1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Gesture
  4. Volume 16, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Gestures that are used by interlocutors to manage the gist of their ‘discourse interactions’, namely content exchange and floor taking, can have one of two very different pragmatic functions: to signal inclusion and cooperation in friendly conversation, or to establish control in more argumentative conversation. While inclusive-cooperative gestures have been extensively studied (e.g., Bavelas, Chovil, Lavrie, & Wade, 1992 ; Kendon, 1995 ; Müller, 2004 ; Sweetser, 1998 ), control gestures received little attention (although see Kendon, 1995 , 2004 ) until a recent spark of interest in their form and function (e.g., Calbris, 2011 ; Müller, 2017 ; Wehling, 2010 , 2012 , 2013 ). However, even though research has detailed important aspects of such discourse managing gestures, to date no comprehensive account of their conceptual foundations and pragmatic functions exists. The present paper fills this gap in the literature. Building on prior analyses of control gestures in argumentative discourse (e.g., Wehling, 2010 ) and inclusive-cooperative gestures in friendly conversation (e.g., Bavelas et al., 1992 ; Müller, 2004 ), it details a typology of that distinguishes and gestures as separate pragmatic types and accounts for their forms and functions in terms of their conceptual foundations in primary metaphoric, space-motion schematic, and force dynamic reasoning.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh
2018-01-12
2023-09-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barbey, Aron & Phillip Wolff
    (2006) Causal reasoning from forces. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2439.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bavelas, Janet B. , Nicole Chovil , Douglas Lavrie , & Allan Wade
    (1992) Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15 (4), 469–489. doi: 10.1080/01638539209544823
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bavelas, Janet B. , Nicole Chovil , Linda Coates , & Lori Roe
    (1995) Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394–405. doi: 10.1177/0146167295214010
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214010 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller
    (2014) The family of away gestures: Negation, refusal and negative assessment. In Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill , Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Vol.2 (pp.1592–1604). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cacioppo, John , Joseph Priester , & Gary Bernston
    (1993) Rudimentary determination of attitudes: II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.65.1.5
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Calbris, Geneviève
    (1990) The semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. (2011) Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Casasanto, Daniel
    (2008) Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind?Memory and Cognition, 36 (6), 1047–1056. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1047
     https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1047 [Google Scholar]
  9. Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin
    (2010) Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE, 5 (7): e11805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011805
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011805 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Mark & John Bargh
    (1999) Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavior predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025002007
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cienki, Alan
    (1998) Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphorical expressions. In Jean-Pierre Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp.189–204). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cienki, Alan , & Cornelia Müller
    (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cooperrider, Kensy
    (2011) Reference in action: Links between pointing and language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
  14. (2017) Foreground gesture, background gesture. Gesture, 16 (2), 176–202 ( this issue ). doi: 10.1075/gest.16.2.02coo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.02coo [Google Scholar]
  15. Enfield, Nick
    (2001) Lip pointing. A discussion of form and function with reference to data from Laos. Gesture, 1 (2), 185–212. doi: 10.1075/gest.1.2.06enf
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.06enf [Google Scholar]
  16. Förster, Jens & Fritz Strack
    (1997) Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: A motorcongruence effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 1419–1427. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1419
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1419 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1998) Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: II: Boundary conditions for motor congruence effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1423–1426. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.3c.1423
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.86.3c.1423 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gibbs, Raymond
    (1996) Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition, 61, 309–319. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(96)00723‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00723-8 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grady, Joseph
    (1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  20. Haviland, John
    (2003) How to point in Zinacantán. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp.139–170). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, Christopher
    (1999) Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see . In Masako Hiraga , Chris Sinha , Sherman Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, typological and psychological perspectives in cognitive linguistics (pp.155–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.152.12joh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.152.12joh [Google Scholar]
  22. Kendon, Adam
    (1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
  23. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2017) Pragmatic functions of gestures: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture, 16 (2), 157–175 ( this issue ). doi: 10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken [Google Scholar]
  25. Kita, Sotaro
    (2003) Interplay of gaze, hand, torso orientation, and language in pointing. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp.307–328). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kwon, Iksoo
    (2011) Evidentials and epistemic modals in a causal event structure. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. doi: 10.3765/bls.v37i1.830
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v37i1.830 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, George & Elisabeth Wehling
    (2008) Auf leisen Sohlen ins Gehirn: Politische Sprache und ihre heimliche Macht. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ladewig, Silva
    (2011) Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6: cognitextes.revues.org/406
  30. McNeill, David
    (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92 (3), 350–371. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.92.3.350
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 [Google Scholar]
  31. (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mittelberg, Irene
    (2013) Balancing acts: Image schemas and force dynamics as experiential essence in pictures by Paul Klee and their gestural enactments. In Mike Borkent , Barbara Dancygier , Jennifer Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp.325–346). Stanford: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Mittelberg, Irene & Linda R. Waugh
    (2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.329–356). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Müller, Cornelia
    (1998) Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. (2004) The palm-up-open-hand: A case of a gesture family?In Cornelia Müller , Roland Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp.233–256). Berlin: Weidler Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. (2017) How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16 (2), 277–304 ( this issue ).
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Nuñez, Rafael & Eve Sweetser
    (2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62 [Google Scholar]
  39. Reddy, Michael
    (1979) The conduit metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.284–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Semino, Elena
    (2006) A corpus-based study of metaphors for speech activity in British English. In Anatol Stefanowitsch , Stefan Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp.36–62). Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2009) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sweetser, Eve
    (1987) Metaphorical models of thought and speech: A comparison of historical directions and metaphorical mappings in the two domains. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. doi: 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1812
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1812 [Google Scholar]
  43. (1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  44. (1992) English metaphors for language: Motivations, conventions, and creativity. Poetics Today, 13 (4): Aspects of Metaphor and Comprehension, 705–724. doi: 10.2307/1773295
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1773295 [Google Scholar]
  45. (1998) Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes. CD-ROM: Elsevier.
  46. Sweetser, Eve & Marisa Sizemore
    (2008) Personal and interpersonal gesture spaces: Functional contrasts in language and gesture. In Andrea Tyler , Yiyoung Kim , Mari Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Cognitive and discourse approaches to language and language learning (pp.25–52). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Talmy, Leonard
    (1981) Force dynamics. Paper presented at theConference on Language and Mental Imagery. University of California, Berkeley.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Tom, Gail , Paul Pettersen , Teresa Lau , Trevor Burton , & Jim Cook
    (1991) The role of overt headmovement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 281–289. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1203_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1203_3 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wehling, Elisabeth
    (2010) Argument is gesture war: Function, form and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. (2012) When interlocutors get pushy: Communicative force in discourse management gestures. Presented at the11th Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language Conference, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. (2013) Discourse management gestures: Their pragmatic functions, primary metaphors, and force-dynamics. Presented at theGesture Pragmatics Symposium, University of California, Berkeley.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Wells, Gary & Richard Petty
    (1980) The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 219–230. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilkins, David
    (2003) Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in sociocultural and semiotic terms). In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp.171–215). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wolff, Phillip
    (2003) Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 47 (3), 276–332. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0285(03)00036‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00036-7 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh
Loading
Discourse management gestures
Gesture 16, 245 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): embodiment; force dynamics; gesture; pragmatics; primary metaphor; space-motion schemas

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error