A letter from Zellig Harris to André Lentin

References

1. Alama, Jesse & Johannes Korbmacher
   2019 “The Lambda Calculus”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyed. byEdward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. URL =https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/lambda-calculus/
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bahdanau, Dzmitry, Kyunghyun Cho & Yoshua Bengio
   2015 “Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate”. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2015). San Diego, CA [arXiv:1409.0473].
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barendregt, Henk
   1997 “The Impact of the Lambda Calculus in Logic and Computer Science”. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic3:2.181–215. 10.2307/421013
   https://doi.org/10.2307/421013 [Google Scholar]
4. Birkhoff, Garrett
   19673 [1940]1 Lattice Theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 25 (3rd ed.). Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bishop, Errett
   1967 Foundations of Constructive Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bloomfield, Leonard
   1935 “Linguistic Aspects of Science”. Philosophy of Science2.499–517. 10.1086/286392
   https://doi.org/10.1086/286392 [Google Scholar]
7. Bloomfield, Leonard
   1939 Linguistic aspects of science. [Monograph.] International Encyclopedia of Unified Science1.4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bridges, Douglas & Erik Palmgren
   2018 “Constructive Mathematics”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyed. byEdward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/mathematics-constructive/
   [Google Scholar]
9. Daladier, Anne
   1990a “Aspects constructifs des grammaires de Zellig Harris”. Langages99.57–84. 10.3406/lgge.1990.1592
   https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1990.1592 [Google Scholar]
10. Daladier, Anne
    1990b “Une représentation applicative des énoncés et de leurs dérivations”. Langages99.92–127. 10.3406/lgge.1990.1594
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1990.1594 [Google Scholar]
11. Daladier, Anne
    2016 “L’inconsistance de la théorie des opérateurs de Harris : de la fin des grammaires finitistes à une typologie inductive”. Perspectives harrissiennesed. byClaire Martinot, Christiane Marque-Pucheu & Sonia Gerolimich, 13–35. Paris: Cellule de recherche en linguistique, (CRL).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dybjer, Peter & Erik Palmgren
    2020 “Intuitionistic Type Theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyed. byEdward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/type-theory-intuitionistic/
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gleitman, Lila
    2002 “Verbs of a feather flock together II: The child’s discovery of words and their meanings”. The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century, Vol. 1: Philosophy of science, syntax, and semanticsed. byBruce Nevin, 209–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.228.17gle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.228.17gle [Google Scholar]
14. Gross, Maurice
    1979 “On the Failure of Generative Grammar”. Language55:4.859–885. 10.2307/412748
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412748 [Google Scholar]
15. Gross, Maurice
    1984 “Lexicon-grammar and the Syntactic Analysis of French”. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING ‘84), 275–282. Stanford (Cal.): Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/980431.980549
    https://doi.org/10.3115/980431.980549 [Google Scholar]
16. Gross, Maurice
    2002 “Consequences of the Metalanguage Being Included in the Language”. The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century, Vol. 1: Philosophy of science, syntax, and semanticsed. byBruce Nevin, 57–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.228.07gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.228.07gro [Google Scholar]
17. Harris, Zellig S.
    1946 “From Morpheme to Utterance”. Language22:3.161–183. 10.2307/410205
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410205 [Google Scholar]
18. Harris, Zellig S.
    1957 “Co-occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure”. Language33:3(1).283–340. 10.2307/411155
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411155 [Google Scholar]
19. Harris, Zellig S.
    1965 “Transformational Theory”. Language41:3.363–401. 10.2307/411782
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411782 [Google Scholar]
20. Harris, Zellig S.
    1968 Mathematical Structures of Language. (=Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 21.) New York: Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Harris, Zellig S.
    1969 The Two Systems of Grammar: Report and paraphrase. (=Transformations and Discourse Analysis Papers, 79.) Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. [Repr. inPapers in Structural and Transformational Linguisticsed. by inHenry Hiż, 612–692. Dordrecht/ Holland: D. Reidel 1970; repr. and revised inTransformationelle Analyse: Die Transformationstheorie von Zellig Harris und ihre Entwicklung / Transformational Analysis: The transformational theory of Zellig Harris and its developmented. bySenta Plötz (=Linguistische Forschungen, 8.), 58–240. Frankfurt/Main: Athenäum-Verlag 1972; repr. in a shortened version inPapers on Syntaxed. byHenry Hiż (=Synthese Language Library, 14.), 293–351. Dordrecht/Holland: D. Reidel 1981.]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Harris, Zellig S.
    1982 A Grammar of English on Mathematical Principles. New York: Wiley/Interscience.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Harris, Zellig S.
    1988 Language and Information. (=Bampton Lectures in America, 28.) New York: Columbia University Press. [Revised version of the Bampton Lectures given atColumbia University, New York City, inOct. 1986, URL=zelligharris.org/langinf.html.]
    [Google Scholar]
24. Harris, Zellig S.
    2002 [1990] “The background of transformational and metalanguage analysis”. The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century, Vol. 1: Philosophy of science, syntax, and semanticsed. byBruce Nevin, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Translated byAnne Daladieras “La genèse de l’analyse des transformations et de la métalangue”, Langages99.9–19 1990.) Available athttps://www.persee.fr/doc/lgge_0458-726x_1990_num_25_99_1589
    [Google Scholar]
25. Harris, Zellig S.
    1991 A Theory of Language and Information: A mathematical approach. Oxford & New York: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Harris, Zellig S. & Paul Mattick, Jr.
    1988 “Science Sublanguages and the Prospects for a Global Language of Science”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science495.73–83 [Vol. Telescience: Scientific Communication in the Information Age.] 10.1177/0002716288495001007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716288495001007 [Google Scholar]
27. Harris, Zellig S., Michael Gottfried, Thomas Ryckman, Paul Mattick, Jr., Anne Daladier, Tzvee N. Harris & Suzanna Harris
    1989 “The Form of Information in Science: Analysis of an immunology sublanguage”. Preface byHilary Putnam. (=Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 104.) Dordrecht/Holland & Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Heijenoort, Jean van
    2002 From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hiż, Henry M.
    1983 Review: Logico-Linguistic Papers by Richard M. Martin, Language and Society12:2.286–287.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Iemhoff, Rosalie
    2019 “Intuitionism in the Philosophy of Mathematics”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyed. byEdward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/intuitionism/
    [Google Scholar]
31. Johnson, Stephen B.
    2002 “The Computability of Operator Grammar”. The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century, Vol. 2: Mathematics and computability of languageed. byBruce Nevin & Stephen B. Johnson, 143–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.229.11joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.229.11joh [Google Scholar]
32. Joshi, Aravind K.
    2002 “Hierarchical Structure and Sentence Description”. The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century, Vol. 2: Mathematics and computability of languageed. byBruce Nevin & Stephen B. Johnson, 121–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.229.10jos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.229.10jos [Google Scholar]
33. Lentin, André
    1990 “Quelques réflexions sur les références mathématiques dans l’œuvre de Zellig Harris”. Langages99.85–91. Available athttps://www.persee.fr/doc/lgge_0458-726x_1990_num_25_99_1593. 10.3406/lgge.1990.1593
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1990.1593 [Google Scholar]
34. Lentin, André
    2002 “Reflections on References to Mathematics in the Work of Zellig Harris”. The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century, Vol. 2: Mathematics and computability of languageed. byBruce Nevin & Stephen B. Johnson, 1–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.229.03len
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.229.03len [Google Scholar]
35. Mancosu, Paolo
    1998 From Brouwer to Hilbert: The Debate on the foundations of mathematics in the 1920s. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Martin-Löf, Per
    1968 Notes on Constructive Analysis. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Martin-Löf, Per
    1975 “An Intuitionistic Theory of Types: predicative part”. Logic Colloquium 1973ed. byHarvey E. Rose and John C. Shepherdson, 73–118. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 10.1016/S0049‑237X(08)71945‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71945-1 [Google Scholar]
38. Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert
    1998 Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Moot, Richard & Christian Retoré
    2019 “Natural Language Semantics and Computability”. Journal of Logic, Language and Information28:2.287–307. 10.1007/s10849‑019‑09290‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-019-09290-7 [Google Scholar]
40. Nevin, Bruce E.
    ed. 2002 The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century, Vol. 1: Philosophy of science, syntax, and semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.228
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.228 [Google Scholar]
41. Nevin, Bruce E. & Stephen B. Johnson
    eds. 2002 The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century, Vol. 2: Mathematics and computability of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.229
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.229 [Google Scholar]
42. Russell, Bertrand
    1903 Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sager, Naomi
    1981 Natural Language Information Processing: A computer grammar of English and its applications. Reading (Mass.): Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wells, Joe Brian
    1999 “Typability and Type Checking in System F are Equivalent and Undecidable”. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic98:1–3.111–156. 10.1016/S0168‑0072(98)00047‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-0072(98)00047-5 [Google Scholar]
45. Weyl, Hermann
    1998 [1921] “Über die neue Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik”. Mathematische Zeitschrift10.39–79. (Translated as “On the New Foundational Crisis in Mathematics”, inFrom Brouwer to Hilbert: The Debate on the foundations of mathematics in the 1920sbyPaolo Mancosu, 86–122. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998.)
    [Google Scholar]
46. Weyl, Hermann
    1946 “Mathematics and Logic”. American Mathematical Monthly53:1.2–13.
    [Google Scholar]