1887
Volume 21, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

A consolidated tendency considers ‘gestures’ and ‘signs’ as distinct categories separated by a ‘cataclysmic break’. According to a different approach, gestures and signs have their common origin in actions, and are considered as part of language. The aim of this study was to compare the productions of preschool speaking hearing children and signing deaf children in response to the same visual stimuli. The execution parameters and representational strategies observed in gestures and signs were analyzed using the same coding. The results showed that hearing children exposed to Italian and deaf children exposed to Italian Sign Language are consistent in their productions of gestures and signs, respectively. Furthermore, the hearing children’s gestures and the deaf children’s signs for some items were produced with the same parameters and according to similar representational strategies. This indicates that these two forms of communication are not separate behaviors, but should rather be considered as a continuum.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20030.cap
2023-04-21
2024-02-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barca, Laura, & Pezzulo, Giovanni
    (2017) The influence of communication mode on written language processing and beyond. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, 17–18. 10.1017/S0140525X15002824
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002824 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsalou, Lawrence W.
    (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (4), 577–660. 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, Elizabeth, Benigni, Laura, Bretherton, Inge, Camaioni, Luigia, & Volterra, Virginia
    (1979) The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑081540‑1.50006‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-081540-1.50006-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bello, Arianna, Caselli, Maria Cristina, Pettenati, Paola, & Stefanini, Silvia
    (2010) PinG. Parole in gioco. Una prova di comprensione e produzione lessicale per la prima infanzia. Firenze, Italy: Giunti OS Organizzazioni Speciali.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bello, Arianna, Giannantoni, Patrizia, Pettenati, Paola, Stefanini, Silvia, & Caselli, Maria Cristina
    (2012) Assessing lexicon: Validation and developmental data of the Picture Naming Game (PiNG), a new picture naming task for toddlers. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47 (5), 589–602. 10.1111/j.1460‑6984.2012.00168.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00168.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Bello, Arianna, Stefanini, Silvia, Rinaldi, Pasquale, Onofrio, Daniela, Volterra, Virginia
    (2020) Gestural symbolic strategies in children with Down syndrome. Gesture, 19 (2/3), 300–335. 10.1075/gest.20002.bel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.20002.bel [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyes-Braem, Penny
    (1981) Significant features of the handshape in American Sign Language. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brentari, Diane, Di Renzo, Alessio, Keane, Jonathan, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2015) Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7 (1), 95–123. 10.1111/tops.12123
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12123 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bressem, Jana
    (2013) A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. InCornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.11, pp.1079–1098). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261318.1079
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.1079 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruner, Jerome Seymor
    (1974) From communication to language – A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3 (3), 255–287. 10.1016/0010‑0277(74)90012‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(74)90012-2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Capirci, Olga, Iverson, Jana M., Montanari, Sandro, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2002) Gestural, signed and spoken modalities in early language development: The role of linguistic input. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 5 (1), 25–37. 10.1017/S1366728902000123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902000123 [Google Scholar]
  12. Capirci, Olga, Contaldo, Annarita, Caselli, Maria Cristina, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2005) From action to language through gesture: A longitudinal perspective. Gesture, 5 (1/2), 155–177. 10.1075/gest.5.1‑2.12cap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.5.1-2.12cap [Google Scholar]
  13. Capirci, Olga & Volterra, Virginia
    (2008) Gesture and speech: The emergence and development of a strong and changing partnership. Gesture, 8 (1), 22–44. 10.1075/gest.8.1.04cap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.1.04cap [Google Scholar]
  14. Capirci, Olga, Cristilli, Carla, De Angelis, Valerio, Graziano, Maria
    (2011) Learning to use gesture in narratives: Developmental trends in formal and semantic gesture competence. InGale Stam & Mika Ishino (Eds.), Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp.189–200). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.4.16cap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.4.16cap [Google Scholar]
  15. Caselli, Maria Cristina
    (1990) Communicative gestures and first words. InVirginia Volterra & C. J. Erting (Eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children (pp.56–67). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑74859‑2_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74859-2_6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Caselli, Maria Cristina, Pasqualetti, Patrizio, & Stefanini, Silvia
    (2007) Parole e frasi nel “Primo vocabolario del bambino”. Nuovi dati normativi fra i 18 e 36 mesi e forma breve del questionario. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cattani, Allegra, Floccia, Caroline, Kidd, Evan, Pettenati, Paola, Onofrio, Daniela, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2019) Gestures and words in naming: Evidence from crosslinguistic and crosscultural comparison. Language Learning, 69 (3), 709–746. 10.1111/lang.12346
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12346 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chu, Mingyuan & Kita, Sotaro
    (2016) Co-thought and co-speech gestures are generated by the same action generation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42 (2), 257–270. 10.1037/xlm0000168
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000168 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cuxac, Christian & Sallandre, Marie-Anne
    (2007) Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. InElena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea, & Raffaele Simone (Eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies (pp.13–33). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CitetononCRdoi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4884.8483
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4884.8483 [Google Scholar]
  20. De Ruiter, Jan Peter
    (2000) The production of gesture and speech. InDavid McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.284–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.018 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibson, James Jerome
    (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Giezen, Marcel R., Costello, Brendan, & Carreiras, Manuel
    (2017) Why space is not one-dimensional: Location may be categorical and imagistic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, e56. 10.1017/S0140525X15002915
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002915 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Singer, Melissa A.
    (2003) From children’s hands to adults’ ears: Gesture’s role in the learning process. Developmental Psychology, 39 (3), 509–520. 10.1037/0012‑1649.39.3.509
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.509 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Brentari, Diane
    (2017) Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, e46. 10.1017/S0140525X15001247
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001247 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hockett, Charles F.
    (1960) The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203 (3), 88–97. 10.1038/scientificamerican0960‑88
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hostetter, Autumn B. & Alibali, Martha W.
    (2008) Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (3), 495–514. 10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hwang, So-One, Tomita, Nozomi, Morgan, Hope, Ergin, Rabia, İlkbaşaran, Deniz, Seegers, Sharon, & Padden, Carol
    (2017) Of the body and the hands: Patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and Cognition, 9 (4), 573–602. 10.1017/langcog.2016.28
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.28 [Google Scholar]
  28. Iverson, Jana M., Capirci, Olga, & Caselli, Maria Cristina
    (1994) From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development, 9 (1), 23–43. 10.1016/0885‑2014(94)90018‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(94)90018-3 [Google Scholar]
  29. Iverson, Jana M., Capirci, Olga, Volterra, Virginia, & Goldin-Meadow, Susan
    (2008) Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication in Italian vs. American children. First Language, 28 (2), 164–181. 10.1177/0142723707087736
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723707087736 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kendon, Adam
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2013) History of the study of gesture. Keith Allan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics (pp.71–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0004 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2014) Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1651), 20130293. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0293
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2016) Gesture and sign: Utterance uses of visible bodily action. InKeith Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp.33–46). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2017) Languages as semiotically heterogenous systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, e59. 10.1017/S0140525X15002940
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002940 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kita, Sotaro & Özyürek, Aslı
    (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48 (1), 16–32. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
  36. Krauss, Robert M., Chen, Yihsiu, & Gottesman, Rebecca F.
    (2000) Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. InDavid McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.261–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.017 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kusters, Annalies & Sahasrabudhe, Sujit
    (2018) Language ideologies on the difference between gesture and sign. Language & Communication, 601, 44–63. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lepic, Rian & Occhino, Corrine
    (2018) A construction morphology approach to sign language analysis. InGert Booij (Ed.), The construction of words. Advances in Construction Morphology (pp.141–172). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑74394‑3_6. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  39. Liebal, Katja
    (2017) What is a gesture? A lesson from comparative gesture research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, e62. 10.1017/S0140525X15002976
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002976 [Google Scholar]
  40. Marentette, Paula, Pettenati, Paola, Bello, Arianna, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2016) Gesture and symbolic representation in Italian and English-speaking Canadian 2-year-olds. Child Development, 87 (3), 944–961. 10.1111/cdev.12523
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12523 [Google Scholar]
  41. Masson-Carro, Ingrid, Goudbeek, Martijin, & Krahmer, Emiel
    (2016) Can you handle this? The impact of object affordances on how co-speech gestures are produced. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31 (3), 430–440. 10.1080/23273798.2015.1108448
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1108448 [Google Scholar]
  42. McNeill, David
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.2307/1576015
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1576015 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2000) Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  45. McNeill, David & Duncan, Susan D.
    (2000) Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. InDavid McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.010 [Google Scholar]
  46. Müller, Cornelia
    (1998) Iconicity and gesture. InSerge Santi (Ed.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale, interaction (pp.321–328). Paris: Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2017) How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 161, 278–306. 10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul [Google Scholar]
  48. (2018) Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?Frontiers in Psychology, 91, 1651. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 [Google Scholar]
  49. Müller, Cornelia, Cienki, Alan J., Fricke, Ellen, Ladewig, Silvia H., McNeill, David, & Teßendorf, S.
    (Eds.) (2013) Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.11). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Nyst, Victoria
    (2016) The depiction of size and shape in gestures accompanying object descriptions in Anyi (Côte d’Ivoire) and in Dutch (The Netherlands). Gesture, 15 (2), 156–191. 10.1075/gest.15.2.02nys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.2.02nys [Google Scholar]
  51. Occhino, Corrine & Wilcox, Sherman
    (2017) Gesture or sign? A categorization problem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, e66. 10.1017/S0140525X15003015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15003015 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ortega, Gerardo, Sümer, Beyza, & Özyürek, Aslı
    (2017) Type of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children, Developmental Psychology, 53 (1), 89–99. 10.1037/dev0000161
    https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000161 [Google Scholar]
  53. Ortega, Gerardo & Özyürek, Aslı
    (2019a) Systematic mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of silent gesture. Behavior Research Methods, 52 (1), 51–67. 10.3758/s13428‑019‑01204‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01204-6 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2019b) Types of iconicity and combinatorial strategies distinguish semantic categories in silent gesture across cultures. Language and Cognition, 12 (1), 84–113. 10.1017/langcog.2019.28
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.28 [Google Scholar]
  55. Ortega, Gerardo, Schiefner, Annika, & Özyürek, Aslı
    (2019) Hearing non-signers use their gestures to predict iconic form-meaning mappings at first exposure to signs. Cognition, 1911, 103996. 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  56. Padden, Carol, Hwang, So-One, Lepic, Ryan, & Seegers, Sharon
    (2015) Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in sign language nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7 (1), 81–94. 10.1111/tops.12121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12121 [Google Scholar]
  57. Padden, Carol A., Meir, Irit, Hwang, So-One, Lepic, Ryan, Seegers, Sharon, & Sampson, Tory
    (2013) Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture, 13 (3), 287–308. 10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad [Google Scholar]
  58. Perniss, Pamela & Vigliocco, Gabriella
    (2014) The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1651), 20130300. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0300
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0300 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pettenati, Paola, Stefanini, Silvia, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2010) Motoric characteristics of representational gestures produced by young children in a naming task. Journal of Child Language, 37 (4), 887–911. 10.1017/S0305000909990092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990092 [Google Scholar]
  60. Pettenati, Paola, Sekine, Kazuki, Congestrì, Elena, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2012) A comparative study on representational gestures in Italian and Japanese children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36 (2), 149–164. 10.1007/s10919‑011‑0127‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0127-0 [Google Scholar]
  61. Rinaldi, Pasquale, Caselli, Maria Cristina, Di Renzo, Alessio, Gulli, Tiziana, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2014) Sign vocabulary in deaf toddlers exposed to sign language since birth. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19 (3), 303–318. 10.1093/deafed/enu007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enu007 [Google Scholar]
  62. Singleton, Jenny L., Goldin-Meadow, Susan, & McNeill, David
    (1995) The cataclysmic break between gesticulation and sign: Evidence against a unified continuum of gestural communication. InKaren Emmorey & Judy Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space (pp.287–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Sparaci, Laura & Volterra, Virginia
    (2017) Hands shaping communication: From gestures to signs. InMarta Bertolaso & Nicola Di Stefano (Eds.), The hand (pp.29–54). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑66881‑9_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66881-9_3 [Google Scholar]
  64. Stefanini, Silvia, Bello, Arianna, Caselli, Maria Cristina, Iverson, Jana M., & Volterra, Virginia
    (2009) Co-speech gestures in a naming task: Developmental data. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 168–189. 10.1080/01690960802187755
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802187755 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stokoe, William C.
    (1960) Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, 81, 1–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2017) Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139149341
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139149341 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Boyes-Braem, Penny
    (2013) Comparing the products and the processes of creating sign language poetry and pantomimic improvisations. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37 (4), 245–280. 10.1007/s10919‑013‑0160‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0160-2 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tomasuolo, Elena, Bonsignori, Chiara, Rinaldi, Pasquale, & Volterra, Virginia
    (2020) The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognitive Linguistics, 31 (1), 1–36. 10.1515/cog‑2018‑0131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0131 [Google Scholar]
  69. Trevarthen, Colwyn
    (1977) Descriptive analyses of infant communicative behaviour. InH. R. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction (pp.227–270). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. van Nispen, Karin, van de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke, & Krahmer, Emiel
    (2017) Production and comprehension of pantomimes used to depict objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 1095. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01095
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01095 [Google Scholar]
  71. Volterra, Virginia
    (1981) Gestures, signs, & words at two years: When does communication become language?Sign Language Studies, (33), 351–362. 10.1353/sls.1981.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1981.0006 [Google Scholar]
  72. Volterra, Virginia & Caselli, Maria Cristina
    (1985) From gestures and vocalizations to signs and words. InWilliam Stokoe & Virginia Volterra (Eds.), SLR, 83: Proceedings of the III. International Symposium on Sign Languag Research, Rome, June 22–26 (pp.1–9). Silver Spring, MD: Linstock Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Volterra, Virginia & Erting, Carol
    (Eds.) (1990) From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑74859‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74859-2 [Google Scholar]
  74. Volterra, Virginia, Iverson, Jana M., & Castrataro, Marianna
    (2006) The development of gesture in hearing and deaf children. InB. Shick, M. Marschark, & P. Spencer (Eds.), Advances in the sign language development of deaf children (pp.46–70). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195180947.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195180947.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  75. Volterra, Virginia, Capirci, Olga, Caselli, Maria Cristina, Rinaldi, Pasquale, & Sparaci, Laura
    (2017) Developmental evidence for continuity from action to gesture to sign/word. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 8 (1), 13–41. 10.1075/lia.8.1.02vol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.02vol [Google Scholar]
  76. Volterra, Virginia, Capirci, Olga, Rinaldi, Pasquale, & Sparaci, Laura
    (2018) From action to spoken and signed language through gesture: Some basic developmental issues for a discussion on the evolution of the human language-ready brain. Interaction Studies, 19 (1/2), 216–238. 10.1075/is.17027.vol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17027.vol [Google Scholar]
  77. Volterra, Virginia, Roccaforte, Marina, Di Renzo, Alessio, & Fontana, Sabina
    (2022) Italian Sign Language from a cognitive and socio-semiotic perspective: Implications for a general language theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.9 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wilcox, Phyllis Perrin
    (2000) Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Wilcox, Sherman
    (2004) Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed language. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (2), 119–147. 10.1515/cogl.2004.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.005 [Google Scholar]
  80. Wilcox, Sherman E.
    (2009) William C. Stokoe and the gestural theory of language origins. Sign Language Studies, 9 (4), 398–409. 10.1353/sls.0.0028
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.0.0028 [Google Scholar]
  81. Wilcox, Sherman & Wilcox, Phyllis Perrin
    (2009) The analysis of signed languages. InB. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp.739–760). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H.
    (2006) ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. InProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006) (pp. 1556–1559). https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/faces/ViewItemOverviewPage.jsp?itemId=item_60436
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20030.cap
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20030.cap
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error