oa The prehistory of generative grammar and Chomsky’s debt to Emil Post

References

1. Anellis, Irving H.
   2012 “Peirce’s Truth-functional Analysis and the Origin of the Truth Table”. History and Philosophy of Logic:.–. 10.1080/01445340.2011.621702
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2011.621702 [Google Scholar]
2. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
   1953 “A Quasi-arithmetical Notation for Syntactic Description”. Language:.–. Reprinted with revisions inBar-Hillel (1964), –. 10.2307/410452
   https://doi.org/10.2307/410452 [Google Scholar]
3. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
   1964 Language and Information: Selected essays on their theory and application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, Micha Perles & Eliyahu Shamir
   1961 “On Formal Properties of Simple Phrase Structure Grammars”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft, und Kommunikationsforschung.–. Reprinted with revisions inBar-Hillel (1964), –.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berwick, Robert & Noam Chomsky
   2016 Why Only Us? Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Beth, Evert W.
   1963 “Konstanten van het wiskundige denken [constants in mathematical thinking]”. Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen: Afdeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks:.–.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brainerd, Walter S. & Lawrence H. Landweber
   1974 Theory of Computation. New York: John Wiley.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brodda, Benny
   1992 “Comments [on Geoffrey Sampson’s paper ‘Probabilistic parsing’]”. Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991ed. byJan Svartvik, number 65 in Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chomsky, Noam
   1951a Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew. Master’s thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chomsky, Noam
    1951b Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew. Typescript of a radical revision of Chomsky’s MA thesis, datedDecember 1951; retyped and published byGarland, New York 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chomsky, Noam
    1955 Transformational Analysis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. URL: https://search.proquest.com/docview/89172813
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chomsky, Noam
    1955–1956 Manuscript, mimeographed 1955; revised 1956 and distributed on microfilm by MIT Library, Cambridge, MA; ultimately published (with some omissions and a new introduction) as Chomsky 1975.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chomsky, Noam
    1956 “Three Models for the Description of Language”. I.R.E. Transactions on Information Theory.–. Substantially revised version published inReadings in Mathematical Psychology, Volume IIed. byR. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter, –. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1965 10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813 [Google Scholar]
14. Chomsky, Noam
    1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
15. Chomsky, Noam
    1959 “On Certain Formal Properties of Grammars”. Information and Control():–. Reprinted inReadings in Mathematical Psychology, Volume, ed. byR. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter, –. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1965 (citation to the original on p. 125 of this reprinting is incorrect). 10.1016/S0019‑9958(59)90362‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(59)90362-6 [Google Scholar]
16. Chomsky, Noam
    1961 “On the notion ‘rule of grammar’.” Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium in Applied Mathematics, –. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. Reprinted inThe Structure of Language: Readings in the philosophy of languageed. byJerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz, –. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 10.1090/psapm/012/9985
    https://doi.org/10.1090/psapm/012/9985 [Google Scholar]
17. Chomsky, Noam
    1962 “Explanatory Models in Linguistics”. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congressed. byErnest Nagel, Patrick Suppes & Alfred Tarski, –. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chomsky, Noam
    1963 “Formal Properties of Grammars”. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume, ed. byR. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter–. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chomsky, Noam
    1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chomsky, Noam
    1966 Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Chomsky, Noam
    1975 The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum. Revision ofChomsky (1955–1956).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Chomsky, Noam
    1986 Knowledge of Language. Its origins, nature, and use. New York: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chomsky, Noam
    1991 “Linguistics and Adjacent Fields: A personal view”. The Chomskyan Turned. byAsa Kasher, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Chomsky, Noam & George A. Miller
    1963 “Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages”. eds., Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume, ed. byR. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter, –. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Church, Alonzo
    1936 “An Unsolvable Problem of Elementary Number Theory”. American Journal of Mathematics:.–. 10.2307/2371045
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2371045 [Google Scholar]
26. Cormen, Thomas H., Charles E. Leiserson & Ronald L. Rivest
    2000 Introduction to Algorithms. Cambridge MA / New York: MIT Press / McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Davis, Martin
    ed. 1958 Computability and Unsolvability. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Davis, Martin
    ed. 1965 The Undecidable: Basic papers on undecidable propositions, unsolvable problems and computable functions. New York: Raven Press. Reissued 2004 by Dover Publications with a different version of the final paper by Post.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Davis, Martin
    1982 “Why Gödel didn’t Have Church’s Thesis”. Information and Control:.–. 10.1016/S0019‑9958(82)91226‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(82)91226-8 [Google Scholar]
30. Davis, Martin
    1994a “Emil L. Post: His life and work”. InDavis 1994b, –.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Davis, Martin
    ed. 1994b Solvability, Provability, Definability: The collected works of Emil L. Post. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
    [Google Scholar]
32. De Mol, Liesbeth
    2006 “Closing the Circle: An analysis of Emil Post’s early work”. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic:.–. 10.2178/bsl/1146620062
    https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1146620062 [Google Scholar]
33. De Mol, Liesbeth
    2009 “On the Boundaries of Solvability and Unsolvability in Tag Systems: Theoretical and experimental results. The Complexity of Simple Programs 2008, number 1 in Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, ed. byT. Neary, D. Woods, A. K. Seda & N. Murphy, –. Waterloo, NSW, Australia: Open Publishing Association. Https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.3329. 10.4204/EPTCS.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.1.5 [Google Scholar]
34. Epstein, Richard L. & Walter A. Carnielli
    2000 Computability: Computable functions, logic, and the foundations of mathematics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2nd ed.
    [Google Scholar]
35. George, Alexander
    1989 “How not to Become Confused about Linguistics”. Reflections on Chomskyed. byAlexander George, –. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ginsburg, Seymour & Barbara Hall-Partee
    1969 “A Mathematical Model of Transformational Grammar”. Information and Control:.–. 10.1016/S0019‑9958(69)90464‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(69)90464-1 [Google Scholar]
37. Gödel, Kurt
    1931 “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I”. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik:.–. Translated as “On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems, I”. Invan Heijenoort, –.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gross, Maurice & André Lentin
    1970 Introduction to Formal Grammars. London: George Allen & Unwin. Translated byMorris Salkoff. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑87129‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87129-0 [Google Scholar]
39. Harris, Randy Allen
    2021 The Linguistics Wars: Chomsky, Lakoff, and the battle over deep structure. New York: Oxford University Press, second ed.. 10.1093/oso/9780199740338.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199740338.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
40. Harris, Zellig S.
    1951 Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Republished asStructural Linguistics 1960 Preface datedJanuary 1947.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Harris, Zellig S.
    1954 “Transfer Grammar”. International Journal of American Linguistics:.–. 10.1086/464289
    https://doi.org/10.1086/464289 [Google Scholar]
42. Harris, Zellig S.
    1991 A Theory of Language and Information: A mathematical approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198242246.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198242246.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
43. Hockett, Charles F.
    1954 “Two Models of Grammatical Description”. Word:.–. Page references are to the reprinting inJoos (ed.) , –. 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659524
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659524 [Google Scholar]
44. Hockett, Charles F.
    1966 “Language, Mathematics and Linguistics. Current Trends in Linguistics: Volume 3, theoretical foundations, –. The Hague: Mouton. Republished as a monograph byMouton, The Hague 1967.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Humberstone, Lloyd
    2008 “Replacing Modus Ponens with One-premiss Rules”. Logic Journal of the IGPL:.–. 10.1093/jigpal/jzn017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzn017 [Google Scholar]
46. Jackson, Allyn
    2018 “Emil Post: Psychological fidelity”. Inference: International Review of Science:. Online athttps://inference-review.com/article/psychological-fidelity
    [Google Scholar]
47. Jakobson, Roman
    1969 “Linguistics in its Relation to Other Sciences. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Linguists, –. Bucharest: Éditions de l’Académie de la République Socialiste de Roumanie. Page reference is to the reprinting in Jakobson’s, Selected Writings, II: Word and Language (The Hague: Mouton 1971), –.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Joseph, John E.
    1990 “Ideologizing Saussure: Bloomfield’s and Chomsky’s readings of the Cours de linquistique générale”. Ideologies of Languageed. byJohn E. Joseph & Talbot J. Taylor, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Joseph, John E.
    2002 From Whitney to Chomsky. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.103
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.103 [Google Scholar]
50. Joshi, Aravind K.
    1985 “Tree Adjoining Grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions?” Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectivesed. byDavid Dowty, Lauri Karttunen & Arnold Zwicky, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597855.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597855.007 [Google Scholar]
51. Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal
    1964 An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kimball, John
    1967 “Predicates Definable over Transformational Derivations by Intersection with Regular Languages”. Information and Control:.–. 10.1016/S0019‑9958(67)90497‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(67)90497-4 [Google Scholar]
53. Kimball, John
    1973 The Formal Theory of Grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Kracht, Marcus
    2003 The Mathematics of Language. NumberinStudies in Generative Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895667
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895667 [Google Scholar]
55. Levelt, W. J. M.
    1974 Formal Grammars in Linguistics and Psycholinguistics. The Hague: Mouton. volumes; republished in one volume asLevelt (2008).
    [Google Scholar]
56. Levelt, W. J. M.
    2008 Formal Grammars in Linguistics and Psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.144
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.144 [Google Scholar]
57. Lewis, C. I.
    1918 A Survey of Symbolic Logic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, first ed.. 10.1525/9780520398252
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520398252 [Google Scholar]
58. Markov, Andrey A.
    1947 “Névozmožnost’ nékotoryh algorifmov v téorii associativnyh sistém” (‘Impossibility of certain algorithms in the theory of associative systems’). Doklady Akadémii Nauk SSSR:–. Abstracted byAndrzej MostowskiinJournal of Symbolic Logic:.– 1948.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Minsky, Marvin L.
    1967 Computation: Finite and infinite machines. Englwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Nevin, Bruce E.
    2009 “More concerning the Roots of Transformational Generative Grammar”. Historiographia Linguistica:.–. 10.1075/hl.36.2.21nev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.2.21nev [Google Scholar]
61. Nevin, Bruce E.
    2010 “Noam and Zellig”. Chomskyan (R)evolutionsed. byDouglas A. Kibbee, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.154.05nev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.154.05nev [Google Scholar]
62. Newmeyer, Frederick J.
    1980 Linguistic Theory in America. New York, NY: Academic Press. First edition 1980; second edition 1986.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ney, James
    1993 “On Generativity: The history of a notion that never was”. Historiographia Linguistica:.–. 10.1075/hl.20.2‑3.08ney
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.20.2-3.08ney [Google Scholar]
64. Partee, Barbara Hall
    1978 Fundamentals of Mathematics for Linguistics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Partee, Barbara Hall, Alice ter Meulen & Robert E. Wall
    1993 Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2213‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2213-6 [Google Scholar]
66. Peters, P. Stanley & Robert W. Ritchie
    1971 “On Restricting the Base Component of Transformational Grammars”. Information and Control:.–. Republished inMathematical Systems Theory, – 1973 10.1016/S0019‑9958(71)90510‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(71)90510-9 [Google Scholar]
67. Peters, P. Stanley & Robert W. Ritchie
    1973 “On the Generative Power of Transformational Grammars”. Information Sciences.–. 10.1016/0020‑0255(73)90027‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(73)90027-3 [Google Scholar]
68. Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo, Juan Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu
    eds. 2009 Of Minds and Language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque country. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199544660.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199544660.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
69. Post, Emil L.
    1921 “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”. American Journal of Mathematics:.–. Reprinted invan Heijenoort (: –) and reproduced inDavis (1994b: –). 10.2307/2370324
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2370324 [Google Scholar]
70. Post, Emil L.
    1936 “Finite Combinatory Processes — Formulation 1”. Journal of Symbolic Logic:.–. Reproduced inDavis (1965: –) and inDavis (1994b: –). 10.2307/2269031
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2269031 [Google Scholar]
71. Post, Emil L.
    1941 The Two-Valued Iterative Systems of Mathematical Logic. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Post, Emil L.
    1941[1965] “Absolutely Undecidable Problems and Relatively Undecidable Propositions — Account of an Anticipation”. Rejected byAmerican Journal of Mathematicsin 1941; posthumously published inDavis (1965: –); reprinted inDavis (1994: –).
    [Google Scholar]
73. Post, Emil L.
    1943 “Formal Reductions of the General Combinatory Decision Problem”. American Journal of Mathematics:.–. Reproduced inDavis (1994b: –). 10.2307/2371809
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2371809 [Google Scholar]
74. Post, Emil L.
    1944 “Recursively Enumerable Sets of Positive Integers and their Decision Problems”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society:.–. Reproduced inDavis (1965: –) and inDavis (1994b: –). 10.1090/S0002‑9904‑1944‑08111‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1944-08111-1 [Google Scholar]
75. Post, Emil L.
    1946 “A Variant of a Recursively Unsolvable Problem”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.–. Reproduced inDavis (1994b: –). 10.1090/S0002‑9904‑1946‑08555‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1946-08555-9 [Google Scholar]
76. Post, Emil L.
    1947 “Recursive Unsolvability of a Problem of Thue”. Journal of Symbolic Logic:.–. Reproduced inDavis (1965: –) and inDavis (1994b: –). 10.2307/2267170
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2267170 [Google Scholar]
77. Postal, Paul M.
    1971 Crossover Phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    1989 “Prospects for Generative Grammar in the 1990s”. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics [WECOL 89], Volume 2, ed.byFrederick H. Brengelman, Vida Samiian & Wendy Wilkins, –. California State University, Fresno: Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    2011 “On the Mathematics of Syntactic Structures”. Journal of Logic, Language and Information:.–. 10.1007/s10849‑011‑9139‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-011-9139-8 [Google Scholar]
80. Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Barbara C. Scholz
    2001 “On the Distinction between Model-Theoretic and Generative-Enumerative Syntactic Frameworks”. Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics: 4th International Conference, number 2099 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, ed. byPhilippe de Groote, Glyn Morrill & Christian Retoré, –. Berlin / New York: Springer. 10.1007/3‑540‑48199‑0_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48199-0_2 [Google Scholar]
81. Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Barbara C. Scholz
    2005 “Contrasting Applications of Logic in Natural Language Syntactic Description”. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Scienceed. byPetr Hájek, Luis Valdés-Villanueva & Dag Westerståhl, –. London: KCL Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Putnam, Hilary
    1961 “Some Issues in the Theory of Grammar”. Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects, number XII inProceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematicsed. byRoman Jakobson, –. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. 10.1090/psapm/012/9984
    https://doi.org/10.1090/psapm/012/9984 [Google Scholar]
83. Quine, Willard Van Orman
    1940 Mathematical Logic. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Rogers, Hartley
    1967 Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Rosenbloom, Paul
    1950 The Elements of Mathematical Logic. New York: Dover.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Rosner, Michael
    1983 “Production Systems”. Parsing Natural Languageed. byMargaret King, –. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Salomaa, Arto
    1971 “The Generative Capacity of Transformational Grammars of Ginsburg and Partee”. Information and Control:.–. 10.1016/S0019‑9958(71)90364‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(71)90364-0 [Google Scholar]
88. Scholz, Barbara C. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2007 “Tracking the Origins of Generative Grammar”. Journal of Linguistics.–. 10.1017/S0022226707004823
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004823 [Google Scholar]
89. Seuren, Pieter A. M.
    1969 Operators and Nucleus: A contribution to the theory of grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Seuren, Pieter A. M.
    1998 Western Linguistics: An historical introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444307467
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307467 [Google Scholar]
91. Seuren, Pieter A. M.
    2009 “Concerning the Roots of Transformational Generative Grammar”. Historiographia Linguistica:.–. 10.1075/hl.36.1.05seu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.1.05seu [Google Scholar]
92. Soare, Scott
    1996 “Computability and Recursion”. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.–. 10.2307/420992
    https://doi.org/10.2307/420992 [Google Scholar]
93. Stillwell, John
    2004 “Emil Post and his Anticipation of Gödel and Turing”. Mathematics Magazine:.–. 10.1080/0025570X.2004.11953222
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.2004.11953222 [Google Scholar]
94. Thue, Axel
    1914 “Probleme über Veränderungen von Zeichenreihen nach gegebenen Regeln”. Skrifter utgit av Videnskapsselskapet i Kristiana, I, number 10 inMatematisk-naturvidenskabelig klasse 1914 Oslo: Norske Videnskaps-Akademi.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Tomalin, Marcus
    2006 Linguistics and the Formal Sciences: The origins of generative grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486340
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486340 [Google Scholar]
96. Tomalin, Marcus
    2007 “Reconsidering Recursion in Syntactic Theory”. Lingua.–. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.001 [Google Scholar]
97. Turing, Alan M.
    1936 “On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem”. Proceedings of the London Mathematical SocietySeries 2, :.–. Received28 May 1936; read12 November 1936. Correction published in PAMS series 2, .– 1937.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Urquhart, Alasdair
    2009 “Emil Post”. The Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 5ed. byDov Gabbay & John Woods. –. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Van Heijenoort, Jean
    1967 From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Wall, Robert
     1972 Introduction to Mathematical Linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Whitehead, Alfred North and Bertrand Russell
     1910–1913 Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Zwicky, Arnold M.
     1963 “Grammars of Number Theory: Some examples”. Working Paper W-6671, MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA. Online at: https://web.stanford.edu/∼zwicky/grammars-of-number-theory.pdf