oa Increased letter spacing and greater letter width improve reading acuity in low vision readers

References

1. Action for blind people
   Action for blind people (2004) Making it clear: Guidelines to producing printed material for people who are blind or partially sighted. Retrieved fromhttps://s27807.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/making_it_clear_guidelines-afsl.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahrens, T., & Mugikura, S.
   (2014) Size-specific adjustments to type designs: An investigation of the principles guiding the design of optical sizes. Just Another Foundry.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alió, J. L., Radner, W., Plaza-Puche, A. B., Ortiz, D., Neipp, C. M., Quiles, J. M., & Rodríguez-Marín, J.
   (2008) Design of short Spanish sentences for measuring reading performance: Radner-Vissum test: Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 34(4), 638–642. doi:  10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.046
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.046 [Google Scholar]
4. Arditi, A., Knoblauch, K., & Grunwald, I.
   (1990) Reading with fixed and variable character pitch’, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 7(10), 2011–2015. doi:  10.1364/JOSAA.7.002011
   https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.7.002011 [Google Scholar]
5. Arditi, Aries
   (2017) Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility. Journal of Vision, 17(5), 8–8. doi:  10.1167/17.5.8
   https://doi.org/10.1167/17.5.8 [Google Scholar]
6. Arditi, Aries, & Cho, J.
   (2005) Serifs and font legibility. Vision Research, 45(23), 2926–2933. doi:  10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.013 [Google Scholar]
7. Baines, P.
   (2004) The end of typography: Slow death by default. Eye Magazine, Spring.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bateman, S., Gutwin, C., & Nacenta, M.
   (2008) Seeing things in the clouds: The effect of visual features on tag cloud selections. InProceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (pp.193–202). doi:  10.1145/1379092.1379130
   https://doi.org/10.1145/1379092.1379130 [Google Scholar]
9. Beier, S.
   (2016) Letterform Research: An academic orphan. Visible Language, 50(2), 64.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Beier, S.
    (2017) Type Tricks: Your personal guide to type design. BIS Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Beier, S., Bernard, J.-B., & Castet, E.
    (2018) Numeral legibility and visual complexity. InDRS Design Research Society, 2018: Limerick. doi:  10.21606/drs.2018.246
    https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.246 [Google Scholar]
12. Beier, S., & Dyson, M. C.
    (2014) The influence of serifs on ‘h’ and ‘i’: Useful knowledge from design-led scientific research. Visible Language, 47(3), 74–95.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Beier, S., & Larson, K.
    (2010) Design Improvements for Frequently Misrecognized Letters. Information Design Journal, 18(2), 118–137. doi:  10.1075/idj.18.2.03bei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.18.2.03bei [Google Scholar]
14. Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T.
    (2019a) The effect of age and font on reading ability. Visible Language, 53(3), 51–69.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T.
    (2019b) Smaller visual angles show greater benefit of letter boldness than larger visual angles. Acta Psychologica, 199, 102904. doi:  10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102904
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102904 [Google Scholar]
16. Bernard, M., Liao, C. H., & Mills, M.
    (2001) The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. InCHI’01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp.175–176). doi:  10.1145/634067.634173
    https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634173 [Google Scholar]
17. Bouma, H.
    (1970) Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177–178. doi:  10.1038/226177a0
    https://doi.org/10.1038/226177a0 [Google Scholar]
18. Brown, J. C., Goldstein, J. E., Chan, T. L., Massof, R., Ramulu, P., & Low Vision Research Network Study Group
    (2014) Characterizing functional complaints in patients seeking outpatient low-vision services in the United States. Ophthalmology, 121(8), 1655–1662. doi:  10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.02.030
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.02.030 [Google Scholar]
19. Burggraaff, M. C., van Nispen, R. M. A., Hoek, S., Knol, D. L., & van Rens, G. H. M. B.
    (2010) Feasibility of the Radner Reading Charts in low-vision patients. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 248(11), 1631–1637. doi:  10.1007/s00417‑010‑1402‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1402-1 [Google Scholar]
20. Burmistrov, I., Zlokazova, T., Ishmuratova, I., & Semenova, M.
    (2016) Legibility of light and ultra-light fonts: Eye tracking study. InProceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp.1–6). doi:  10.1145/2971485.2996745
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996745 [Google Scholar]
21. Calossi, A., Boccardo, L., Fossetti, A., & Radner, W.
    (2014) Design of short Italian sentences to assess near vision performance. Journal of Optometry, 7(4), 203–209. doi:  10.1016/j.optom.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
22. Carter, H.
    (1937) Optical scale in typefounding. Typography, 4, 2–6.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chung, S. T. L.
    (2014) Size or spacing: Which limits letter recognition in people with age-related macular degeneration?Vision Research, 101, 167–176. doi:  10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.015 [Google Scholar]
24. Chung, S. T. L., & Bernard, J.-B.
    (2018) Bolder print does not increase reading speed in people with central vision loss. Vision Research, 153, 98–104. doi:  10.1016/j.visres.2018.10.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2018.10.012 [Google Scholar]
25. Chung, S. T. L., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E.
    (1998) Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Research, 38(19), 2949–2962. doi:  10.1016/S0042‑6989(98)00072‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00072-8 [Google Scholar]
26. Dobres, J., Reimer, B., Parikhal, L., Wean, E., & Chahine, N.
    (2015) The Incredible Shrinking Letter: How Font Size Affects the Legibility of Text Viewed in Brief Glances. InProceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: driving assessment 2015 (pp.435–442). doi:  10.17077/drivingassessment.1605
    https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1605 [Google Scholar]
27. Dyson, M. C., & Beier, S.
    (2016) Investigating typographic differentiation: Italics are more subtle than bold for emphasis. Information Design Journal, 22(1), 3–18. doi:  10.1075/idj.22.1.02dys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22.1.02dys [Google Scholar]
28. Fletcher, D. C., Schuchard, R. A., & Watson, G.
    (1999) Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36(4), 356–364.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Galvin, K.
    (2014) Online and print inclusive design and legibility considerations. https://www.visionaustralia.org/services/digital-access/blog/12-03-2014/online-and-print-inclusive-design-and-legibility-considerations
    [Google Scholar]
30. Garvey, P. M., Zineddin, A. Z., & Pietrucha, M. T.
    (2001) Letter legibility for signs and other large format applications. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45(18), 1443–1447. doi:  10.1177/154193120104501828
    https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120104501828 [Google Scholar]
31. Garvey, P. M., Eie, W.-Y., & Klenna, M. J.
    (2016) The effect of font characteristics on large format display. Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding, 1(1). doi:  10.15763/issn.2470‑9670.2016.v1.i1.a3
    https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2016.v1.i1.a3 [Google Scholar]
32. Hess, R. F., Dakin, S. C., & Kapoor, N.
    (2000) The foveal ‘crowding’ effect: Physics or physiology?Vision Research, 40(4), 365–370. doi:  10.1016/S0042‑6989(99)00193‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00193-5 [Google Scholar]
33. Kingery, D., & Furuta, R.
    (1997) Skimming electronic newspaper headlines: A study of typeface, point size, screen resolution, and monitor size. Information Processing & Management, 33(5), 685–696. doi:  10.1016/S0306‑4573(97)00025‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00025-3 [Google Scholar]
34. Kitchel, J.
    (2013) APH guidelines for print document design. https://www.aph.org/aph-guidelines-for-print-document-design
35. Larson, K., & Carter, M.
    (2016) Sitka: A collaboration between type design and science. InM. C. Dyson & C. Y. Suen (Eds.), Digital Fonts and Reading (Vol.1, pp.37–53). World Scientific. doi:  10.1142/9789814759540_0003
    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814759540_0003 [Google Scholar]
36. Legge, G. E., Rubin, G. S., Pelli, D. G., & Schleske, M. M.
    (1985) Psychophysics of reading – II. Low vision. Vision Research, 25(2), 253–265. doi:  10.1016/0042‑6989(85)90118‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(85)90118-X [Google Scholar]
37. Liu, L., & Arditi, A.
    (2001) How crowding affects letter confusion. Optometry & Vision Science, 78(1), 50–55. doi:  10.1097/00006324‑200101010‑00014
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200101010-00014 [Google Scholar]
38. Maaijwee, K., Mulder, P., Radner, W., & Van Meurs, J. C.
    (2008) Reliability testing of the Dutch version of the Radner Reading Charts. Optometry and Vision Science, 85(5), 353–358. doi:  10.1097/OPX.0b013e31816bf58b
    https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31816bf58b [Google Scholar]
39. Mansfield, J. S., Legge, G. E., & Bane, M. C.
    (1996) Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37(8), 1492–1501.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Morris, R. A., Aquilante, K., Yager, D., & Bigelow, C.
    (2002) P-13: Serifs slow RSVP reading at very small sizes, but don’t matter at larger sizes. InSID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 33(1), 244–247. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi:  10.1889/1.1830242
    https://doi.org/10.1889/1.1830242 [Google Scholar]
41. Munch, I. C., Jørgensen, A. R., & Radner, W.
    (2016) The Danish version of the Radner Reading Chart: Design and empirical testing of sentence optotypes in subjects of varying educational background. Acta Ophthalmologica, 94(2), 182–186. doi:  10.1111/aos.12845
    https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12845 [Google Scholar]
42. Neelam, K., Nolan, J., Chakravarthy, U., & Beatty, S.
    (2009) Psychophysical Function in Age-related Maculopathy. Survey of Ophthalmology, 54(2), 167–210. doi:  10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.12.003 [Google Scholar]
43. Pušnik, N., Podlesek, A., & Možina, K.
    (2016) Typeface comparison – Does the x-height of lower-case letters increased to the size of upper-case letters speed up recognition?International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 54, 164–169. doi:  10.1016/j.ergon.2016.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.06.002 [Google Scholar]
44. Radner, W.
    (2017) Reading charts in ophthalmology. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 255(8), 1465–1482. doi:  10.1007/s00417‑017‑3659‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3659-0 [Google Scholar]
45. Radner, W., & Diendorfer, G.
    (2014) English sentence optotypes for measuring reading acuity and speed – The English version of the RADNER Reading Charts. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 252(8), 1297–1303. doi:  10.1007/s00417‑014‑2646‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2646-y [Google Scholar]
46. Radner, Wolfgang, Obermayer, W., Richter-Mueksch, S., Willinger, U., Velikay-Parel, M., & Eisenwort, B.
    (2002) The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 240(6), 461–467. doi:  10.1007/s00417‑002‑0443‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-002-0443-5 [Google Scholar]
47. Rasmussen, A., Bloch, S. B., Fuchs, J., Hansen, L. H., Larsen, M., LaCour, M., Lund-Andersen, H., & Sander, B.
    (2013) A 4-year longitudinal study of 555 patients treated with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology, 120(12), 2630–2636. doi:  10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.018 [Google Scholar]
48. Rasmussen, A., Brandi, S., Fuchs, J., Hansen, L. H., Lund-Andersen, H., Sander, B., & Larsen, M.
    (2015) Visual outcomes in relation to time to treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmologica, 93(7), 616–620. doi:  10.1111/aos.12781
    https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12781 [Google Scholar]
49. Rosa, A. M., Farinha, C. L., Radner, W., Diendorfer, G., Loureiro, M. F., & Murta, J. N.
    (2016) Development of the Portuguese version of a standardized reading test: The Radner-Coimbra Charts. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 79(4), 238–242. doi:  10.5935/0004‑2749.20160068
    https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20160068 [Google Scholar]
50. Sheedy, J. E., Subbaram, M. V., Zimmerman, A. B., & Hayes, J. R.
    (2005) Text legibility and the letter superiority effect. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47(4), 797–815. doi:  10.1518/001872005775570998
    https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005775570998 [Google Scholar]
51. Smuc, M., Windhager, F., Siebenhandl, K., & Egger, S.
    (2007) Impaired Visibility Typeface Test– Report. Report In-Safety A, 2.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Soleimani, H., & Mohammadi, E.
    (2012) The effect of text typographical features on legibility, comprehension, and retrieval of EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 207. doi:  10.5539/elt.v5n8p207
    https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n8p207 [Google Scholar]
53. Szpiro, S. F. A., Hashash, S., Zhao, Y., & Azenkot, S.
    (2016) How people with low vision access computing devices: Understanding challenges and opportunities. InProceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp.171–180). doi:  10.1145/2982142.2982168
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982168 [Google Scholar]
54. Tarita-Nistor, L., Lam, D., Brent, M. H., Steinbach, M. J., & González, E. G.
    (2013) Courier: A better font for reading with age-related macular degeneration. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology/Journal Canadien d’Ophtalmologie, 48(1), 56–62. doi:  10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.09.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.09.017 [Google Scholar]
55. Tracy, W.
    (1986) Letters of credit: A view of type design. London: Gordon Fraser.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Tunold, S., Radianti, J., Gjøsæter, T., & Chen, W.
    (2019) Perceivability of Map Information for Disaster Situations for People with Low Vision. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 342–352. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑030‑23560‑4_25
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23560-4_25 [Google Scholar]
57. Unger, G.
    (2018) Theory of type design. nai010.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Virsu, V., & Rovamo, J.
    (1979) Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37(3), 475–494. doi:  10.1007/BF00236818
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236818 [Google Scholar]
59. Wallace, J. M., Chung, S. T. L., & Tjan, B. S.
    (2017) Object crowding in age-related macular degeneration. Journal of Vision, 17(1), 33. doi:  10.1167/17.1.33
    https://doi.org/10.1167/17.1.33 [Google Scholar]
60. Waller, R.
    (2007) Comparing typefaces for airport signs. Information Design Journal, 15(1), 1–15. doi:  10.1075/idj.15.1.01wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.1.01wal [Google Scholar]
61. Wong, W. L., Su, X., Li, X., Cheung, C. M. G., Klein, R., Cheng, C.-Y., & Wong, T. Y.
    (2014) Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 2(2), e106–e116. doi:  10.1016/S2214‑109X(13)70145‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1 [Google Scholar]
62. Xiong, Y.-Z., Lorsung, E. A., Mansfield, J. S., Bigelow, C., & Legge, G. E.
    (2018) Fonts Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 59(10), 4182–4189. doi:  10.1167/iovs.18‑24334
    https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24334 [Google Scholar]
63. Yager, D., Aquilante, K., & Plass, R.
    (1998) High and low luminance letters, acuity reserve, and font effects on reading speed. Vision Research, 38(17), 2527–2531. doi:  10.1016/S0042‑6989(98)00116‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00116-3 [Google Scholar]