Volume 26, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0142-5471
  • E-ISSN: 1569-979X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study aimed to assess perceptions on the graphical informational materials designed to help in the fight against COVID-19 in Portugal and Brazil. We assessed the perceptions using an online survey incorporating the AttrakDiff2TM questionnaire. The results show that the perception of risk with relation to the COVID-19 pandemic is high among the respondents, and that they believe that they will have mild symptoms if infected by the virus. The results also show that the materials available in these countries were poorly designed and not effective in promoting adequate behaviour change. These findings can contribute to future design projects whose aim is to design risk communication materials to inform and guide people facing health crisis situations.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ackoff, R. L.
    (1989) From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 15, 3–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dick, M. E.
    (2017) Design da informação e competência em informação: relações possíveis. Revista Brasileira de Design da Informação, 17 (1), p.1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dubb SS
    Dubb SS. Coronavirus pandemic: applying a whole-of-society model for the whole-of-the world. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2020) doi:  10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. COVID-19 situation updates worldwide, as ofJuly17th 2020  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102143
  5. Frascara, J.
    (2000) Diseño gráfico para la gente. Comunicaciones de masa y cambio social (2nd ed.). Ediciones Infinito.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Grant, R.
    (2019) Data Visualization Charts, Maps and Interactive Graphics. Florida: CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hassenzahl, M.
    (2004) The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products. Marc Human-Computer Interaction, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, vol19, pp.319–349. 10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Horn, R. E.
    (1999) Information Design: Emergence of a New Profession. MIT Press: Robert Jacobson.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
    Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2020) Human Factors Science: Guidelines for Effective Communication of COVID-19 Messages to the Public. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/HFES/UploadedImages/494f57d0-9800-48d9-aaec-80259ada371c/HFES_COVID_response_Communicating_-_final.pdf
  10. Huynh, T. L. D.
    (2020) ‘The COVID-19 risk perception: A survey on socioeconomics and media attention’, Economics Bulletin, v40, Issue1, 758–764.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Manzini, E.
    (2014) Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7(2): 95–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Laughery, K. R. & Wogalter, M. S.
    (2011) A three-stage model summarizes product warning and environmental sign research. Safety Science, 61:3–10. 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  13. Milenkovic, A.
    (2020) Extensions and adaptations of existing medical information system in order to reduce social contacts during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Medical Informatics141 (2020) 104–224. doi:  10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104224
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104224 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mukhtar, S. Psychological health during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic outbreak
    (2020) International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1–5. sagepub.com/journals-permissions doi:  10.1177/0020764020925835journals.sagepub.com/home/isp
  15. Nicomedes, C. J. C., Avila, R. M. A.
    (2020) An Analysis on the Panic During COVID-19 Pandemic Through An Online Form. Journal of Affective Disorders. doi:  10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.046
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.046 [Google Scholar]
  16. Pan, S.
    (2020) Information resource orchestration during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study of community lockdowns in China. International Journal of Information Management, 54102–143. doi:  10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102143
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102143 [Google Scholar]
  17. Peters, E., Slovic, P.
    (2014) Risk Perception and Affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006, 15 (6): 322–325. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2006.00461.xSage Publications, NY, USA
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Rowley, J.
    (2007) The Wisdom Hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33 (2): 163–180. doi:  10.1177/0165551506070706. Sage Publications, NY, USA.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070706 [Google Scholar]
  19. SEF/GEPF, Serviço de Estrangeiros e Fronteiras
    SEF/GEPF, Serviço de Estrangeiros e Fronteiras (2020) Relatório de Imigração, Fronteiras e Asilo 2019. Barcarena: SEF. ISSN: 2183–2935. https://sefstat.sef.pt/Docs/Rifa2019.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tran, B. X.
    (2020) Coverage of Health Information by Different Sources in Communities: Implication for COVID-19. Epidemic Response Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3577; doi:  10.3390/ijerph17103577
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103577 [Google Scholar]
  21. Tromp, N. & Hekkert, P.
    (2019) Designing for society. Products and Services for a Better World. Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781474205221
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474205221 [Google Scholar]
  22. Vallejo, B. M., Ong, R. A. C.
    (2020) Policy responses and government science advice for the COVID 19 pandemic in the Philippines: January to April 2020, Progress in Disaster Science (2020), doi:  10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100115
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100115 [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, P-W.
    (2020) COVID-19-Related Information Sources and the Relationship With Confidence in People Coping with COVID-19: Facebook Survey Study in Taiwan. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun; 22(6): e20021. doi:  10.2196/20021
    https://doi.org/10.2196/20021 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AttrakDiff2TM tool; behaviour change; Covid-19; information design; risk communication
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error