1887
Volume 43, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0302-5160
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9781
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

The Emergence of the Syntactic Concept of Phrase in Comenius, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/hl.43.3.02oni-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/hl.43.3.02oni
2016-12-16
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Artopoeus, Petrus
    1534Latinae phrasis elegantiae. Ex potissimis authoribus conscriptae. Vitebergae: apud Georgium Rhau.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bathe, William
    (attributed to) 1611Ianua linguarum, sive modus maxime accommodates, quo patefit aditus ad omnes linguas intellegendas. Industria Patrum Hibernorum Societatis Iesu, qui in collegio eiusdem nationis Salamanticae degunt. Salamantica: eapud Franciscum Cea Tesa.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, Karl Ferdinand
    1841Organism der Sprache. 2. Ausgabe. Frankfurt: Kettembeil.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chytraeus, David
    1564De ratione discendi et ordine studiorum in singulis artibus recte instituendo. Vitebergae.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Comenius, Jan Amos
    1631Janua linguarum reserata, sive seminarium linguarum et scientiarumomnium. Lesnae: typis Danielis Vetteri.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1649Grammatica Latino-vernacula, Annotationes super grammaticam. Lesnae: typis Danielis Vetteri. Ed. by Jiři Beneš & Karel Hubka and published as Jan AmosKomensky, Opera Onmia. 15/III. Academia scientiarum Bohemoslovaca. Praha: Academia, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1657Opera didactica omnia. Amsterdami: excuderunt Christophorus Cunradus & Gabriel a Roy.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1658Orbis sensualium pictus, Norimbergae: typis & sumptibus Michaelis Endteri.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dolet, Etienne
    1539Formulae Latinarum locutionum illustrium. Lugduni: apud eundem Doletum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1576Phrases et formulae linguae Latinae elegantiores, Stephano Doleto autore, nunc denuo recognitae, cum praefatione Ioan. Sturmii, quibus adiecimus connubium adverbiorum Ciceronianorum Huberti Sussannaei. Argentorati: excudebat Iosias Rihelius.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Du Bellay, Johachim
    1549La deffence, et illustration de la langue francoise. Paris. (Ed. by Jean-Charles Monferran . Geneve: Droz 2001.)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Elyot, Thomas
    1533The doctrinal of princes made by the noble oratour Isocrates, translated out of Greke in to Englishe by syr Thomas Eliot knight, London: in the house of Thomas Berthelet.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Erasmus of Rotterdam
    1484–1536 Opus epistolarum Des. Erasmi Roterodami. Ed. by Percy Stafford Allen , Helen Mary Allen , Heathcote William Garrod , Barbara Flower & Elizabeth Rosenbaum . I–XII. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1906–1958.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Girard, Gabriel
    1747Les vrais principes de la langue francaise ou la Parole reduite en method conformement aux lois de l’usage, I, Paris: chez Le Breton.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Manutius, Aldus
    1556Eleganze della lingua toscana e latina. Venetia: Aldus.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1567Purae, elegantes et copiosae Latinae linguae phrases. Coloniae Agrippinae: apud Gualtherum Fabricium & Ioannem Gymnicum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1573Phrases Linguae Latinae. Nunc primum in ordinem abecedarium adductae & in Anglicum sermonem conversae. Londinii: ex officina Thomae Vautrollerij. (Facs. Ed., Menston: Scholar Press, 1970; and Ann Arbor. Mich.: ProQuest EEBO Editions, 2010.)
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schorus, Antonius
    1548Phrases linguae Latinae, ratioque observandorum eorum in auctoribus legendis, quae praecipuam ac singularem vim aut usum habent. Coloniae: apud Petrum Horst.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Valla, Laurentius
    1444Elegantiarum linguae Latinae libri sex. [List of manuscripts and printed editions in IJsewijn & Tournoy 1969 (see below).]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vossius, Gerardus Ioannes
    1635De arte grammatica libri septem. Amsterdami: apud Guilielmum Blaeu.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Auroux, Sylvain , E.F.K. Koerner , Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh
    eds. 2000History of the Language Sciences / Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften / Histoire des sciences du langage. Vol. I. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Baratin, Marc
    1999 “La conception de l’enonce dans les textes grammaticaux latins”. Buttgen et al , eds. Theories de la phrase et de la proposition de Platon a Averroes,171–188.
  23. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bonnet, Guillaume
    2011 “Syntagms in the artigraphic Latin grammars”. Matthaios et al , eds. Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, concepts and contexts,361–374.
  25. Breimeier, Heinrich
    2001 “Phrasis”. Thesaurus linguae Latinae, vol. X.1, p.2053, coll. 35–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Buttgen, Philippe , Stephane Dieblet & Marwan Rashed
    eds. 1999Theories de la phrase et de la proposition de Platon a Averroes. Paris: Rue d’Ulm.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Campos, Julio
    1953 “La phrasis de Quintiliano”. Helmantica4:13/15.99–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Čapkova, Dagmar
    1970 “J. A. Comenius’s Orbis Pictus in its Conception as a Textbook for the Universal Education of Children”. Paedagogica Historica10:1.5–27. doi: 10.1080/0030923700100101
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0030923700100101 [Google Scholar]
  29. Caravolas, Jean Antoine
    2000 “Les origines de la didactique des langues en tant que discipline autonome”. Auroux et al , eds. 2000.History of the Language Sciences / Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften / Histoire des sciences du langage,1009–1022.
  30. Chiron, Pierre & Carlos Levy
    eds. 2010Les noms du style dans l’Antiquite Greco-Latine, Louvain: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Claes, Frans M.W
    1988 “Uber die Verbreitung lexikographischer Werke in den Niederlanden und ihre wechselseitige Beziehungen mit dem Ausland bis zum Jahre 1600”. Historiographia Linguistica15:1/2.17–38. doi: 10.1075/hl.15.1‑2.03cla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.15.1-2.03cla [Google Scholar]
  32. Dolbeau, Francois
    2003 “Phrasis”. Novum glossarium mediae Lainitatis ab anno DCCC usquead annum MCC. Hafniae: Einar Munksgaard.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Drskova, Kateřina
    ed. 2013Opera Romanica14. Česke Budějovice: Filozoficka fakulta.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Forsgren, Kjell Ake
    1992Satz, Satzarten, Satzglieder: Zur Gestaltung der deutschen traditionellen Grammatik von Karl Ferdiand Becker bis Konrad Duden 1830–1880. Munster: Nodus.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Garcea, Alessandro
    2005 “Systemes de description et unites linguistiques: le cas du latin dictio”. Incontri Linguistici28.145–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Geissler, Heinrich
    1959Comenius und die Sprache. Heidelberg: Quelle & Mayer.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gourinat, Jean-Baptiste
    2010 “Y a-t-il une theorie stoicienne du style?”. Chiron & Levy , eds. Les noms du style dans l’Antiquite Greco-Latine,317–345.
  38. Gmiterek, Henryk
    2009 “Comenius”. ed. Stammerjohann . Lexicon Grammaticorum. A bio-bibliographical companion to the history of linguistics,315-316.
  39. Graffi, Giorgio
    1990 “L’analisi in costituenti immediati prima di Bloomfield”. Lingua e Stile25:3.457–469.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1991La sintassi tra Ottocento e Novecento. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2001200 Years of Syntax. A critical survey. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sihols.98
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.98 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hockett, Charles Francis
    1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hubka, Karel
    1974 “Komenskeho lešenska Grammatica latina a latinske mluvnice 16. a 17. stol. Listy Filologicke97:2.73–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. IJsewijn, Jozef & Gilbert Tournoy
    1969 “Un primo censimento dei manoscritti e delle edizion a stampa degli Elegantiarum linguae Latinae libri sex di Lorenzo Valla”. Humanistica Lovaniensia18.25-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jespersen, Otto
    1924The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Knape, Joachim
    1994 “Elocutio”. Ueding , ed. II.Historisches Worterbuch der Rhetorik,1022–1083.
  47. Mathuna, Sean P.O
    1986William Bathe, S.J., 1564–1614: A pioneer in linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sihols.37
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.37 [Google Scholar]
  48. Matthaios, Stephanos , Franco Montanari & Antonios Rengakos
    eds. 2011Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, concepts and contexts. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110254044
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110254044 [Google Scholar]
  49. Miškovska-Kozakova, Vlasta T
    1979 “Comenius’s Linguistic Theory and Experiment”. Acta Comeniana4:2.291–319.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Moss, Ann
    1996Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198159087.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198159087.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2003Renaissance Truth and the Latin Language Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249879.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249879.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Norton, Glyn P
    1984The Ideology and Language of Translation in Renaissance France and their Humanistic Antecedents. Geneve: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pešek, Ondrej
    2013 “Sententia, periodus, oratio. Elements de syntaxe textuelle dans les ecrits grammaticaux de Comenius”. Drskova , ed. Opera Romanica,202–216. Ries, John. 1928. Zur Wortgruppenlehre. Prag: Taussig & Taussig.
  54. Rocca, Silvana
    1989Comenio e la riforma didattica del latino (con testo e traduzione del II Vestibulum). Genova: Compagnia dei Librai.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Russo, Emilio
    2008 “Manuzio, Aldo il Giovane”. Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani. Vol. LIX.245–250. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Šabršula, Jan
    1992 “La linguistique dans les ecrits latins de Comenius”. Listy filologicke115Suppl. 1.1–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sadler, John Edward
    1966Comenius and the Concept of Universal Education. New York: Barns & Noble. (Repr., London: Routledge, 2013.)
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Stammerjohann, Harro
    ed. 2009Lexicon Grammaticorum. A bio-bibliographical companion to the history of linguistics. 2nd ed., 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783484971127
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484971127 [Google Scholar]
  59. Tukey, Ralph Hermon
    1911 “The Stoic use of λέξις and φράσις”. Classical Philology6:4.444–449. doi: 10.1086/359579
    https://doi.org/10.1086/359579 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ueding, Gert
    ed. 1994Historisches Worterbuch der Rhetorik. Vols. I–XII. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Wundt, Wilhelm
    1912Volkerpsychologie. II.2: Die Sprache. 3rd revised ed. [11900]. Leipzig: Engelmann.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/hl.43.3.02oni
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error