The Historiography of Generative Linguistics. By András Kertész

References

1. Chomsky, Noam
   1957 Syntactic Structures. Janua Linguarum Series Minor, 4. The Hague: Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chomsky, Noam
   1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chomsky, Noam
   1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Studies in Generative Grammar, 9. Dordrecht: Foris.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chomsky, Noam
   1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle
   1968 Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kertész, András and Csilla Rákosi
   2012 Data and Evidence in Linguistics: A Plausible Argumentation Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920752
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920752 [Google Scholar]
7. Koerner, E. F. K.
   1989 “The Chomskyan ‘revolution’ and its historiography: Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography: Selected Essaysed. byE. F. K. Koerner, 101–146. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.50
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.50 [Google Scholar]
8. Koerner, E. F. K.
   1995 “Historiography of Linguistics”. Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivistsed. byE. F. K. Koerner and R. E. Asher, 7–16. Cambridge: Pergamon. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑042580‑1.50005‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50005-2 [Google Scholar]
9. Koerner, E. F. K.
   2002 “The Chomskyan Revolution and its Historiography”. Toward a History of American Linguisticsed. byE. F. K. Koerner, 151–209. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203361856_chapter_8
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361856_chapter_8 [Google Scholar]
10. Koerner, E. F. K.
    2006 “The development of Linguistic Historiography — History, Methodology, and Present State”. History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Presented. bySylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe, and Kees Versteegh, 2802–2820. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kuhn, Thomas S.
    1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lakoff, Robin T.
    1989 “The Way we Were: Or, the Real Actual Truth about Generative Semantics: A Memoir”. Journal of Pragmatics13.939–988. 10.1016/0378‑2166(89)90016‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90016-7 [Google Scholar]
13. Laudan, Larry
    1977 Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Murray, Stephen O.
    1982 “Review of F. Newmeyer, Linguistic Theory in America”. Historiographia Linguistica8.107–112.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Murray, Stephen O.
    1989 “Recent studies of American linguistics”. Historiographia Linguistica16.149–171. 10.1075/hl.16.1‑2.10mur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.16.1-2.10mur [Google Scholar]
16. Newmeyer, Frederick J.
    1986a The Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Newmeyer, Frederick J.
    1986b “Has there been a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics?”. Language62.1–19. (Reprinted inGenerative Linguistics: A Historical Perspectiveed. byF. Newmeyer 1996, pp.1923–1938. London: Routledge.).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Post, Emil
    1944 “Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society50.284–316. 10.1090/S0002‑9904‑1944‑08111‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1944-08111-1 [Google Scholar]
19. Ten Hacken, Pius
    2007 Chomskyan Linguistics and its Competitors. London: Oakville: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]