1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Historiographia Linguistica
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The distributed invention of enunciation theory
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

In the second half of the 20th century a linguistic approach emerged that aimed to complement the analysis of language structure: , centred on speakers and the act of speaking. Émile Benveniste has had his role raised to author of the theory, despite its developing simultaneously in work by Roman Jakobson and Jacques Lacan, and later Tzvetan Todorov, with each of whom he had professional and personal ties. Others who figure in its formulation are J. L. Austin, Charles Bally, Leonard Bloomfield, Jacques Damourette and Édouard Pichon, Bronisɬaw Malinowski, Hendrik Pos and, to some extent, Karl Bühler. Of particular significance is work published in 1969 by Jean Dubois and Michel Foucault, both of whom give enunciation a clearer and fuller treatment than is found in the 1970 paper by Benveniste regarded as the . The present article argues for, not sidelining Benveniste, but approaching the invention of enunciation as dialogic – a case of distributed cognition – instead of treating it on the lines of the ‘Great Man theory of history’ which this journal’s founder, E. F. K. Koerner, worked hard to oppose.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00157.jos
2024-11-22
2024-12-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/hl.00157.jos
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/hl.00157.jos/hl.00157.jos.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00157.jos&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alegría Polo, Marcos Alberto
    2014 Sentido y evento: El problema de la significación en Bühler y Benveniste. Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Buenos Aires. repositorio.filo.uba.ar:8080/handle/filodigital/4241
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Angermuller, Johannes
    2014 Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis: Subjectivity in enunciative pragmatics. Houndmills, Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. French version, Analyse du discours poststructuraliste: Les voix du sujet dans le langage chez Lacan, Althusser, Foucault, Derrida, Sollers, trans. byRosine Inspektor & Johannes Angermuller. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas 2013 10.1057/9781137442475
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442475 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2023 “The Analysis of Discursive Subjects”. Handbook of Political Discourseed. byPiotr Cap, –. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781800373570.00021
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800373570.00021 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arrivé, Michel
    1986 Linguistique et psychanalyse: Freud, Saussure, Hjelmslev, Lacan et les autres. Paris: Méridiens-Klincksieck. English version, seeArrivé 1992.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 1992 Linguistics and Psychoanalysis: Freud, Saussure, Hjelmslev, Lacan and others. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Trans. byJames Leader of Arrivé 1986.) 10.1075/sc.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sc.4 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1994 Langage et psychanalyse, linguistique et inconscient: Freud, Saussure, Pichon, Lacan. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 1996 “Ce que Lacan retient de Damourette et Pichon: l’exemple de la négation”. Langages.–. 10.3406/lgge.1996.1766
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1996.1766 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2007 Preface to Ono, –. 10.3828/comma.2007.3‑4.2
     https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2007.3-4.2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Austin, J. L.
    1961a Philosophical Papers. Ed. byJ. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock. Oxford: Clarendon Press. French version, Écrits philosophiques, trans. byLou Aubert & Anne-Lise Hacker, Paris: Seuil 1994.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 1961b “Performative Utterances”. Unscripted broadcast, BBC Third Channel, 24 Aug. 1956, corrected transcript first publ. inAustin (1961a: –).
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 1962a “Performatif-constatif”. La philosophie analytique, Cahiers de Royaumont, –. Paris: Minuit. English version, “Performative-Constative”, trans. byG. J. Warnock, inPhilosophy and Ordinary Languageed. byCharles E. Caton, –. Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1963.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 1962b How To Do Things With Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press. French version, Quand dire c’est fairetrans. byGilles Lane. Paris: Le Seuil 1970.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bally, Charles
    1932 Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Benveniste, Émile
    1946 “Structures des relations de personne dans le verbe”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, fasc. 1, no, –. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 1949 “Le système sublogique des prépositions en latin”. Travaux de Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 5: Recherches structurales, –. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.) 10.1080/01050206.1949.10416301
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01050206.1949.10416301 [Google Scholar]
  16. 1954 “Tendances récentes en linguistique générale”. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique–années:.–. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 1956a “Remarques sur la fonction du langage dans la découverte freudienne”. La psychanalyse.–. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 1956b “La nature des pronoms”. For Roman Jakobson, –. The Hague: Mouton. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 1958 “De la subjectivité dans la langue”. Journal de Psychologie, juillet-sept., –. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 1963 “La philosophie analytique et le langage”. Les études philosophiques.–. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 1964 “Documents pour l’histoire de quelques notions saussuriennes”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure.–
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale 1. Paris: Gallimard. English version, seeBenveniste 1971.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 1968 “Structuralisme et linguistique” (interview withPierre Daix). Les lettres françaises, no (24–30juillet), –. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 1969 “Sémiologie de la langue”. Semiotica.–, –. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.) 10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  25. 1970a “L’appareil formel de l’énonciation”. Langages.– (repr. inBenveniste: –). 10.3406/lgge.1970.2572
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1970.2572 [Google Scholar]
  26. 1970b “Structure de la langue et structure de la société”. Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica (Congresso Internazionale Olivetti, Milano, 14–17 ottobre 1968), –. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità. (Repr. inBenveniste: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 1971 Problems in General Linguistics, trans. byMary Elizabeth Meek, Coral Gables. Florida: University of Miami Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 1974 Problèmes de linguistique générale 2. Paris: Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2012 Dernières leçons: Collège de France, 1968 et 1969. Ed. byJean-Claude Coquet & Irène Fenoglio. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Gallimard, Seuil. English version, seeBenveniste 2019 [2012].
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 2019 [2012] Last Lectures: Collège de France, 1968 and 1969trans. byJohn E. Joseph. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. ed. 1951 Actes de la Conférence européenne de sémantique (Nice, 26–31 mars 1951), organisée par M. E. Benveniste (Paris), avec la participation de MM. C. E. Bazell (Istanbul), G. Devoto (Florence), J. R. Firth (Londres), H. Frei (Genève), L. Hjelmslev (Charlottenlund), J. Lotz (Columbia U. New-York), A. Sommerfelt (Oslo), S. Ullmann (Glasgow). Paris: Société de Linguistique de Paris.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1924 Rev. of Saussure (1922 [1916]). Modern Language Journal:.–. 10.2307/313991
     https://doi.org/10.2307/313991 [Google Scholar]
  33. 1933 Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.; London: George Allen & Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 1935 “Linguistic Aspects of Science”. Philosophy of Science.–. 10.1086/286392
     https://doi.org/10.1086/286392 [Google Scholar]
  35. Bühler, Karl
    1934 Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Chiss, Jean-Louis
    1986 “Charles Bally: Qu’est-ce qu’une ‘théorie de l’énonciation’?”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage:.–. 10.3406/hel.1986.2230
     https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.1986.2230 [Google Scholar]
  37. Coquet, Jean-Claude
    1987 “Linguistique et sémiologie”. Actes sémiotiques-Documents, .–.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Courtine, Jean-Jacques
    1981 “Quelques problèmes théoriques et méthodologiques en analyse du discours, à propos du discours communiste adressé aux chrétiens.” Langages.–. 10.3406/lgge.1981.1873
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1981.1873 [Google Scholar]
  39. Damourette, Jacques & Édouard Pichon
    1911–1930 Des mots à la pensée: Essai de grammaire de la langue française. vols. Paris: d’Artrey.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Dubois, Jean
    1969 “Énoncé et énonciation”. Langages.–. 10.3406/lgge.1969.2511
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1969.2511 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ducrot, Oswald
    1984 Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Eribon, Didier
    1989 Michel Foucault. Paris: Flammarion.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Falco, Mariacristina
    2022 “Saussure, Bühler, Benveniste: Sign and enunciation”. With Saussure, Beyond Saussure: Between linguistics and philosophy of languageed. byMarina De Palo & Stefano Gensini, –. Münster: Nodus.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Fenoglio, Irène
    2017 “Sur la notion de ‘sujet’ chez Benveniste”. Linx.–. journals.openedition.org/linx/1767. 10.4000/linx.1767
     https://doi.org/10.4000/linx.1767 [Google Scholar]
  45. Foucault, Michel
    1966 Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 1969 L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. English version, seeFoucault 1972.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 1972 The Archaeology of Knowledgetrans. byA. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Tavistock.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 1976 La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard. English version.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 1978 The History of Sexuality, vol.: An introduction, trans. byRobert Hurley. New York: Pantheon.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Harris, Zellig S.
    1952 “Discourse Analysis”. Language:.–. 10.2307/409987
     https://doi.org/10.2307/409987 [Google Scholar]
  51. Irigaray, Luce
    1969 “L’énoncé en analyse”. Langages.–. 10.3406/lgge.1969.2512
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1969.2512 [Google Scholar]
  52. 1970 “Le sexe fait ‘comme’ signe”. Langages.–. 10.3406/lgge.1970.2575
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1970.2575 [Google Scholar]
  53. Jakobson, Roman
    1957 “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb”. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, Dept. of Slavic Language & Literatures. (Repr. inJakobson, Selected Writings, vol.: Word and language, –. The Hague: Mouton 1971; partial repr. as “Shifters and Verbal Categories” inJakobson: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 1960 “Linguistics and Poetics”. Style in Languageed. byThomas A. Sebeok, –. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 1990 On Language. Ed. byLinda Waugh & Monique Monville-Burston. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Jakobson, Roman & Claude Lévi-Strauss
    2018 Correspondance 1942–1982. Ed. byEmmanuelle Loyer & Patrice Maniglier. Paris: Le Seuil.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Jespersen, Otto
    1922 Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin; New York: Henry Holt.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Joseph, John E.
    2017 “The Arbre-Tree Sign: Pictures and words in counterpoint in the Cours de linguistique générale”. Semiotica:.–. 10.1515/sem‑2016‑0040
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0040 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2018 Language, Mind and Body: A conceptual history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 2019 “The Resistant Embrace of Formalism in the Work of Émile Benveniste and Aurélien Sauvageot”. Form and Formalism in Linguisticsed. byJames McElvenny, –. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 2022a “The Affective, the Conceptual and the Meaning of ‘Life’ in the Stylistics of Charles Bally”. Language & Communication.–. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.05.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  62. 2022b “Making Grammars Concrete Again: Aurélien Sauvageot’s Esquisses of Finnish and Hungarian”. The Architecture of Grammar: Studies in linguistic historiography in honour of Pierre Swiggersed. byTim Denecker, Piet Desmet, Lieve Jooken, Peter Lauwers, Toon Van Hal & Raf Van Rooy, –. Leuven: Peeters. 10.2307/j.ctv2tjdgm3.30
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2tjdgm3.30 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2023 “What Structuralism Is Not”. Structuralism as One — Structuralism as Many: Studies in structuralismsed. byLorenzo Cigana & Frans Gregersen, –. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. In press. “Koerner, Saussure, Chomsky: An eternal upbraiding of the ‘Great man theory’”. Language & History.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Joseph, John E., Chloé Laplantine & George-Jean Pinault
    2020 “Lettres d’Émile Benveniste à Claude Lévi-Strauss (1948–1967)”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage:.–. 10.4000/hel.612
     https://doi.org/10.4000/hel.612 [Google Scholar]
  66. Koerner, E. F. K.
    1971 “Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic theory in Western studies of language: A critical evaluation of the evolution of Saussurean principles and their relevance to contemporary linguistic theories. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in General Linguistics in the Department of Modern Languages, Simon Fraser University”, https://summit.sfu.ca/_flysystem/fedora/sfu_migrate/2954/b11119603.pdf
  67. Kristeva, Julia
    2012 “Préface: Émile Benveniste, un linguiste qui ne dit ni ne cache, mais signifie”. InBenveniste (2012: –).
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lacan, Jacques
    1945 “Le temps logique et l’assertion de certitude anticipée: Un nouveau sophisme”. Cahiers d’art 1940–1944, –. (Repr. inLacan 1966b: –). English version, “Logical Time and the Assertion of Anticipated Certainty”, inLacan (2006 [1966b]: –.)
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 1956 “Fonction et champ de la parole et du langage dans la psychanalyse: Rapport du Congrès de Rome tenu à l’Istituto di Psicologia della Università di Roma les 26 et 27 septembre 1953”. La psychanalyse.–. (Repr. inLacan 1966b: –). English version, “The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis”, inLacan (2006 [1966b]: –).
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 1958 “Le désir et son interpretation”. Seminar of 12 Nov. 1958, https://ecole-lacanienne.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/1958.11.12.pdf (publ. version inLacan 2013).
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 1966a [1960] “Subversion du sujet et dialectique du désir dans l’inconscient freudien”. Paper read (with the title “La dialectique”) at the Congrès réuni à Royaumont par les soins des Colloques philosophiques internationaux, 19–23 Sep. 1960, and first published (in rewritten form) in Lacan (1966b: 793–827). English version, “The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious”, inLacan 2006 [1966b]: –).
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 1966b Écrits. Paris: Seuil. English version, seeLacan 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 2006 Écrits: The first complete edition in Englishtrans. byBruce Fink, in collaboration with Hélöise Fink & Russell Grigg. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 2013 Le séminaire, livre VI: Le désir et son interprétation (1958–1959). Ed. byJacques-Alain Miller. Paris: La Martinière. English version, seeLacan 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 2019 Desire and Its Interpretation: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VI, trans. byBruce Fink, Cambridge & Medford, Mass.: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Lehmann, Winfred P.
    1968 Rev. of Benveniste (1966b). Language:.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Lie, Sulgi
    2020 Towards a Political Aesthetics of Cinema: The outside of film. Trans. byDaniel Fairfax. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. (Orig. publ. asDie Aussenseite des Films: Zur politischen Filmästhetic, Zürich & Berlin: Diaphanes 2012.)
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Lock, Charles
    1992 “Roman Jakobson and the Future of Linguistics” (rev. art. onJakobson 1990) Canadian Slavonic Papers/Revue canadienne des Slavistes:.–. 10.1080/00085006.1992.11091993
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.1992.11091993 [Google Scholar]
  79. Lösener, Hans
    2010 “Die Origo der Subjektivität: ich, jetzt, hier bei Bühler und Benveniste”. Grammatik — Praxis — Geschichte: Festschrift für Wilfried Kürschnered. byAbraham P. ten Cate, Reinhard Rapp, Jürg Strässler, Maurice Vliegen & Heinrich Weber, –. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Lotz, John
    1951 Letter to Émile Benveniste, 9 Jan. 1951. Papiers d’Orientalistes (), f.. Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Malinowski, Bronisɬaw
    1923 “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. Supplement toC. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism, –, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1945 Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Miller, Alexander
    2022 “Formation and Development of the Concept of Discourse in Lacan and Benveniste”. Psychoanalysis and History:.–. 10.3366/pah.2022.0422
     https://doi.org/10.3366/pah.2022.0422 [Google Scholar]
  84. Milner, Jean-Claude
    2002 Le périple structural: Figures et paradigmes. Paris: Le Seuil.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Mitelman, Myriam
    2015 “Secrets de l’énonciation”. Ironik! Le bulletin UFORCA pour l’Université Populaire Jacques-Lacanno. (sep 2015) https://www.lacan-universite.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/MITELMAN.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Normand, Claudine
    1986 “Les termes de l’énonciation de Benveniste”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage:.–. 10.3406/hel.1986.2232
     https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.1986.2232 [Google Scholar]
  87. Ono, Aya
    2007 La notion d’énonciation chez Émile Benveniste. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Osthoff, Hermann and Brugman(n), Karl
    1878 Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen, Part. Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Pos, Hendrik J.
    1939 “Phénoménologie et linguistique”. Revue internationale de philosophie.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1881 De l’emploi du génitif absolu en sanscrit, thèse pour le doctorat présentée à la Faculté de Philosophie de l’Université de Leipzig. Genève: Imprimerie Jules-Guillaume Fick.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. byCharles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger. Paris and Lausanne: Payot. (2nd ed. 1922; subsequent eds essentially unchanged). English version, Course in General Linguistics, trans. byWade Baskin, New York: Philosophical Library 1959.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Sauvageot, Aurélien
    1946 Esquisse de la langue finnoise. Paris: La Nouvelle Édition.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 1951 Esquisse de la langue hongroise. Paris: Klincksieck.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Sicard, l’Abbé
    1808 Élémens de grammaire générale, appliqués à la langue française, tome. 3rd ed.Paris: chez Deterville.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Silverman, Hugh J.
    1994 “French Structuralism and After: De Saussure, Lévi-Strauss, Barthes, Lacan, Foucault”. Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophyed. byRichard Kearney, –. London & New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Smith, Russell
    2021 “Enunciation”. Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Literatureed. byJohn Frow. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1058
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1058 [Google Scholar]
  97. Šťastná, Eva
    . n. d. “Words Referring to Their Own Utterance: Jakobson and Benveniste on shifters”. https://www.academia.edu/5984378/_Words_referring_to_their_own_utterance_Jakobson_and_Benveniste_on_shifters_
  98. Sumpf, Joseph & Jean Dubois
    1969 “Problèmes de l’analyse du discours”. Langages.–. 10.3406/lgge.1969.2506
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1969.2506 [Google Scholar]
  99. Todorov, Tzvetan
    1970 “Problèmes de l’énonciation”. Langages.–. 10.3406/lgge.1970.2571
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1970.2571 [Google Scholar]
  100. 1981 Mikhaïl Bakhtine: Le principe dialogique, suivi de: Écrits du cercle de Bakhtin. Paris: Seuil.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 2012 “Postface: Émile Benveniste, le destin d’un savant”. InBenveniste (2012: –).
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Weinreich, Uriel
    1966 “Explorations in Semantic Theory”. Current Trends in Linguistics IIIed. byThomas A. Sebeok, –. The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00157.jos
Loading
The distributed invention of enunciation theory
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00157.jos
/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00157.jos
/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00157.jos
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error