1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Gesture
  4. Volume 20, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper discusses how a particular type of recurrent gesture, the holding away gesture, highlights and structures spoken utterances in German and Savosavo, a Papuan language spoken in Solomon Islands in the Southwest Pacific. In particular, the paper poses the following questions: What kinds of discursive functions of this gesture are observable in these speech communities? How do they map onto the two speech communities? Are there cross-linguistic similarities and differences detectable? What motivates similarity and variation across speech communities? Utilizing Fraser’s (1999) pragmatic classification of discourse markers, it is shown that the holding away gesture shows the connection of topics and messages. For both languages, we explore the functional diversity of the gesture. Some functions are found in both data sets, though the proportions differ, while others are exclusively found in one or the other. Finally, we discuss how differences in discourse type and interactional setting may facilitate specific forms and uses of the holding away gesture.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.19041.bre
2022-05-30
2025-04-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/gest.19041.bre
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blakemore, D.
    (2004) Discourse markers. InL. R. Horn & G. L. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 221–240). Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Blühdorn, H.
    (2017) Diskursmarker: Pragmatische Funktion und syntaktischer Status. InH. Blühdorn, A. Deppermann, H. Helmer, & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und Analysen (pp. 311–336). Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Blühdorn, H., Deppermann, A., Helmer, H., & Spranz-Fogasy, T.
    (2017) Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und Analysen. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blühdorn, H., Foolen, A., & Loureda, Ó.
    (2017) Diskursmarker: Begriffsgeschichte – Theorie – Beschreibung. Ein bibliographischer Überblick. InH. Blühdorn, A. Deppermann, H. Helmer, & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und Analysen (pp. 7–48). Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bordería, S. P.
    (2006) A functional approach to the study of discourse markers. InK. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 77–100). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C.
    (2013) Linguistic annotation system for gestures (LASG). InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1098–1125). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bressem, J. & Müller, C.
    (2014a) A repertoire of recurrent gestures of German. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. (2014b) The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110302028.1592
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1592 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2017) The “Negative-Assessment-Construction”–A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture?Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1). 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑0053
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bressem, J., Stein, N., & Wegener, C.
    (2015) Structuring and highlighting speech – Discursive functions of holding away gestures in Savosavo. Paper presented at theGESPIN 4, Nantes.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. (2017) Multimodal language use in Savosavo. Refusing, excluding and negating with speech and gesture. Pragmatics, 27 (2), 173–206.   10.1075/prag.27.2.01bre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.2.01bre [Google Scholar]
  12. Brookes, H.
    (2004) A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14 (2), 186–224. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186
     https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bühler, K.
    (1934) Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Calbris, G.
    (1990) The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. (2003) From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis. Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3 (1), 19–46. 10.1075/gest.3.1.03cal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.3.1.03cal [Google Scholar]
  16. (2011) Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2013) Elements of meaning in gesture: The analogical links. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 658–674). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261318.658
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.658 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cooperrider, K.
    (2019) Universals and diversity in gesture. Research past, present, and future. Gesture, 18 (2/3), 209–238. 10.1075/gest.19011.coo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19011.coo [Google Scholar]
  19. Cooperrider, K., Abner, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2018) The palm-up puzzle: meanings and origins of a widespread form in gesture and sign. Frontiers in Communication, 3, 23. 10.3389/fcomm.2018.00023
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00023 [Google Scholar]
  20. Diewald, G.
    (2007) Abtönungspartikel. InL. Hoffmann (Ed.), Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten (pp. 117–142). Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (2015) Modal particles in different communicative types. Constructions and Frames, 7 (2), 218–257. 10.1075/cf.7.2.03die
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.7.2.03die [Google Scholar]
  22. Duboisdindien, G., Grandin, C., Boutet, D., & Lacheret-Dujour, A.
    (2019) A multimodal corpus to check on pragmatic competence for Mild Cognitive Impaired aging people. Corpus (19).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Efron, D.
    (1941/1972) Gesture, race, and culture. Paris & The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V.
    (1969) The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98. 10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fischer, K.
    (2006) Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. InK. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 427–447). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1163/9780080461588_023
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_023 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fraser, B.
    (1999) What are discourse markers?Journal of Pragmatics, 31 (7), 931–952. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00101‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2006) Towards a theory of discourse markers. InK. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 189–204). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (2009a) An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics, 1 (2), 293–320. 10.1163/187730909X12538045489818
     https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489818 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2009b) Topic orientation markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (5), 892–898. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  30. Fricke, E., Bressem, J., & Müller, C.
    (2014) Gesture families and gesture fields. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1630–1640). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Harrison, S.
    (2009) Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. PhD Thesis, Université Michel de Montaigne, Bordeaux3.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. (2018) The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108265065
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108265065 [Google Scholar]
  33. Helbig, G.
    (1988) Lexikon deutscher Partikeln. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Inbar, A. & Shor, L.
    (2019) Covert negation in Israeli Hebrew: Evidence from co-speech gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 85–95. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kendon, A.
    (1972) Some relationship between body motion and speech. InA. Seigman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–216). New York: Pergamon Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑015867‑9.50013‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7 [Google Scholar]
  36. (1983) Gesture and speech: how they interact. InJ. M. Wiemann (Ed.), Nonverbal interaction (pp. 13–46). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. (1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
  38. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2017) Reflections on the “gesture-first” hypothesis of language origins. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24 (1), 163–170. 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1117‑3
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1117-3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ladewig, S. H.
    (2011) Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6. 10.4000/cognitextes.406
     https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.406 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2014a) Recurrent gestures. InC. Müller, E. Fricke, A. Cienki, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. (2014b) The cyclic gesture. InC. Müller, E. Fricke, A. Cienki, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1605–1618). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lempert, M.
    (2011) Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11 (3), 241–270. 10.1075/gest.11.3.01lem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.01lem [Google Scholar]
  44. (2017) Uncommon resemblance: Pragmatic affinity in political gesture. Gesture, 16 (1), 35–67. 10.1075/gest.16.1.02lem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.02lem [Google Scholar]
  45. Loehr, D.
    (2004) Gesture and intonation. PhD Thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Lopez-Ozieblo, R.
    (2020) Proposing a revised functional classification of pragmatic gestures. Lingua, 102870. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102870
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102870 [Google Scholar]
  47. McClave, E. Z.
    (1991) Intonation and gesture. PhD Thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. (1994) Gestural beats: The rhythm hypothesis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23 (1), 45–66. 10.1007/BF02143175
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143175 [Google Scholar]
  49. McCullough, K. E.
    (2005) Using gestures during speaking: Self-generating indexical fields. Ann Arbor, MI: U.M.I.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. McNeill, D. & Levy, E. T.
    (1982) Conceptual representations in language activity and gesture. InJ. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, slace, and action. Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 271–295). Chichester: John Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. (1993) Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes, 16 (4), 363–386. 10.1080/01638539309544845
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544845 [Google Scholar]
  54. McNeill, D., Levy, E. T., & Duncan, S. D.
    (2015) Gesture in discourse. InDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, & Deborah Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 262–289). Chichester: John Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Mittelberg, I.
    (2006) Metaphor and metonymy in language and gesture: Discoursive evidence for multimodal models of grammar. Ann Arbor, MI: U.M.I.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. (2010) Interne und externe Metonymie: Jakobsonsche Kontiguitätsbeziehungen in redebegleitenden Gesten. Sprache und Literatur, 41 (105), 112–143. 10.1163/25890859‑041‑01‑90000007
     https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000007 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mittelberg, I. & Waugh, L. R.
    (2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–356). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Müller, C.
    (1998) Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin-Verlag Spitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. (2004) Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family?InC. Müller & R. Posner (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Weidler Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. (2010) Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive. Sprache und Literatur, 41 (1), 37–68. 10.1163/25890859‑041‑01‑90000004
     https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000004 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2014) The Ring across space and time: Variation and stability of forms and meanings. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1511–1522). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. (2017) How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16 (2), 276–303.   10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul [Google Scholar]
  63. (2018) Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1651. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 [Google Scholar]
  64. Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H.
    (2013) Towards a grammar of gesture: A form-based view. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 707–733). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261318.707
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.707 [Google Scholar]
  65. Müller, C. & Speckmann, G.
    (2002) Gestos con una valoración negativa en la conversación cubana. DeSignis, 3, 91–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Payrató, L. & Teßendorf, S.
    (2014) Pragmatic gestures. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1531–1540). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Posner, R.
    (2003) Everyday gestures as a result of ritualization. InM. Rector, I. Poggi, & N. Trigo (Eds.), Everyday gestures: Meaning and use. (pp. 217–230). Porto: Fernando Pessoa Univ. Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Quintilian
    Quintilian (1993) The institution oratoria. Vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Redeker, G.
    (1991) Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29 (6), 1139–1172.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. (2006) Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions. InK. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (Vol. 1, pp. 339–358). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Schiffrin, D.
    (1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  72. Schoonjans, S.
    (2018) Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110566260
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110566260 [Google Scholar]
  73. Streeck, J.
    (2005) Pragmatic aspects of gesture. InJ. Mey (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics (pp.275–299). Oxford: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. (2008) Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (2), 154–186. 10.1080/08351810802028662
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028662 [Google Scholar]
  75. (2009) Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  76. Teßendorf, S.
    (2014) Pragmatic and metaphoric gestures– combining functional with cognitive approaches in the analysis of the “brushing aside gesture”. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1540–1558). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110302028.1540
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1540 [Google Scholar]
  77. (2016) Actions as sources for gestures. InK. Jungbluth & M. Fernández-Villanueva (Eds.), Beyond language boundaries. Multimodal use in multilingual contexts. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458817‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458817-003 [Google Scholar]
  78. Thurmair, M.
    (1989) Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783111354569
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111354569 [Google Scholar]
  79. Wegener, C.
    (2012) A grammar of Savosavo. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110289657
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110289657 [Google Scholar]
  80. Wehling, E.
    (2018) Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16 (2), 245–276. 10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh [Google Scholar]
  81. Weydt, H.
    (1979) Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110863574
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110863574 [Google Scholar]
  82. (1989) Sprechen mit Partikeln. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.19041.bre
Loading
Handling talk
Gesture 20, 219 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19041.bre
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.19041.bre
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.19041.bre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse; gesture; negation; particles; typology

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error