Volume 48, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 0302-5160
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9781
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article reviews Formalism and Functionalism in Linguistics. The Engineer and the Collector

13: 978-0-367-78784-422,95 US$


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bates, Elizabeth & Brian MacWhinney
    1987 Competition, Variation, and Language Learning. Mechanisms of language acquisitioned. byBrian MacWhinney, 157–193. Hillsdale: NY. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1989 Functionalism and the Competition Model. The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processinged. byBrian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates. 3–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, Noam
    1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague & Paris: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Croft, William
    2008 On Iconicity of Distance. Cognitive Linguistics19:1.49–57. ( 10.1515/COG.2008.003).
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.003 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fischer, Olga
    2007Morphosyntactic Change. Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Haiman, John
    ed. 1985Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2008 In Defence of Iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics19:1.35–48. ( 10.1515/COG.2008.002)
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hajičová, Eva
    1994 Topic/Focus and Related Research. The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics: A short introductioned. byPhilip A. Luelsdorff, 245–275. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/llsee.41.10haj
    https://doi.org/10.1075/llsee.41.10haj [Google Scholar]
  9. Harder, Peter
    2013 Structure and Function: A niche-constructional approach. Functional Approaches to Languageedited byShannon T. Bischoff & Carmen Jany, 71–106. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110285321.71
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110285321.71 [Google Scholar]
  10. Haspelmath, Martin
    2008 Frequency vs. Iconicity in Explaining Grammatical Asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics19:1.1–33. 10.1515/COG.2008.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyams, Nina
    1999 Underspecification and Modularity in Early Syntax: A formalist perspective on early acquisition. Functionalism and Formalism in Linguisticsed. byEdith Moravcsik, Michael Darnell, Frederick Newmeyer, Michael Noonan & Kathleen Wheatley, Vol.I, 387–413. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.41.18hya
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.41.18hya [Google Scholar]
  12. Ibbotson, Paul & Michael Tomasello
    2016 Evidence Rebuts Chomsky’s Theory of Language Learning. Scientific American315. Available at: www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-rebuts-chomsky-s-theory-of-language-learning/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tomasello, Michael
    2003Constructing a Language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error