oa Addendum to “The distributed invention of enunciation theory”

References

1. Ammann, Hermann
   1925–1928 Die menschliche Rede: Sprachphilosophische Untersuchungen. parts. Lahr im Breisgau: Moritz Schauenburg.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bally, Charles
   1932 Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benveniste, Émile
   1970 “L’appareil formel de l’énonciation”. Langages.–. Repr. in Benveniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale. –. Paris: Gallimard 1974 10.3406/lgge.1970.2572
   https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1970.2572 [Google Scholar]
4. Daneš, František
   1994 “Prague School Functionalism as a Precursor of Text Linguistics”. Cahiers de l’ILSL, no, L’École de Prague: L’apport épistémologique, ed. byPatrick Sériot & Mortéza Mahmoudian, –. Lausanne: L’Institut de Linguistique et des Sciences du Langage de l’Université de Lausanne.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dubois, Jean
   1969 “Énoncé et énonciation”. Langages. –. 10.3406/lgge.1969.2511
   https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1969.2511 [Google Scholar]
6. Firbas, Jan
   1992 “The Why’s and the How’s in my Research into Functional Sentence Perspective”. Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in honour of René Dirven on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, ed. byMartin Pütz, –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.61.28fir
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.61.28fir [Google Scholar]
7. Graffi, Giorgio
   2001 200 Years of Syntax: A critical survey. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.98
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.98 [Google Scholar]
8. Hajičová, Eva, Barbara Hall Partee & Petr Sgall
   1998 Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9012‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9012-9 [Google Scholar]
9. Joseph, John E.
   2025 “The Distributed Invention of Enunciation Theory”. Historiographia Linguistica:. –. 10.1075/hl.00157.jos
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00157.jos [Google Scholar]
10. Krásová, Eva
    2023 “The General Meaning as a Potential”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia:. –. 10.1080/03740463.2023.2234234
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2023.2234234 [Google Scholar]
11. Mathesius, Vilém
    1927 “Lingvistická charakteristika a její místo v moderním jazykozpytu” [‘Linguistic characterology and its place within modern linguistics’]. Časopis pro moderní filologii. –.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mathesius, Vilém
    1929 “On Linguistic Characterology with Illustrations from Modern English”. Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes, du 10–15 avril 1928 à la Haye, –. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff. Repr. inA Prague School Reader in Linguistics, ed. byJosef Vachek, –. Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mathesius, Vilém
    1930 “O tak zvaném aktuálním členění větném” [‘On the so-called Functional Sentence Perspective’]. Slovo a Slovesnost. –.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke
    1996 Language, Action and Context: The early history of pragmatics in Europe and America, 1780–1930. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.80
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.80 [Google Scholar]
15. Noreen, Adolf
    1923 Einführung in die wissenschaftliche Betrachtung der Sprache. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Skalička, Vladimír
    1937 “Promluva jako lingvistický pojem (L’enunciation [sic] comme notion de la linguistique)”. Slovo a Slovestnost. –.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Trnka, Bohumil
    1946 “Vilém Mathesius”. Časopis pro moderní filologii. –. English trans. byVladimir HonsainPortraits of Linguists: A biographical source book for the history of Western linguistics, 1746–1963, vol., ed. byThomas A. Sebeok, –. Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1967.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Vachek, Josef
    1980 “Vilém Mathesius as Forerunner of Contrastive Linguistic Studies”. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, ed. byJacek Fisiak, –. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Weil, Henri
    1844 De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes: Question de grammaire générale. Paris: Joubert.
    [Google Scholar]