Radi(c)al departures

References

1. Bartram, D.J
   (1980) Comprehending spatial information: The relative efficiency of different methods of presenting information about bus routes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 65, 103–110.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bornstein, R.F
   (1989) Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.106.2.265
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 [Google Scholar]
3. Boston Globe
   (2013) MBTA map-making contest garners 17,000 votes. http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/09/21/map-making-contest-garners-votes/egeCO7x7Q8rbfciGVHaSyI/story.html [accessed20/11/2015]
4. Bronzaft, A.L. , & Dobrow, S.B
   (1984) Improving transit information systems. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13, 365–376. doi: 10.2190/JD6U‑YAW5‑8QQR‑DTTV
   https://doi.org/10.2190/JD6U-YAW5-8QQR-DTTV [Google Scholar]
5. Bronzaft, A.L. , Dobrow, S.B. , & O’Hanlon, T.J
   (1976) Spatial orientation in a subway system. Environment & Behavior, 8, 575–594. doi: 10.1177/001391657684005
   https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657684005 [Google Scholar]
6. Burch, M. , Kurzhals, K. , Raschke, M. , Blascheck, T. , & Weiskopf, D
   (2014) How do people read metro maps? An eye tracking study. Schematic Mapping Workshop 2014, University of Essex, April. https://sites.google.com/site/schematicmapping/Burch-EyeTracking.pdf [accessed20/11/2015]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carpenter, P.A. Just, M.A. , and Shell, P
   (1990) What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–431. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.97.3.404
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.404 [Google Scholar]
8. Chabris, C. , & Simons, D
   (2010) The invisible gorilla. New York: Crown Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chi, M.T.H. , Feltovich, P.J. , & Glaser, R
   (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
   https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 [Google Scholar]
10. Creative Review
    (2013) A circular subway map for NYC. www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2013/august/a-circular-subway-map-for-nyc/ [accessed20/11/2015]
11. Die Welt
    (2013) Ein Psychologe macht S- und U-Bahn Pläne rund. www.welt.de/gesundheit/psychologie/article120467042/Ein-Psychologe-macht-S-und-U-Bahn-Plaene-rund.html [accessed20/11/2015]
12. Die Zeit
    (2013) Menschen mögen Muster. www.zeit.de/2013/37/u-bahn-plaene-design-maxwell-roberts [accessed20/11/2015].
13. Dow, A
    (2005) Telling the passenger where to get off. Harrow Weald, UK: Capital Transport Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fink, M. , Lechner, M. , & Wolff, A
    (2014) Concentric metro maps. Schematic Mapping Workshop 2014, University of Essex, April. https://sites.google.com/site/schematicmapping/Fink-Concentric.pdf [accessed20/11/2015]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Garland, K
    (1994) Mr Beck’s Underground map. Harrow Weald, UK: Capital Transport Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gothamist
    (2013) New NYC subway map elegantly inspired by concentric circles. gothamist.com/2013/07/25/fun_map_nyc_subway_map_as_a_circle.php [accessed20/11/2015]
17. Guo, Z
    (2011) Mind the map! The impact of transit maps on travel decisions in public transit. Transportation Research Part A, 45, 625–639.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guo, Z. , & Wilson, N.H.M
    (2011) Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: A case study of the London Underground. Transportation Research Part A, 45, 91–104.
    [Google Scholar]
19. ITV News
    (2013) New London tube map goes round in circles. www.itv.com/news/2013-01-30/new-london-tube-map-goes-round-in-circles/ [accessed20/11/2015]
20. Kruger, J. , & Dunning, D
    (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.77.6.1121
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 [Google Scholar]
21. Leder, H. , Tinio, P.P.L. , & Bar, M
    (2011) Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects. Perception, 40, 649–655. doi: 10.1068/p6845
    https://doi.org/10.1068/p6845 [Google Scholar]
22. Meo, M. , Roberts, M.J. & Marucci, F.S
    (2007) Element salience as a predictor of item difficulty for Raven’s Progressive Matrices. Intelligence, 35, 359–368. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.10.001 [Google Scholar]
23. Metro
    (2013) New version of London Underground map shows circles are the war forward. metro.co.uk/2013/01/30/new-version-of-london-underground-map-shows-circles-are-the-way-forward-3374600/ [accessed20/11/2015].
24. Newton, E.J. , & Roberts, M.J
    (2009) Applying cognitive psychology principles to Underground map design. Poster presented atLondon South Bank University research day, July.
25. Nöllenburg, M
    (2014) A survey on automated metro map layout methods. Schematic Mapping Workshop 2014, University of Essex, April. https://sites.google.com/site/schematicmapping/Nöllenburg_survey.pdf [accessed20/11/2015]
    [Google Scholar]
26. Nöllenburg, M. , & Wolff, A
    (2011) Drawing and labeling high-quality metro maps by mixed-integer programming. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17, 626–641. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.81
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.81 [Google Scholar]
27. Ovenden, M
    (2003) Metro maps of the world (1st ed). Harrow Weald, UK: Capital Transport Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ovenden, M
    (2005) Metro maps of the world (2nd ed). Harrow Weald, UK: Capital Transport Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ovenden, M
    (2007) Transit maps of the world. New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ovenden, M
    (2008) Paris Metro style in map and station design. Harrow Weald, UK: Capital Transport Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ovenden, M
    (2015) Transit maps of the world (2nd ed). New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Palmer, S.E. , Schloss, K.B. , & Sammartino, J
    (2013) Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 77–107. doi: 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑120710‑100504
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504 [Google Scholar]
33. Primi, R
    (2002) Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks, contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 41−70. doi: 10.1016/S0160‑2896(01)00067‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00067-8 [Google Scholar]
34. Roberts, M.J
    (2005) Underground maps after Beck. Harrow Weald, UK: Capital Transport Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Roberts, M.J
    (2012) Underground maps unravelled, explorations in information design. Wivenhoe, UK: Published by the author.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Roberts, M.J
    (2014a) Schematic maps in the laboratory. Schematic Mapping Workshop 2014, University of Essex, April. www.tubemapcentral.com/articles/roberts_empirical_2014.pdf [accessed20/11/2015]
    [Google Scholar]
37. Roberts, M.J
    (2014b) What’s your theory of effective schematic map design?Schematic Mapping Workshop 2014, University of Essex, April. www.tubemapcentral.com/articles/roberts_theoretical_2014.pdf [accessed20/11/2015]
    [Google Scholar]
38. Roberts, M.J. , Newton, E.J. , Lagattolla, F.D. , Hughes, S. , & Hasler, M.C
    (2013) Objective versus subjective measures of Paris Metro map usability: Investigating traditional octolinear versus all-curves schematic maps. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 71, 363–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.004 [Google Scholar]
39. Roberts, M.J. , Welfare, H. , Livermore, D.P. & Theadom, A.M
    (2000) Context, visual salience, and inductive reasoning, Thinking and Reasoning, 6, 349–374. doi: 10.1080/135467800750038175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/135467800750038175 [Google Scholar]
40. Rosenholtz, R
    (2011) What your visual system sees when you are not looking. Proceedings of theSPIE: Human vision and electronic imaging, XVI, San Francisco, California.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Silvia, P.J. , & Barona, C.M
    (2009) Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 25–42. doi: 10.2190/EM.27.1.b
    https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.27.1.b [Google Scholar]
42. Stott, J.M. , Rodgers, P.J. , Martinez-Ovando, J.C. , & Walker, S.G
    (2011) Automatic metro map layout using multicriteria optimization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17, 101–114. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.24
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.24 [Google Scholar]
43. Vertesi, J
    (2008) Mind the Gap: The London Underground map and users’ representations of urban space. Social Studies of Science, 38, 7–33. doi: 10.1177/0306312707084153
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084153 [Google Scholar]
44. Vodegel Matzen, L.B. , Van der Molen, M.W. , & Dudink, A.C
    (1994) Error analysis of Raven test performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 433–445. doi: 10.1016/0191‑8869(94)90070‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90070-1 [Google Scholar]
45. Wolff, A
    (2007) Drawing subway maps: A survey. Informatik, 22, 23–44. doi: 10.1007/s00450‑007‑0036‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-007-0036-y [Google Scholar]