Volume 27, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0142-5471
  • E-ISSN: 1569-979X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The ability to quantify and compare typography has potential in many disciplines such as marketing, branding, education, and literacy studies. However, formal features of typography have been difficult to operationalize for quantitative analysis. The article proposes a quantitative, distinctive feature-based framework for describing and comparing fonts. The analyses made using the framework yield a clear and quantifiable separation of well-established typographical categories. It is also sensitive enough to pick up even small variations between fonts. The framework can aid in developing a more generally accepted typographical meta-language that allows for comparison and cross-fertilization of typographical knowledge across disciplines.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J.
    (2010) Principal component analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: computational statistics, 2(4), 433–459. 10.1002/wics.101
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, M. M.
    (2013) Typeface persona: Investigating Gotham’s suitability for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Howard University, Washington, DC. Retrieved fromsearch.proquest.com/docview/1512417400
  3. Armean, O.
    (2016) New Media Typography. Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media, 9(24), 28–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bateman, J. A.
    (2019) Information design and multimodality: New possibilities for engagement across theory and practice. Information Design Journal, 25(3), 249–257. 10.1075/idj.25.3.02bat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.3.02bat [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateman, J. A., Veloso, F. O., & Lau, Y. L.
    (2019) On the track of visual style: A diachronic study of page composition in comics and its functional motivation. Visual Communication, 1470357219839101.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauermeister, B.
    (1988) A manual of comparative typography: the PANOSE system. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bringhurst, R.
    (1997) The elements of typographic style (2nd ed.). Hartley & Marks.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brumberger, E. R.
    (2003) The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical communication, 50(2), 206–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Laurentis, M. S., Bauermeister, B., Beausoleil, R. G., Brown, G. N., & McQueen III, C. D.
    (1993) PANOSE 2.0 White Paper. Hewlett-Packard Corporation. RetrievedJuly6th 2022 fromhttps://www.w3.org/Fonts/Panose/pan2.html
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hustwit, G.
    (2007) Helvetica.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hyndman, S.
    (2016) Why fonts matter. Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Johannessen, C. M.
    (2011) The Forensic Analysis of Graphic Trademarks. A multimodal social semiotic approach. University of Southern Denmark. Odense.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2016) Experiential meaning potential in the Topaz Energy logo: A framework for graphemic and graphetic analysis of graphic logo design. Social Semiotics, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Johannessen, C. M., Tvede, M. L., Claussen-Boesen, K., and Hiippala, T.
    (2021) “A Corpus-Based Approach to Color, Shape, and Typography in Logos”. In: Pflaeging, J., Wildfeuer, J., and Bateman, J. (Eds) Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 159–186. 10.1515/9783110725001‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110725001-007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Järlehed, J., & Jaworski, A.
    (2015) Typographic landscaping: Creativity, ideology, movement. In: Taylor & Francis. 10.1080/10350330.2015.1010318
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010318 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lupton, E.
    (2014) Thinking with type: A critical guide for designers, writers, editors, & students. Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Morrissy, S.
    (2017) Inexplicable in the last resort. Information Design Journal, 23(2), 184–193. 10.1075/idj.23.2.07mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23.2.07mor [Google Scholar]
  20. MyFonts
    MyFonts (2020) Display Fonts. RetrievedNovember18thfromhttps://www.myfonts.com/display-fonts?at=1
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nørgaard, N.
    (2009) The semiotics of typography in literary texts. A multimodal approach. Orbis litterarum, 64(2), 141–160. 10.1111/j.1600‑0730.2008.00949.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0730.2008.00949.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Pantaleo, S.
    (2014) Elementary students consider the “what” and “how” of typography in picturebooks. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 20(2), 144–166. 10.1080/13614541.2014.929450
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2014.929450 [Google Scholar]
  23. Rajabi, E.
    (2020) Typography as a regime of reading/looking in Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye (1970). Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1811580. 10.1080/23311983.2020.1811580
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1811580 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ravelli, L. J., & Starfield, S.
    (2008) Typography and disciplinary identity in academic writing. Information Design Journal, 16(2), 133–147. 10.1075/idj.16.2.06rav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.2.06rav [Google Scholar]
  25. Spitzmüller, J.
    (2015) Graphic variation and graphic ideologies: A metapragmatic approach. Social Semiotics, 25(2), 126–141. 10.1080/10350330.2015.1010323
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010323 [Google Scholar]
  26. Stöckl, H.
    (2005) Typography: body and dress of a text-a signing mode between language and image. Visual Communication, 4(2), 204–214. 10.1177/1470357205053403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205053403 [Google Scholar]
  27. Stötzner, A.
    (2003) Signography as a subject in its own right. Visual Communication, 2(3), 285–302. 10.1177/14703572030023003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572030023003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G.
    (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research, 9(11), 2579–2605.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Leeuwen, T.
    (2005a) Introducing Social Semiotics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (2005b) Typographic Meaning. Visual Communication, 4(2), 137–143. 10.1177/1470357205053749
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205053749 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2006) Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 139–155. 10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee [Google Scholar]
  32. Veytsman, B., & Akhmadeeva, L.
    (2011) Towards evidence-based typography: Literature review and experiment design. In: TUGboat.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): distinctive features; fonts; multimodality; principal component analysis; Typography
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error