1887
Volume 24, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examines speakers’ points during word searches in Mandarin-speaking daily interaction, specifically when searching for place references. It investigates whether these points are directed toward the referent and what functions they serve in local contexts. The dataset comprises 67 points from 303 minutes of video recordings, analyzed using multimodal conversation analysis. Findings show that points occur in both solitary and joint word searches. When the sought-after TCU component refers to a nearby location, points are more likely to be accurate, whereas accuracy decreases significantly for distant locations. Accurate points provide spatial deixis that is precise in direction yet abstract in reference, facilitating the retrieval of place references independently or collaboratively. They not only indicate the location of the referent but also invoke participants’ shared knowledge about it. Inaccurate points, by contrast, index the absence of the particular TCU component while displaying the speaker’s commitment to completing the word search.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.25023.che
2026-05-22
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, P., & Zima, E.
    (2021) On word searches, gaze, and co-participation. Gesprächsforschung, 22(1), 390–425.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blythe, J., Mardigan, K. C., Perdjert, M. E., & Stoakes, H.
    (2016) Pointing out directions in Murrinhpatha. Open Linguistics, 2(1), 132–159. 10.1515/opli‑2016‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0007 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blythe, J., Possemato, F., Dahmen, J., de Dear, C., Gardner, R., & Stirling, L.
    (2024) A satellite view of spatial points in conversation. InP. Haddington, T. Eilittä, A. Kamunen, L. Kohonen-Aho, T. Oittinen, I. Rautiainen, & A. Vatanen (Eds.), Ethnomethodological conversation analysis in motion, pp.171–198. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, H. H.
    (2003) Pointing and placing. InS. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet, pp.211–231. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooperrider, K.
    (2023) Fifteen ways of looking at a pointing gesture. Public Journal of Semiotics, 10(2), 40–84. 10.37693/pjos.2023.10.25120
    https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2023.10.25120 [Google Scholar]
  6. de Dear, C., Blythe, J., Possemato, F., Stirling, L., Gardner, R., Mushin, I., & Kofod, F.
    (2021) Locational pointing in Murrinhpatha, Gija, and English conversations. Gesture, 20(3), 417–452. 10.1075/gest.20035.dea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.20035.dea [Google Scholar]
  7. Dressel, D.
    (2020) Multimodal word searches in collaborative storytelling: On the local mobilization and negotiation of coparticipation. Journal of Pragmatics, 1701, 37–54. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.010 [Google Scholar]
  8. Enfield, N. J., Kita, S., & de Ruiter, J. P.
    (2007) Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1722–1741. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodwin, C.
    (1986) Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 29–50. 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C.
    (1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 51–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gullberg, M.
    (1998) Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish. Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haviland, J. B.
    (1993) Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 31, 3–45. 10.1525/jlin.1993.3.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1993.3.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2003) How to point in Zinacantán. InS. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, pp.139–170. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayashi, M.
    (2003a) Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(2), 109–141. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2003b) Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.12 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hayashi, M., & Yoon, K.-E.
    (2006) A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: With particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. Studies in Language, 30(3), 485–540. 10.1075/sl.30.3.02hay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.30.3.02hay [Google Scholar]
  17. Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B.
    (2013) The conversation analytic approach to transcription. InJ. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, pp.57–76. John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heritage, J.
    (2012a) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2012b) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) A glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, pp.13–31. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  21. Kendon, A.
    (1990) Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kendon, A., & Versante, L.
    (2003) Pointing by hand in “Neapolitan”. InS. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet, pp.109–138. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kendrick, K. H.
    (2010) Epistemics and action formation in Mandarin Chinese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara].
  25. Kita, S.
    (2003) Pointing: A foundational building block of human communication. InS. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet, pp.1–8. Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410607744‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607744-5 [Google Scholar]
  26. Le Guen, O.
    (2011) Modes of pointing to existing spaces and the use of frames of reference. Gesture, 11(3), 271–307. 10.1075/gest.11.3.02leg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.02leg [Google Scholar]
  27. Lerner, G. H.
    (1996) On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 131, 238–276. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2013) On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: A turn-constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion. InM. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding, pp.95–134. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Levinson, S. C.
    (2004) Deixis. InL. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of Pragmatics, pp.97–121. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1989) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Manrique, E., & Enfield, N. J.
    (2015) Suspending the next turn as a form of repair initiation: Evidence from Argentine Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1326), 1–21. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326 [Google Scholar]
  32. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McNeill, D., Cassell, J., & Levy, E. T.
    (1993) Abstract deixis. Semiotica, 95(1–2), 5–20. 10.1515/semi.1993.95.1‑2.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1993.95.1-2.5 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mondada, L.
    (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rossano, F.
    (2012) Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. [Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen].
  36. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2013) Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. InM. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding, pp.41–70. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. 10.2307/413107
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413107 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stirling, L., Gardner, R., Mushin, I., Blythe, J., & Possemato, F.
    (2022) On the road again: Displaying knowledge of place in multiparty conversations in the remote Australian outback. Journal of Pragmatics, 1871, 90–114. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.026 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sweetser, E., & Sizemore, M.
    (2008) Personal and interpersonal gesture spaces: Functional contrasts in language and gesture. InA. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Cognitive and discourse approaches to language, pp.25–51. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199123.1.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199123.1.25 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, W.
    (2017) Prosody and functions of discourse markers in Mandarin Chinese conversation: The cases of Ranhou, Wo Juede, and Meiyou. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles].
  41. Wu, R.-J. R.
    (2022) Gestural repair in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies, 24(1), 65–93. 10.1177/14614456211037451
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456211037451 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.25023.che
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.25023.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): indexing; Mandarin; multimodal conversation analysis; pointing; word search
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error