1887
Volume 50, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 0302-5160
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9781
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

One of the most obscure and most frequently commented on texts in Arabic grammatical tradition is the opening formulation in its earliest extant book, Sībawayhi’s , concerning the tripartite division of parts of speech. For the third part of speech, the particle, around which the present article revolves, Sībawayhi uses a complex term, whose head is , a term which is commonly used by itself by later grammarians for this part of speech. This article revisits the question of whether the term by itself denotes “particle” in , alongside the denotation “word”. Following Weiss’ article, published more than a hundred years ago, it will be argued that does not denote “particle” in , though occurrences thereof may refer to particles, and that scholars who ascribe the later denotation “particle” to in do so due to an anachronistic bias.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00136.kas
2024-03-04
2024-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-ʿAyn = ʾAbū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ḫalīl b. ʾAḥmad al-Farāhīdī
    Al-ʿAyn = ʾAbū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ḫalīl b. ʾAḥmad al-Farāhīdī, Kitāb al-ʿAyn ed. by Mahdī al-Maḫzūmī & ʾIbrāhīm al-Sāmarrāʾī. [Beirut]: Dār wa-Maktabat al-Hilāl, [n.d.].
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-ʾAzharī, Šarḥ = Ḫālid b. ʿAbdallāh b. ʾAbī Bakr al-ʾAzharī
    Al-ʾAzharī, Šarḥ = Ḫālid b. ʿAbdallāh b. ʾAbī Bakr al-ʾAzharī, Šarḥ al-ʾĀǧurrūmiyya ed. by Ḥāyif al-Nabhān. Kuwait: Dār al-Ẓāhiriyya 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ibn Ḫarūf, Šarḥ = ʾAbū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī b. Muḥammad b. ʿAlī Ibn Ḫarūf
    Ibn Ḫarūf, Šarḥ = ʾAbū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī b. Muḥammad b. ʿAlī Ibn Ḫarūf, Šarḥ Ǧumal al-Zaǧǧāǧī. Pt. 1 (min al-ʾawwal ḥattā nihāyat bāb al-muḫāṭaba) ed. by Salwā Muḥammad ʿUmar ʿArab. Mecca: Maʿhad al-Buḥūṯ al-ʿIlmiyya wa-ʾIḥyāʾ al-Turāṯ al-ʾIslāmī, 1419 AH. Pt. 2 (min bāb al-hiǧāʾ ḥattā bāb al-ḥikāya) ed. by Salwā Muḥammad ʿUmar ʿArab. Jeddah: Markaz al-Našr al-ʿIlmī, Ǧāmiʿat al-Malik ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz 1427 AH.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ibn ʿUṣfūr, Šarḥ = Ibn ʿUṣfūr
    Ibn ʿUṣfūr, Šarḥ = Ibn ʿUṣfūr, Šarḥ Ǧumal al-Zaǧǧāǧī ed. by Ṣāḥib ʾAbū Ǧanāḥ. [n.p., n.d.]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ǧābir b. Ḥayyān, Muḫtār rasāʾil
    Ǧābir b. Ḥayyān, Muḫtār rasāʾil = Muḫtār rasāʾil Ǧābir ibn Ḥayyān (Jābir ibn Ḥayyān, Essai sur l’histoire des idées scientifiques dans l’Islam. VolI1: Textes choisis) ed. by Paul Kraus. Paris: Librairie orientale et américaine 1935.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Makkūdī, Šarḥ = ʾAbū Zayd ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. ʿAlī b. Ṣāliḥ al-Makkūdī
    Al-Makkūdī, Šarḥ = ʾAbū Zayd ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. ʿAlī b. Ṣāliḥ al-Makkūdī, Šarḥ matn al-ʾĀǧurrūmiyya ed. by ʾAḥmad b. ʾIbrāhīm b. ʿAbd al-Mawlā al-Muġaynī. Cairo: al-Maktaba al-ʾIslāmiyya 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Mubarrad, al-Muqtaḍab = ʾAbū al-ʿAbbās Muḥammad b. Yazīd al-Mubarrad
    Al-Mubarrad, al-Muqtaḍab = ʾAbū al-ʿAbbās Muḥammad b. Yazīd al-Mubarrad, Kitāb al-Muqtaḍab ed. by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Ḫāliq ʿUḍayma. 3rd ed.Cairo: Laǧnat ʾIḥyāʾ al-Turāṯ al-ʾIslāmī 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sībawayhi, al-Kitāb = Le livre de Sībawaihi
    Sībawayhi, al-Kitāb = Le livre de Sībawaihi ed. by Hartwig Derenbourg. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale 1881–1889.
  9. Al-Sīrāfī, Šarḥ = ʾAbū Saʿīd al-Sīrāfī, al-Ḥasan b. ʿAbdallāh b. al-Marzubān
    Al-Sīrāfī, Šarḥ = ʾAbū Saʿīd al-Sīrāfī, al-Ḥasan b. ʿAbdallāh b. al-Marzubān, Šarḥ Kitāb Sībawayhi ed. by ʾAḥmad Ḥasan Mahdalī & ʿAlī Sayyid ʿAlī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Al-Zamaḫšarī, al-Kaššāf = Ǧār Allāh ʾAbū al-Qāsim Maḥmūd b. ʿUmar al-Zamaḫšarī
    Al-Zamaḫšarī, al-Kaššāf = Ǧār Allāh ʾAbū al-Qāsim Maḥmūd b. ʿUmar al-Zamaḫšarī, al-Kaššāf ʿan ḥaqāʾiq ġawāmiḍ al-tanzīl wa-ʿuyūn al-ʾaqāwīl fī wuǧūh al-taʾwīl ed. by ʿĀdil ʾAḥmad ʿAbd al-Mawǧūd & ʿAlī Muḥammad Muʿawwaḍ. Riyadh: Maktabat al-ʿUbaykān 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Baalbaki, Ramzi
    1979 “Some Aspects of Harmony and Hierarchy in Sībawayhi’s Grammatical Analysis”. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik21.7–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ed. 2007The Early Islamic Grammatical Tradition. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2014The Arabic Lexicographical Tradition: From the 2nd/8th to the 12th/18th century. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274013 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bohas, Georges & Michael Carter
    trans. 2004 “Prolégomènes au Kitāb de Sībawayhi”. Langues et littératures du monde arabe51.43–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bravmann, Max
    1934 Materialien und Untersuchungen zu den phonetischen Lehren der Araber. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Universitäts-Buchdruckerei (Inaugural-Dissertation, Schlesische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Breslau).
  16. Campbell, Lyle
    2020Historical Linguistics: An introduction. 4th ed.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474463133
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474463133 [Google Scholar]
  17. Carter, Michael G.
    1972 “Les origines de la grammaire arabe”. Revue des Études Islamiques401.69–97 (English translation, byPhilip Simpson, inBaalbaki 2007: 1–26).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1973 “An Arab Grammarian of the Eighth Century A.D.: A contribution to the history of linguistics”. Journal of the American Oriental Society931.146–157. 10.2307/598889
    https://doi.org/10.2307/598889 [Google Scholar]
  19. ed. 1981Arab Linguistics: An introductory classical text with translation and notes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.24 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2008 “Parts of Speech”. Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol.III1, 546–552.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2015 “The Grammar of Affective Language in the Kitāb”. The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics II. Kitāb Sībawayhi: Interpretation and transmissioned. byAmal Elesha Marogy & Kees Versteegh, 36–65. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004302662_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004302662_004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Diem, Werner
    1974 “Nomen, Substantiv und Adjektiv bei den arabischen Grammatikern”. Oriens23–241.312–332 (English translation, byA. Gwendolin Goldbloom, inBaalbaki 2007: 279–299).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Druel, Jean N. & Almog Kasher
    2019 “‘Though This Be Madness, Yet There Is Method In’t’: The mamnūʿ min al-ṣarf (Diptotes) in Arabic Grammatical Tradition”. Arabica661.98–136. 10.1163/15700585‑12341520
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15700585-12341520 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fischer, Wolfdietrich
    1989 “Zur Herkunft des grammatischen Terminus ḥarf”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam121.135–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fleisch, Henri
    1971 “Ḥarf”. EI2, vol.III1, 204–205.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Forster, Regula
    2018 “Jābir b. Ḥayyān”. EI Three, Brill Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gätje, Helmut
    1971 “Die Gliederung der sprachlichen Zeichen nach al-Fārābī”. Der Islam471.1–24. 10.1515/islm.1971.47.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/islm.1971.47.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Guillaume, Jean-Patrick
    1988 “‘Le discours tout entier est nom, verbe et particule’: Élaboration et constitution de la théorie des parties du discours dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Langages921.25–36 (English translation, byPhilip Simpson, inBaalbaki 2007: 261–277). 10.3406/lgge.1988.1997
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1988.1997 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2011 “Defining the Word within the Arabic Grammatical Tradition: ʾAstarābāḏī’s predicament”. The Word in Arabiced. byGiuliano Lancioni & Lidia Bettini, 49–68. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004206427_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004206427_005 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2019 “Les parties du discours dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Histoire des parties du discoursed. byBernard Colombat & Aimée Lahaussois, 475–490. Louvain: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2021 “L’«hypothèse grecque» et le débat sur les origines de la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage43:1.61–72. 10.4000/hel.635
    https://doi.org/10.4000/hel.635 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hamzé, Hassan
    1994 “Les parties du discours dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Les classes de mots: traditions et perspectivesed. byLouis Bassat & Marcel Perennec, 93–115. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ighbariah, Ahmad
    2016 “Grammatical Features in Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ’s Categories”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam431.251–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jahn, Gustav
    1894 “Zum Verständniss des Sîbawaihi: Eine Erwiderung”. ZDMG48:4.1–21 (also appended to Jahn 1895–1900, vol. I/1).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1895–1900Sîbawaihi’s Buch über die Grammatik übersetzt und erklärt. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Karabekyan, Samvel & Marat Yavrumyan
    2007 “Ḥarf”. Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol.II1, 236–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kasher, Almog
    2009 “The Term ism in Medieval Arabic Grammatical Tradition: A hyponym of itself”. Journal of Semitic Studies541.459–474. 10.1093/jss/fgp009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgp009 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2011 “Anachronistic Interpretation of Sībawayhi’s al-Kitāb: Al-Sīrāfī and the tanwīn-naṣb principle”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes1011.273–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2016 “Is ḫalfa a Preposition? On a subclass of the ẓarf in Arabic grammatical tradition”. Folia Orientalia531.113–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2018 “Early Pedagogical Grammars of Arabic”. Foundations of Arabic Linguistics III. The Development of a Tradition: Continuity and changeed. byGeorgine Ayoub & Kees Versteegh, 146–166. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2022 “Was ʾilā a Noun in Arabic Grammatical Tradition?”. Romano-Arabica211.227–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kinberg, Naphtali
    1996A Lexicon of al-Farrāʾ’s Terminology in His Qurʾān Commentary: With full definitions, English summaries and extensive citations. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kouloughli, Djamel Eddine
    1986–1987 “Les particules ont-elles un sens? Autour d’une controverse dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. BULAG (Bulletin de linguistique générale et appliquée)131.215–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2001 “Réflexions sur l’origine du terme ‘ǧumla’ dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Métalangage et terminologie linguistique: Actes du colloque international de Grenoble, (Université Stendhal-Grenoble III, 14–16 mai 1998)ed. byBernard Colombat & Marie Savelli, vol.I1, 577–589. Louvain: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. trans 2004 “Préambule du Kitāb de Sībawayhi”. Langues et littératures du monde arabe51.29–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kraus, Paul
    1942Jābir ibn Ḥayyān: Contribution à l’histoire des idées scientifiques dans l’Islam. Vol.II1: Jābir et la science grecque. Cairo: Imprimerie de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lane, Edward W.
    1863–1893An Arabic-English Lexicon. London: Williams & Norgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Larcher, Pierre
    2011 “What is a Kalima? ʾAstarābāḏī’s answer”. The Word in Arabiced. byGiuliano Lancioni & Lidia Bettini, 33–48. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004206427_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004206427_004 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2012Le système verbal de l’arabe classique. 2nd ed.Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2017Syntaxe de l’arabe classique. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2019 “Kalām et ǧumla: proposition, phrase, énoncé dans la tradition linguistique arabe”. Proposition, phrase, énoncé: Linguistique et philosophieed. byFranck Neveu, 45–72. London: ISTE Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Levin, Aryeh
    1985 “The Distinction between Nominal and Verbal Sentences according to the Arab Grammarians”. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik151.118–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 1986 “The Medieval Arabic Term Kalima and the Modern Linguistic Term Morpheme: Similarities and differences”. Studies in Islamic History and Civilization in Honour of Professor David Ayaloned. byMoshe Sharon, 423–446. Jerusalem: Cana. 10.1163/9789004661561_025
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004661561_025 [Google Scholar]
  54. 1987 “The Views of the Arab Grammarians on the Classification and Syntactic Function of Prepositions”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam101.342–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2000a “The Meaning of ḥarf ǧāʾa li-maʿnan in Sībawayhi’s al-Kitāb”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam241.22–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2000b “Sībawayhi”. History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginning to the Presented. bySylvain Auroux, E. F. Konrad Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh, vol.11, 252–263. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 2011 “The Concept of Kalima in Old Arabic Grammar”. The Word in Arabiced. byGiuliano Lancioni & Lidia Bettini, 17–32. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004206427_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004206427_003 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2016 “What Does Sībawayhi Mean by ḥarfunlaysa bi-smin wa-lā fiʿlin”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam431.191–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lyons, John
    1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Merx, Adalbert
    1889Historia artis grammaticae apud Syros. Leipzig: Brockhaus.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 1891 “L’origine de la grammaire arabe”. Bulletin de l’Institut Égyptien, troisième série21.13–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 2023A History of the Study of Grammar among the Syrians: An English translation of Historia artis grammaticae apud Syros, trans. byDaniel King. Piscataway: Gorgias Press. 10.31826/9781463241988
    https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463241988 [Google Scholar]
  63. Mosel, Ulrike
    1975 Die syntaktische Terminologie bei Sibawaih, PhD Dissertation, University of Munich.
  64. Nasser, Shady Hekmat
    2013The Transmission of the Variant Readings of the Qurʾān: The problem of tawātur and the emergence of shawādhdh. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004241794
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004241794 [Google Scholar]
  65. Noy, Avigail S.
    2006 The Concept of ʾištiġāl in Medieval Arabic Grammatical Tradition. MA Thesis, Tel-Aviv University [in Hebrew].
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Owens, Jonathan
    1988The Foundations of Grammar: An introduction to medieval Arabic grammatical theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.45 [Google Scholar]
  67. 1990Early Arabic Grammatical Theory: Heterogeneity and standardization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.53 [Google Scholar]
  68. Peled, Yishai
    1999 “Aspects of the Use of Grammatical Terminology in Medieval Arabic Grammatical Tradition”. Arabic Grammar and Linguisticsed. byYasir Suleiman, 50–85. Richmond: Curzon.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 2009Sentence Types and Word-Order Patterns in Written Arabic: Medieval and modern perspectives. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004170629.i‑250
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004170629.i-250 [Google Scholar]
  70. Praetorius, Franz
    1894 Review of Jahn (1895–1900). Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen705–715.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 1895Zum Verständnisse Sibawaihi’s. Halle a.S: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 1909 “Ḥarfun = Terminus.” ZDMG631.504–505.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Rundgren, Frithiof
    1976 “Über den griechischen Einfluss auf die arabische Nationalgrammatik”. Acta Societatis Linguisticae Upsaliensis2:5.119–144 (English translation byA. Gwendolin Goldbloom, inBaalbaki 2007: 75–99).
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Schoeler, Gregor
    2000 “Wer ist der Verfasser des Kitāb al-ʿAyn”. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik381.15–45 (English translation in Chapter 6 ofGregor Schoeler 2006 The Oral and the Written in Early Islam, trans. byUwe Vagelpohl, ed. byJames E. Montgomery. London: Routledge).
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Silvestre de Sacy
    Silvestre de Sacy 1829Anthologie grammaticale arabe, ou Morceaux choisis de divers grammairiens et scholiastes arabes, avec une traduction française et des notes. Paris: Imprimerie royale.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Ṭāhā, Zaynab ʾAḥmad (= Zeinab A. Taha
    ) 2020Malāmiḥ min taṭawwur al-fikr al-luġawī: min Sībawayhi ʾilā al-Ǧurǧānī. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Miṣriyya al-ʿĀmma li-l-Kitāb.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Talmon, Rafael
    1984 “al-Tafkīr al-naḥwī qabla Kitāb Sībawayhi – dirāsa fī taʾrīḫ al-muṣṭalaḥ al-naḥwī al-ʿarabī”. al-Karmil51.37–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 1991 “Naẓra ǧadīda fī qaḍiyyat ʾaqsām al-kalām: dirāsa ḥawla kitāb Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ fī al-manṭiq”. al-Karmil121.43–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 2003Eighth-Century Iraqi Grammar: A critical exploration of pre-Ḫalīlian Arabic linguistics. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. 10.1163/9789004369917
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004369917 [Google Scholar]
  80. Troupeau, Gérard
    1973–1974 “La Risālat al-Kitāb de Sībawayhi”. Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph481.321–338.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 1976Lexique-index du Kitāb de Sībawayhi. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 1981 “La logique d’Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ et les origines de la grammaire arabe”. Arabica281.242–250 (English translation, byPhilip Simpson, inBaalbaki 2007: 27–35).
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Versteegh, Kees
    1977Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004348196
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004348196 [Google Scholar]
  84. 1995The Explanation of Linguistic Causes: al-Zaǧǧāǧī’s theory of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.75
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.75 [Google Scholar]
  85. 1997Landmarks in Linguistic Thought III: The Arabic Linguistic Tradition. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Weiss, Josef
    1910 “Die arabische Nationalgrammatik und die Lateiner”. ZDMG641.349–390.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00136.kas
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error