Uncommon resemblance

References

1. Agha, Asif
   (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Austin, John
   (1962) How to do things with words. Edited byJ. O. Urmson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bate, Bernard
   (2009) Tamil oratory and the Dravidian aesthetic: Democratic practice in South India. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/bate14756
   https://doi.org/10.7312/bate14756 [Google Scholar]
4. Beaver, David I. & Brady Z. Clark
   (2002) The proper treatments of focus sensitivity. InLine Mikkelsen & Chris Potts (Eds.), WCCFL 21 Proceedings (pp.15–28). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Borges, Jorge Luis
   (1962) Funes, the memorious. InJorge Luis Borges, Labyrinths: Selected stories & other writings (pp.65–71). New York: New Directions.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni, & Susan Goldin-Meadow
   (2012) When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Nat Lang Linguist Theory, 30 (1), 1–31. doi:  10.1007/s11049‑011‑9145‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9145-1 [Google Scholar]
7. Brookes, Heather J.
   (2001)  O clever ʻHe’s streetwise.’ When gestures become quotable: The case of the clever gesture. Gesture, 1 (2), 167–184. doi:  10.1075/gest.1.2.05bro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.05bro [Google Scholar]
8. Brookes, Heather J.
   (2004) A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14 (2), 186–224. doi:  10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186
   https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186 [Google Scholar]
9. Brookes, Heather J.
   (2011) Amangama amathathu ‘The three letters’: The emergence of a quotable gesture (emblem). Gesture, 11 (2), 194–218. doi:  10.1075/gest.11.2.05bro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.2.05bro [Google Scholar]
10. Calbris, Geneviève
    (2011) Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/gs.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5 [Google Scholar]
11. Enfield, Nick J.
    (2009) The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511576737
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576737 [Google Scholar]
12. Fleming, Luke, & Michael Lempert
    (2014) Poetics and performativity. InNick J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman, & Jack Sidnell (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp.485–515). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139342872.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.023 [Google Scholar]
13. Fox, James J.
    (1974) Our ancestors spoke in pairs. InRichard Bauman & Joel Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp.65–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fromkin, Victoria
    (1980) Errors in linguistic performance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. San Francisco: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goffman, Erving
    (1956) The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58, 472–502. doi:  10.1525/aa.1956.58.3.02a00070
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1956.58.3.02a00070 [Google Scholar]
16. Goldin-Meadow, Susan
    (2014) Homesign: When gesture is called upon to be language. InCornelia Müller, Alan J. Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Vol.2 (pp.113–125). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Heidi Feldman
    (1977) The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science, 197 (4301), 401–403. doi:  10.1126/science.877567
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.877567 [Google Scholar]
18. Goodman, Nelson
    (1972) Seven strictures on similarity. InNelson Goodman (Ed.), Problems and projects (pp.437–446). New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goodwin, Charles
    (2003) Pointing as situated practice. InSotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp.217–241). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gundel, Jeanette K.
    (1999) On different kinds of focus. InPeter Bosch & Rob A. van der Sandt (Ed.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp.293–305). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gundel, Jeanette K. & Thorstein Fretheim
    (2006) Topic and focus. InLaurence R. Horn & Gregory L. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp.175–196). Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell. doi:  10.1002/9780470756959.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch8 [Google Scholar]
22. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, & Ron Zacharski
    (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69 (2), 274–307. doi:  10.2307/416535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
23. Haviland, John B.
    (2013) The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: Specification, iconicity, and syntax. Gesture, 13 (3), 203–247. doi:  10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav [Google Scholar]
24. Kendon, Adam
    (1988) How gestures can become like words. InFernando Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp.131–141). Toronto: Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kendon, Adam
    (1990) Gesticulation, quotable gestures, and signs. InMichael Moerman and Masaichi Nomura (Eds.), Culture embodied (pp.53–78). Osaka, Japan: National Museum of Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kendon, Adam
    (1992) Some recent work from Italy on ʻquotable gestures’ (ʻemblems’). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2, 92–108. doi:  10.1525/jlin.1992.2.1.92
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.1.92 [Google Scholar]
27. Kendon, Adam
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
28. Lempert, Michael
    (2011) Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11 (3), 241–270. doi:  10.1075/gest.11.3.01lem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.01lem [Google Scholar]
29. Lempert, Michael
    (2012a) Discipline and debate: The language of violence in a Tibetan Buddhist monastery. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi:  10.1525/california/9780520269460.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520269460.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
30. Lempert, Michael
    (2012b) Where the action isn’t: Review article on Nick Enfield’sThe anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Language in Society, 41 (2), 259–266.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lempert, Michael
    (2014) Imitation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 379–395. doi:  10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102313‑030008
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030008 [Google Scholar]
32. Lempert, Michael & Michael Silverstein
    (2012) Creatures of politics: Media, message, and the American presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Matoesian, Gregory & Kristin Enola-Gilbert
    (2016) Multifunctionality of hand gestures and material conduct during closing argument. Gesture, 15 (1), 79–114.
    [Google Scholar]
34. McNeill, David
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McNeill, David
    (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:  10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
36. Morris, Desmond
    (1977) Manwatching: a field guide to human behaviour. London: Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Newkirk, Don, Edward S. Klima, Carlene Canady Pendersen, & Ursula Bellugi
    (1980) Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. InVictoria Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp.165–197). San Francisco: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Parmentier, Richard J.
    (1994a) Naturalization of convention. InRichard J. Parmentier (Ed.), Signs in society: Studies in semiotic anthropology (pp.175–190). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Parmentier, Richard J.
    (1994b) The semiotic regimentation of social life. InRichard J. Parmentier (Ed.), Signs in society: Studies in semiotic anthropology (pp.125–155). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Prince, Ellen F.
    (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. InPeter Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp.223–255). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rains, Charleen
    (1992) “You die for life”: On the use of poetic devices in argumentation. Language in Society, 21, 253–276. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500015281
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015281 [Google Scholar]
42. Sandler, Wendy
    (2012) Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language. Gesture, 12 (3), 265–307. doi:  10.1075/gest.12.3.01san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.3.01san [Google Scholar]
43. Sapir, Edward
    (1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: A Harvest/HBJ Book.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schuler, Edgar A.
    (1944) V for victory: a study in symbolic social control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 283–299.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Senghas, Ann
    (2003) Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognitive Development, 18 (4), 511–531. doi:  10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.006 [Google Scholar]
46. Senghas, Ann & Marie Coppola
    (2001) Children creating language: How Nicaraguan sign language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12 (4), 323–328. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9280.00359
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00359 [Google Scholar]
47. Silverstein, Michael
    (2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23 (3/4), 193–229. doi:  10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
48. Singleton, Jenny L., Jill P. Morford, & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    (1993) Once is not enough: Standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans. Language, 69 (4), 683–715. doi:  10.2307/416883
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416883 [Google Scholar]
49. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2009) Gesturecraft: the manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
50. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2008) Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41 (2), 154–186. doi:  10.1080/08351810802028662
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028662 [Google Scholar]
51. Tannen, Deborah
    (2007) Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
52. Teßendorf, Sedinha
    (2014) Emblems, quotable gestures, or conventionalized body movements. InCornelia Müller, Alan J. Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Vol.2 (pp.82–100). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Uhmann, Susanne
    (1992) Contextualizing relevance: On some forms and functions of speech rate changes in everyday conversation. InPeter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp.297–336). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.22.19uhm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.19uhm [Google Scholar]