1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom can support the language acquisition of learners in learning a second language (Stam & Tellier, 2022). Depending on learners’ language skills, different dimensions of gestures (e.g., deictic, metaphorical) are considered to facilitate successful language comprehension. This study investigates which gestures teachers use in German as a second language (GSL) classrooms and to what extent teachers adapt their gestures to learners’ language proficiency. Teacher gestures in 10 video-recorded integration and preparation classes were analyzed. Two coders reliably identified 4143 gestures. Results show that GSL teachers predominantly used deictic gestures, metaphorical gestures, and feedback by head movements. Moreover, between-learner variability in teachers’ use of deictic and metaphorical gestures was explained by teacher-perceived German language proficiency of learners. These results suggest that teachers systematically adapt some dimensions of gestures in GSL classes, thus emphasizing the importance of studying nonverbal interactions for a better understanding of language acquisition processes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.22023.sah
2024-04-02
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, T. W.
    (1998) Gesture in foreigner talk. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.]
  2. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J.
    (2006) Teachers’ gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. InR. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Denny (Eds.), Video Research in the Learning Sciences (pp.349–365). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Boncoddo, R., & Pier, E.
    (2019) Managing common ground in the classroom: Teachers use gestures to support students’ contributions to classroom discourse. ZDM, 51(2), 347–360. 10.1007/s11858‑019‑01043‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01043-x [Google Scholar]
  4. Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Church, R. B., Wolfgram, M. S., Kim, S., & Knuth, E. J.
    (2013) Teachers’ gestures and speech in mathematics lessons: forging common ground by resolving trouble spots. ZDM, 45(3), 425–440. 10.1007/s11858‑012‑0476‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0476-0 [Google Scholar]
  5. Azaoui, B.
    (2013) One Teacher, Two Instructional Contexts. Same Teaching Gestures?TiGeR : Tilburg Gesture research meeting, 1–4. https://hal.science/hal-00833026
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2016) Mise en abyme des interactions didactiques [Putting didactic interactions in perspective]. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures, 13(1). rdlc.rev​ues.org/1472. 10.4000/rdlc.1472
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rdlc.1472 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2020) On pointing in first and foreign language classes. GESPIN proceedings. Stockholm, Sweden. https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02912833
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bleakley, H., & Chin, A.
    (2004) Language skills and earnings: Evidence from childhood immigrantsReview of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 481–496. 10.1162/003465304323031067
    https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323031067 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brennan, S. E., & Hanna, J. E.
    (2009) Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 274–291. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2009.01019.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01019.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Dargue, N., Sweller, N., & Jones, M. P.
    (2019) When our hands help us understand: A meta-analysis into the effects of gesture on comprehension. Psychological Bulletin, 145(8), 765–784. 10.1037/bul0000202
    https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000202 [Google Scholar]
  11. Derwing, T. M.
    (1987) Individual differences in foreigner talk: factors in successful communication with non-native speakers [University of Alberta Libraries]. DataCite.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eckes, T., & Grotjahn, R.
    (2006) A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing, 23(3), 290–325. 10.1191/0265532206lt330oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt330oa [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209–224. 10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  14. Esser, H.
    (2006) Sprache und Integration: Die sozialen Bedingungen und Folgen des Spracherwerbs von Migranten [Language and Integration: The Social Conditions and Consequences of Migrants’ Language Acquisition]. Campus-Verl.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferguson, C. A.
    (1975) Toward a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 171, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J.
    (1991) Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. Contexts of Accommodation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2000) Beyond words: The importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71(1), 231–239. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00138
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00138 [Google Scholar]
  18. Grotjahn, R.
    (2019) C-Tests. InS. Jeuk & J. Settinieri (Eds.), DaZ-Handbücher: Band 2. Sprachdiagnostik Deutsch als Zweitsprache: Ein Handbuch (pp.585–610). de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110418712‑024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110418712-024 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gullberg, M.
    (2006) Some reasons for studying gesture and second language acquisition (Hommage à Adam Kendon). IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44(2). 10.1515/IRAL.2006.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2006.004 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2010) Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research, 26(1), 75–102. 10.1177/0267658309337639
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309337639 [Google Scholar]
  21. Guven, C., & Islam, A.
    (2015) Age at migration, language proficiency, and socioeconomic outcomes: Evidence from Australia. Demography, 52(2), 513–542. 10.1007/s13524‑015‑0373‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0373-6 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hadar, U., Dar, R., & Teitelman, A.
    (2002) Gesture during speech in first and second language. Gesture, 1(2), 151–165. 10.1075/gest.1.2.04had
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.04had [Google Scholar]
  23. Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P.
    (2005) Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 6–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hardy, I., Decristan, J., & Klieme, E.
    (2019) Adaptive teaching in research on learning and instruction. Journal for Educational Research Online (11), 169–191. 10.25656/01:18004
    https://doi.org/10.25656/01:18004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hauge, E.
    (1998) Gesture in the EFL class: an aid to communication or a source of confusion?InDanielle Killick & Mike Parry (Eds.), Cross-cultural capability – the why, the ways and the means: New theories and methodologies in language education, pp.271–280. Proceedings of the conference at Leeds Metropolitan UniversityDec. 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (1999) Some common emblems used by British English teachers in EFL classes. InDanielle Killick & Mike Parry (Eds.), Cross-cultural capability – promoting the discipline: Marking boundaries and crossing borders, pp.405–420. Proceedings of the conference at Leeds Metropolitan UniversityDec. 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hochman, O., & Davidov, E.
    (2014) Relations between second-language proficiency and national identification: The case of immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review, 30(3), 344–359. 10.1093/esr/jcu043
    https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu043 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hostetter, A. B.
    (2011) When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297–315. 10.1037/a0022128
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022128 [Google Scholar]
  29. Howe, C., & Abedin, M.
    (2013) Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. 10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hupp, J. M., & Gingras, M. C.
    (2016) The role of gesture meaningfulness in word learning. Gesture, 15(3), 340–356. 10.1075/gest.15.3.04hup
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.3.04hup [Google Scholar]
  31. Johnston, P., Dozier, C., & Smit, J.
    (2016) How language supports adaptive teaching through a responsive learning culture. Theory into Practice, 55(3), 189–196. 10.1080/00405841.2016.1173992
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1173992 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kendon, A.
    (2010) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  33. Krashen, S.
    (1989) We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1989.tb05325.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Lazaraton, A.
    (2004) Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00249.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00249.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Lazaraton, A., & Ishihara, N.
    (2005) Understanding second language teacher practice using microanalysis and self-reflection: A collaborative case study. Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 529–542. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2005.00328.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00328.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Lim, F. V.
    (2021) Investigating intersemiosis: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis of the relationship between language and gesture in classroom discourse. Visual Communication, 20(1), 34–58. 10.1177/1470357218820695
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218820695 [Google Scholar]
  37. Loewen, S., & Sato, M.
    (2018) Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. 10.1017/S0261444818000125
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125 [Google Scholar]
  38. Long, M. H.
    (1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126 [Google Scholar]
  39. Martinovic, B., van Tubergen, F., & Maas, I.
    (2009) Dynamics of interethnic contact: A panel study of immigrants in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 25(3), 303–318. 10.1093/esr/jcn049
    https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn049 [Google Scholar]
  40. Matsumoto, Y., & Dobs, A. M.
    (2017) Pedagogical gestures as interactional resources for teaching and learning tense and aspect in the ESL grammar classroom. Language Learning, 671, 7–42. 10.1111/lang.12181
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12181 [Google Scholar]
  41. McCafferty, S. G., & Stam, G.
    (Eds.) (2008) ESL & applied linguistics professional series. Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press. www.loc.gov/catdir/description/uchi052/91032575.html
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2005) Gesture and Thought. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Otto, J., Migas, K., Austermann, N., & Bos, W.
    (2016) Integration neu zugewanderter Kinder und Jugendlicher ohne Deutschkenntnisse. Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen und Perspektiven [Integration of newly immigrated children and young people without German language skills. Possibilities, challenges and perspectives]. Waxmann. 10.25656/01:15094
    https://doi.org/10.25656/01:15094 [Google Scholar]
  45. Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., Pierczynski, M., & Allen, M.
    (2018) Teachers’ instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205–242. 10.3102/0034654317743198
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sato, R.
    (2020) Gestures in EFL classroom: Their relations with complexity, accuracy, and fluency in EFL teachers’ L2 utterances. System, 891, Article 102215. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102215
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102215 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K.
    (2014) EXMARaLDA. InU. G. Jacques Durand & Gjert Kristoffersen (Eds.), Handbook on Corpus Phonology, pp.402–419. Oxford University Press. ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199571932.do
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sime, D.
    (2001) The use and perception of illustrators in the foreign language classroom. InC. Cave, I. Guaitella, & S. Santi (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication (pp.582–585). L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2006) What do learners make of teachers’ gestures in the language classroom?International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44(2), 211–230. 10.1515/IRAL.2006.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2006.009 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2008) “Because of her gesture, it’s very easy to understand”: Learners’ perceptions of teachers’ gestures in the foreign language class. InS. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research, pp.259–279. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Smotrova, T.
    (2017) Making pronunciation visible: Gesture in teaching pronunciation. TESOL Q, 511, 59–89. 10.1002/tesq.276
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.276 [Google Scholar]
  52. Smotrova, T. & Lantolf, J. P.
    (2013) The function of gesture in lexically focused L2 instructional conversations. Modern Language Journal, 971, 397–416. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12008.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12008.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Stam, G.
    (2012) Second Language Acquisition and Gesture. InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C. A. Chapelle (Ed.). 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1049
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1049 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2016) Gesture as a window onto conceptualization in multiple tasks: Implications for second language teaching. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 4(1), 289–314. 10.1515/gcla‑2016‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2016-0017 [Google Scholar]
  55. Stam, G., & Tellier, M.
    (2022) Gesture helps second and foreign language learning and teaching. InA. Morgenstern & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Gesture in language: Development across the lifespan, pp.335–363. De Gruyter Mouton; American Psychological Association. 10.1037/0000269‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0000269-014 [Google Scholar]
  56. Stam, G., & Urbanski, K. (Buescher)
    (eds.) (2023) Gesture and multimodality in second language acquisition: A Research Guide. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sueyoshi, A., & Hardison, D. M.
    (2005) The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(4), 661–699. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00320.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00320.x [Google Scholar]
  58. Tabensky, A.
    (2008) Expository discourse in a second language classroom: How learners use gesture. InS. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research, pp.298–320. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Tellier, M.
    (2008) Dire avec des gestes [Say it with gestures]. Français Dans le Monde, Recherche et Application, 441, 40–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2009) Usage pedagogique et perception de la multimodalite pour l’acces au sens en langue etrangere [Educational use and perception of multimodality for access to meaning in a foreign language]. InR. Bergeron, G. Plessis-Belaire, & L. Lafontaine (Eds.), La place des savoirs oraux dans le contexte scolaire d’aujourd’hui, pp.223–245. Presses de l’Universite du Quebec.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tellier, M., & Cadet, L.
    (2013) Dans la peau d’un natif: Etat des lieux sur l’enseignement des gestes culturels [In the skin of a native: State of play on the teaching of cultural gestures in French as a foreign language]. La Revue Française d’Education Comparée, 91, 111–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Tellier, M.
    (2016) Prendre son cours à bras le corps. De l’articulation des modalités kinésiques avec la parole [Taking the class by the hand. Articulating kinesic modalities with speech]. Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures. Les cahiers de l'Acedle, 13(13–1). 10.4000/rdlc.474
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rdlc.474 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tellier, M., Stam, G., & Ghio, A.
    (2021) Handling language. Gesture, 20(1), 30–62. 10.1075/gest.19031.tel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19031.tel [Google Scholar]
  64. Tellier, M., & Yerian, K.
    (2023) How to Study Pedagogical Gesture in Naturalistic Settings. InG. Stam & K. (Buescher) Urbanski, Gesture and Multimodality in Second Language Acquisition, pp.99–123. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Thoms, J. J.
    (2012) Classroom discourse in foreign language classrooms: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), s8–s27. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2012.01177.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01177.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Tissot, A., Croisier, J., Pietrantuono, G., Baier, A., Ninke, L., Rother, N., & Babka von Gostomski, C.
    (2019) Zwischenbericht I zum Forschungsprojekt “Evaluation der Integrationskurse (EvIk)”: erste Analysen und Erkenntnisse [Interim report I on the research project “Evaluation of the integration courses (EvIk)”: main results] (Bd.331). SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V; Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl (FZ).
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Ulichny
    Ulichny (1979) Adult foreigner talk: Input language to L2 learners. Studi Italiani Di Linguistica Teorica Ed Applicata, 81, 187.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Urbanski, K., & Stam, G.
    (2023) Overview of multimodality and gesture in second language acquisition. InG. Stam & K. (Buescher) Urbanski, Gesture and Multimodality in Second Language Acquisition, pp.1–25. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003100683‑1
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003100683-1 [Google Scholar]
  69. Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L.
    (2021) A review on the accuracy of teacher judgments. Educational Research Review, 321, 100374. 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100374
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100374 [Google Scholar]
  70. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1978) Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological ProcessesHarvard University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang, W., & Loewen, S.
    (2016) Nonverbal behavior and corrective feedback in nine ESL university-level classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 459–478. 10.1177/1362168815577239
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815577239 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.22023.sah
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.22023.sah
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): adaptive teaching; second language acquisition; teachers’ gestures
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error