1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Gesture
  4. Volume 20, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In gesture studies, the adjective ‘recurrent’ has developed to distinguish a range of semiotic and conceptual phenomena concerning the nature of meaningful bodily movements. This article begins with a brief and recent history of recurrent gesture studies. We raise ongoing debates concerning the position of recurrent gestures on the so-called Kendon’s continuum, the relation between gestures and practical actions, and the interplay between gesture’s cultural specificity and universality. A selection of findings from previous research on recurrent gestures then acquaints readers with characteristics of these gestures: their form-function pairings and context-variation, linguistic organization and multimodal constructions, and community-specific typologies (from cultural, situational, as well as individual perspectives). Proposing to help build recurrent gesture theory, the paper then recognizes that recurrency goes hand-in-hand with  – both in the ways these gestures exist for members of a community and their role in the styles, habits, and creations of individuals.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21014.har
2022-05-30
2023-03-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/gest.21014.har
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrén, Mats
    (2010) Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Doctoral Thesis, Lund University.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. (2014) On the lower limit of gesture. InMandana Seyfeddinipur & Marianne Gullberg (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp. 153–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.188.08and
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.08and [Google Scholar]
  3. Beaupoil-Hourdel, P.
    (2015) Acquisition et expression multimodale de la négation. Étude d’un corpus vidéo et longitudinal de dyades mère-enfant francophone et anglophone. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité.
  4. Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Morgenstern, A., & Boutet, D.
    (2016) A child’s multimodal negations from 1 to 4: The interplay between modalities. InPierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives (pp. 95–123). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17464‑8_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8_5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. & Debras, C.
    (2017) Developing communicative postures. The emergence of shrugging in child communication. Language, Interaction and Acquisition (LIA), 8 (1), 89–116. 10.1075/lia.8.1.05bea
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.05bea [Google Scholar]
  6. Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. & Morgenstern, A.
    (2021, this issue). French and British children’s shrugs: A cross-linguistic developmental case-study of a recurrent gesture. Gesture, 20 (2), 180–218. 10.1075/gest.19043.bea
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19043.bea [Google Scholar]
  7. Bressem, J., Ladewig, S., & Müller, C.
    (2013) Linguistic annotation system for gestures. InC. Müller, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1098–1124). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261318.1098
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.1098 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bressem, J. & Müller, C.
    (2014a) The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110302028.1592
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1592 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bressem, J. & Müller, C.
    (2014b) A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110302028.1575
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1575 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bressem, J. & Wegener, C.
    (2021, this issue). Handling talk: A cross-linguistic perspective on discursive functions of gestures in German and Savosavo. Gesture, 20 (2), 219–253. 10.1075/gest.19041.bre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19041.bre [Google Scholar]
  11. Brookes, H.
    (2004) A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14 (2), 186–224. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186
     https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2014) Gesture in the communicative ecology of a South African township. InM. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance (pp. 59–73). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.188.04bro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.04bro [Google Scholar]
  13. Calbris, G.
    (1990) The semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. (2011) Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2013) Elements of meaning in gesture: The analogical links. InC. Müller, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, and S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 658–674). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261318.658
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.658 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cienki, A.
    (2012) Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. InJ. Badio & K. Kosecki (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 149–158). Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (2017) Ten lectures on spoken language and gesture from the perspective of cognitive linguistics: Issues of dynamicity and multimodality. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004336230
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004336230 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cienki, A. & Müller, C.
    (Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Conlin, F., Hagstrom, P., & Neidle, C.
    (2003) A particle of indefiniteness in American Sign Language. Linguistic Discovery, 2 (1), 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cooperrider, K.
    (2019) Universals and diversity in gesture: Research past, present, and future. Gesture, 18 (2/3), 210–239. 10.1075/gest.19011.coo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19011.coo [Google Scholar]
  21. Di Paolo, E., Cuffari, E., & De Jaegher, J.
    (2018) Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11244.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11244.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Duncan, S. D.
    (2002) Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture, 2 (2), 183–206.   10.1075/gest.2.2.04dun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.04dun [Google Scholar]
  23. Enfield, N. J.
    (2001) ‘Lip-pointing’: A discussion of form and function with reference to data from Laos. Gesture, 1 (2), 185–211. 10.1075/gest.1.2.06enf
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.06enf [Google Scholar]
  24. Engberg-Pedersen, E.
    (2002) Gestures in signing: The presentation gesture in Danish Sign Language. InR. Schulmeister & H. Reinitzer (Eds.), Progress in sign language research: In honor of Siegmund Prillwitz / Festschrift für Siegmund Prillwitz (pp. 143–162). Hamburg: Signum.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferré, G. & Mettouchi, A.
    (2020) A cultural study of Open-Palm Hand gestures and their prosodic correlates. InProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2020, 25–28May 2020, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 285–289).   10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020‑58
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-58 [Google Scholar]
  26. Floyd, S.
    (2016) Modally hybrid grammar? Celestial pointing for time-of-day reference in Nheengatú. Language, 92 (1), 31–64. 10.1353/lan.2016.0013
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0013 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fricke, E.
    (2010) Phonaestheme, Kinaestheme und multimodale Grammatik: Wie Artikulationen zu Typen werden, die bedeuten können. Sprache und Literatur, 41 (105), 70–88. 10.1163/25890859‑041‑01‑90000005
     https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000005 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gawne, L.
    (2021) ‘Away’ gestures associated with negative expressions in narrative discourse in Syuba (Kagate, Nepal) speakers. Semiotica 2021 (239), 37–59. 10.1515/sem‑2017‑0163
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0163 [Google Scholar]
  29. Harrison, S.
    (2014) The organisation of kinesic ensembles related to negation. Gesture, 14 (2), 117–141. 10.1075/gest.14.2.01har
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.14.2.01har [Google Scholar]
  30. (2018) The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108265065
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108265065 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2021, this issue). The feel of a recurrent gesture: Embedding the Vertical Palm within a gift- giving episode in China (aka the ‘seesaw battle’). Gesture, 20 (2), 254–284. 10.1075/gest.21003.har
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21003.har [Google Scholar]
  32. (forthcoming). Gestures associated with negation: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. InCienki, A. Ed. The Cambridge handbook of gesture studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Harrison, S. & Larrivée, P.
    (2016) Morphosyntactic correlates of gestures: A gesture associated with negation in French and its organisation with speech. InP. Larrivée & C. Lee (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives (pp. 75–94). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17464‑8_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8_4 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hotze, Lena
    (2019) Multimodale Kommunikation in den Vorschuljahren: Zur Verschränkung von Sprache und Gestik in der kindlichen Entwicklung. Doctoral Dissertation, Europa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt-Oder.
  35. Janzen, T.
    (2012) Lexicalization and grammaticalization. InR. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 816–840). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.816
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.816 [Google Scholar]
  36. Janzen, T. & Shaffer, B.
    (2002) Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. InR. P. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 199–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kendon, A.
    (1988) How gestures can become like words. InF. Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. (1992) Some recent work from Italy on “quotable gestures (emblems)”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2 (1), 92–108. 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.1.92
     https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.1.92 [Google Scholar]
  39. (1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23 (3), 247–279. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
  40. Kendon, A. & Versante, L.
    (2003) Pointing by hand in “Neapolitan”. InS. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 109–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2008) Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture, 8 (3), 348–366. 10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken [Google Scholar]
  43. (2017) Pragmatic functions of gestures: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture, 16 (2), 157–175. 10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken [Google Scholar]
  44. Kita, S.
    (2000) How representational gestures help speaking. InD. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2009) Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 145–167. 10.1080/01690960802586188
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802586188 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kusters, A.
    (2017) Special Issue: Deaf and hearing signers’ multimodal and translingual practices. Applied Linguistics Review, 10 (1), 1–8. 10.1515/applirev‑2017‑0086
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0086 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ladewig, S. H.
    (2011) Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6. 10.4000/cognitextes.406
     https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.406 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2014a) Recurrent gestures. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. (2014b) The cyclic gesture. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1605–1617). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. (forthcoming). Recurrent gestures. InA. Cienki Ed. The Cambridge handbook of gesture studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Ladewig, S. H. & Bressem, J.
    (2013) New insights into the medium hand: Discovering structures in gestures on the basis of the four parameters of sign language. Semiotica, 197, 203–231.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ladewig, S. & Hotze, L.
    (2021, this issue). The Slapping movement as an embodied practice of dislike: Inter-affectivity in interactions among children. Gesture, 20 (2), 285–312. 10.1075/gest.21013.lad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21013.lad [Google Scholar]
  53. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Langacker, R. W.
    (1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110800524
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lapaire, J. R.
    (2006a) Negation, reification and manipulation in a cognitive grammar of substance. InS. Bonnefille & S. Salbayre (Eds.), La négation (pp. 333–349). Tours: Presses universitaires François-Rabelais. 10.4000/books.pufr.4853
     https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pufr.4853 [Google Scholar]
  56. Lapaire, J.-R.
    (2006b) From sensory to propositional modality: Towards a phenomenology of epistemic modal meanings. Corela, 4 (1). journals.openedition.org/corela/441. 10.4000/corela.441
     https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.441 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lapaire, J. R.
    (2011) Grammar, gesture and cognition: Insights from multimodal utterances and applications for gesture analysis. Visnyk of Lviv University. Philology Series, 52, 88–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. (2013) Gestualité cogrammaticale: de l’action corporelle spontanée aux postures de travail métagestuel guidé. Maybe et le balancement épistémique en anglais. Langages, 192, 57–72.   10.3917/lang.192.0057
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.192.0057 [Google Scholar]
  59. LeBaron, C. D. & Streeck, J.
    (2000) Gesture, knowledge, and the world. InD. McNeill (Ed.), Gesture and language (pp. 118–138). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.008 [Google Scholar]
  60. Lempert, M.
    (2011) Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11 (3), 241–270. 10.1075/gest.11.3.01lem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.01lem [Google Scholar]
  61. Lopez-Ozieblo, R.
    (2020) Proposing a revised functional classification of pragmatic gestures. Lingua, 247,   10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102870
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102870 [Google Scholar]
  62. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gesture reveals about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  64. (2012) How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139108669
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108669 [Google Scholar]
  65. (2018) Recurrent gestures: How the mental reflects the social. Gesture, 17 (2), 229–244. 10.1075/gest.18012.mcn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.18012.mcn [Google Scholar]
  66. Merleau-Ponty, M.
    (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Trans.Colin Smith. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 10.4324/9780203994610
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610 [Google Scholar]
  67. Mesh, K. & Hou, L.
    (2018) Negation in San Juan Quiahije Chatino Sign Language: The integration and adaptation of conventional gestures. Gesture, 17 (3), 330–374. 10.1075/gest.18017.mes
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.18017.mes [Google Scholar]
  68. Morgenstern, A.
    (2014) Children’s multimodal language development. InC. Facke (Ed.), Manual of language acquisition (pp.123–142). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110302257.123
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302257.123 [Google Scholar]
  69. Morgenstern, A., Blondel, M., Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Benazzo, S., Boutet, D., Kochan, A., & Limousin, F.
    (2018) The blossoming of negation in gesture sign and oral productions. InM. Hickmann, E. Veneziano, & H. Jisa (Eds). Sources of variation in first language acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners (pp. 339–364). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.22.17mor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.17mor [Google Scholar]
  70. Morris, D.
    (1977) Manwatching: A field guide to human behavior. London: Cape. New edition (2002): Peoplewatching. London: Vintage.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Müller, C.
    (2004) Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family?InR. Posner & C. Müller (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 234–256). Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. (2010) Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive. Sprache und Literatur, 41 (105), 37–68. 10.1163/25890859‑041‑01‑90000004
     https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000004 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2014) Gestures as “deliberate expressive movement”. InM. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance (pp. 127–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.188.07mul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.07mul [Google Scholar]
  74. (2017) How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16 (2), 277–304. 10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul [Google Scholar]
  75. (2018) Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?Frontiers of Psychology, 9, 1651. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 [Google Scholar]
  76. Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H.
    (2013) Towards a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 707–733). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261318.707
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.707 [Google Scholar]
  77. Pfau, R. & Steinbach, M.
    (2006) Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign language. Linguistics in Potsdam, 24 (3), 3–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Ruth-Hirrel, L.
    (2018) Cyclic gestures and multimodal symbolic assemblies: an argument for symbolic complexity in gesture. PhD Dissertation, University of New Mexico. https:// digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/57
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Ruth-Hirrel, Laura & Ladewig, Silva H.
    (in preparation). The embodied nature of aspect – a cross-linguistic comparison of the cyclic gesture in English, Farsi, and German.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Schoonjans, S.
    (2017) Multimodal construction grammar issues are construction grammar issues. Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1). 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑0050
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0050 [Google Scholar]
  81. Shaffer, B. & Janzen, T.
    (2000) Gesture, lexical words, and grammar: Grammaticalization processes in ASL. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 26 (1), 235–245. 10.3765/bls.v26i1.1138
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v26i1.1138 [Google Scholar]
  82. Streeck, J.
    (1994) Gesture as communication II: The audience as co-author. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27 (3), 239–267. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_5
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_5 [Google Scholar]
  83. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2009) Gesturecraft: The manu-facturing of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  84. Streeck, J.
    (2017) Self-making man. A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139149341
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139149341 [Google Scholar]
  85. (2021) The emancipation of gesture. Interactional Linguistics, 1 (1), 90–122. 10.1075/il.20013.str
     https://doi.org/10.1075/il.20013.str [Google Scholar]
  86. van Loon, E., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M.
    (2014) The grammaticalization of gestures in sign languages. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 2133–2149). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110302028.2133
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.2133 [Google Scholar]
  87. Wilcox, S.
    (2004) Gesture and language: Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture, 4 (2), 43–75. 10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
  88. (2005) Routes from gesture to language. Revista da ABRALIN – Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, 4 (1/2), 11–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Zeshan, U.
    (2006) Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_453832
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_453832 [Google Scholar]
  90. Zima, E. & Bergs, A.
    (2017) Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1). 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑1006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-1006 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21014.har
Loading
Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices
Gesture 20, 153 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21014.har
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21014.har
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.21014.har
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): diversity; Kendon’s continuum; practical actions; recurrent gestures

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error