The category of preposición in early missionary grammars of Aymara (Bertonio 1603 and Torres Rubio 1616)

References

1. Álvares, Manuel
   1572 De Institutione Grammatica Libri Tres. Olyssipone [Lisbon]: Ioannes Barrerius, Typographus Regius.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anonymous
   Anonymous 1614 [1586] Arte y vocabulario en la lengua general del Peru llamada Quichua, y en la lengua Española. Lima: Francisco del Canto.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bertonio, Ludovico
   1603 Arte y grammatica muy copiosa de la lengua aymara. Roma: Luis Zannetti.
   [Google Scholar]
4. GL =Keil, Heinrich
   GL =Keil, Heinrich ed. 1855–1880 Grammatici Latini. Voll.. Leipzig: Teubner.
   [Google Scholar]
5. González Holguín, Diego
   1607 Gramatica y arte nueva de la lengua general de todo el Peru llamada lengua Qquichua, o lengua del Inca. Lima: Francisco del Canto.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Huerta, Alonso de
   1616 Arte dela lengua quechua general delos Yndios de este Reyno del Piru. Lima: Francisco del Canto.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Molina, Alonso de
   1571 Arte de la lengua mexicana y castellana. México: Pedro Ocharte.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Nebrija de, Antonio
   1981 [1481] Introductiones latinae. Salamanca.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Olmos, Andrés de
   1993 [1547] Andrés de Olmos, Arte de la lengua mexicana. Concluido en el convento de San Andres de Ueytlalpan, en la provincia de la Totonacapan que es en la Nueva Espana. [Manuscript, 1547]ed. byAscensión Hernández de León-Portilla & Miguel León-Portilla, Miguel (éd.). Madrid: Ediciones de Cultura Hispánica.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Rincón, Antonio del
    1595 Arte mexicana. México: Pedro Balli. Sanctius [Brocensis], Franciscus (Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas). 1587. Minerva sive de causis linguae latinae. Salamanca: Renaut.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Santo Tomás de, Domingo
    1560 Gramatica o arte de la lengua general de los Indios de los reynos del Peru. Valladolid: Francisco Fernández.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Torres Rubio, Diego de
    1616 Arte de la lengua aymara. Lima: Francisco del Canto.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Torres Rubio, Diego de
    1619 Arte de la lengua quichua. Lima: Francisco Lasso.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Adelaar, Willem F. H.
    1993 “La categoría del plural inclusivo en las lenguas americanas: interpretación y realidad”. España: ¿Ruptura 1492?ed. byMaxim P. A. M. Kerkhof, Hugo de Schepper & Otto Zwartjes, –. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004655553_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004655553_013 [Google Scholar]
15. Adelaar, Willem F. H.
    (with the collaboration ofPieter C. Muysken) 2004 The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486852
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486852 [Google Scholar]
16. Bartolotta, Annamaria
    2022 “Grammatica latina e innovazione nella linguistica missionaria: il contributo di Ludovico Bertonio (1557–1625)”. Ubi homo, ibi lingua. Studi in onore di Maria Patrizia Bolognaed. byLaura Biondi, Francesco Dedè & Andrea Scala, . –. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bartolotta, Annamaria
    2025a “The conjunction between coordination and subordination in missionary grammars of Aymara and Quechua”. Historiographia Linguistica:. –. 10.1075/hl.00184.bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00184.bar [Google Scholar]
18. Bartolotta, Annamaria
    ed. 2025b The Emergence of Syntactic Categories in the History of Linguistics: From Medieval to Modern Age. Palermo: Palermo University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Belardi, Walter
    1990 “Aspetti del linguaggio e della lingua nel pensiero degli Stoici. 2, Il senso originario di casus rectus”. Rendiconti dell’Accademia dei Lincei. Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Booij, Geert
    2000 “Inflection and derivation”. Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formationed. byGeert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, Wolfgang Kesselheim & Stavros Skopeteas, . –. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110111286.1.5.360
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111286.1.5.360 [Google Scholar]
21. Booij, Geert
    2006 “Inflection and derivation”. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguisticsed. byKeith Brown, . –. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00115‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00115-2 [Google Scholar]
22. Bossong, Georg
    2009 “The typology of Tupi-Guarani as reflected in the grammars of four Jesuit missionaries: Anchieta (1595), Aragona (c.1625), Montoya (1640) and Restivo (1729)”. Historiographia Linguistica:. –. 10.1075/hl.36.2‑3.04bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.2-3.04bos [Google Scholar]
23. Breva-Claramonte, Manuel
    2007 “The European linguistic tradition and early missionary grammars in Central and South America”. History of Linguistics 2005. Selected Papers from the Tenth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHOLS X), 1–5 September 2005,Urbana-Champaign, Illinoised. byDouglas A. Kibbee, –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.112.19bre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.112.19bre [Google Scholar]
24. Bybee, Joan L.
    1985 Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning of form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
25. Calvo Pérez, Julio
    2000 “Las gramáticas del Siglo de Oro quechua: originalidad y diversidad”. Las gramáticas misioneras de tradición hispánica (siglos XVI–XVII)ed. byOtto Zwartjes, –. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004488564_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004488564_008 [Google Scholar]
26. Cancino Cabello, Nataly
    2018. “La categoría ‘nombre’ en la Grammatica o Arte (1560) de Domingo de Santo Tomás y en el Arte (1571) de Alonso de Molina”. Historiographia Linguistica:. –. 10.1075/hl.00014.can
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00014.can [Google Scholar]
27. Case, Justin
    2020 “Were there ever any adjectives? The recognition of the absence of an autonomous adjective class in Tupi-Guarani as demonstrated in the earliest missionary grammars”. Missionary Linguistic Studies from Mesoamerica to Patagoniaed. byAstrid Alexander-Bakkerus, Rebeca Fernández Rodríguez, Liesbeth Zack & Otto Zwartjes, –. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004427006_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004427006_006 [Google Scholar]
28. Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo
    1997 “La primera codificación del aimara”. La descripción de las lenguas amerindias en la época colonialed. byKlaus Zimmermann, –. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert/ Madrid: Iberoamericana.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo
    2000 Lingüística aimara. Lima: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Coler, Matt
    2014 A Grammar of Muylaq’ Aymara. Aymara as Spoken in Southern Peru. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004284005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004284005 [Google Scholar]
31. Dressler, Wolfgang U., Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang Ullrich Wurzel
    1987 Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.10 [Google Scholar]
32. Esparza Torres, Miguel Ángel
    2007 “Nebrija y los modelos de los misioneros lingüistas del náhuatl”. Missionary Linguistics III. Morphology and Syntax. Selected Papers from the Third and Fourth International Conferences On Missionary Linguistics, Hong Kong/Macau, 12–15 March 2005, Valladolid, 8–11 March 2006ed. byOtto Zwartjes, Gregory James & Emilio Ridruejo, –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.111.03esp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.111.03esp [Google Scholar]
33. Esparza Torres, Miguel Ángel
    2016 “Elogio de la lengua nativa y planteamiento metalingüístico en las gramáticas misioneras: el ejemplo de Domingo de Santo Tomás”. Revista de Investigación Lingüística. –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Haspelmath, Martin
    1996 “Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory”. Yearbook of Morphology 1995ed. byGeert Booij & Jaap Van Marle, –. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3716‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_3 [Google Scholar]
35. Haverling, Gerd
    2003 “On prefixes and actionality in Classical and Late Latin”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica:. –. 10.1556/ALing.50.2003.1‑2.7
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.50.2003.1-2.7 [Google Scholar]
36. Kortmann, Bernd
    1998 “Adverbial subordinators in the languages of Europe”. Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europeed. byJohan van der Auwera & Dónall P. Ó Baoill, –. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802610.457
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802610.457 [Google Scholar]
37. Nardi, Edoardo
    2025a “Notes on the verbal classification in Antonio Ruiz de Montoya’s Arte de la lengua guarani”. Il ruolo del metalinguaggio nelle nuove grammatiche nazionali e missionarieed. byPaola Cotticelli Kurras & Federico Righi, –. Roma: Il Calamo.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Nardi, Edoardo
    2025b “Verbal categorization(s) in missionary grammars of South American languages (16th–17th century): transitivity and verbal valency”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Nigrelli, Castrenze
    2023 “Rapporti di reggenza? Una descrizione ambivalente nella tradizione grammaticale tardoantica e medioevale”. InVerbis:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nigrelli, Castrenze
    2025 “On preposition-case relation in missionary grammarians and their predecessors: between terminological legacy and innovation”. The Emergence of Syntactic Categories in the History of Linguistics: From Medieval to Modern Ageed. byAnnamaria Bartolotta, –. Palermo: Palermo University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Peetermans, Andy
    2020 The Art of Transforming Traditions. Conceptual Developments in Early Modern American Missionary Grammar Writing. PhD dissertation: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ramat, Paolo & Davide Ricca
    1994 “Prototypical adverbs: on the scalarity/radiality of the notion of ADVERB”. Rivista di Linguistica:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Romagno, Domenica
    2003 “Azionalità e transitività: il caso dei proverbi latini”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Romagno, Domenica
    2022 “Aspects of the verbal domain in Greek and Latin: changing valency and actionality”. Variation, Contact and Reconstruction in the Ancient Indo-European Languages: Between Linguistics and Philologyed. byDomenica Romagno, Francesco Rovai, Michele Bianconi & Marta Capano, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004508873_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004508873_013 [Google Scholar]
45. Ronzitti, Rosa
    2013 “Antico indiano víbhakti- e greco πτῶσις: preistoria di due diverse metafore della flessione nominale”. Linguistica e Filologia. –.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rousseau, André
    ed. 1995 Les préverbes dans les langues d’Europe. Introduction à l’étude de la préverbation. Lille: Presse Universitaires des Septentrion.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Scalise, Sergio
    1988 Inflection and derivation. Linguistics:. –. 10.1515/ling.1988.26.4.561
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1988.26.4.561 [Google Scholar]
48. Segovia Gordillo, Ana
    2012 Contribución a la lingüística misionera americana: la obra gramatical de Diego González Holguín. PhD dissertation: Universidad de Valladolid.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Squeri, Elena
    2025 “L’eredità del problema filosofico di referenzialità e definitezza nella grammatica antica: gli ὀνόματα κύρια e προσηγορικά nella τέχνη γραμματική”. Rivista Italiana di Filologia e Istruzione Classica:. –. 10.1484/J.RFIC.5.152000
    https://doi.org/10.1484/J.RFIC.5.152000 [Google Scholar]
50. Štekauer, Pavol
    2015 “The delimitation of derivation and inflection”. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europeed. byPeter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer, . –. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110246254‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-016 [Google Scholar]
51. Van Loon, Zanna & Andy Peetermans
    2020 “Wide-lensed approaches to missionary linguistics: the circulation of knowledge on Amerindian languages through sixteenth-century Spanish printed grammars”. Missionary Linguistic Studies from Mesoamerica to Patagoniaed. byAstrid Alexander-Bakkerus, Rebeca Fernández Rodríguez, Liesbeth Zack & Otto Zwartjes, –. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004427006_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004427006_004 [Google Scholar]
52. Van Marle, Jaap
    1996 “The unity of morphology: on the interwovenness of the derivational and inflectional dimension of the world”. Yearbook of Morphology 1995ed. byGeert Booij & Jaap Van Marle, –. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3716‑6_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_4 [Google Scholar]
53. Zimmermann, Klaus
    ed. 1997 La descripción de las lenguas amerindias en la época colonial. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert/ Madrid: Iberoamericana.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Zwartjes, Otto
    ed. 2000 Las gramáticas misioneras de tradición hispánica (siglos XVI–XVII). Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004488564
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004488564 [Google Scholar]
55. Zwartjes, Otto
    2002 “The description of the indigenous languages of Portuguese America by the Jesuits during the colonial period: the impact of the Latin grammar of Manuel Álvares”. Historiographia Linguistica:. –. 10.1075/hl.29.1.06zwa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.29.1.06zwa [Google Scholar]
56. Zwartjes, Otto
    2011 Portuguese Missionary Grammars in Asia, Africa and Brazil, 1550–1800. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.117 [Google Scholar]
57. Zwartjes, Otto
    2012 “The historiography of missionary linguistics: Present state and further research opportunities”. Historiographia Linguistica:. –. 10.1075/hl.39.2‑3.01zwa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.39.2-3.01zwa [Google Scholar]
58. Zwartjes, Otto
    2019 “Diego de Basalenque’s linguistic work on Matlazinca: the “Tratado de las partículas” (1640) and the parts of speech”. Grammaticalia. Hommage à Bernard Colombated. byJean-Marie Fournier, Aimée Lahaussois & Valérie Raby, –. Lyon: ENS Éditions. 10.4000/books.enseditions.12204
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.enseditions.12204 [Google Scholar]
59. Zwartjes, Otto
    2020 “Between grammars and dictionaries: the ‘Tratado de las partículas’ (treatise on particles) in Diego de Basalenque’s work on Matlatzinca”. Missionary Linguistic Studies from Mesoamerica to Patagoniaed. byAstrid Alexander-Bakkerus, Rebeca Fernández Rodríguez, Liesbeth Zack & Otto Zwartjes, –. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004427006_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004427006_005 [Google Scholar]