1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Gesture
  4. Volume 21, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

It is well known that signers and speakers routinely produce finger points during interaction. While the referential functions of such finger points have received great attention from researchers, they are also used to manage interactions between interlocutors. These functions are less understood and have received less research focus. The current study helps to redress this gap in the literature by investigating how finger pointing is used to index and coordinate turn-beginnings in a corpus of 11 semi-naturalistic (Norwegian) signed language conversations, involving between two to five signers (3.4 hours of signing). The data was initially annotated in ELAN and then further qualitative analysis was conducted. This investigation revealed that finger pointing effectively indexes previous and upcoming discourse, thereby binding sequences of conversational moves and guiding their trajectory, helping signers to coordinate turn transitions and interaction as it unfolds.

© 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21004.fer
2023-06-20
2025-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/gest.21004.fer
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, P.
    (1996) The pre-front field in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position Pragmatics, 61, 295–322. 10.1075/prag.6.3.03aue
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.3.03aue [Google Scholar]
  2. (2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 25(1), 7–36. 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2018) Gaze, addressee selection and turn-taking in three-party interaction. InG. Brône, & B. Oben (Eds.), Eye-tracking in Interaction: Studies on the role of eye gaze in dialogue (pp.197–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ais.10.09aue
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.10.09aue [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, C.
    (1977) Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. InL. A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp.215–236). New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bavelas, J. B.
    (1994) Gestures as part of speech: methodological implications. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 27(3), 201–221. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T.
    (2002) Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 566–580. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02562.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02562.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A.
    (1992) Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15(4), 469–489. 10.1080/01638539209544823
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beattie, G. W.
    (1978) Floor apportionment and gaze in conversational dyads. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(1), 7–15. 10.1111/j.2044‑8260.1978.tb00889.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00889.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Beukeleers, I.
    (2020) On the role of eye gaze in Flemish Sign Language: A multifocal eye-tracking study on the phenomena of online turn processing and depicting. Leuven: KU Leuven PhD dissertation.
  10. Brône, G., Oben, B., Jehoul, A., Vranjes, J., & Feyaerts, K.
    (2017) Eye gaze and viewpoint in multimodal interaction management. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3), 449–483. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0119
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0119 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cibulka, P.
    (2015) When the hands do not go home: A micro-study of the role of gesture phases in sequence suspension and closure. Discourse Studies, 17(1), 3–24. 10.1177/1461445614557756
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614557756 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2003) Pointing and placing. InS. Kita (Ed.), Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp.243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. (2005) Coordinating with each other in a material world. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 507–525. 10.1177/1461445605054404
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054404 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E.
    (1991) Grounding in communication. InL. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10096‑006
     https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006 [Google Scholar]
  16. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D.
    (1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 221, 1–39. 10.1016/0010‑0277(86)90010‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cormier, K., Schembri, A., & Woll, B.
    (2013) Pronouns and pointing in sign languages. Lingua, 1371, 230–247. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deppermann, A.
    (2013) Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 91–121. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  19. Deppermann, A., & Streeck, J.
    (2018) The body in interaction: Its multiple modalities and temporalities. InA. Deppermann, & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp.1–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.293.intro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.intro [Google Scholar]
  20. De Stefani, E., & Horlacher, A.-S.
    (2008) Topical and sequential backlinking in a French radio phone-in program: Turn shapes and sequential placements. Pragmatics, 18(3), 381–406. 10.1075/prag.18.3.02ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.3.02ste [Google Scholar]
  21. de Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2015) Turn-timing in signed conversations: coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(268). 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dressel, D.
    (2020) Multimodal word searches in collaborative storytelling: On the local mobilization and negotiation of coparticipation. Journal of Pragmatics, 1701, 37–54. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Duncan, S. Jr.
    (1972) Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(1), 283–292. 10.1037/h0033031
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033031 [Google Scholar]
  24. Enfield, N. J.
    (2009) The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511576737
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576737 [Google Scholar]
  25. Engberg-Pedersen, E.
    (2003) From pointing to reference and predication: pointing signs, eyegaze, and head and body orientation in Danish Sign Language. InS. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp.269–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ferrara, L.
    (2020) Some interactional functions of finger pointing in signed language conversations. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics, 5(1), 1–26. 10.5334/gjgl.993
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.993 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ferrara, L. and Bø, V.
    (2022) Norwegian Sign Language Corpus – Pilot Corpus (Conversations). Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure Norway (CLARINO) Bergen Repository. Available athdl.handle.net/11509/147 (last access23 April 2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ferrara, L., & Ringsø, T.
    (2021) Norwegian Sign Language corpus – Depicting Perspective. Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure Norway (CLARINO) Bergen Repository. Available athdl.handle.net/11509/147 (last access23 April 2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1996) Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited Pragmatics, 6(3), 427–454. 10.1075/prag.6.3.07for
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.3.07for [Google Scholar]
  30. Girard-Groeber, S.
    (2015) The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in Psychology, 61, 741. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00741
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00741 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2018) Participation by hard-of-hearing students in integration classroms: Facets of interactional competence. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Goodwin, C.
    (1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (1986) Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 29–49. 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.29
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1489–1522. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  35. (2002) Time in action. Current Anthropology, 43(S4). 10.1086/339566
     https://doi.org/10.1086/339566 [Google Scholar]
  36. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C.
    (1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 51–75. 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.51
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hayashi, M.
    (2005) Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica, 156(1–4), 21–53. 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.21
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.21 [Google Scholar]
  38. Heritage, J.
    (1984a) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. (1984b) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. InJ. M. Atkinson, & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Holler, J., Turner, K., & Varcianna, T.
    (2013) It’s on the tip of my fingers: Co-speech gestures during lexical retrieval in different social contexts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(10), 1509–1518. 10.1080/01690965.2012.698289
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.698289 [Google Scholar]
  41. Iwasaki, S.
    (2009) Initiating interactive turn spaces in Japanese conversation: Local projection and collaborative action. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 226–246. 10.1080/01638530902728918
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728918 [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnston, T.
    (2013a) Towards a comparative semiotics of pointing actions in signed and spoken languages. Gesture, 13(2), 109–142. 10.1075/gest.13.2.01joh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.2.01joh [Google Scholar]
  43. (2013b) Formational and functional characteristics of pointing signs in a corpus of Auslan (Australian sign language): Are the data sufficient to posit a grammatical class of ‘pronouns’ in Auslan?Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(1), 109–159. 10.1515/cllt‑2013‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0012 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kalma, A.
    (1992) Gazing in triads: A powerful signal in floor apportionment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 311, 21–39. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1992.tb00953.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00953.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Keevallik, L.
    (2018) What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar?Research on Language & Social Interaction, 51(1), 1–21. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kendon, A.
    (1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychological, 261, 22–63. 10.1016/0001‑6918(67)90005‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kidwell, M.
    (2013) Framing, grounding, and coordinating conversational interaction: Posture, gaze, facial expression, and movement in space. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication (Vol.I1, pp.100–113). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261318.100
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.100 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kita, S.
    (Ed.) (2003) Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9781410607744
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607744 [Google Scholar]
  50. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R.
    (1991) Constructed shared communicative environments. InL. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.172–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10096‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-008 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kääntä, L.
    (2012) Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(2), 166–186. 10.1080/19463014.2012.716624
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.716624 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lackner, A.
    (2009) Turn-Taking und Dialogstruktur in der Oesterreichischen Gebärdensprache. Eine Gesprächsanalyse der Salzburger Variante, Vol.811. Hamburg: Das Zeichen.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Lepeut, A.
    (2020) Framing language through gesture: Palm-up, index finger-extended gestures, and holds in spoken and signed language interactions in French-speaking and signing Belgium. Namur: University of Namur PhD dissertation.
  54. Lerner, G. H.
    (2003) Selecting Next Speaker: The Context-Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free Organization. Language in society, 32(2), 177–201. 10.1017/S004740450332202X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, X.
    (2014) Multimodality, interaction and turn-taking in Mandarin Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.3 [Google Scholar]
  56. Liddell, S. K.
    (2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lindström, J.
    (2006) Grammar in the service of interaction: Exploring turn organization in Swedish. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 39(1), 81–117. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3901_4
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3901_4 [Google Scholar]
  58. Linell, P.
    (2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Local, J.
    (2004) Getting back to prior talk: and-uh(m) as a back-connecting device in British and American English. InE. Couper-Kuhlen, & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation (pp.377–400). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.62.18loc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62.18loc [Google Scholar]
  60. Martinez, L. B.
    (1995) Turn-taking and eye gaze in sign conversations between Deaf Filipinos. InC. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities (pp.272–306). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Mazeland, H., & Huiskes, M.
    (2001) Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. InM. Selting, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp.141–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10.08maz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.08maz [Google Scholar]
  62. McCleary, L., & de Arantes Leite, T.
    (2013) Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4.11, 123–154. 10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123
     https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123 [Google Scholar]
  63. McIlvenny, P.
    (1995) Seeing conversations: Analyzing sign language talk. InP. Ten Have, & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp.129–150). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Mittelberg, I.
    (2019) Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica, 2281, 193–222. 10.1515/sem‑2018‑0090
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0090 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mondada, L.
    (2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 194–225. 10.1177/1461445607075346
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
  66. (2009) Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 1977–1997. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  67. (2013) Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 461, 39–68. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  69. Rossano, F.
    (2013) Gaze in conversation. InJ. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.308–329). Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Rutter, D. R., Stephenson, G. M., Ayling, K., & White, P. A.
    (1978) The timing of looks in dyadic conversation. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(1), 17–21. 10.1111/j.2044‑8260.1978.tb00890.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00890.x [Google Scholar]
  71. Ryttervik, M.
    (2015) Gesten PU i svenskt teckenspråk: En studie i dess form och funktion [Palms up gesture in Swedish Sign Language: An investigation of its form and function]. Stockholm: Stockholm University MA thesis. Available athttps://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:862407/FULLTEXT02.pdf (last access23 April 2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  73. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. InJ. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis (pp.266–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. (1996) Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. InE. A. Schegloff, E. Ochs, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp.52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  75. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H.
    (1989) Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 211–232. 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90008‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90008-X [Google Scholar]
  76. Shaw, E.
    (2019) Gesture in multiparty interaction. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sidnell, J.
    (2006) Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2 [Google Scholar]
  78. Streeck, J.
    (1995) On projection. InE. N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp.87–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621710.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621710.007 [Google Scholar]
  79. (2009a) Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 161–179. 10.1080/01638530902728793
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2009b) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  81. Streeck, J., & Hartge, U.
    (1992) Previews: Gestures at the transition place. InA. Di Luzio, & P. Auer (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp.135–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.22.10str
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.10str [Google Scholar]
  82. Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S.
    (2009) Projection and anticipation: The forward-looking nature of embodied communication. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 93–102. 10.1080/01638530902728777
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728777 [Google Scholar]
  83. Tiitinen, S., & Ruusuvuori, J.
    (2012) Engaging parents through gaze: Speaker selection in three-party interactions in maternity clinics. Parent Education and Counseling, 891, 38–43. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.04.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  84. Van Herreweghe, M.
    (2002) Turn-taking mechanisms and active participation in meetings with deaf and hearing participants in Flanders. InC. Lucas (Ed.), Turn-taking, fingerspelling, and contact in signed languages (Vol.81, pp.73–103). Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Wilkes-Gibbs, D.
    (1997) Studying language use as collaboration. InG. Kasper, & E. Kellerman (Eds.), Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp.238–274). London: Addison Wesley Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21004.fer
Loading
Indexing turn-beginnings in Norwegian Sign Language conversation
Gesture 21, 1 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21004.fer
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21004.fer
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21004.fer
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): indexicality; interaction; Norwegian Sign Language; pointing; turn-taking

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error