1887
Volume 19, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In most languages, individual words can be ambiguous between several different meanings, but through syntax and context the intended meaning of an ambiguous word usually becomes apparent. Many great ape gestures also have ambiguous meanings, which poses the problem of how individuals can interpret the signaller’s intended meaning in specific instances. We tested the effects of sequence compositionality and situational context (including behavioural and interpersonal contexts) in wild bonobos () at Wamba, DRCongo. We found no effect on a gesture’s meaning from its presence and position in sequence. However, two aspects of situational context did affect meaning: behaviour of the signaller immediately prior to gesturing, and relative age/sex of signaller and recipient. The intended meaning of ambiguous gestures was almost completely disambiguated by means of these aspects of context. Our findings suggest that the use of contextual information to interpret ambiguous signals predates the uniquely-human lineage and is not specific to language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.19028.gra
2021-09-28
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnold, Kate & Zuberbühler, Klaus
    (2008) Meaningful call combinations in a non-human primate. Current Biology, 18 (5), 202–203. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.040
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.040 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, Elizabeth
    (1976) Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruner, Jerome S.
    (1981) Intention in the structure of action and interaction. Advances in Infancy Research, 1, 41–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne, Richard W., Cartmill, Erica A., Genty, Emilie, Graham, Kirsty E., Hobaiter, Catherine, & Tanner, Joanne
    (2017) Great ape gestures: intentional communication with a rich set of innate signals. Animal Cognition, 20 (4), 755–769. 10.1007/s10071‑017‑1096‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1096-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Call, Josep & Tomasello, Michael
    (2007) The gestural communication of apes and monkeys. Manhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cäsar, Cristiane, Zuberbühler, Klaus, Young, Robert J., & Byrne, Richard W.
    (2013) Titi monkey call sequences vary with predator location and type. Biology Letters, 9, 20130535. 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0535
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0535 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clay, Zanna & Zuberbühler, Klaus
    (2009) Food-associated calling sequences in bonobos. Animal Behaviour, 77 (6), 1387–1396. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.016 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2011) Bonobos extract meaning from call sequences. PloS One, 6 (4), e18786. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018786
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018786 [Google Scholar]
  9. Corballis, Michael C.
    (2002) From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691221731
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691221731 [Google Scholar]
  10. Engesser, Sabrina, Crane, Jodie M. S., Savage, James L., Russell, Andrew F., & Townsend, Simon W.
    (2015) Experimental evidence for phonemic contrasts in a nonhuman vocal system. PLoS Biology, 13 (6), 1–16. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002171
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002171 [Google Scholar]
  11. Engesser, Sabrina, Ridley, Amanda R., & Townsend, Simon W.
    (2016) Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (21), 5976–5981. 10.1073/pnas.1600970113
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600970113 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitch, W. Tecumseh
    (2010) The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511817779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817779 [Google Scholar]
  13. Freeman, G. H., & Halton, John H.
    (1951) Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika, 38 (1/2), 141–149. 10.1093/biomet/38.1‑2.141
    https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.141 [Google Scholar]
  14. Furuichi, Takeshi
    (2011) Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. Evolutionary Anthropology, 20 (4), 131–142. 10.1002/evan.20308
    https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20308 [Google Scholar]
  15. Genty, Emilie & Byrne, Richard W.
    (2010) Why do gorillas make sequences of gestures?Animal Cognition, 13 (2), 287–301. 10.1007/s10071‑009‑0266‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0266-4 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodall, Jane
    (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Graham, Kirsty E., Furuichi, Takeshi, & Byrne, Richard W.
    (2017) The gestural repertoire of the wild bonobo (Pan paniscus): a mutually understood communication system. Animal Cognition, 20 (2), 171–177. 10.1007/s10071‑016‑1035‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1035-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Graham, Kirsty E., Hobaiter, Catherine, Ounsley, James, Furuichi, Takeshi, & Byrne, Richard W.
    (2018) Bonobo and chimpanzee gestures overlap extensively in meaning. PLoS Biology, 16 (2), e2004825. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004825
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004825 [Google Scholar]
  19. Halina, Marta, Rossano, Federico, & Tomasello, Michael
    (2013) The ontogenetic ritualization of bonobo gestures. Animal Cognition, 16 (4), 653–666. 10.1007/s10071‑013‑0601‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0601-7 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hashimoto, Chie
    (1997) Context and development of sexual behavior of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Zaire. International Journal of Primatology, 18 (1), 1–21. 10.1023/A:1026384922066
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026384922066 [Google Scholar]
  21. Herman, Louis M., Kuczaj, Stan A., & Holder, Mark D.
    (1993) Responses to anomalous gestural sequences by a language-trained dolphin: Evidence for processing of semantic relations and syntactic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122 (2), 184–194. 10.1037/0096‑3445.122.2.184
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.2.184 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hobaiter, Catherine & Byrne, Richard W.
    (2011) Serial gesturing by wild chimpanzees: its nature and function for communication. Animal Cognition, 14 (6), 827–838. 10.1007/s10071‑011‑0416‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0416-3 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2014) The meanings of chimpanzee gestures. Current Biology, 24 (14), 1–5. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.066
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.066 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2017) What is a gesture? A meaning-based approach to defining gestural repertoires. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 82, 3–12. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jansen, David A., Cant, Michael A., & Manser, Marta B.
    (2013) Segmental concatenation of individual signatures and context cues in banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) close calls. BMC Biology, 10 (97).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Liebal, Katja, Call, Josep, & Tomasello, Michael
    (2004) Use of gesture sequences in chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 64, 377–396. 10.1002/ajp.20087
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20087 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mehta, Cyrus R. & Patel, Nitin R.
    (1983) A network algorithm for performing Fisher exact test in r X c contingency-tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78 (382), 427–434.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Moore, Richard
    (2016) Meaning and ostension in great ape gestural communication. Animal Cognition, 19, 223–231. 10.1007/s10071‑015‑0905‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0905-x [Google Scholar]
  29. Pepperberg, Irene M.
    (1999) The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pika, Simone, Liebal, Katja, & Tomasello, Michael
    (2005) Gestural communication in subadult bonobos (Pan paniscus): repertoire and use. American Journal of Primatology, 65 (1), 39–61. 10.1002/ajp.20096
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20096 [Google Scholar]
  31. Plooij, Frans X.
    (1978) Some basic traits of language in wild chimpanzees?InA. Lock. (Ed.), Action gesture and symbol (pp.111–131). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pollick, Amy S. & de Waal, Frans B. M.
    (2007) Ape gestures and language evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (19), 8184–8189. 10.1073/pnas.0702624104
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702624104 [Google Scholar]
  33. Progovac, Ljiljana
    (2015) Evolutionary syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736547.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736547.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rodd, Jenifer, Gaskell, Gareth, & Marslen-Wilson, William
    (2002) Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46 (2), 245–266. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2810 [Google Scholar]
  35. Savage-Rumbaugh, E. Sue, Murphy, Jeannine, Sevcik, Rose A., Brakke, Karen E., Williams, Shelly L., & Rumbaugh, Duane M.
    (1993) Language comprehension in ape and child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (3/4), 1–222. 10.2307/1166068
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1166068 [Google Scholar]
  36. Scott, Nicole M.
    (2013) Gesture use by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Differences between sexes in inter-and intra-sexual interactions. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 555–567. 10.1002/ajp.22133
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22133 [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith, W. John
    (1965) Message, meaning, and context in ethology. The American Naturalist, 99 (908), 405–409. 10.1086/282382
    https://doi.org/10.1086/282382 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tabossi, Patrizia & Zardon, Francesco
    (1993) Processing ambiguous words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 32 (3), 359–372. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1019
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1019 [Google Scholar]
  39. Townsend, Simon W., Koski, Sonja E., Byrne, Richard W., Slocombe, Katie E., Bickel, Balthasar, Boeckle, Markus, Braga Goncalves, Ines, Burkart, Judith M., Flower, Tom, Gaunet, Florence, Glock, Hans Johann, Gruber, Thibaud, Jansen, David A. W. A. M., Liebal, Katja, Linke, Angelika, Miklósi, Ádám, Moore, Richard, Schaik, Carel P., Stoll, Sabine, Vail, Alex, Waller, Bridget M., Wild, Markus, Zuberbühler, Klaus, & Manser, Marta B.
    (2017) Exorcising Grice’s ghost: an empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals. Biological Reviews, 92 (3), 1427–1433. 10.1111/brv.12289
    https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12289 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.19028.gra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.19028.gra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bonobo; context; gesture; meaning; syntax
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error