1887
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper introduces the Slapping movement as an embodied practice of dislike or meta-commentary recurring in conflictive situations between German children aged four to six (Hotze, 2019). Children move this way primarily in stopping a co-participant’s action and protesting against the action to be stopped. The Slapping movements documented showed different manners of execution. Some forms appeared to be very expressive, others were more schematic. Inspired by a phenomenological approach to gestures our analysis shows that the movement qualities show different degrees of communicative effort and affective intensity which respond to the inter-affective dynamics unfolding between the participants of a situation. This means that the affective intensities unfolding in an interaction not only give rise to the Slapping movement, but they also influence how the hands are moved. In more detail, we observed that the higher the affective intensities become the larger and more vigorous the Slapping movements are.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21013.lad
2022-05-30
2024-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrén, M.
    (2010) Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. PhD Dissertation, Lund University, Lund. Retrieved fromwww.salc-sssk.org/pages/andren.mats/refs/andren2010-thesis.pdf
  2. (2014) Multimodal constructions in children: Is the headshake part of language?Gesture, 14 (2), 141–170. 10.1075/gest.14.2.02and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.14.2.02and [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateson, G.
    (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L.
    (1995) Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (4), 394–405. 10.1177/0146167295214010
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214010 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., & Debras, C.
    (2017) Developing communicative postures: The emergence of shrugging in child communication. Language, interaction and acquisition, 8(1), 89–116. 10.1075/lia.8.1.05bea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.05bea [Google Scholar]
  6. Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Morgenstern, A., & Boutet, D.
    (2016) A Child’s Multimodal Negations from 1 to 4: The Interplay Between Modalities. InP. Larrivée & C. Lee (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives (Vol.1, pp.95–123). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17464‑8_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8_5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blomberg, J.
    (2019) Interpreting the concept of sedimentation in Husserl’s Origin of Geometry. Public Journal of Semiotics, 9 (1), 78–94. 10.37693/pjos.2019.9.22182
    https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2019.9.22182 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bressem, J.
    (2012) Repetitions in gestures: Structures and cognitive aspects. Doctoral thesis, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt-Oder.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C.
    (2013) A linguistic annotation system for gestures (LASG). InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.1, pp.1098–1125). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bressem, J., & Müller, C.
    (2014) A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.2, pp.1575–1592). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110302028.1575
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1575 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2017) The “Negative-Assessment-Construction”: A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture?Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1). 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑0053
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bühler, K.
    (1933) Ausdruckstheorie. Das System an der Geschichte aufgezeigt. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Calbris, G.
    (1990) The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Conlin, F., Hagstrom, P., & Neidle, C.
    (2003) A particle of indefiniteness in American Sign Language. Linguistic Discovery, 2 (1), 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Di Paolo, E., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H.
    (2018) Linguistic bodies: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11244.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11244.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ekman, P. & Rosenberg, E. L.
    (1997) What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Engberg-Pedersen, E.
    (2002) Gestures in signing: The presentation gesture in Danish Sign Language. InR. Schulmeister & H. Reinitzer (Eds.), Progress in sign language research: In honor of Siegmund Prillwitz / Festschrift für Siegmund Prillwitz (pp.143–162). Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fricke, E.
    (2010) Phonaestheme, Kinaestheme und multimodale Grammatik: Wie Artikulationen zu Typen werden, die bedeuten können. Sprache und Literatur, 41 (105), 70–88. 10.1163/25890859‑041‑01‑90000005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fuchs, T.
    (2017) Intercorporeality and interaffectivity. InC. Meyer, J. Streeck, & S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp.194–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuchs, T. & De Jaegher, H.
    (2009) Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486. 10.1007/s11097‑009‑9136‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Graziano, M.
    (2014) The development of two pragmatic gestures of the so-called Open Hand Supine family in Italian children. InM. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance : Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp.311–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.188.14gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.14gra [Google Scholar]
  22. Graziano, M., Kendon, A., & Cristilli, C.
    (2011) ‘Parallel gesturing’ in adult-child conversations. InG. Stam & M. Ishino (Eds.), lntegrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp.89–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.4.08gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.4.08gra [Google Scholar]
  23. Greifenstein, S.
    (2019) Tempi der Bewegung – Modi des Gefühls. Expressivität, heitere Affekte und die Screwball Comedy. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hanks, W. F.
    ([1996] 2018) Language and communicative practices. New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harrison, S.
    (2021, this issue). The feel of a recurrent gesture: Embedding the Vertical Palm within a gift-giving episode in China (aka the ‘seesaw battle’). Gesture, 20 (2), 254–284. 10.1075/gest.21003.har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21003.har [Google Scholar]
  26. Horst, D., Boll, F., Schmitt, C., & Müller, C.
    (2014) Gestures as interactive expressive movement: Inter-affectivity in face-to-face communication. InA. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.2, pp.2112–2125). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110302028.2112
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.2112 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hotze, L.
    (2019) Multimodale Kommunikation in den Vorschuljahren – Zur Verschränkung von Sprache und Gestik in der kindlichen Entwicklung. Doctoral Dissertation, European-University Viadrina, Frankfurt-Oder.
  28. Husserl, E.
    (1939) Die Frage nach dem Ursprung der Geometrìe als intentional-historisches Problem. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 1 (2), 203–225. Retrieved fromwww.jstor.org/stable/23932333
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Iverson, J. M. & Thelen, E.
    (1999) Hand, mouth and brain. The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (11/12), 19–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Janzen, T.
    (2012) Lexicalization and grammaticalization. InR. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp.816–840). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.816
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.816 [Google Scholar]
  31. Janzen, T. & Shaffer, B.
    (2002) Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. InR. P. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp.199–223) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kappelhoff, H.
    (2004) Matrix der Gefühle. Das Kino, das Melodrama und das Theater der Empfindsamkeit. Berlin: Vorwerk 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kappelhoff, H. & Müller, C.
    (2011) Embodied meaning construction. Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film. Metaphor in the Social World, 1 (2), 121–153. 10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap [Google Scholar]
  34. Kendon, A.
    (1988) How gestures can become like words. InF. Poyatos (Ed.), Crosscultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp.131–141). Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
  36. Ladewig, S. H.
    (2010) Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern: Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste. Sprache und Literatur, 41 (1), 89–111. 10.1163/25890859‑041‑01‑90000006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000006 [Google Scholar]
  37. (to appear). Recurrent gestures in the process of becoming mutually sedimented forms. InA. Cienki Ed. The Cambridge handbook of gesture studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Merleau-Ponty, M.
    (1963) The structure of behavior. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. ([1962] 2005) Phenomenology of perception. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Morgenstern, A.
    (2014) Children’s multimodal language development. InC. Fäcke (Ed.), Manual of language acquisition (pp.123–142). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110302257.123
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302257.123 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mosher, J. A.
    (1916) The essentials of effective gesture for students of public speaking. New York: The Macmillan Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Müller, C.
    (2017) How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16 (2), 278–306. 10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul [Google Scholar]
  43. Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H.
    (to appear). Gesture and language (Textbook): London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Müller, C. & Kappelhoff, H.
    (2018) Cinematic metaphor: experience – affectivity – temporality. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110580785
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580785 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ott, E. A.
    (1902) How to gesture. New York City: Hinds & Noble.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pfau, R. & Steinbach, M.
    (2006) Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign language. Linguistics in Potsdam 24, 24 (3), 3–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Plessner, H.
    (1982) Die Deutung des mimischen Ausdrucks. Ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Bewußtsein des anderen Ichs. InH. Plessner, Gesammelte Schriften, Vol.7: Ausdruck und menschliche Natur (pp.67–130). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Quintilian
    Quintilian (1969) The Institutio Oratoria. Trans.H. E. Butler. Cambridge, MA: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rohlfing, K. J., Grimminger, A., & Lüke, C.
    (2017) An interactive view on the development of deictic pointing in infancy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1319. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01319
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01319 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ruth-Hirrel, L.
    (2018) A construction-based approach to cyclic gesture functions in English and Farsi. Doctoral Thesis, University of New Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., […] Uhmann, S.
    (2009) GesprächsanalytischesTranskriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 10, 353–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Shaffer, B.
    (2000) A syntactic, pragmatic analysis of the expression of necessity and possibility in American Sign Language. Ann Arbor: U.M.I.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Shaffer, B. & Janzen, T.
    (2000) Gesture, lexical words, and grammar: Grammaticalization processes in ASL. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 26 (1), 235–245.   10.3765/bls.v26i1.1138
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v26i1.1138 [Google Scholar]
  54. Streeck, J.
    (2009) Gesturecraft: The manu-facturing of meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2013) Praxeology of gesture. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.1, pp.674–685). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. (2017) Self-making man: a day of action, life, and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139149341
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139149341 [Google Scholar]
  57. Thurmair, M.
    (2010) Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U.
    (2007) A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78, 705–722. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01025.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x [Google Scholar]
  60. van Loon, E., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M.
    (2014) The Grammaticalization of Gestures in Sign Languages. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.2, pp.2133–2149). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110302028.2133
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.2133 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wilcox, S.
    (2004) Gesture and language. Gesture, 4 (1), 43–73. 10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
  62. Wundt, W.
    (1921) Völkerpyschologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Vol.1: Die Sprache. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zima, E.
    (2014) English multimodal motion constructions. A construction grammar perspective. Linguistic Society of Belgium, 8, 14–29.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21013.lad
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21013.lad
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error