oa Review of Postal (2025): Generative Grammar’s Grave Foundational Errors

References

1. Chomsky, Noam
   1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chomsky, Noam
   1969 “Linguistics and philosophy”. Language and Philosophy: A Symposium, ed. bySidney Hook, –. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chomsky, Noam
   1972 “Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar”. Goals of Linguistic Theory, ed. byStanley Peters, –. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 10.1515/9783110867589‑005
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867589-005 [Google Scholar]
4. Chomsky, Noam
   1973 “Conditions on transformations”. A Festschrift for Morris Halleed. byStephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, –. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky, Noam
   1980 Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chomsky, Noam
   1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger Scientific.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chomsky, Noam
   1987 “Reply”. Mind & Language.–.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chomsky, Noam and Jerrold J. Katz
   1975 “On innateness: A reply to Cooper”. Philosophical Review.–. 10.2307/2184081
   https://doi.org/10.2307/2184081 [Google Scholar]
9. Harris, Zellig S.
   1968 Mathematical Structures of Language. Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 21. New York: Interscience.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky, and Warren Tecumseh Fitch
    2002 “The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?” Science(22November).–.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jackendoff, Ray S.
    1984 “On the phrase the phrase ‘the phrase’”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.–. 10.1007/BF00233712
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233712 [Google Scholar]
12. Katz, Jerrold J.
    1964 “Mentalism in linguistics”. Language.–. 10.2307/411571
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411571 [Google Scholar]
13. Katz, Jerrold J.
    1980 “Chomsky on meaning”. Language.–. 10.2307/412641
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412641 [Google Scholar]
14. Katz, Jerrold J.
    1981 Language and Other Abstract Objects. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Katz, Jerrold J.
    1998 Realistic Rationalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Katz, Jerrold J. and Paul M. Postal
    1964 An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Katz, Jerrold J. and Paul M. Postal
    1991 “Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics”. Linguistics and Philosophy.–. 10.1007/BF00632596
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632596 [Google Scholar]
18. Lavine, Shaughan
    1998 Understanding the Infinite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Linsky, Leonard
    1952 Semantics and Philosophy of Language. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. McCawley, James D.
    1968 “Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar”. Foundations of Language.–.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Partee, Barbara Hall
    1973 “The syntax and semantics of quotation”. A Festschrift for Morris Halleed. byStephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, –. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Postal, Paul M.
    1972 “The best theory”. Goals of Linguistic Theoryed. byStanley Peters, –. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Postal, Paul M.
    1974 On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Postal, Paul M.
    2004 Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195166712.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195166712.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
25. Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    1973 “Review of Mathematical Structures of Language by Zellig Harris”. York Papers in Linguistics, –. York, UK: Department of Language, University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    2025 “The prehistory of generative grammar and Chomsky’s debt to Emil Post”. Historiographia Linguistica.–. 10.1075/hl.00186.pul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00186.pul [Google Scholar]
27. Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Barbara C. Scholz
    2010 “Recursion and the infinitude claim”. Recursion in Human Languageed. byHarry van der Hulst, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219258.111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219258.111 [Google Scholar]
28. Smith, Neil
    1999 Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. (1st ed.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]