oa Review of Żywiczyński, Blomberg & Boruta-Żywiczyńska (2024): Perspectives on Pantomime

References

1. Arbib, M.
   (2012) How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford Academic. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896684.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896684.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Bank, R.
   (2015) The ubiquity of mouthings in NGT. A corpus study. Utrecht: LOT. 10.1075/sll.18.2.05ban
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.05ban [Google Scholar]
3. Blackwell, N. L., Perlman, M., & Fox Tree, J. E.
   (2015) Quotation as a multimodal construction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.004 [Google Scholar]
4. Börstell, C., Lepic, R., & Belsitzman, G.
   (2016) Articulatory plurality is a property of lexical plurals in sign language. Lexical plurals and beyond. Special Issue ofLingvisticae Investigationes, (), –. 10.1075/li.39.2.10bor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/li.39.2.10bor [Google Scholar]
5. Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. a.
   (2006) Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607
   https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607 [Google Scholar]
6. Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K.
   (2016) Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.004 [Google Scholar]
7. Corballis, M.
   (2003) From hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language. InM. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0011
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
8. Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P.
   (2020) Construals of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form-meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/langcog.2019.48
   https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.48 [Google Scholar]
9. Emmorey, K., McCullough, S., Mehta, S., Ponto, L. L. B., & Grabowski, T. J.
   (2011a) Sign language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690965.2010.492643
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.492643 [Google Scholar]
10. Emmorey, K., McCullough, S., Mehta, S., Ponto, L. L. B., & Grabowski, T. J.
    (2011b) Sign language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690965.2010.492643
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.492643 [Google Scholar]
11. Ferrara, L., & Hodge, G.
    (2018) Language as description , indication , and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology, (), –. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716 [Google Scholar]
12. Fuks, O.
    (2023) Infants’ use of iconicity in the early periods of sign/spoken word-learning. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, (), –. 10.1093/deafed/enac035
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enac035 [Google Scholar]
13. Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W. C., Ozyürek, A., & Mylander, C.
    (2008a) The natural order of events: how speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, (), –. 10.1073/pnas.0710060105
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710060105 [Google Scholar]
14. Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W. C., Ozyürek, A., & Mylander, C.
    (2008b) The natural order of events: how speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, (), –. 10.1073/pnas.0710060105
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710060105 [Google Scholar]
15. Hagoort, P., & Özyürek, A.
    (2024) Extending the architecture of language from a multimodal perspective. Topics in Cognitive Science, , –. 10.1111/tops.12728
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12728 [Google Scholar]
16. Jantunen, T.
    (2017) Constructed action, the clause and the nature of syntax in Finnish Sign Language. Open Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/opli‑2017‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0004 [Google Scholar]
17. Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., & Maris, E.
    (2010) Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1177/0956797609357327
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609357327 [Google Scholar]
18. Kendon, A.
    (1980) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
20. Kita, S., & Özyürek, A.
    (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
21. Lewin, D., & Schembri, A. C.
    (2011) Mouth gestures in British Sign Language: A case study of tongue protrusion in BSL narratives. Sign Language & Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/sll.14.1.06lew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.14.1.06lew [Google Scholar]
22. Marentette, P., Pettenati, P., Bello, A., & Volterra, V.
    (2016) Gesture and symbolic representation in Italian and English-speaking Canadian 2-year-olds. Child Development, (), –. 10.1111/cdev.12523
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12523 [Google Scholar]
23. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Meir, I., Aronoff, M., Börstell, C., Hwang, S., Ilkbasaran, D., Kastner, I., Lepic, R., Ben-Basat, A. L., Padden, C. & Sandler, W.
    (2017) The origin of grammatical word order: insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011 [Google Scholar]
25. Meissner, M., Philpott, S. B., & Philpott, D.
    (1975) The Sign Language of sawmill workers in British Columbia. Sign Language Studies, (), –. 10.1353/sls.1975.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1975.0010 [Google Scholar]
26. Motamedi, Y., Schouwstra, M., Culbertson, J., Smith, K., & Kirby, S.
    (2018) Evolving artificial sign languages in the lab: From improvised gesture to systematic sign. Cognition, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Müller, C.
    (2016) From mimesis to meaning: A systematics of gestural mimesis for concrete and abstract referential gestures. InJ. Zlatev, G. Sonesson & P. Konderak (Eds.), Meaning, mind and communication: Explorations in cognitive semiotics, pp.–. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Müller, C.
    (2018) Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?Frontiers in Psychology, (), . 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 [Google Scholar]
29. Müller, C.
    (2024) Gestural mimesis as “as-if” action. InP. Zywiczynski, J. Blomberg, & M. Boruta-Zywiczynski (Eds.), Perspectives on Pantomime, pp.–. John Benjamins. 10.1075/ais.12.09mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.12.09mul [Google Scholar]
30. Newport, E. L., & Supalla, T.
    (1978) How many seats in a chair? The derivations of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. InP. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, pp.–. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. O’Reilly, A. W.
    (1995) Using representations: comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child Development, (), –. 10.2307/1131794
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131794 [Google Scholar]
32. Ortega, G., & Özyürek, A.
    (2019) Systematic mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of silent gesture. Behavior Research Methods, (). 10.3758/s13428‑019‑01204‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01204-6 [Google Scholar]
33. Ortega, G., Schiefner, A., & Ozyürek, A.
    (2019) Hearing non-signers use their gestures to predict iconic form-meaning mappings at first exposure to signs. Cognition, . 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.008 [Google Scholar]
34. Ortega, G., Sümer, B., & Ozyürek, A.
    (2017) Type of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children. Developmental Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/dev0000161
    https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000161 [Google Scholar]
35. Özçalişkan, Ş., Lucero, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2016) Does language shape silent gesture?Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.001 [Google Scholar]
36. Özyürek, A.
    (2014) Hearing and seeing meaning in speech and gesture: Insights from brain and behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, (), 20130296. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0296
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0296 [Google Scholar]
37. Padden, C., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., & Seegers, S.
    (2015) Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in Sign Language nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1111/tops.12121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12121 [Google Scholar]
38. Padden, C., Meir, I., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., Seegers, S., & Sampson, T.
    (2013) Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture, (), –. 10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad [Google Scholar]
39. Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G.
    (2010) Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, (), –. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227 [Google Scholar]
40. Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G.
    (2014) The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, ().
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L.
    (1996) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, (), –. 10.1016/0926‑6410(95)00038‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 [Google Scholar]
42. Sandler, W.
    (2018) The body as evidence for the nature of language. Frontiers in Psychology, (), –. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01782
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01782 [Google Scholar]
43. Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D.
    (2006) Sign Language and linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
44. Schiefner, A., Ortega, G., & Perniss, P.
    (n.d.). Iconicity shapes lexical similarity: The case of British and German Sign Language. Submitted.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Stec, K., Huiskes, M., & Redeker, G.
    (2016) Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008 [Google Scholar]
46. Stefanini, S., Bello, A., Caselli, M. C., Iverson, J. M., & Volterra, V.
    (2009) Co-speech gestures in a naming task: Developmental data. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960802187755
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802187755 [Google Scholar]
47. Stefanini, S., Caselli, M. C., & Volterra, V.
    (2007) Spoken and gestural production in a naming task by young children with Down syndrome. Brain and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.01.005 [Google Scholar]
48. Stokoe, W. C.
    (1960) Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. InStudies in linguistics: Occasional papers Vol. 8, University of Buffalo.
    [Google Scholar]
49. van Nispen, K., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M., Mol, L., & Krahmer, E.
    (2016) Pantomime production by people with aphasia: What are influencing factors?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, (), –. 10.1044/2015_JSLHR‑L‑15‑0166
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0166 [Google Scholar]
50. van Nispen, K., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E., & Krahmer, E.
    (2017) Production and comprehension of pantomimes used to depict objects. Frontiers in Psychology, (), . 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01095
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01095 [Google Scholar]
51. Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D.
    (2014) Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, (). 10.1098/rstb.2013.0292
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0292 [Google Scholar]
52. Volterra, V., Capirci, O., Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., & Sparaci, L.
    (2017) Developmental evidence for continuity from action to gesture to sign/word. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, (), –. 10.1075/lia.8.1.02vol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.02vol [Google Scholar]
53. Żywiczyński, P., Blomberg, J., & Boruta-Żywiczyńska, M.
    Eds. (2024) Perspectives on pantomime. John Benjamins. 10.1075/ais.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.12 [Google Scholar]