Generous and inviting interfaces revisited

References

1. Aspelmeier, J.
   (2019) “Geschichte selber erkunden”: Geschichtsdidaktische Überlegungen zu Chancen und Grenzen Historischen Lernens im und mit dem Archiv. Archivar. Zeitschrift für Archivwesen, 72(2), 105–108.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Belkin, N. J.
   (2008) Some(What) Grand Challenges for Information Retrieval. InC. Macdonald, I. Ounis, V. Plachouras, I. Ruthven, & R. W. White (Eds.), Advances in Information Retrieval (pp.1–1). Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑540‑78646‑7_1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7_1 [Google Scholar]
3. Bludau, M. J., Brüggemann, V., Busch, A., & Dörk, M.
   (2020) Reading Traces: Scalable Exploration in Elastic Visualizations of Cultural Heritage Data. Computer Graphics Forum, 39(3), 77–87. doi:  10.1111/cgf.13964
   https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13964 [Google Scholar]
4. Bludau, M.-J., Dörk, M., & Heidmann, F.
   (2019) Relational Perspectives as Situated Visualizations of Art Collections. ADHO 2019 – Utrecht. https://dh-abstracts.library.cmu.edu/works/9760
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bradley, A. J., El-Assady, M., Coles, K., Alexander, E., Chen, M., Collins, C., Ja, S., & Wrisley, D. J.
   (2018) Visualization and the Digital Humanities. IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 13. 10.1109/MCG.2018.2878900
   https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2018.2878900 [Google Scholar]
6. Brüggemann, V., Bludau, M.-J., & Dörk, M.
   (2020) Die Falte: Ein Denkraum für interaktive und kritische Datenvisualisierungen. DHd 2020 Spielräume: Digital Humanities zwischen Modellierung und Interpretation. Konferenzabstracts, 114–116. doi:  10.5281/zenodo.3666690
   https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3666690 [Google Scholar]
7. Butler, B.
   (2013, April19). Visual Exploration of Australian Prints and Printmaking. The annual conference of Museums and the Web, Portland.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Craft, B., & Cairns, P.
   (2005) Beyond Guidelines: What Can We Learn from the Visual Information Seeking Mantra?Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV’05), 110–118. doi:  10.1109/IV.2005.28
   https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2005.28 [Google Scholar]
9. Davis, S. B., & Vane, O.
   (2019) Design as externalization: Enabling research. Information Design Journal, 25(1), 28–42. doi:  10.1075/idj.25.1.03van
   https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.1.03van [Google Scholar]
10. Dörk, M., Carpendale, S., & Williamson, C.
    (2011) The information flaneur: A fresh look at information seeking. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1215–1224. doi:  10.1145/1978942.1979124
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979124 [Google Scholar]
11. Drucker, J.
    (2011) Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 005(1).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Drucker, J.
    (2013) Performative Materiality and Theoretical Approaches to Interface. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 007(1).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Frantiska, J. J.
    (2019) Interface development for learning environments: Establishing connections between users and learning. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2094506. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑14482‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14482-1 [Google Scholar]
14. Gallner-Holzmann, K.
    (2020) Visualisierung und Didaktisierung digitaler Archivbestände: MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 373–399. doi:  10.21240/mpaed/jb17/2020.05.15.X
    https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/jb17/2020.05.15.X [Google Scholar]
15. Grünberger, N.
    (2014) Räume zum Flanieren, Spielen und Lernen. Überlegungen zur Gestaltung von Bildungs- und Lernräumen im Kontext kultureller Entwicklungen. InK. Rummler (Ed.), Lernräume gestalten – Bildungskontexte vielfältig denken (pp.56–67). Waxmann.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hahnel, C., Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., & Kröhne, U.
    (2016) Effects of linear reading, basic computer skills, evaluating online information, and navigation on reading digital text. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part A), 486–500. doi:  10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.042
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.042 [Google Scholar]
17. Hinton, S., & Whitelaw, M.
    (2010) Exploring the digital commons: An approach to the visualisation of large heritage datasets. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2010). doi:  10.14236/ewic/EVA2010.10
    https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2010.10 [Google Scholar]
18. Jäger, S.
    (2009) Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung. Unrast-Verl.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jänicke, S.
    (2016) Valuable Research for Visualization and Digital Humanities: A Balancing Act. /paper/Valuable-Research-for-Visualization-and-Digital-%3A-A-J%C3%A4nicke/1b2663f566266de4cc725e15c92b99a705b86bed
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jänicke, S., Franzini, G., Cheema, M. F., & Scheuermann, G.
    (2015) On Close and Distant Reading in Digital Humanities: A Survey and Future Challenges. Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis), 21.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jänicke, S., Franzini, G., Cheema, M. F., & Scheuermann, G.
    (2017) Visual Text Analysis in Digital Humanities: Visual Text Analysis in Digital Humanities. Computer Graphics Forum, 36(6), 226–250. doi:  10.1111/cgf.12873
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12873 [Google Scholar]
22. Krippendorff, K.
    (2020) Why discourses in action?InK. Krippendorff & N. Halabi (Eds.), Discourses in action (pp.13–72). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429356032
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429356032 [Google Scholar]
23. Lange, T., & Lux, T.
    (2004) Historisches Lernen im Archiv: Methoden Historischen Lernens (1., Edition). Wochenschau Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lawrence, J., & Reed, C.
    (2020) Argument Mining: A Survey. Computational Linguistics, 45(4), 765–818. doi:  10.1162/coli_a_00364
    https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00364 [Google Scholar]
25. Link, J.
    (1999) Diskursive Ereignisse, Diskurse, Interdiskurse: Sieben Thesen zur Operativität der Diskursanalyse, am Beispiel des Normalismus. InH. Bublitz, A. D. Bührmann, C. Hanke, & A. Seier (Eds.), Das Wuchern der Diskurse: Perspektiven der Diskursanalyse Foucaults (pp.148–161). Campus Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lippi, M., & Torroni, P.
    (2016) MARGOT: A web server for argumentation mining. Expert Systems with Applications, 65, 292–303. doi:  10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.050
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.050 [Google Scholar]
27. Liu, K.
    (2013) Designing visitor experience for open-ended creative engagement in art museums: A conceptual multi-touch prototype design. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13559
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mochales, R., & Moens, M.-F.
    (2011) Argumentation mining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 19(1), 1–22. doi:  10.1007/s10506‑010‑9104‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-010-9104-x [Google Scholar]
29. Schwabe, A.
    (2012) Historisches Lernen im World Wide Web: Suchen, flanieren oder forschen? Fachdidaktisch-mediale Konzeption, praktische Umsetzung und empirische Evaluation der regionalhistorischen Website Vimu.info. V & R unipress.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Shneiderman, B.
    (1996) The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations. Proceedings / IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, September 3 – 6, 1996, Boulder, Colorado, 336–343. 10.1109/VL.1996.545307
    https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307 [Google Scholar]
31. Supriyanto, Fahana J., & Handoko, S.
    (2018) Gamification to Improve Digital Data Collection in Ecotourism Management. 2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT), 139–142. doi:  10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878581
    https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878581 [Google Scholar]
32. Terhart, E.
    (1999) Konstruktivismus und Unterricht. Gibt es einen neuen Ansatz in der Allgemeinen Didaktik?Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45, 629–647.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Vann, S. W., & Tawfik, A. A.
    (2020) Flow Theory and Learning Experience Design in Gamified Learning Environments – Learner and User Experience Research. Games-Based Learning. https://edtechbooks.org/ux/flow_theory_and_lxd
    [Google Scholar]
34. Von Glasersfeld, E.
    (1990) Zuerst muß man zu zweit sein. Rationale Gedanken zur Liebe. Ernst von Glasersfeld (1990) Zuerst Zeitschrift Der Österreichischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Für Systemische Therapie, 2, 119–135.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Von Glasersfeld, E., & Cobb, P.
    (1983) Knowledge as Environmental Fit. Man-Environment Systems, 13(5), 216–224.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Vörös, Z., Rouet, J.-F., & Pléh, C.
    (2011) Effect of high-level content organizers on hypertext learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 2047–2055. doi:  10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.005 [Google Scholar]
37. Wendel, K.
    (2020) MediaWiki – eine ideale Erschließungssoftware für Archive, Museen und Bibliotheken?Archivalia. https://archivalia.hypotheses.org/9276
    [Google Scholar]
38. Whitelaw, M.
    (2015) Generous Interfaces for Digital Cultural Collections. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 9(1). www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000205/000205.html
    [Google Scholar]
39. Winston, E. A., & Monikowski, C.
    (2000) Discourse Mapping. Developing Textual Cohernce Skills and Interpreters. InC. B. Roy (Ed.), Innovative practices for teaching sign language interpreters. Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wojton, M. A., Hayde, D., Heimlich, J. E., & Börner, K.
    (2018) Begin at the Beginning: A Constructionist Model for Interpreting Data Visualizations. Curator: The Museum Journal, 61(4), 559–574. doi:  10.1111/cura.12277
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12277 [Google Scholar]