1887
image of Multimodality’s role in nano-scale niche construction

Abstract

Abstract

Human communicative discourse can be understood as a form of nano-scale niche construction. If our burst-like communicative moves in the medium of language are to create niches that persist long enough to be exploited as shared informational environments, then we need ways to bind individual moves into larger, temporarily stable structures. One important resource for this purpose is multimodality, as found in pioneering work in gesture research by Adam Kendon and by David McNeill, among others. The discussion points to areas where gesture studies and evolutionary approaches to human communication have potential for collaboration and innovation.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.25029.enf
2025-12-10
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/gest.25029.enf/gest.25029.enf.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/gest.25029.enf&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aureli, F., Schaffner, C. M., Boesch, C., Bearder, S. K., Call, J., Chapman, C. A., Connor, R., Di Fiore, A., Dunbar, R. I. M., Henzi, S. P., Holekamp, K., Korstjens, A. H., Layton, R., Lee, P., Lehmann, J., Manson, J. H., Ramos-Fernandez, G., Strier, K. B., and van Schaik, C. P.
    (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics. Current Anthropology(): –. 10.1086/586708
    https://doi.org/10.1086/586708 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickerton, D.
    (2009) Adam’s tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. 1st edn. Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, A.
    (2005) Word, niche and super-niche: How language makes minds matter more. THEORIA(), –. 10.1387/theoria.561
    https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.561 [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawkins, R.
    (1982) The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deacon, T. W.
    (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dennett, D. C.
    (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dingemanse, M., Rossi, G., & Floyd, S.
    (2017) Place reference in story beginnings: A cross-linguistic study of narrative and interactional affordances.” Language in Society(), –. 10.1017/S0047404516001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516001019 [Google Scholar]
  9. Donovan, A. M., Brown, S. A., & Alibali, M. W.
    (2023) Weakest link or strongest link?: The effects of different types of linking gestures on learning.” Gesture(), –. 10.1075/gest.21021.don
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21021.don [Google Scholar]
  10. Dor, D.
    (2015) The instruction of imagination: Language as a social communication technology. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256623.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256623.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Enfield, N. J.
    (2009) The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511576737
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576737 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2025) The enchronic envelope. Psychological Review, ahead of print, March31. 10.1037/rev0000553
    https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000553 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibson, J. J.
    (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, E.
    (1963) Behaviour in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, C.
    (1981) Interactional organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2018Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goody, J.
    (1977) The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Heyes, C. M.
    (2018) Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Innis, H. A.
    (1950) Empire and communications. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kendon, A.
    (1972) Some relationships between body motion and speech: An analysis of an example.” InSiegman, A. W., & Pope, B. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication, pp.–. Pergamon Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑015867‑9.50013‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7 [Google Scholar]
  22. (1978) Differential perception and attentional frame in face-to-face interaction: Two problems for investigation.” Semiotica(), –. 10.1515/semi.1978.24.3‑4.305
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1978.24.3-4.305 [Google Scholar]
  23. (1990) Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Koffka, K.
    (1936) Principles of gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lala, K. N., Andrews, D., Uller, T., Feiner, N., Feldman, M. W., & Gilbert, S. F.
    (2024) Evolution evolving: The developmental origins of adaptation and biodiversity. Princeton University Press. 10.2307/jj.13359158
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.13359158 [Google Scholar]
  26. Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., & Odling-Smee, J.
    (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences(): . 10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019 [Google Scholar]
  27. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W.
    (2000) Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences(), –. 10.1017/S0140525X00002417
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00002417 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewin, K.
    (1926) Vorsatz Wille und Bedürfnis: Mit Vorbemerkungen über die psychischen Krāfte und Energien und die Struktur der Seele. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑50826‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50826-4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Liddell, S. K.
    (2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
  30. Manrique, E.
    (2016) Other-initiated repair in Argentine Sign Language. Open Linguistics(), pp.–. 10.1515/opli‑2016‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Manrique, E., & Enfield, N. J.
    (2015) Suspending the next turn as a form of repair initiation: Evidence from Argentine Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology, –. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326 [Google Scholar]
  32. McNeill, D.
    (2000) Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850 [Google Scholar]
  33. McNeill, D., Quek, F., McCullough, K. -E., Duncan, S. D., Furuyama, R. B., & Ansari, R.
    (2001) Catchments, prosody and discourse. Gesture(), –. 10.1075/gest.1.1.03mcn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.1.03mcn [Google Scholar]
  34. Odling-Smee, J. C.
    (2024) Niche construction: How life contributes to its own evolution. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/13942.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13942.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ong, W. J.
    (1982) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Methuen. 10.4324/9780203328064
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203328064 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. C.
    (2021) Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108610728
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610728 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pinker, S.
    (2010) The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(supplement_2): –. 10.1073/pnas.0914630107
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914630107 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A.
    (2002) Home position. Gesture(), –. 10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac [Google Scholar]
  40. Sinha, C.
    (2015) Language and other artifacts: Socio-cultural dynamics of niche construction. Frontiers in Psychology 6(October), –. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01601
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01601 [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith, B. D.
    (2007) The ultimate ecosystem engineers. Science(), –. 10.1126/science.1137740
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137740 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stivers, T.
    (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction(), –. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tooby, J., & DeVore, I.
    (1987) The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. InKinzey, W. G. (Ed.), Evolution of human behavior: Primate models, pp.–. SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.25029.enf
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
Keywords: multimodality ; binding ; niche-construction ; catchments ; evolution ; temporality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error