Volume 18, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



For gesture research outside anthropology, the promise – and challenge – of anthropological method stems from one or more of its core commitments: its pursuit of human variation, both diachronic and synchronic; its insistence on naturalistic rather than experimental research design; and its integrative sensibility that situates human behavior in relation to an expansive sociocultural context. This essay reflects on this last sensibility. As we envision an anthropology of gesture and weigh its potential for gesture studies, we should pause and reflect on the fitful history of gesture in anthropology. As a parable for the present, I revisit a neglected anthropological voice from twentieth-century gesture research: Ray L. Birdwhistell, whose ambitious postwar science of kinesics teamed film-based microanalysis with American linguistic structuralism. At stake in Birdwhistell’s work was a problem that looms large here, that of how and at what cost a science of gesture can contextualize its object integratively.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agha, Asif
    (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateson, Gregory & Mead, Margaret
    (1942) Balinese character: A photographic analysis. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman, Richard
    (1983) Let your words be few: Symbolism of speaking and silence among seventeenth-century Quakers. Edited by Peter Burke & Ruth Finnegan . New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauman, Richard & Briggs, Charles L.
    (2003) Voices of modernity: Language ideologies and the politics of inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486647
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647 [Google Scholar]
  5. Birdwhistell, Ray L.
    (1952) Field methods and techniques: Body motion research and interviewing. Human Organization, 11 (1), 37–38. 10.17730/humo.11.1.9k22l626q55m4473
    https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.11.1.9k22l626q55m4473 [Google Scholar]
  6. (1955) Background to kinesics. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 13 (1), 10–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1956) Kinesic analysis of filmed behavior of children. In Bertram Schaffner (Ed.), Group processes: Transactions of the Second Conference. October 9, 10, 11, and 12, 1955, Princeton, N.J. (pp. 141–144). New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1963a) Research in the structure of group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Therapy, 13, 485–493.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Birdwhistell, R. L.
    (1963b) The use of audio-visual teaching aids. In Rexford S. Beckham , Gabriel Ward Lasker , Ethel M. Albert , Marie P. Beckham , & David Goodman Mandelbaum (Eds.), Resources for the teaching of anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Birdwhistell, Ray L.
    (1970) Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1977) Some discussion of ethnography, theory, and method. In Mary Catherine Bateson & John Brockman (Eds.), About Bateson: Essays on Gregory Bateson (pp. 103–141). New York: E.P. Dutton.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bloch, Maurice
    (2012) Anthropology and the cognitive challenge: New departures in anthropology. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139020008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139020008 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013) In and out of each otherʼs bodies: Theory of mind, evolution, truth, and the nature of the social. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Boas, Franz
    (1896) The limitations of the comparative method of anthropology. Science, 4 (103), 901–908. 10.1126/science.4.103.901
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.4.103.901 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bremmer, Jan N. & Roodenburg, Herman
    (1992) A cultural history of gesture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brookes, Heather
    (2001)  O clever ʻHeʼs streetwise.ʼ When gestures become quotable: The case of the clever gesture. Gesture, 1 (2), 167–184. 10.1075/gest.1.2.05bro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.05bro [Google Scholar]
  17. (2004) A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14 (2), 186–224. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186 [Google Scholar]
  18. Brookes, Heather J.
    (2011) Amangama amathathu ‘The three letters’: The emergence of a quotable gesture (emblem). Gesture, 11 (2), 194–218. 10.1075/gest.11.2.05bro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.2.05bro [Google Scholar]
  19. Candea, Matei
    (2018) Comparison in anthropology: The impossible method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108667609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667609 [Google Scholar]
  20. Carr, E. Summerson & Lempert, Michael
    (2016) Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life. Oakland: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520965430
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520965430 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cooperrider, K. , Slotta, J. , & Nunez, R.
    (2018) The preference for pointing with the hand is not universal. Cognitive Science, 42 (4), 1375–1390. 10.1111/cogs.12585
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12585 [Google Scholar]
  22. Covington-Ward, Yolanda
    (2016) Gesture and power: Religion, nationalism, and everyday performance in Congo. The religious cultures of African and African diaspora people. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Darnell, Regna
    (2015) The Franz Boas papers. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Davis, Martha
    (2001–2002) Film projectors as microscopes: Ray L. Birdwhistell & Microanalysis of Interaction (1955–1975). Visual Anthropology Review, 17 (2), 39–49. 10.1525/var.2001.17.2.39
    https://doi.org/10.1525/var.2001.17.2.39 [Google Scholar]
  25. Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles
    (Eds.) (1992) Rethinking context: Language as interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Duranti, Alessandro
    (1997) Linguistic anthropology. Edited by S. R. Anderson Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511810190
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810190 [Google Scholar]
  27. Efron, David
    (1941) Gesture and environment; a tentative study of some of the spatio-temporal and “linguistic” aspects of the gestural behavior of eastern Jews and southern Italians in New York city, living under similar as well as different environmental conditions. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ekman, Paul & Friessen, W.
    (1969) The repertoire of non-verbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98. 10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49 [Google Scholar]
  29. Erickson, Frederick
    (2004) Origins: A brief intellectual and technological history of the Emergence of Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In Philip LeVine & Ron Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 196–207). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (2011) Uses of video in social research: A brief history. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14 (3), 179–189. 10.1080/13645579.2011.563615
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.563615 [Google Scholar]
  31. Farnell, Brenda
    (2003) Birdwhistell, Hall, Lomax and the origins of visual anthropology. Visual Anthropology, 16 (1), 43–55
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gal, Susan & Irvine, Judith T.
    (2019) Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108649209
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649209 [Google Scholar]
  33. Geertz, Clifford
    (1984) Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Geoghegan, Bernard Dionysius
    (2017) The family as machine: Film, infrastructure, and cybernetic kinship in suburban America. Grey Room, 66, 70–101. 10.1162/GREY_a_00212
    https://doi.org/10.1162/GREY_a_00212 [Google Scholar]
  35. Goffman, Erving
    (1964) The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66 (6.2), 133–136. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090 [Google Scholar]
  36. Goodlett, Mary Moore & Lynch, Barbara
    (1979) Making entree to communication data through the (family) living room. Paper presented to theTwenty-ninth Annual Conference of The International Communication Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Goodwin, Charles
    (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96 (3), 606–633. 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gumperz, John J.
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  39. Handler, Richard
    (2009) Erving Goffman and the gestural dynamics of modern selfhood. In M. J. Braddick (Ed.), The politics of gesture: Historical perspectives (Past and Present, Supplement) (pp. 280–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hoenes del Pinal, Eric
    (2011) Towards an ideology of gesture: Gesture, body movement, and language ideology among Q’eqchi’-Maya Catholics. Anthropological Quarterly, 84 (3), 595–630. 10.1353/anq.2011.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2011.0041 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ingold, Tim
    (2008) Anthropology is not ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy, 154, 69–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Keane, Webb
    (2016) Ethical life: Its natural and social histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400873593
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873593 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kendon, Adam
    (1972) Review: Birdwhistell, Ray L. Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. The American Journal of Psychology, 85 (3), 441–455.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1988) How gestures can become like words. In Fernando Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto & Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (1990a) Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (1990b) Gesticulation, quotable gestures, and signs. In M. Moerman & M. Nomura (Eds.), Culture embodied (pp. 53–78). Osaka, Japan: National Museum of Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (1992) Some recent work from Italy on ‘quotable gestures’ (‘emblems’). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2, 92–108. 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.1.92
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.1.92 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kendon, Adam & Sigman, Stuart J.
    (1996) Ray L. Birdwhistell (1918–1994). Semiotica, 112 (3/4), 231–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kroeber, Alfred L.
    (1935) History and science in anthropology. American Anthropologist, 37 (4), 539–569. 10.1525/aa.1935.37.4.02a00020
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1935.37.4.02a00020 [Google Scholar]
  51. Landecker, Hannah
    (2006) Microcinematography and the history of science and film. Isis, 97 (1), 121–132. 10.1086/501105
    https://doi.org/10.1086/501105 [Google Scholar]
  52. Latour, Bruno
    (2005) Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy
    (1987) The social history of The natural history of an interview: A multidisciplinary investigation of social communication. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 20, 1–51. 10.1080/08351818709389274
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818709389274 [Google Scholar]
  54. (1989) Frieda Fromm-Reichmann and the natural history of an interview. In Ann-Louise S. Silver (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and psychosis (pp. 95–127). New York: International Universities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2010) The PENN tradition. In Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz (Ed.), The social history of language and social interaction research: People, places, ideas (pp. 235–270). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lempert, Michael
    (2014) Imitation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 379–395. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102313‑030008
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030008 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2017) Uncommon resemblance: pragmatic affinity in political gesture. Gesture, 16 (1), 35–67. 10.1075/gest.16.1.02lem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.02lem [Google Scholar]
  58. (2018) On the pragmatic poetry of pose: Gesture, parallelism, politics. Signs and Society, 6 (1), 120–146. 10.1086/695425
    https://doi.org/10.1086/695425 [Google Scholar]
  59. (2019) Fine-grained analysis: talk therapy, media, and the microscopic science of the face-to-face. Isis, 110 (1), 24–47. 10.1086/702914
    https://doi.org/10.1086/702914 [Google Scholar]
  60. Mauss, Marcel
    (1954 [1925]) The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (2007) The notion of body techniques. In Margaret M. Lock & Judith Farquhar (Eds.), Beyond the body proper: Reading the anthropology of material life (pp. 50–68). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. McDermott, Ray
    (1980) Profile: Ray L. Birdwhistell. The Kinesis Report: News and Views of Nonverbal Communication, 2 (3), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. McGranahan, Carole
    (2018) Ethnography beyond method: The importance of an ethnographic sensibility. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, 15 (1). 10.11157/sites‑id373
    https://doi.org/10.11157/sites-id373 [Google Scholar]
  64. McNeill, David
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  66. McQuown, Norman A.
    (Ed.) (1971) The natural history of an interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Murray, Stephen O.
    (1998) American sociolinguistics: Theorists and theory groups. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.86
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.86 [Google Scholar]
  68. Otto, Ton & Bubandt, Nils
    (Eds.) (2010) Experiments in holism theory and practice in contemporary anthropology. Chichester, West Sussex & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444324426
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426 [Google Scholar]
  69. Pike, Kenneth L.
    (1954) Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Vol.1 (Preliminary Edition). Glendale, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R.
    (1951) The comparative method in social anthropology. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 81 (1/2), 15–22. 10.2307/2844014
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2844014 [Google Scholar]
  71. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    (1983) Course in general linguistics. La Salle: Open Court.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Sayre, Nathan F.
    (2005) Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration. Progress in Human Geography, 29 (3), 276–290. 10.1191/0309132505ph546oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph546oa [Google Scholar]
  73. (2015) Scales and Polities. In Thomas Albert Perreault , Gavin Bridge , and James McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of political ecology (pp. 504–515). London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Scheflen, Albert E.
    (1973a) Communicational structure: Analysis of a psychotherapy transaction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. (1973b) How behavior means. New York: Gordon and Breach.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Schuler, Edgar A.
    (1944) V for Victory: A study in symbolic social control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 283–299.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Silverstein, Michael
    (1981) The limits of awareness. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. (1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz & Richard J. Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives (pp. 219–259). New York: Academic Press, Inc. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑491280‑9.50016‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-491280-9.50016-9 [Google Scholar]
  79. (1986) The diachrony of Sapir’s linguistic description; or, Sapir’s ‘cosmographical’ linguistics. In William Cowan , Michael K. Foster , & E. F. K. Koerner (Eds.), New perspectives in language, culture, and personality: Proceedings of the Edward Sapir Centenary Conference (Ottawa, 1–3 October 1984) (pp. 67–110). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sihols.41.06sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.41.06sil [Google Scholar]
  80. (1992) The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough?In Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 55–76). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.22.05sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.05sil [Google Scholar]
  81. (2004a) Boasian cosmographic anthropology and the sociocentric component of mind. In Richard Handler (Ed.), Significant others: Interpersonal and professional commitments in anthropology (pp. 131–157). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. (2004b) “Cultural” concepts and the language-culture nexus. Current Anthropology, 45 (5), 621–652. 10.1086/423971
    https://doi.org/10.1086/423971 [Google Scholar]
  83. (2006) How we look from where we stand. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 16 (2), 269–278. 10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.269
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.269 [Google Scholar]
  84. (2017) Forty years of speaking (of) the same (object) language – sans le savoir. Langage et société 2017 (2) (No.160–161), 93–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Stocking, George W.
    (1996) Volksgeist as method and ethic: Essays on Boasian ethnography and the German anthropological tradition. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Strathern, Marilyn
    (1995) The relation: Issues in complexity and scale, Vol.6. Cambridge: Prickly Pear Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. (2000) Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale. In Kate Flint & Howard Morphy (Eds.), Culture, landscape, and the environment: The Linacre Lectures 1997 (pp. 44–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Teßendorf, Sedinha
    (2014) Emblems, quotable gestures, or conventionalized body movements. In Cornelia Müller , Alan J. Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill , & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.2, pp. 82–100). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Watter, Seth Barry
    (2017) Scrutinizing: Film and the microanalysis of behavior. Grey Room, 66, 32–69. 10.1162/GREY_a_00211
    https://doi.org/10.1162/GREY_a_00211 [Google Scholar]
  90. (2020) Interaction chronograph: The administration of equilibrium. Grey Room, 79, 40–77. 10.1162/grey_a_00292
    https://doi.org/10.1162/grey_a_00292 [Google Scholar]
  91. Winkin, Yves
    (Ed.) (1988) Erving Goffman: Les moments et leurs hommes. Paris: Seuil/Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Wortham, Stanton
    (2001) Narratives in action. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anthropology; Birdwhistell; comparison; ethnography; history; kinesics; methodology; scale
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error