989.0027 [Google Scholar]
  31. Liddell, Scott K. & Melanie Metzger
    (1998) Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 657–697. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00061‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00061-7 [Google Scholar]
  32. McNeill, David
    (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92, 350–371. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.92.3.350
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Metzger, Melanie
    (1995) Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp.255–271). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Okrent, Arika
    (2002) A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). In: Richard P. Meier , Kearsy Cormier , & David Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken language (pp.175–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486777.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.009 [Google Scholar]
  37. Padden, Carol & David Perlmutter
    (1987) American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 335–375. doi: 10.1007/BF00134553
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134553 [Google Scholar]
  38. Perniss, Pamela , Robin L. Thompson , & Gabriella Vigliocco
    (2010) Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Language Sciences, 1, 227.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Quinto-Pozos, David & Sarika Mehta
    (2010) Register variation in mimetic gestural complements to signed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (3), 557–584. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sandler, Wendy
    (2009) Symbolic symbolization by hand and mouth in sign language. Semiotica, 174, 241–275.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sandler, Wendy , & Diana Lillo-Martin
    (2006) Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
  42. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    ([1916] 1983) Course in general linguistics. Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye (Eds.), Roy Harris (Trans.). London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Schembri, Adam , Caroline Jones , & Dennis Burnham
    (2005) Are classifier verbs of movement a blend of signed language and gesture? Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwanese Sign Language, and non-signers’ gestures. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (3), 272–290. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni029
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni029 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schick, Brenda S
    (1990) Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics, 1, 15–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Shaw, Emily P
    (2013) Gesture in multiparty interaction: A study of embodied discourse in spoken English and American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Shintel, Hadas , Howard C. Nusbaum , & Arika Okrent
    (2006) Analog acoustic expression in speech communication. Journal of Memory and Language, 55 (2), 167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  47. Supalla, Ted
    (1978) Morphology of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. In Frank Caccamise & Doin Hicks (Eds.), American Sign Language in a bilingual, bicultural context. Proceedings of the Second National Symposium on sign language research and teaching, Coronado, California, Oct 15–19, 1978 (pp.27–46). Coronado, CA: National Association of the Deaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (1986) The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Colette Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization: Typological studies in language (pp.181–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.7.13sup
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.7.13sup [Google Scholar]
  49. (2003) Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier predicates. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp.249–257). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tobin, Yishai
    (1997) Phonology as human behavior: Theoretical implications and &clinical applications. Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilcox, Sherman
    (2004) Gesture and language: Cross linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture, 4 (1), 43–73. doi: 10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.15.2.03fuk
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): gesture , iconicity , Israeli Sign Language , semiotic and sign
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error