Volume 45, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 0302-5160
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9781
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Eric Heinz Lenneberg (1921–1975), a neuroscientist and linguist born in Düsseldorf, published his masterpiece in 1967 . This book, now recognized as a classic in the field, inaugurated the scientific study of the biology of language, and has since its publication exerted an enormous influence. However, some interpretations of this work do not accurately capture the author’s biological and linguistic thinking. Here I concentrate on one such interpretation, that of leading generative acquisitionist Kenneth Wexler (1942-), who has formulated what he terms ‘Lenneberg’s dream’, portraying Lenneberg as believing that a trait like language is directly rooted in the genome. The present paper will show that Lenneberg’s view was in fact quite different from that assumed by Wexler. First, while the latter author explicitly adopts the genocentric stance that has characterized generative grammar since its very inception, the former relativized the role of genes and rejected the genome as the direct source of language. Second, Wexler’s position can be shown to be preformationist, assuming the genome to contain a specific program for language; Lenneberg, in contrast, never embraced that position and instead adopted an opposite, epigenesist stance. In sum, Lenneberg dreamt a completely different dream.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Amundson, Ron
    2007The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Stephen R. & David Lightfoot
    2002The Language Organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613869
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613869 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateson, Patrick
    2001 “Behavioral Development and Darwinian Evolution”. Cycles of Contingencies. Developmental systems and evolutioned. by Susan Oyama , Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray , 149–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benítez Burraco, Antonio & Víctor M. Longa
    2011 “El papel del ADN fósil en Paleoantropología: FOXP2, Neandertales y lenguaje”. Zephyrus: Revista de Prehistoria y ArqueologíaLXVII.45–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benítez Burraco, Antonio , & Víctor M. Longa
    2012 “On the inference ‘Neanderthals had FOXP2 = they had complex language”. The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference (EVOLANG9)ed. by Thomas C. Scott-Phillips , Mónica Tamariz , Erica A. Cartmill & James R. Hurford , 50–57. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.10.1142/9789814401500_0007
    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814401500_0007 [Google Scholar]
  6. Berwick, Robert C. & Noam Chomsky
    2016Why Only Us. Language and Evolution. Cambridge, Mss.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berwick, Robert C. , Angela D. Friederici , Noam Chomsky & Johan J. Bolhuis
    2013 “Evolution, Brain, and the Nature of Language”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences17:2.89–98.10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bialystok, Ellen & Judith F. Kroll
    . In press. “The Neurobiology of language: looking beyond monolinguals”. Biolinguistics11.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blumberg, Mark S.
    2005Basic Instinct. The Genesis of Behavior. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boeckx, Cedric & Víctor M. Longa
    2011 “Lenneberg’s Views on Language Development and Evolution and their Relevance for Modern Biolinguistics”. Biolinguistics5:3.254–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Borer, Hagit & Kenneth Wexler
    1987 “The Maturation of Syntax”. Parameter Settinged. by Thomas Roeper & Edwin Williams , 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978‑94‑009‑3727‑7_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_6 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1992 “Bi-Unique Relations and the Maturation of Grammatical Principles”. NLLT10.147–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown, Eric R.
    1975 “Eric H. Lenneberg”. Foundations of Language Development: A multidisciplinary approach, vol.Ied. by Eric H. Lenneberg & Elizabeth Lenneberg , v–vi. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑443701‑2.50004‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50004-4 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown, Roger W. & Eric H. Lenneberg
    1954 “A Study in Language and Cognition”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology49.454–462.10.1037/h0057814
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057814 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carroll, Sean B.
    2005Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The new science of Evo Devo and the making of the animal kingdom. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Catlin, Jack
    1978 “Discussion of the Papers by Stolzenberg and Chomsky”. Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberged. by George A. Miller & Elizabeth Lenneberg , 271–280. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chomsky, Noam
    1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1966Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row. [Quoted from the 2nded. by James McGilvray . Christchurch, New Zealand: Cybereditions 2002.]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1976 “On the Biological Basis of Linguistic Capacities”. The Neuropsychology of Language: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberged. by Robert W. Rieber , 1–24. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978‑1‑4684‑2292‑4_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2292-4_1 [Google Scholar]
  20. 1980Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2004 “The Biolinguistic Perspective after 50 Years”. Quaderni del Dipartamento di Linguistica, Universitá di Firenze14.3–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2005 “Three Factors in Language Design”. Linguistic Inquiry36:1.1–22.10.1162/0024389052993655
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2007 “Approaching UG from below”. Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semanticsed. by Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner , 1–29. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2009 “Opening Remarks”. Of Minds & Language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Countryed. by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini , Juan Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu , 13–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2011 “Language and Other Cognitive Systems: What is special about language?”. Language Learning and Development7.263–278.10.1080/15475441.2011.584041
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.584041 [Google Scholar]
  26. Crain, Stephen & Rosalind Thornton
    1998Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Davidson, Eric H.
    2006The Regulatory Genome: Gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. Burlington, Mass.: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Cedric Boeckx
    2011 “Introduction: Contours of the biolinguistic research agenda”. The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language facultyed. by Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx , 1–16. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria , Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini , Kenneth Wexler , Robert C. Berwick , Cedric Boeckx , Lyle Jenkins , Juan Uriagereka , Karin Stromswold , Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng , Heidi Harley , Andrew Wedel , James McGilvray , Elly van Gelderen & Thomas G. Bever
    2010 “The Biological Nature of Human Language”. Biolinguistics4.4–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dobzhansky, Theodosius
    1937Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fisher, Simon E. & Sonja C. Vernes
    2015 “Genetics and the Language Sciences”. Annual Review of Linguistics1.289–310.10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125024
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125024 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fitch, W. Tecumseh
    . In press. “What Would Lenneberg Think? Biolinguistics in the third millennium”. Biolinguistics11.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fodor, Jerry & Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini
    2010What Darwin Got Wrong. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Fortis, Jean-Michel
    2006 “Lenneberg, Eric H. (1921–1975). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics2nded. by Keith Brown , vol.VII, 43–44. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/02700‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02700-0 [Google Scholar]
  35. Geschwind, Norman
    1965a “Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man. Part I”. Brain88.237–295.10.1093/brain/88.2.237
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/88.2.237 [Google Scholar]
  36. 1965b “Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man. Part II”. Ibid., pp.585–644.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gilbert, Scott F. & Michael J. F. Barresi
    2016Developmental Biology. 11th ed.Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Gilbert, Scott F. & Richard M. Burian
    2003 “Developmental Genetics”. Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biologyed. by Brian K. Hall & Wendy M. Olson , 68–74. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Goodwin, Brian
    1994How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The evolution of complexity. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gottlieb, Gilbert
    1997Synthesizing Nature-Nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2001 “A Developmental Psychobiological Systems View: Early formulation and current status”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolutioned. by Susan Oyama , Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray , 41–54. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2003 “On Making Behavioral Genetics Truly Developmental”. Human Development46.337–355.10.1159/000073306
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000073306 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gould, Stephen Jay & Richard C. Lewontin
    1979 “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences205.581–598.10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 [Google Scholar]
  44. Griffiths, Paul E. & Russell D. Gray
    2001 “Darwinism and Developmental Systems”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolutioned. by Susan Oyama , Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray , 195–218. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2005 “Discussion: Three ways to misunderstand developmental systems theory”. Biology and Philosophy20.417–425.10.1007/s10539‑004‑0758‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-0758-1 [Google Scholar]
  46. Griffiths, Paul E. & Robin D. Knight
    1998 “What is the Developmentalist Challenge?”. Philosophy of Science65.253–258.10.1086/392636
    https://doi.org/10.1086/392636 [Google Scholar]
  47. Griffiths, Paul E. & Karola Stotz
    2000 “How the Mind Grows: A developmental perspective on the biology of cognition”. Synthese122.29–51.10.1023/A:1005215909498
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005215909498 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2013Genetics and Philosophy: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511744082
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511744082 [Google Scholar]
  49. Grohmann, Kleanthes K. & Cedric Boeckx
    2013 “Introducing the volume”. The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguisticsed. by Cedric Boeckx & Kleanthes K. Grohmann , 1–3. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511980435.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Guasti, Maria Teresa
    2002Language Acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hall, Brian K. & Wendy M. Olson
    eds. 2003Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Hoekstra, Teun & Jan G. Kooij
    1988 “The Innateness Hypothesis”. Explaining Language Universalsed. by John A. Hawkins , 31–55. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hornstein, Norbert
    2009A Theory of Syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Hyams, Nina
    2002 “Clausal Structure in Child Greek: A reply to Varlokosta, Vainikka and Rohrbacher and a reanalysis”. The Linguistic Review19.225–269.10.1515/tlir.2002.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2002.001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Jablonka, Eva & Marion J. Lamb
    2005Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Jenkins, Lyle
    1979 “The Genetics of Language”. Linguistics & Philosophy3.105–119.10.1007/BF00578450
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00578450 [Google Scholar]
  57. Johnston, Timothy
    1987 “The Persistence of Dichotomies in the Study of Behavioral Development”. Developmental Review7.149–182.10.1016/0273‑2297(87)90011‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(87)90011-6 [Google Scholar]
  58. Johnston, Timothy & Laura Edwards
    2002 “Genes, Interactions, and the Development of Behavior”. Psychological Review109.26–34.10.1037/0033‑295X.109.1.26
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.26 [Google Scholar]
  59. Keller, Evelyn Fox
    1995Refiguring Life: Metaphors of twentieth-century biology. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lander, Eric S. & Robert A. Weinberg
    2000 “Genomics: Journey to the center of biology”. Science287.1777–1782.10.1126/science.287.5459.1777
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1777 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lehrman, Daniel S.
    1953 “A Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinctive Behavior”. The Quarterly Review of Biology28:4.337–363.10.1086/399858
    https://doi.org/10.1086/399858 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lenneberg, Eric H.
    1953 “Cognition in Ethnolinguistics”. Language29.463–471.10.2307/409956
    https://doi.org/10.2307/409956 [Google Scholar]
  63. 1957 “A Probabilistic Approach to Language Learning”. Behavioral Science2.1–13.10.1002/bs.3830020102
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020102 [Google Scholar]
  64. 1960 “Language, Evolution, and Purposive Behavior”. Culture in History: Essays in honor of Paul Radined. by Stanley Diamond , 869–893. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 1961 “Color Naming, Color Recognition, Color Discrimination: A re-appraisal”. Perceptual and Motor Skills12.375–382.10.2466/pms.1961.12.3.375
    https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1961.12.3.375 [Google Scholar]
  66. 1962a “A Laboratory for Speech Research at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center”. New England Journal of Medicine266.385–392.10.1056/NEJM196202222660805
    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196202222660805 [Google Scholar]
  67. 1962b “Understanding Language without Ability to Speak: A case report”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology65:6.419–425.10.1037/h0041906
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041906 [Google Scholar]
  68. 1964a “Language Disorders in Childhood”. Harvard Educational Review34:2.152–177.10.17763/haer.34.2.g6w5521052672853
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.34.2.g6w5521052672853 [Google Scholar]
  69. 1964b “A Biological Perspective of Language”. New Directions in the Study of Languageed. by Eric H. Lenneberg , 65–88. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 1966 “The Natural History of language”. The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approached. by Frank Smith & George A. Miller , 219–252. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 1967Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 1969 “On Explaining Language”. Science164.635–643.10.1126/science.164.3880.635
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3880.635 [Google Scholar]
  73. Lenneberg, Eric H. , Irene A. Nichols & E. F. Rosenberger
    1964 “Primitive Stages of Language Development in Mongolism”. Disorders of Communication42.119–137Baltimore, N.Y..: Williams & Wilkins.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Lenneberg, Eric H. , Freda G. Rebelsky & Irene A. Nichols
    1965 “The Vocalization of Infants Born to Deaf and to Hearing Parents”. Human Development8.23–37.10.1159/000270229
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000270229 [Google Scholar]
  75. Levit, Georgy S. , Uwe Hossfeld & Lennart Olsson
    2006 “From the ‘Modern Synthesis’ to Cybernetics: Ivan Ivanovich Schmalhausen (1884–1963) and his research program for a synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology”. Journal of Experimental Zoology, Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution306B:2.89–106.10.1002/jez.b.21087
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21087 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lewontin, Richard C.
    1970 “The Units of Selection”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics1.1–18.10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000245
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000245 [Google Scholar]
  77. 2000aThe Triple Helix: Gene, organism, and environment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Lewontin, Richard
    2000b “Foreword”. In Susan Oyama , The Ontogeny of Information. Developmental Systems and Evolution, vii–xv. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Lickliter, Robert
    2008 “The Growth of Developmental Thought: Implications for a new evolutionary psychology”. New Ideas in Psychology26.353–369.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.07.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.07.015 [Google Scholar]
  80. Lickliter, Robert & Hunter Honeycutt
    2003 “Developmental Dynamics: Toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology”. Psychological Bulletin129:6.819–835.10.1037/0033‑2909.129.6.819
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.819 [Google Scholar]
  81. 2010 “Rethinking Epigenesis and Evolution in Light of Developmental Science”. Oxford Handbook of Developmental Behavioral Neuroscienceed. by Mark S. Blumberg , John H. Freeman & Scott R. Robinson , 30–47. New York: Oxford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Lightfoot, David
    1982The Language Lottery. Toward a Biology of Grammars. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 1999The Development of Language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 2006How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616204
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616204 [Google Scholar]
  85. Longa, Víctor M.
    2008 “Una visión crítica sobre la noción de ‘programa genético’ desde la biología y la lingüística: Consecuencias para la conceptualización de la ontogenia del lenguaje”. Verba35.347–385.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Longa, Víctor M. & Guillermo Lorenzo
    2012 “Theoretical Linguistics Meets Development: Explaining FL from an epigenecist point of view”. Language, From a biological point of view. Current Issues in Biolinguisticsed. by Cedric Boeckx , María Carmen Horno Chéliz & José L. Mendívil Giró , 52–84. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Lorenzo, Guillermo & Víctor M. Longa
    2009 “Beyond Generative Geneticism: Rethinking language acquisition from a developmentalist point of view”. Lingua119.1300–1315.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  88. 2018El innatismo: Origen, variaciones y vitalidad de una idea. Madrid: Cátedra.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Maienschein, Jane
    2005 “Epigenesis and preformationism”. Stanford Enclyclopedia of Philosophy. [plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/epigenesis/#7].
  90. Mameli, Matteo & Patrick Bateson
    2006 “Innateness and the Sciences”. Biology and Philosophy21.155–188.10.1007/s10539‑005‑5144‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-5144-0 [Google Scholar]
  91. Marx, Otto
    1967 “Appendix B: The history of the biological basis of language”. Lenneberg 1967: 443–469.
  92. Maynard-Smith, John & Eörs Szathmáry
    1999The Origins of Life: From the birth of life to the origin of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Mayr, Ernst
    1982The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. 1991One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Moore, David S.
    2001The Dependent Gene: The fallacy of ‘Nature vs. Nurture’. New York: Henry Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Moss, Lenny
    2003What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Müller, Gert B. & Lennard Olson
    2003 “Epigenesis and epigenetics”. Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biologyed. by Brian K. Hall & Wendy M. Olson , 114–123. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Neisser, Ulric , Daniel Tapper & Eleanor J. Gibson
    1975 “Eric H. Lenneberg: September 19, 1921–May 31, 1975”. Office of the Dean of the University Faculty of Cornell University. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Oyama, Susan
    2000[1982]The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental systems and evolution. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822380665
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822380665 [Google Scholar]
  100. 2001 “Terms in Tension: What do you do when all the good words are taken?”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolutioned. by Susan Oyama , Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray , 177–193. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Oyama, Susan , Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray
    eds. 2001Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Penfield, Wilder & Lamar Roberts
    1959Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Piaget, Jean
    1980 “Introductory remarks”. Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomskyed. by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini , 57–61. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo
    . In press. “From Zero to Fifty: Considerations on Eric Lenneberg’s Biological Foundations of Language and updates”. Biolinguistics11.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Pinker, Steven
    1984Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Poeppel, David & David Embick
    2005 “Defining the Relation between Linguistics and Neuroscience”. Twenty-first Century Psycholinguistics: Four cornerstonesed. by Anne Cutler , 103–118. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Raff, Rudolf A.
    2000 “Evo-Devo: The evolution of a new discipline”. Nature Review Genetics1.74–79.10.1038/35049594
    https://doi.org/10.1038/35049594 [Google Scholar]
  108. Robert, Jason Scott
    2003 “Developmental Systems Theory”. Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biologyed. by Brian K. Hall & Wendy M. Olson , 94–97. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. 2004Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking development seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498541
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498541 [Google Scholar]
  110. Samuels, Richard
    2004 “Innateness and Cognitive Science”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences8:3.136–141.10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  111. Smith, Linda B. & Esther Thelen
    2003 “Development as a Dynamic System”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7:8.343–348.10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00156‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6 [Google Scholar]
  112. Smith, Neil
    1999Chomsky. Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139163897
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163897 [Google Scholar]
  113. Spencer, John P. , Mark S. Blumberg , Bob McMurray , Scott R. Robinson , Larissa K. Samuelson & J. Bruce Tomblin
    2009 “Short Arms and Talking Eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate”. Child Development Perspectives3.79–87.10.1111/j.1750‑8606.2009.00081.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00081.x [Google Scholar]
  114. Thompson, D’Arcy W.
    1917On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.5962/bhl.title.11332
    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11332 [Google Scholar]
  115. Thornton, Rosalind & Stephen Crain
    2013 “Parameters: The pluses and the minuses”. The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntaxed. by Marcel den Dikken , 927–970. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804571.032
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804571.032 [Google Scholar]
  116. Thornton, Rosalind & Kenneth Wexler
    1999Principle B, Ellipsis, and Interpretation in Child Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Trettenbrein, Patrick C.
    ed. In press. “50 years later: A tribute to Eric Lenneberg’s Biological Foundations of Language ”, Special issue ofBiolinguistics11.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Vercelli, Donata & Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini
    2009 “Language in an Epigenetic Framework”. Of Minds & Language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Countryed. by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini , Juan Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu , 97–107. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Weber, Bruce W. & David J. Depew
    2001 “Developmental Systems: Darwinian evolution, and the unity of science”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolutioned. by Susan Oyama , Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray , 239–253. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. West-Eberhard, Mary
    2003Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Wexler, Kenneth
    1990 “Innateness and Maturation in Linguistic Development”. Developmental Psychobiology23:7.645–660.10.1002/dev.420230708
    https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.420230708 [Google Scholar]
  122. 1994 “Optional Infinitives, Head Movement and the Economy of Derivations”. Verb Movemented. by David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein , 305–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627705.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627705.016 [Google Scholar]
  123. 1998 “Very Early Parameter Setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage”. Lingua106.23–79.10.1016/S0024‑3841(98)00029‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00029-1 [Google Scholar]
  124. 2003 “Lenneberg’s Dream: Learning, normal language development, and specific language impairment”. Language Competence across Populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairmented. by Yonata Levi & Jeannette Schaeffer , 11–61. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. 2011 “Grammatical Computation in the Optional Infinitive Stage”. Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisitioned. by Jill de Villiers & Tom Roeper , 53–118. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978‑94‑007‑1688‑9_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1688-9_3 [Google Scholar]
  126. 2013 “Luria’s Biolinguistic Suggestion and the Growth of Language”. The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguisticsed. by Cedric Boeckx & Kleanthes K. Grohmann , 94–128. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511980435.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.009 [Google Scholar]
  127. Wilson, Edward O.
    1975Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Wimsatt, William
    1999 “Generativity, Entrenchment, Evolution, and Innateness: Philosophy, evolutionary biology, and conceptual foundations of science”. Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical essaysed. by Valerie G. Hardcastle 139–179. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  129. 2001 “Generative Entrenchment and the Developmental Systems Approach to Evolutionary Processes.”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolutioned. by Susan Oyama , Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray , 219–237. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Yang, Charles D.
    2004 “Toward a Theory of Language Growth”. Variation and Universals in Biolinguisticsed. by Lyle Jenkins , 37–56. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error