Simplification of pharmaceutical pictograms to improve visual acuity

References

1. Askehave, I., & Zethsen, K. K.
   (2014) A comparative analysis of the lay-friendliness of Danish EU patient information leaflets from 2000 to 2012. Communication & Medicine, 11(3), 209–222. 10.1558/cam.v11i3.20700
   https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.v11i3.20700 [Google Scholar]
2. Barros, I. M. C., Alcântara, T. S., Mesquita, A. R., Santos, A. C. O., Paixão, F. P., & Lyra, Jr.
   (2014) The use of pictograms in the health care: A literature review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 10(5), 704–719. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
3. Beier, S.
   (2012) Reading Letters: Designing for legibility. BIS Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beier, S., Bernard, J.-B., & Castet, E.
   (2018, June28). Numeral Legibility and Visual Complexity. Design Research Society Conference2018. 10.21606/drs.2018.246
   https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.246 [Google Scholar]
5. Bernard, J. B., & Chung, S. T.
   (2011) The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target–flanker similarity. Journal of Vision, 11(8). 10.1167/11.8.1
   https://doi.org/10.1167/11.8.1 [Google Scholar]
6. Boersema, T., & Adams, A. S.
   (2017) Does my symbol sign work?Information Design: Research and Practice, Edited byAlison Black, Paul Luna, Ole Lund and Sue Walker (pp.303–314). Routlege.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bouma, H.
   (1970) Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177–178. 10.1038/226177a0
   https://doi.org/10.1038/226177a0 [Google Scholar]
8. Choi, J.
   (2011) Literature review: Using pictographs in discharge instructions for older adults with low-literacy skills. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(21–22), 2984–2996. 10.1111/j.1365‑2702.2011.03814.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03814.x [Google Scholar]
9. Del Re, L., Vaillancourt, R., Villarreal, G., & Pouliot, A.
   (2016) Pictograms: Can They Help Patients Recall Medication Safety Instructions?Visible Language, Vol.50(1), 127–151.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dickinson, D., & Gallina, S.
    (2017) Chapter 47: Information design in medicine package leaflets – How detailed design and usability testing can help medicine users. InInformation Design – Research and Practice (pp.685–700). Routlege.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Directive 92/27/EEC, Council Directive 92/27/EEC
    Directive 92/27/EEC, Council Directive 92/27/EECof31March 1992 on the labelling of medicinal products for human use and on package leaflets OJ No L 113 of 30.4.1992 (1992).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dowse, R.
    (2021) Designing and reporting pictogram research: Problems, pitfalls and lessons learnt. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(6), 1208–1215. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.013 [Google Scholar]
13. Dowse, R., & Ehlers, M. S.
    (1998) Pictograms in pharmacy. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 6(2), 109–118. 10.1111/j.2042‑7174.1998.tb00924.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.1998.tb00924.x [Google Scholar]
14. Hamm, L. M., Yeoman, J. P., Anstice, N., & Dakin, S. C.
    (2018) The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity. Journal of Vision, 18(3), 13. 10.1167/18.3.13
    https://doi.org/10.1167/18.3.13 [Google Scholar]
15. Hill, L. H.
    (2006) Using visual concept mapping to communicate medication information to patients with low health literacy; a preliminary study. Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, 621–628.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Houts, P. S., Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Loscalzo, M. J.
    (2006) The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling, 61(2), 173–190. 10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004 [Google Scholar]
17. ISO 9186-2:2008
    ISO 9186-2:2008 (2008) Graphical symbols – Test methods – Part 2: Method for testing perceptual quality. Geneva: ISO.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kanji, L., Xu, S., & Cavaco, A.
    (2018) Assessing the Understanding of Pharmaceutical Pictograms among Cultural Minorities: The Example of Hindu Individuals Communicating in European Portuguese. Pharmacy, 6(1:22). 10.3390/pharmacy6010022
    https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6010022 [Google Scholar]
19. Katz, M. G., Kripalani, S., & Weiss, B. D.
    (2006) Use of pictorial aids in medication instructions: A review of the literature. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 63(23), 2391–2397. 10.2146/ajhp060162
    https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp060162 [Google Scholar]
20. Kline, D. W., & Fuchs, P.
    (1993) The Visibility of Symbolic Highway Signs Can Be Increased among Drivers of All Ages. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35(1), 25–34. 10.1177/001872089303500102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500102 [Google Scholar]
21. Knapp, P., Raynor, D. K., Jebar, A. H., & Price, S. J.
    (2005) Interpretation of Medication Pictograms by Adults in the UK. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 39(7–8), 1227–1233. 10.1345/aph.1E483
    https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1E483 [Google Scholar]
22. Korenevsky, A., Vaillancourt, R., Pouliot, A., Revol, M., Steed, E., Besançon, L., Wahrendorf, M.-S., & Patel, J. R.
    (2013) How Many Words Does a Picture Really Tell? Cross-sectional Descriptive Study of Pictogram Evaluation by Youth. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 66(4), 219–226. 10.4212/cjhp.v66i4.1269
    https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v66i4.1269 [Google Scholar]
23. Lalor, S. J. H., Formankiewicz, M. A., & Waugh, S. J.
    (2016) Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols. Vision Research, 121, 31–38. 10.1016/j.visres.2016.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.01.007 [Google Scholar]
24. Legge, G. E., Cheung, S.-H., Yu, D., Chung, S. T., Lee, H.-W., & Owens, D. P.
    (2007) The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 9–9. 10.1167/7.2.9
    https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.9 [Google Scholar]
25. Lesch, M. F., Powell, W. R., Horrey, W. J., & Wogalter, M. S.
    (2013) The use of contextual cues to improve warning symbol comprehension: Making the connection for older adults. Ergonomics, 56(8), 1264–1279. 10.1080/00140139.2013.802019
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.802019 [Google Scholar]
26. Pander Maat, H., & Lentz, L.
    (2010) Improving the usability of patient information. Patient Education and Counseling, Volume80(Issue1), 113–119. 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.030
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.030 [Google Scholar]
27. Pedersen, P.
    (2019) Legibility of Pharmaceutical Pictograms: Towards defining a paradigm. Visible Language, 53(2), 72–99.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C.
    (2006) Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023 [Google Scholar]
29. Radner, W.
    (2017) Reading charts in ophthalmology. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 255(8), 1465–1482. 10.1007/s00417‑017‑3659‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3659-0 [Google Scholar]
30. Rosa, E., Perea, M., & Enneson, P.
    (2016) The role of letter features in visual-word recognition: Evidence from a delayed segment technique. Acta Psychologica, 169, 133–142. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.016 [Google Scholar]
31. Rosen, S., Chakravarthi, R., & Pelli, D. G.
    (2014) The Bouma law of crowding, revised: Critical spacing is equal across parts, not objects. Journal of Vision, 14(6), 10–10. 10.1167/14.6.10
    https://doi.org/10.1167/14.6.10 [Google Scholar]
32. Sayim, B., & Wagemans, J.
    (2017) Appearance changes and error characteristics in crowding revealed by drawings. Journal of Vision, 17(11), 8. 10.1167/17.11.8
    https://doi.org/10.1167/17.11.8 [Google Scholar]
33. Schubert, T.
    (2017) Why are digits easier to identify than letters?Neuropsychologia. 95, 136–155. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.016 [Google Scholar]
34. Sharif, S. I., Abdulla, M., Yousif, A., & Mohamed, D.
    (2014) Interpretation of Pharmaceutical Pictograms by Pharmacy and Non-Pharmacy University Students. Pharmacology Pharmacy, 05(08), 821–827. 10.4236/pp.2014.58092
    https://doi.org/10.4236/pp.2014.58092 [Google Scholar]
35. Strauss, A., & Zender, M.
    (2017) Design by Consensus: A New Method for Designing Effective Pictograms. Visible Language, 51(2), 7–33.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Vaillancourt, R., Giby, C. N., Murphy, B. P., Pouliot, A., & Trinneer, A.
    (2019) Recall of Pharmaceutical Pictograms by Older Adults. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 72(6). 10.4212/cjhp.v72i6.2944
    https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v72i6.2944 [Google Scholar]
37. Waarde, K. van der
    (2008) Measuring the quality of information in medical package leaflets: Harmful or helpful?Information Design Journal, 16(3), 216–228. 10.1075/idj.16.3.05waa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.3.05waa [Google Scholar]
38. Waarde, K. van der
    (2010) Visual Communication for Medicines: Malignant Assumptions and Benign Design?Visible Language, Vol.44(1), 39–69.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Waarde, K. van der
    (2017) Chapter 49 Medical information design and its legislation. InA. Black, P. Luna, O. Lund, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information Design – Research and Practice (pp.715–730). Routlege.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Waarde, K. van der, & Spinillo, C.
    (2015) Chapter 12: The development of visual information about medicines in Europe. InJ. Frascara (Ed.), Information design as principled action: Making information accessible, relevant, understandable, and usable (pp.185–189). Common Ground Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
41. WHO
    WHO (2019) Medication Safety in Polypharmacy (WHO/UHC/SDS/2019.11). World Health Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wogalter, M. S., Conzola, V. C., & Smith-Jackson, T. L.
    (2002) Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 33(3), 219–230. 10.1016/S0003‑6870(02)00009‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00009-1 [Google Scholar]
43. Wogalter, M. S., La Murray, T. A., Glover, B. L., & Shaver, E. F.
    (2002) Comprehension of Different Types of Prohibitive Safety Symbols with Glance Exposure. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46(19), 1753–1757. 10.1177/154193120204601914
    https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120204601914 [Google Scholar]
44. Wong, B., & Szücs, D.
    (2013) Single-digit Arabic numbers do not automatically activate magnitude representations in adults or in children: Evidence from the symbolic same–different task. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 488–498. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.006 [Google Scholar]
45. Zhang, J. Y., Zhang, T., Xue, F., Liu, L., & Yu, C.
    (2007) Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 48(5), 2383–2390. 10.1167/iovs.06‑1195
    https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-1195 [Google Scholar]
46. Zender, M., & Mejía, G. M.
    (2013) Improving Icon Design: Through Focus on the Role of Individual Symbols in the Construction of Meaning. VISIBLE LANGUAGE, 48(1), 69–95.
    [Google Scholar]