1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Historiographia Linguistica
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of A corpus-based network analysis of onomastic references in 16th- and 17th century British grammar writing
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

The present study investigates who was considered authoritative in matters of language in the 16th and 17th centuries as well as how grammar authors position themselves with respect to these authorities. It evaluates whether a shift in referencing norms may already be observed from the 16th to the 17th century in these regards.

As it is claimed that in England the 16th century marks the beginning of English grammar writing (McCarthy 2020: 19–20) and the 17th century saw a shift in favour of English being recognized as a separate academic discipline (Beal 2004: 102), one can ask if and how onomastic — that is, name-based — references, appear in those grammars and how they can be categorized.

One of the findings of this study is that the onomastic references found in the 16th- and 17th-century grammars can be categorized along the six semantic categories suggested in previous work for 19th-century grammars (Busse et al. 2020: 11–12). These include, for example, quotations, opinions, or mere mentions. To account for a possible shift in reference strategies over time, these semantic categories were reevaluated by means of inter-rater reliability (IRR) in the 16th- and 17th-century context.

Our main findings show that while some 16th-century authors put emphasis on Latinate authors, others embrace moving away from the Latinate approach by not referring to the established Latinate authorities at all or only rarely. A significant shift in onomastic referencing can be observed from the 16th to the 17th century, however the Latinate authorities still held significant ground in the 18th century grammar texts.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00192.dum
2026-05-07
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/hl.00192.dum
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/hl.00192.dum/hl.00192.dum.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00192.dum&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Algeo, John
    1985 “The Earliest English Grammars”. Historical & Editorial Studies in Medieval & Early Modern English: For Johan Gerritsened. byMary-Jo Arn, Hanneke Wirtjes & Hans Jansen, –. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 1986 “A Grammatical Dialectic”. The English Reference Grammar: Language and linguistics, writers and readersed. byGerhard Leitner, –. (=Linguistische Arbeiten, 172). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alston, R. C.
    1965 A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vol.. Leeds: Arnold and Son.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderwald, Lieselotte
    2016 Language between Description and Prescription: Verb and verb categories in nineteenth century grammars of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190270674.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190270674.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Auroux, Sylvain
    1994 La révolution technologique de la grammatisation. Liège: Mardaga.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakró-Nagy, Marianne
    2010 “The Data in Historical Linguistics: On utterances, sources, and reliability”. Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik:. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beal, Joan C.
    2004 English in Modern Times. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, Douglas
    1993 “Representativeness in Corpus Design”. Literary and Linguistic Computing:. –. 10.1093/llc/8.4.243
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blair, Ann M.
    2010 Too Much to Know: Managing scholarly information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bryant, Anthony & Kathy Charmaz
    2007 “Introduction: Grounded Theory Research: Methods and Practices”. InThe SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theoryed. byAnthony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz, –. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781848607941
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941 [Google Scholar]
  11. eds. 2007 The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781848607941
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941 [Google Scholar]
  12. Busse, Beatrix
    2015 “Genre”. The Cambridge Handbook of Stylisticsed. byPeter Stockwell & Sara Whiteley, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Busse, Beatrix, Kirsten Gather & Ingo Kleiber
    2018 “Assessing the Connections Between English Grammarians of the Nineteenth Century: A corpus-based network analysis”. Grammar and Corpora 2016ed. byEric Fuß, Marek Konopka, Beata Trawiński & Ulrich H. Waßner, –. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2019 “Paradigm Shifts in 19th-Century British Grammar Writing: A network of texts and authors”. Norms and Conventions in the History of Englished. byBirte Bös & Claudia Claridge, –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.347.04bus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.347.04bus [Google Scholar]
  15. 2020 “A Corpus-Based Analysis of Grammarians’ References in 19th-Century British Grammars”. Variation in Time and Space: Observing the world through corporaed. byAnna Čermáková & Markéta Malá, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110604719‑007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110604719-007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Csárdi, Gábor, Tamás Nepusz, Vincent Traag, Szabolcs Horvát, Fabio Zanini, Daniel Noom & Karsten Müller
    2025 igraph: Network Analysis and Visualization in R. R package version 2.1.4. 10.5281/zenodo.7682609
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7682609 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dons, Ute
    2004 Descriptive Adequacy of Early Modern English Grammars. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110906042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110906042 [Google Scholar]
  18. Egbert, Jesse, Douglas Biber & Bethany Gray
    2022 Designing and Evaluating Language Corpora: A practical framework for corpus representativeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316584880
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584880 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer, Olga
    2004 “What Counts as Evidence in Historical Linguistics?” Studies in Language:. –. 10.1075/sl.28.3.21fis
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.3.21fis [Google Scholar]
  20. Freeman, Linton C.
    2004 The Development of Social Network Analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Görlach, Manfred
    1998 An Annotated Bibliography of Nineteenth Century Grammars of English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lisl.26
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lisl.26 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heath, Terrence
    1971 “Logical Grammar, Grammatical Logic, and Humanism in Three German Universities”. Studies in the Renaissance. –. 10.2307/2857078
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2857078 [Google Scholar]
  23. Howard-Hill, Trevor H.
    2006 Early Modern Printers and the Standardization of English Spelling. London: Modern Humanities Research Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunston, Susan
    2008 “Collection Strategies and Design Decisions”. Corpus Linguisticsed. byAnke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö, –. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jenset, Gard B. & Barbara McGillivray
    2017 Quantitative Historical Linguistics: A corpus framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198718178.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198718178.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen
    2014 “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and interactions”. Diachronic Corpus Pragmaticsed. byIrma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen, –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.243.03juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243.03juc [Google Scholar]
  27. Kleiber, Ingo, Beatrix Busse, Lyubomira Dimitrova, Sophie Du Bois & Julia Marcus
    2022 SimpleCorpusNetwork [Computer software]. Cologne: University of Cologne. https://github.com/heidelgram/HGSimpleCorpusNetwork
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Law, Vivien
    2015 The History of Linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Le Prieult, Henri
    2015 “The ‘Stranger’ and the Grammarian: When Early English Grammarians Reached Out”. Caliban.–. 10.4000/caliban.3115
     https://doi.org/10.4000/caliban.3115 [Google Scholar]
  30. Linn, Andrew
    2006 “English Grammar Writing”. The Handbook of English Linguisticsed. byBas Aarts & April McMahon, –. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lowth, Robert
    1762 A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London: J. Hughs.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McCarthy, Michael
    2020 Innovations and Challenges in Grammar. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429243561
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429243561 [Google Scholar]
  33. Michael, Ian
    1970 English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 1987 The Teaching of English from the Sixteenth Century to 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165853
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165853 [Google Scholar]
  35. Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy
    2012 [1985] Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation. 4th ed.London & New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Mitchell, Linda C.
    1994 “Inversion of Grammar Books and Dictionaries in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries”. InEuralex 94 Proceedings, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nevalainen, Terttu
    2006 An Introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748626366
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626366 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nevalainen, Terttu & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
    2006 “Standardisation”. A History of the English Languageed. byRichard M. Hogg & David Denison, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791154.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791154.006 [Google Scholar]
  39. Padley, G. A.
    1988 Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Prell, Christina
    2012 Social Network Analysis: History, Theory, and Methodology. London: SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Raby, Valérie & Wilfrid Andrieu
    2018 “Norms and Rules in the History of Grammar: French and English handbooks in the seventeenth century”. Standardising English: Norms and margins in the history of the English languageed. byLinda Pillière, Wilfrid Andrieu, Valérie Kerfelec & Diana Lewis, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108120470.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108120470.004 [Google Scholar]
  42. Robins, Robert H.
    1986 “The Evolution of English Grammar Books Since the Renaissance”. The English Reference Grammar: Language and linguistics, writers and readersed. byGerhard Leitner, –. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Usmonovna, Latipova Umida
    2021 “The History of English Grammar”. International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems:. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Vorlat, Emma
    1998 “Criteria of Grammaticalness in 16th- and 17th-Century English Grammar”. A Reader in Early Modern Englished. byMats Rydén, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Merja Kytö, –. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. White, Howard D.
    2011 “Scientific and Scholarly Networks”. InThe SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysised. byJohn Scott & Peter J. Carrington, –. London: SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wolf, Göran
    2011 Englische Grammatikschreibung 1600–1900: Der Wandel einer Diskurstradition. (=Arbeiten zur Sprachanalyse, 54). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 2015 “English Grammaticography as Discourse Tradition: Comments on 18th-century developments”. InAnglistentag 2014 Hannovered. byRainer Emig & Jana Gohrisch, –. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
    2016 “Early and Late Modern English Grammars as Evidence in English Historical Linguistics”. The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguisticsed. byMerja Kytö & Päivi Pahta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139600231.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600231.011 [Google Scholar]
  49. Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria & M. E. Rodríguez-Gil
    2013 “The ECEG Database”. Transactions of the Philological Society:. –. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12003
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12003 [Google Scholar]
  50. Bullokar, Wiliam
    1586 Brief Grammar for English. London: Edmund Bollifant.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Coote, Edmund
    1596 The English Schoole-Maister Teaching all his Schollers, of What Age Soever, the Most Easie, Short, and Perfect Order of Distinct Reading, and True Writing our English-Tongue, that Hath Euer Yet Beene Knowne or Published by any. London: Printed by the Widow Orwin, for Ralph Jackson & Robert Dextar.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Mulcaster, Richard
    1582 The First Part of the Elementarie Which Entreateth Chefelie of the Right Writing of our English Tung. London: Thomas Vautroullier.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Meurier, Gabriel
    1586 The Coniugations in Englishe and Netherdutche, According as Gabriel Mevrier Hath Ordayned the Same, in Netherdutche, and Frenche. Leyden: Thomas Basson.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Sherry, Richard
    1577 A Treatise of the Figures of Grammer and Rhetorike. London: Ricardi Totteli.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Aickin, Joseph
    1693 The English grammar. London: John Lawrence.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Brinsley, John
    1612 The Posing of the Parts. London: Thomas Man.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Butler, Charles
    1633 English Grammar. Oxford: William Turner.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Cooper, Christopher
    1687 The English Teacher (English translation of Grammatica Ling. Angl.). London: John Richardson.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hewes, John
    1624 A Perfect Survey. London: Edw: All-de.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Howell, James
    1662 A New English Grammar. London: T. Williams, H. Brome, and H. Marsh.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Hume, Alexander
    1617 Orthographie and Congruitie of the Britan Tongue. London: Early English Text Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Jonson, Ben
    1640 The English Grammar.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Lewis, M.
    1675 Plain & Short Rules.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Lodowyck, Francis
    1647 A Common Writing.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Miège, Guy
    1688 The English Grammar. London: J. Redmaine.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Newton, John
    1669 School Pastime for Young Children: or the Rudiments of Grammar. London: Robert Walton.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 1677 The English Academy, or, a Brief Introduction to the Seven Liberal Arts. London: W. Godbid.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Poole, Joshua
    1646 The English Accidence. London: E. Cotes.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Wharton, Jeremiah
    1654 The English Grammar. London: William Du-Gard.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Wheeler, Maurice
    1690 The Royal Grammar. London: J. Heptinstall.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Wilkins, John
    1668 An Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: Royal Society.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00192.dum
Loading
A corpus-based network analysis of onomastic references in 16th- and 17th century British grammar writing
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00192.dum
/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00192.dum
/content/journals/10.1075/hl.00192.dum
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error