oa A tale of two languages

References

1. Anonymus, De verbo = Anonymus, De verboHeinrich Keil
   Anonymus, De verbo = Anonymus, De verbo Ed. by Heinrich Keil, GL, –; ed. by Marina Passalacqua, Tre testi grammaticali bobbiesi (GL–; –; –Keil). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura 1984.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Apollonius, Syntaxis = Apollonius Dyscolus, De constructione libri quattuorGustav Uhlig
   Apollonius, Syntaxis = Apollonius Dyscolus, De constructione libri quattuor Ed. by Gustav Uhlig, GG. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1910 (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 1965.)
   [Google Scholar]
3. Charisius, Ars = Flavius Sosipater Charisius, Artis grammaticae libri VCarolus [Karl] Barwick
   Charisius, Ars = Flavius Sosipater Charisius, Artis grammaticae libri V Ed. by Carolus [Karl] Barwick. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1954.
4. Choeroboscus, Scholia I = Georgius Choeroboscus, Prolegomena et scholia in Theodosii Alexandrini Canones isagogicas de flexione nominumAlfred Hilgard
   Choeroboscus, Scholia I = Georgius Choeroboscus, Prolegomena et scholia in Theodosii Alexandrini Canones isagogicas de flexione nominum Ed. by Alfred Hilgard, GG, –. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
   [Google Scholar]
5. Choeroboscus, Scholia II = Georgius Choeroboscus, Prolegomena et scholia in Theodosii Alexandrini Canones isagogicas de flexione verborumAlfred Hilgard
   Choeroboscus, Scholia II = Georgius Choeroboscus, Prolegomena et scholia in Theodosii Alexandrini Canones isagogicas de flexione verborum Ed. by Alfred Hilgard, GG, –. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cicero, Ad Quintum fratrem = M. Tullius Cicero, Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. BrutumDavid Roy Shackleton Bailey
   Cicero, Ad Quintum fratrem = M. Tullius Cicero, Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum Ed. by David Roy Shackleton Bailey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980.
7. Cicero, De fin. = M. Tullius Cicero, De finibus bonorum et malorumHarris Rackham
   Cicero, De fin. = M. Tullius Cicero, De finibus bonorum et malorum Ed. and transl. by Harris Rackham. 2nd ed.London: Heinemann 1931.
8. Cledonius, Ars = Cledonii Constantinopolitani grammatici ArsHeinrich Keil
   Cledonius, Ars = Cledonii Constantinopolitani grammatici Ars Ed. by Heinrich Keil, GL, –. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
   [Google Scholar]
9. Diomedes, Ars = Diomedes, Artis grammaticae libri IIIHeinrich Keil
   Diomedes, Ars = Diomedes, Artis grammaticae libri III Ed. by Heinrich Keil, GL, –. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Antiquitates = Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Antiquitatum Romanarum quae supersuntKarl Jacoby
    Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Antiquitates = Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Antiquitatum Romanarum quae supersunt Ed. by Karl Jacoby. vols. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1885.
11. Dionysius Thrax, Techne = Dionysius Thrax, Ars grammaticaGustav Uhlig
    Dionysius Thrax, Techne = Dionysius Thrax, Ars grammatica Ed. by Gustav Uhlig, GG, –. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1901 (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 1965.)
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dositheus, Ars = Dosithei Magistri Ars grammaticaHeinrich Keil
    Dositheus, Ars = Dosithei Magistri Ars grammatica Ed. by Heinrich Keil, GL, –. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
    [Google Scholar]
13. GG = Grammatici graeci. 6 vols
    GG = Grammatici graeci. 6 vols. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, –. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 1965.)
14. GL = Grammatici latiniHeinrich Keil
    GL = Grammatici latini Ed. by Heinrich Keil. vols. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1864 (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
15. Macrobius, De diff. = Macrobii Theodosii, De verborum graeci et latini differentiis vel societatibus excerptaPaolo De Paolis
    Macrobius, De diff. = Macrobii Theodosii, De verborum graeci et latini differentiis vel societatibus excerpta Ed. by Paolo De Paolis. Urbino: Quattro Venti 1990.
16. Macrobius, Saturnalia = Macrobii Ambrosii Theodosii SaturnaliaRobert A. Kaster
    Macrobius, Saturnalia = Macrobii Ambrosii Theodosii Saturnalia Ed. by Robert A. Kaster. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
17. Phocas, Ars = Phocas, Ars de nomine et verboHeinrich Keil
    Phocas, Ars = Phocas, Ars de nomine et verbo Ed. by Heinrich Keil, GL, –. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
    [Google Scholar]
18. Priscian, Institutiones = Prisciani grammatici Caesariensis Institutiones grammaticarum libri XVIIIMartin Hertz
    Priscian, Institutiones = Prisciani grammatici Caesariensis Institutiones grammaticarum libri XVIII Ed. by Martin Hertz, GL. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1859 (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
    [Google Scholar]
19. Scholia D.T. = Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem grammaticamAlfred Hilgard
    Scholia D.T. = Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem grammaticam Ed. by Alfred Hilgard, GG, –. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1901 (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 1965.)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Theodosius, Canones = Theodosius Alexandrinus, Canones isagogici de flexione nominum et verborumAlfred Hilgard
    Theodosius, Canones = Theodosius Alexandrinus, Canones isagogici de flexione nominum et verborum Ed. by Alfred Hilgard, GG, –. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 2007.)
    [Google Scholar]
21. Varro, De L.L. = Marcus Terentius Varro, De lingua latinaRoland G. Kent
    Varro, De L.L. = Marcus Terentius Varro, De lingua latina Ed. and transl. by Roland G. Kent. 3rd ed.vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press and London: W. Heinemann 1958.
22. Adams, James N.
    2003 Bilingualism and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511482960
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482960 [Google Scholar]
23. Adams, James N., Mark Janse & Simon Swain
    eds. 2002 Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language contact and the written text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Amsler, Mark
    1989 Etymology and grammatical discourse in late Antiquity and the early Middle Ages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.44 [Google Scholar]
25. Bacigalupo, Valeria
    2025 “La flessione verbale nella tradizione greca: Un sistema imperfetto?”. Rhesis. International Journal of Linguistics, Philology, and Literature, special issueDall’Anomia alla Norma, –.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Baratin, Marc
    1989 La naissance de la syntaxe à Rome. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Barwick, Karl
    1922 Remmius Palaemon und die römische Ars grammatica. Wiesbaden: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 1967).
    [Google Scholar]
28. Basset, Louis, Frédérique Biville, Bernard Colombat, Pierre Swiggers &, Alfons Wouters
    eds. 2007 Bilinguisme et terminologie grammaticale gréco-latine. (=Orbis/ Supplementa, 27). Leuven, Paris & Dudley, MA: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Bécares Botas, Vicente
    1985 Diccionario de la terminología gramatical griega. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Benedetti, Marina
    2015 “De verborum Graeci et Latini differentiis vel societatibus: La diatesi media e il punto di vista latino”. Studi e Saggi Linguistici:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Benedetti, Marina
    2018 “Specchiarsi nell’altro: I grammatici, oltre l’ablativo”. L’altro nel mondo antico: Riflessioni linguisticheed. byMarina Benedetti, Carla Bruno, Felicia Logozzo & Liana Tronci, –. Pisa: Pacini.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Biville, Frédérique
    2002 “The Graeco-Romans and Graeco-Latin: A terminological framework for cases of bilingualism”. Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language contact and the written texted. byJames N. Adams, Mark Janse & Simon Swain, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
33. Bonnet, Guillaume
    2007 “Glose ou traduction? La version grecque de l’ars grammatica de Dosithée”. Bilinguisme et terminologie grammaticale gréco-latine. (=Orbis/ Supplementa, 27) ed. byLouis Basset , –. Leuven, Paris & Dudley, MA: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Cameron, Alan
    1966 “The date and identity of Macrobius”. Journal of Roman Studies:. –. 10.2307/300131
    https://doi.org/10.2307/300131 [Google Scholar]
35. Carchereux-Marchand, Diane
    2010 “L’accident verbal du tempus chez les grammairiens latins: Définition et description”. Relations spatio-temporelles en latin (= Revue de linguistique latine du centre Alfred Ernout “De lingua latina”, 5) ed. byClaire Blanche-Benveniste & Michèle Fruyt, –. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris-Sorbonne.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Cavazza, Franco
    1987 “Gellio grammatico e i suoi rapporti con l’Ars grammatica romana”. The History of Linguistics in the Classical perioded. byDaniel J. Taylor, –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.46.06cav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.46.06cav [Google Scholar]
37. Christidis, Anastassios-Fivos
    ed. 2001 A History of Ancient Greek, from the Beginnings to late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Coleman, Robert G. G.
    2001 “Greek and Latin”. A History of Ancient Greek, from the Beginnings to late Antiquityed. byAnastassios-Fivos Christidis, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Crellin, Robert
    2020 Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyonded. byRobert Crellin & Thomas Jügel, –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.352.16cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.16cre [Google Scholar]
40. Conti, Sara Eco
    2009 “Reflections on the verb in Apollonius Dyscolus”. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica. –.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Dammer, Raphael
    2001 Diomedes grammaticus. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
42. De Martino, Marcello
    2000 “On the semantic interpretation of passive imperative sentences: A case of ‘voluntary’ interference between Ancient Greek and Latin in Latin grammarians”. Syntaxis: An International Journal of Syntactic Research. –.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Denecker, Tim
    2023 “T(w)o be or not t(w)o be: The dualis numerus according to Latin grammarians up to the Early Middle Ages”. Roman perspectives on linguistic diversity: Guardians of a changing languageed. byAdam Gitner, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197611975.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197611975.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
44. De Paolis, Paolo
    1990 “Per una nuova edizione critica del De differentiis di Macrobio”. Dicti studiosus: Scritti di filologia offerti a Scevola Mariotti dai suoi allievi, –. Urbino: QuattroVenti.
    [Google Scholar]
45. De Paolis, Paolo
    2015 “La parentela linguistica fra greco e latino nella tradizione grammaticale latina”. Latin linguistics in the early 21st century: Acts of the 16th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Uppsala, June 6th–11th, ed. byGerd V. M. Haverling, –. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Dickey, Eleanor
    2016a “The authorship of the Greek version of Dositheus’ grammar and what it tells us about the grammar’s original use”. The Latin of the Grammarians: Reflections about language in the Roman worlded. byRolando Ferri & Anna Zago, –. Turnhout: Brepols.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Dickey, Eleanor
    2016b Learning Latin the Ancient Way: Latin textbooks from the Ancient world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Dionisotti, A. Carlotta
    1984 “Latin Grammar for Greeks and Goths”. Journal of Roman Studies. –. 10.2307/299016
    https://doi.org/10.2307/299016 [Google Scholar]
49. Dionisotti, A. Carlota
    1988 “Greek grammars and dictionaries in Carolingian Europe”. The Sacred Nectar of the Greeks: The study of Greek in the West in the Early Middle Agesed. byMichael W. Herren & Shirley Ann Brown, –. London: University of London King’s College.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ferri, Rolando & Anna Zago
    eds. 2016 The Latin of the Grammarians: Reflections about language in the Roman world. Turnhout: Brepols.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Fortes, Fábio
    2019 “Priscian and the Graeco-Roman bilingualism: An example of cross-linguistic analysis within Priscian’s De constrvctione (Inst. gramm. XVII)”. Revista de Estudios Clásicos. –.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Gatto, Biagio
    2021 Priscian: A syntactic interpretation of a Graeco-Roman World. Ph.D. thesis, University College London.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Gitner, Adam
    2015 “Varro Aeolicus: Latin’s Affinity with Greek”. Varro Varius: The polymath of the Roman worlded. byDavid J. Butterfield, –. Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Gitner, Adam
    ed. 2023 Roman Perspectives on Linguistic Diversity: Guardians of a changing language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197611975.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197611975.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
55. Helmig, Christoph
    2008 “Proclus and other Neoplatonists on universals and predication”. Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale. –.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Herren, Michael
    2015 “Pelasgian fountains: Learning Greek in the early Middle Ages”. Learning Latin and Greek from Antiquity to the Presented. byElizabeth P. Archibald, William Brockliss & Jonathan Gnoza, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107279896.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279896.005 [Google Scholar]
57. Holford-Strevens, Leofranc
    2003 Aulus Gellius: An Antonine scholar and his achievement. Revised editionOxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263196.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263196.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
58. Holford-Strevens, Leofranc
    2023 “Grammar and grammarians: Linguistic and social change from Gellius to Macrobius”. Roman Perspectives on Linguistic Diversity: Guardians of a changing languageed. byAdam Gitner, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197611975.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197611975.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
59. Horrocks, Geoffrey
    1997 Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kaster, Robert A.
    1980 “Macrobius and Servius: Verecundia and the grammarian’s function”. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. –. 10.2307/311051
    https://doi.org/10.2307/311051 [Google Scholar]
61. Kaster, Robert A.
    1988 Guardians of language: The grammarians and society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520342767
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520342767 [Google Scholar]
62. Law, Vivien
    1986 “Late Latin grammars in the Early Middle Ages: A typological history”. Historiographia Linguistica. –. 10.1075/hl.13.2‑3.13law
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.13.2-3.13law [Google Scholar]
63. Manetti, Giovanni
    2022 “The debate on the question of ‘tense’ and ‘aspect’ in the Stoics’ linguistic theory”. Conceptions of time in Greek and Roman Antiquityed. byRichard Faure, Simon-Pierre Valli & Arnaud Zucker, –. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110736076‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110736076-002 [Google Scholar]
64. Mastriani, Maria Camilla
    2022 Lo studio del verbo nella tradizione grammaticale latina: Per un corpus comparativo. Ph.D. diss., Università degli Studi di Napoli.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Mellet, Sylvie
    2000 “Le parfait latin, un ‘praeteritum perfectum’”. Cahiers Chronos. –. 10.1163/9789004484399_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004484399_009 [Google Scholar]
66. Müller, Carl Werner, Kurt Sier & Jürgen Werner
    eds. 1992 Zum Umgang mit fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Welt. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Petrilli, Raffaella
    2009 “Macrobius”. Lexicon grammaticorumed. byHarro Stammerjohann, II, –. 2nd edition. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Racine, Félix
    2015 “Servius’ Greek lessons”. Learning Latin and Greek from Antiquity to the Presented. byElizabeth P. Archibald, William Brockliss & Jonathan Gnoza, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107279896.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279896.004 [Google Scholar]
69. Rochette, Bruno
    2010 “Greek and Latin bilingualism”. A Companion to the Ancient Greek Languageed. byEgbert J. Bakker, –. New York: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444317398.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317398.ch19 [Google Scholar]
70. Rochette, Bruno
    2023 “Use of Greek in Diomedes’ Ars grammatica”. Roman Perspectives on Linguistic Diversity: Guardians of a changing languageed. byAdam Gitner, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197611975.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197611975.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
71. Scappaticcio, Maria Chiara
    2015 Artes Grammaticae in frammenti: I testi grammaticali latini e bilingui greco-latini su papiro. Edizione commentata. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110447378
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110447378 [Google Scholar]
72. Scappaticcio, Maria Chiara
    2016 “Tra Declinationes verborum ed Hermeneuta: Le flessioni verbali greco-latine su papiro”. The Latin of the Grammarians: Reflections about language in the Roman worlded. byRolando Ferri & Anna Zago, –. Turnhout: Brepols.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Schad, Samantha
    2007 A Lexicon of Latin Grammatical Terminology. Rome & Pisa: Fabrizio Serra.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Schironi, Francesca
    2007 “ΑΝΑΛΟΓΙΑ, analogia, proportio, ratio: Loanwords, calques, and reinterpretations of a Greek technical word”. Bilinguisme et terminologie grammaticale gréco-latine. (=Orbis/ Supplementa, 27) ed. byLouis Basset , –. Leuven, Paris & Dudley, MA: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Schöpsdau, Klaus
    1992 “Vergleiche zwischen Lateinisch und Griechisch in der antiken Welt”. Zum Umgang mit fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Welted. byCarl Werner Müller, Carl Werner, Kurt Sier & Jürgen Werner, –. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Serbat, Guy
    1976 “Les temps du verbe en latin. III. Le parfait de l’indicatif actif”. Revue des Etudes Latines. –.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Siebenborn, Elmar
    1976 Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtigkeit und ihren Kriterien: Studien zur antiken normativen Grammatik. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Silva, Hudson Carlos Alves da
    2018 Uma proposta pedagógica da língua grega em um tratado gramatical em latim: De differentiis de Erígena. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade de Juiz de Fora.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Souris, George A. & Pantelis Nigdelis
    2001 “The parallel use of Greek and Latin in the Greco-Roman world”. A History of Ancient Greek, from the Beginnings to late Antiquityed. byAnastassios-Fivos Christidis, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Stevens, Benjamin
    2006 “Aeolism: Latin as a dialect of Greek”. The Classical Journal:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Stoppie, Karen
    2005 “The role of the Greek in Charisius’ Ars grammatica”. Rocniki Humanistyczne:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Stoppie, Karen, Pierre Swiggers & Alfons Wouters
    2007 “La terminologie grammaticale en contexte bilingue: Macrobe et l’analyse de la diathèse verbale”. Bilinguisme et terminologie grammaticale gréco-latine. (=Orbis/ Supplementa, 27) ed. byLouis Basset , –. Leuven, Paris & Dudley, MA: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Swain, Simon
    2002 “Bilingualism in Cicero? The evidence of code-switching”. Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language contact and the written texted. byJames N. Adams, Mark Janse & Simon Swain, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
84. Taylor, Daniel J.
    1996 Varro — De lingua latina X. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.85
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.85 [Google Scholar]
85. Valette-Cagnac, Emmanuelle
    2005 “‘’Plus attique que la langue des Athéniens’: Le grec imaginaire des Romains”. Façons de parler grec à Romeed. byFlorence Dupont & Emmanuelle Valette-Cagnac, –. Paris: Belin.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Versteegh, Kees
    2000 “Review of: Jean Lallot, Apollonius Dyscole, De la construction (syntaxe)”. vols.Paris: J. Vrin 1997 Word. –.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Versteegh, Kees
    2013 “A Perfect Mess: The distinction of tense and aspect in grammatical traditions”. Comparing ancient grammars: The Greek, Syriac and Arabic traditionsed. bySara Eco Conti & Margherita Farina, –. Pisa: Edizioni della Scuola Normale Superiore.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Weis, Rudolf
    1992 ““Zur Kenntnis des Griechischen im Rom der republikanischen Zeit””. Zum Umgang mit fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Welted. byCarl Werner Müller, Carl Werner, Kurt Sier & Jürgen Werner, –. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Wouters, Alfons
    1994 “The ancient Greek (and Latin) grammarians and the μετ’ ὀλίγον μέλλων tense”. Florilegium historiographiae linguisticae: Études d’historiographie de la linguistique et de grammaire comparée à la mémoire de M. Leroyed. byJan De Clercq and Piet Desmet, –. Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Zetzel, James E. G.
    2018 Critics, Compilers, and Commentators: An introduction to Roman philology, 200 BCE-88 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]