oa The ghost of Vulgar Latin

References

1. Biondo, Flavio
   2015 [1435] De verbis romanae locutionis Biondi ad Leonardum Arretinum. Flavio Biondo, Leonardo Bruni, Poggio Bracciolini, Lorenzo Valla: Débats humanistes sur la langue parlée dans l’Antiquité. Textes édités, traduits, présentés, annotés et commentésed. byAnne Raffarin, 123–169. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bonamy, Pierre-Nicolas
   1756 Mémoire sur l’introduction de la langue latine dans les Gaules, sous la domination des Romains. Mémoires de Littérature tirés des registres de l’Académie Royale des Inscriptions et Belles-LettresXXIV, 582–602. Paris: L’Imprimerie Royale. (Repr. inPierre-Nicolas Bonamy: Vier Abhandlungen zum Vulgärlatein und zur Frühgeschichte des Französischen, ausgewählt, eingeleitet und kommentierted. byJörn Albrecht, 1–22. Tübingen: Gunter Narr 1975.)
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bruni, Leonardo
   2015 [1435] Leonardus Flavio Foroliviensi S. Quaerit an vulgus et litterati eodem modo locuti sint. Flavio Biondo, Leonardo Bruni, Poggio Bracciolini, Lorenzo Valla: Débats humanistes sur la langue parlée dans l’Antiquité. Textes édités, traduits, présentés, annotés et commentésed. byAnne Raffarin, 171–189. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cittadini, Celso
   2019 [1601] Trattato della vera origine e del processo, e nome della nostra lingua, scritto in volgar sanese (Venezia Ciotti). Edited byPierluigi Ortolano. Florence: Franco Cesati. [Originally published inVenice: Ciotti 1601.]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Adamik, Béla
   2019 “Transformation of the Case System in A. L. as Evidenced in Inscriptions”. Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis55.13–36.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Adams, James N.
   2007 The Regional Diversification of Latin 200 BC – AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511482977
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482977 [Google Scholar]
7. Adams, James N.
   2013 Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511843433
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843433 [Google Scholar]
8. Albrecht, Jörn
   ed. 1975 Pierre-Nicolas Bonamy: Vier Abhandlungen zum Vulgärlatein und zur Frühgeschichte des Französischen, ausgewählt, eingeleitet und kommentiert. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Alessio, Gian Carlo
   2015 “La grammatica speculativa e Dante”. Gian Carlo Alessio, Lucidissima dictandi peritia: Studi di grammatica e retorica medievaleed. byFilippo Bognini, 127–144. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bakker, Peter
    2008 “Pidgins versus Creoles versus Pidgincreoles”. The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studiesed. bySilvia Kouwenberg & John Victor Singler, 130–157. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444305982.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305982.ch6 [Google Scholar]
11. Banniard, Michel
    2011 “Du latin tardif (IIIe-VIIe siècle) au protofrançais (VIIIe siècle): Vers un nouveau paradigme”. Diachroniques. Revue de linguistique française diachronique1.39–58.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Becker, Lidia
    2014 “La protohistoire médiévale des langues romanes”. Manuel des langues romanesed. byAndré Klump, Johannes Kramer & Aline Willems, 261–286. Berlin & New York: W. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110302585.261
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302585.261 [Google Scholar]
13. Blau, Joshua
    1982 “Das frühe Neuarabisch in mittelarabischen Texten”. Grundriß der arabischen Philologie. I. Sprachwissenschafted. byWolfdietrich Fischer, 83–95. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clackson, James
    2016a “Latin as a Source for the Romance Languages”. The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languagesed. byAdam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden, 3–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
15. Clackson, James
    2016b “The language of a Pompeian Tavern: Submerged Latin?”. Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change?ed. byJames N. Adams & Nigel Vincent, 70–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316450826.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316450826.005 [Google Scholar]
16. Coseriu, Eugenio
    1954 “El llamado « latín vulgar » y las primeras diferenciaciones romances: Breve introducción a la lingüística románica”. Montevideo: Universidad de la República.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Curchin, Leonard A.
    2004 The Romanization of Central Spain: Complexity, Diversity and Change in a Provincial Hinterland. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203633717
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203633717 [Google Scholar]
18. Dardel, Robert de & Jacob Wüest
    1993a “Latin vulgaire et créolisation”. Actes du XXe Congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanesed. byGerold Hilty, II, 656–661. Tübingen & Basel: Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dardel, Robert de & Jacob Wüest
    1993b “Les systèmes casuels du protoroman: Les deux cycles de simplification”. Vox Romanica52.25–65.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Diez, Friedrich
    1836 Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen, I. Bonn: E. Weber.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Eskhult, Josef
    2018 “Vulgar Latin as an Emergent Concept in the Italian Renaissance (1435–1601): Its ancient and medieval prehistory and its emergence and development in Renaissance linguistic thought”. Journal of Latin Linguistics17:2.191–230. 10.1515/joll‑2018‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2018-0006 [Google Scholar]
22. Ferguson, Charles A.
    1959 “Diglossia”. Word15.325–40. 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702 [Google Scholar]
23. Frank-Job, Barbara & Maria Selig
    2016 “Early Evidence and Sources”. The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languagesed. byAdam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden, 24–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
24. Gaeng, Paul A.
    1992 “The Extent to which Inscriptional Evidence may serve as Source of ‘Vulgar,’ i.e. Spoken Latin”. Linguistica (Ljubljana) 32.19–29.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gensini, Stefano
    2009 “Dante Alighieri”. Lexicon grammaticorum: A bio-bibliographical companion to the history of linguisticsed. byHarro Stammerjohann, I, 351–356. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goetz, Hans-Werner
    2003 Europa im frühen Mittelalter: 500–1050. Stuttgart: Ulmer. 10.36198/9783838524276
    https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838524276 [Google Scholar]
27. Grandgent, Charles Hall
    1907 An Introduction to Vulgar Latin. Boston: D.C. Heath.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gulyás, Adrienn
    2019 “How Do New Languages Arise? A comparison of romanization and gallicization”. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae59.9–18. 10.1556/068.2019.59.1‑4.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/068.2019.59.1-4.3 [Google Scholar]
29. Haynes, Ian
    1999 “Military Service and Cultural Identity in the Auxilia”. The Roman Army as a Community, including papers of a conference held at Birkbeck College, University of London on 11–12 January, 1997ed. byAdrian Goldsworthy & Ian Haynes, 165–174. (= Journal of Roman Archaeology, supplementary series 34.) Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Haynes, Ian
    2013 Blood of the Provinces: The Roman Auxilia and the Making of Provincial Society from Augustus to the Severans. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199655342.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199655342.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Herman, József
    2000 [1967] Vulgar Latin. English transl. byRoger Wright. University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University Press. [Originally published asLe latin vulgaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1967.]
    [Google Scholar]
32. Holtus, Günter
    1989 “Das ‘vulgare illustre’ als Modell einer italienischen Kunstsprache: Standard, Substandard und Varietät in Dante Alighieri’s Traktat ‘De vulgari eloquentia’ (1305)”. Sprachlicher Substandard. II. Standard und Substandard in der Sprachgeschichte und in der Grammatiked. byGünter Holtus & Edgar Radtke, 1–13. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110935820‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110935820-002 [Google Scholar]
33. Imbach, Ruedi & Irène Rosier-Catach
    2005 “De l’un au multiple, du multiple à l’un: Une clef d’interprétation pour le De vulgari eloquentia”. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome. Moyen Âge117:2.509–529.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Janson, Tore
    2012 “Vulgar Latin and Middle Arabic”. High vs. Low and Mixed Varieties: Status, norms and functions across time and languagesed. byGunvor Mejdell & Lutz Edzard, 24–31. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
35. John, Alison
    2022 “Cultural Memory and Classical Education in Late Antique Gaul”. Making and Unmaking Ancient Memoryed. byRajiv K. Bhola & Martine De Marre, 256–272. New York & London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429352843‑17
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429352843-17 [Google Scholar]
36. Jorge, Muriel
    2018 Philologie, grammaire historique, histoire de la langue: Constructions disciplinaires et savoirs enseignés (1867–1923). Thèse de doctorat, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle–Paris 3.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kiesler, Reinhard
    2018 Einführung in die Problematik des Vulgärlateinsed. byVolkert Noll. 2nd ed.Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110546361
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110546361 [Google Scholar]
38. Kramer, Johannes
    1998 Die Sprachbezeichnungen Latinus und Romanus im Lateinischen und Romanischen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Křepinský, Maximilian
    1958 “Romanica. II. La naissance des langues communes et l’existence d’une période de leur évolution commune (latin vulgaire, période romane)”. Rozpravy Československé Akademie Věd, Řada Společenských Věd13.1–55.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lloyd, Paul M.
    1979 “On the Definition of ‘Vulgar Latin’: The eternal return”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen80:2.110–122.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Löfstedt, Einar
    1956 [1933] Syntactica: Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins, II. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup. [Originally published, Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup 1933.]
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lo Piparo, Franco
    1986 “Sign and Grammar in Dante: A non-Modistic language theory”. The History of Linguistics in Italyed. byPaolo Ramat, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Konrad Koerner, 1–22. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.33.02pip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.33.02pip [Google Scholar]
43. Lüdtke, Helmut
    2016 Der Ursprung der romanischen Sprachen: Eine Geschichte der sprachlichen Kommunikation. 2nd ed.Kiel: Westensee-Verlag. (1st ed. 2009.)
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mańczak, Witold
    1977 Le latin classique: Langue romane commune. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Marazzini, Claudio
    2018 Breve storia della questione della lingua. Rome: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Mathisen, Ralph W.
    2018 “‘Roman’ Identity in Late Antiquity, with Special Attention to Gaul”. Transformations of Romanness in the Early Middle Agesed. byWalter Pohl, 255–274. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110598384‑018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110598384-018 [Google Scholar]
47. Maurer, Theodoro Henrique
    1962 O problema do latim vulgar. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Acadêmica.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm
    1890 Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen, I. Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Marcellino, Giuseppe
    2019 “Latin and the Vernacular in Biondo Flavio’s Thought and Works”. Neo-Latin and the Vernaculars: Bilingual interactions in the Early Modern Perioded. byAlexander Winkler & Florian Schaffenrath, 11–35. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Millett, Martin
    1990 “Romanization: Historical issues and archaeological interpretation”. The Early Roman Empire in the Wested. byThomas Blagg & Martin Millett, 35–41. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Mohrmann, Christine
    1951 “Les formes du latin dit ‘vulgaire’: Essai de chronologie et de systématisation de l’époque augustinéenne aux langues romanes”. Actes du Premier Congrès d’études classiques, 207–220. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Nedeljković, Vojin
    2015 “Castles Made of Sand? Balkan Latin from Petar Skok to J.N. Adams”. The Danubian Lands between the Black, Aegean and Adriatic Seas (7th century BC – 10th century AD): Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Black Sea Antiquities (Belgrade 17–21 September 2013)ed. byGocha R. Tsetskhladze, Alexandru Avram & James Hargrave, 323–328. Oxford: Archaeopress. 10.2307/j.ctvr43k44.49
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr43k44.49 [Google Scholar]
53. Palmer, Leonard Robert
    1954 The Latin Language. London: Faber and Faber. (Repr., Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press 1988.)
    [Google Scholar]
54. Raffarin, Anne
    ed. 2015 Flavio Biondo, Leonardo Bruni, Poggio Bracciolini, Lorenzo Valla: Débats humanistes sur la langue parlée dans l’Antiquité. Textes édités, traduits, présentés, annotés et commentés. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Raynouard, François Just Marie
    1821 Grammaire comparée des langues de l’Europe latine dans leurs rapports avec la langue des troubadours. Paris: Firmin Didot.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Rochette, Bruno
    2011 “The Language Policies in the Roman Republic and Empire”. A Companion to the Latin Languageed. byJames Clackson, 549–563. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444343397.ch30
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343397.ch30 [Google Scholar]
57. Rutgers, Leonard Victor
    1995 The Jews in Late Ancient Rome: Evidence of Cultural Interaction in the Roman Diaspora. Leiden: E.J. Brill. (Repr. 2000.) 10.1163/9789004283473
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004283473 [Google Scholar]
58. Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte
    1977 “L’origine des langues romanes: Un cas de créolisation”. Langues en contact, pidgins – Creoles, Languages in Contacted. byJürgen M. Meisel, 81–101. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Schöntag, Roger
    2017a “Das Verständnis von Vulgärlatein in der Frühen Neuzeit vor dem Hintergrund der questione della lingua: Eine Untersuchung zur Begriffsgeschichte im Rahmen einer varietätenlinguistischen Verortung”. Synchronie und Diachronie (= Bavarian Working Papers in Linguistics, 6) ed. byBarbara Sonnenhauser, Caroline Trautmann, Daniel Holl & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna, 111–129. Munich: Ibykos Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Schöntag, Roger
    2017b “Il dibattito intorno al volgare antico tra Leonardo Bruni e Flavio Biondo sullo sfondo della cognizione linguistica di Dante”. Forum Italicum51:3.553–572. 10.1177/0014585817711685
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0014585817711685 [Google Scholar]
61. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1866 Der Vokalismus des Vulgärlateins, I. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Speidel, Michael Alexander
    1995 “Das römische Heer als Kulturträger”. La politique édilitaire dans les provinces de l’Empire romain. IIème-IVème siècles après J.-C.: Actes du IIe Colloque roumano-suisse (Berne, 12–19 septembre 1993)ed. byRegula Frei-Stolba & Heinz E. Herzig, 187–209. Bern: P. Lang. (Repr., Heer und Herrschaft im römischen Reich der Hohen Kaiserzeit, ed. byMichael Alexander Speidel, 515–544. Stuttgart: F. Steiner 2009.)
    [Google Scholar]
63. Swiggers, Pierre
    2001 “Les débuts et l’évolution de la philologie romane au XIXe siècle, surtout en Allemagne”. History of the Language Sciencesed. bySylvain Auroux, Konrad Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh, II, 1272–1285. Berlin & New York: W. de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Swiggers, Pierre
    2014 “Les études linguistiques romanes des origines jusqu’au début du XIXe siècle: Les ‘prémices’ de la romanistique”. Manuel des langues romanesed. byAndré Klump, Johannes Kramer & Aline Willems, 13–42. Berlin and New York: W. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110302585.13
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302585.13 [Google Scholar]
65. Tavoni, Mirko
    1990 “‘Ydioma tripharium’ (Dante, De vulgari eloquentia, I 8–9)”. History and Historiography of Linguistics: papers from the fourth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS IV), Trier, 24–28 August 1987ed. byHans-Josef Niederehe & Konrad Koerner, I, 233–247. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.51.1.26tav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.51.1.26tav [Google Scholar]
66. Tavoni, Mirko
    ed. 2017 Dante Alighieri, De vulgari eloquentia. Milan: Mondadori.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Tovar, Antonio
    1964 “A Research Report on Vulgar Latin and its Local Variations”. Kratylos9.113–134.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Väänänen, Veikko
    1981 Introduction au latin vulgaire. 3rd ed.Paris: Klincksieck. (Repr. 2012; 1st ed. 1963.)
    [Google Scholar]
69. Versluys, Miguel John
    2014 “Understanding Objects in Motion: An archaeological dialogue on Romanization”. Archaeological Dialogues21:1.1–20. 10.1017/S1380203814000038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203814000038 [Google Scholar]
70. Versteegh, Kees
    2002 “Dead or Alive: The status of the standard language”. Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Worded. byJames N. Adams, Mark Janse & Simon Swain, 52–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
71. Versteegh, Kees
    2005 “Breaking the Rules without Wanting to: Hypercorrection in Middle Arabic texts”. Investigating Arabic: Current Parameters in Analysis and Learninged. byAlaa Elgibali, 3–18. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Vincent, Nigel
    2016 “Continuity and Change from Latin to Romance”. Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change?ed. byJames N. Adams & Nigel Vincent, 1–13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316450826.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316450826.002 [Google Scholar]
73. Webster, Jane
    2001 “Creolizing the Roman Provinces”. American Journal of Archaeology105:2.209–225. 10.2307/507271
    https://doi.org/10.2307/507271 [Google Scholar]
74. Woolf, Greg
    1998 Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511518614
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518614 [Google Scholar]
75. Wright, Roger
    1982 Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France. Liverpool: Cairns.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Wright, Roger
    2002 A Sociophilological Study of Late Latin. Turnhout: Brepols. 10.1484/M.USML‑EB.5.106445
    https://doi.org/10.1484/M.USML-EB.5.106445 [Google Scholar]
77. Wright, Roger
    2016 “Latin and Romance in the Medieval Period: A sociophilological approach”. The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languagesed. byAdam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden, 14–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0002 [Google Scholar]