1887
Volume 19, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper revives an interest in a gestural phenomenon: silence gestures, that is, cases where speakers suspend talk and produce a gesture in momentary silence. Earlier research noted this phenomenon, but largely left interactional details unaddressed. Consequently, we have known of the phenomenon for a long time, but known very little about how interactants use it. This study applies conversation analysis to elucidate silence gestures as they appear during naturally occurring Danish interaction. Two classes are considered: i) silence gestures that occur during word search processes and ii) ‘no-problem’ silence gestures. Analysis of the first class offers more nuances to previous assumptions about its affiliation with process difficulties and turn-taking dynamics. Analysis of the second class disconfirms the belief that silence gestures foremost relate to speech difficulties. It reveals that speakers actively postpone or suspend speech production to achieve a turn-intra pauses, which enables them to momentarily foreground the gestural act.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20022.bec
2021-09-28
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aijmer, K.
    (1989) Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 12 (2), 137–154. doi:  10.1017/S033258650000202X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S033258650000202X [Google Scholar]
  2. Beattie, G.
    (1977) The dynamics of interruption and the filled pause. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 16 (3), 283–284. doi:  10.1111/j.2044‑8260.1977.tb00230.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1977.tb00230.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Beattie, G. & Aboudan, R.
    (1994) Gestures, pauses and speech: An experimental investigation of the effects of changing social context on their precise temporal relationship. Semiotica, 99 (3/4), 1–40. doi:  10.1515/semi.1994.99.3‑4.239
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1994.99.3-4.239 [Google Scholar]
  4. Butterworth, B. & Beattie, G.
    (1978) Gesture and silence as indicators of planning in speech. InR. Campell & P. T. Smith. (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language: Formal and experimental approaches (pp.347–360). New York: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑4684‑2532‑1_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2532-1_19 [Google Scholar]
  5. Butterworth, B., & Hadar, U.
    (1989) Gesture, speech, and computational stages: A reply to McNeill. Psychological Review, 96 (1), 168–174. doi:  10.1037/0033‑295X.96.1.168
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.168 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clayman, S. E.
    (2012) Turn-constructional units and the transition-relevance place. InJack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers. (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp.150–166). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooperrider, K.
    (2017) Foreground gesture, background gesture. Gesture, 16 (2), 176–202. 10.1075/gest.16.2.02coo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.02coo [Google Scholar]
  8. Depperman, A.
    (2013) Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 91–121. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Drew, P. & Heritage, J.
    (1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. InP. Drew & J. Heritage. (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp.3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerwin, J. & Dalby, A. M. L.
    (2014) Gestures convey content: An exploration of the semantic functions of physicians’ gestures. Patient Education and Counselling, 96, 308–314. 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.014 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, E.
    (1978) Response cries. Language, 54 (4), 787–815. 10.2307/413235
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413235 [Google Scholar]
  12. (1986) Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodwin, C.
    (2017) Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139016735
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayashi, M.
    (2003) Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.12 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heath, C. & Luff, P.
    (2012) Gesture and institutional interaction. InJ. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron. (Eds), Embodied interaction: Language and the body in the material world (pp.276–288). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Heritage, J.
    (2013) Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of pragmatics, 57, 331–337. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2015) Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of pragmatics, 88, 88–104. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. InG. H. Lerner. (Ed), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13–23). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J.
    (2015) How listeners use facial expression to shift the emotional stance of the speaker’s utterance. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (3), 319–334. 10.1080/08351813.2015.1058607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058607 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2017) Pragmatic functions of gestures. Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture, 16 (2), 157–176. 10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken [Google Scholar]
  22. Kita, S.
    (2000) How representational gestures help speaking. InD. McNeill. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lerner, G. H.
    (1996) On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. InE. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson. (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp.238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
  24. Levinson, S. C. & Torreira, F.
    (2015) Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731 [Google Scholar]
  25. Local, J. & Kelly, J.
    (1986) Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9 (2/3), 185–204. 10.1007/BF00148126
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148126 [Google Scholar]
  26. Manrique, E. & Enfield, N. J.
    (2015) Suspending the next turn as a form of repair initiation: Evidence from Argentine Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1326. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326 [Google Scholar]
  27. McNeill, D.
    (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92 (3), 350–371. doi:  10.1037/0033‑295X.92.3.350
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 [Google Scholar]
  28. (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:  10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2006) Gesture: A psycholinguistic approach. InE. Brown & A. Anderson (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp.58–66). Boston: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00798‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00798-7 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mondada, L.
    (2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9 (2), 194–225. doi:  10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2019) Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mondada, L. & Oloff, F.
    (2011) Gestures in overlap: The situated establishment of speakership. InG. Stam & M. Ishino. (Eds.), Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp.321–338). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.4.29mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.4.29mon [Google Scholar]
  34. Mortensen, K.
    (2009) Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes, 46 (5), 491–515. 10.1080/01638530902959463
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959463 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nevile, M.
    (2015) The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (2), 121–151. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nobe, S.
    (2000) Where do most spontaneous representational gestures actually occur with respect to speech?InD. McNeill. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.186–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.012 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ogden, R.
    (2001) Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 31 (1), 139–152. 10.1017/S0025100301001116
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100301001116 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pouw, W. & Dixon, J. A.
    (2019) Entrainment and modulation of gesture–speech synchrony under delayed auditory feedback. Cognitive Science, 43 (3). doi:  10.1111/cogs.12721
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12721 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rossano, F.
    (2012) Gaze in conversation. In: J. Sidnell & T. Stivers. (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp.308–329). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch15
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch15 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. A.
    (2001) Home position. Gesture, 2 (2), 133–146. 10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac [Google Scholar]
  42. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735. doi:  10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage. (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp.266–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97 (5), 1295–1345. 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  45. Selting, M.
    (2000) The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 29 (4), 477–517. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500004012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004012 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sikveland, R. O. & Ogden, R.
    (2012) Holding gestures across turns: Moments to generate shared understanding. Gesture, 12 (2), 166–199. 10.1075/gest.12.2.03sik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.2.03sik [Google Scholar]
  47. Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J., Yoon, K. -E., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (26), 10587–10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stivers, T. & Sidnell, J.
    (2005) Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 156, 1–20. doi:  10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1 [Google Scholar]
  49. Streeck, J.
    (2009a) Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46 (2/3), 161–179. 10.1080/01638530902728793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2009b) Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stukenbrock, A.
    (2014) Pointing to an ʻempty’ space: Deixis am Phantasma in face-to-face interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 70–93. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20022.bec
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conversation analysis; gesture; multimodality; silence; turn-taking
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error