1887
Volume 22, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0142-5471
  • E-ISSN: 1569-979X
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

As novel tools and techniques for visualizing information grow popular, many information design solutions are increasingly demonstrating high technical and visual sophistication, but often at the expense of thoughtful, effective communication. This recurring phenomenon highlights an overemphasis on the production of design outputs and failure to understand the initial problem, content, and audience early in a project. We assert that ineffective information design results primarily from a lack of rigor in the conceptual stage of the design process, when critical decisions determine the end result. We propose 23 methods information designers may adopt to reinforce their conceptual design activities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/idj.22.3.06pon
2017-01-16
2018-11-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnheim, R
    (1993) Sketching and the Psychology of Design Design Issues, 9(2), 15–19. doi: 10.2307/1511669
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1511669 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baer, K
    (2008) Information design workbook: graphic approaches, solutions, and inspiration + 30 case studies. Beverly (Mass): Rockport.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell, S.J. & Shank J.D
    (2007) Academic Librarianship by Design: A Blended Librarian’s Guide to the Tools and Techniques. Chicago: American Library Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bektaş, E. ; Heintz, J.L. & Wamelink, J.W.F
    (2008) A Review of knowledge management in collaborative design: The necessity of project knowledge integration in large scale building projects. Innovation Conference in AEC 2008. Antalya, Turkey (1–12).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Buzan, T
    (2002) How to mind map: The thinking tool that will change your life. USA: Thorsons.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Conley, C
    (2004) Where are the design methodologists?Visible Language, 38(2), 196–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cross, N. , Christiaans, H. & Dorst, K
    (1996) Analysing design activity. England: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cross, N
    (2000) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, U. & Wilson, K
    (2013) Design methods for developing services. Design Council (UK).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Doorley, S. & Witthoft, S
    (2012) Make space: How to set the stage for creative collaboration. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dorst, K. & Lawson, B
    (2009) Design expertise. Oxford: Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubberly, H
    (2005) How do you design?[Online Book] [Accessible from: www.dubberly.com/articles/howdo-you-design.html].
  13. Frascara, J
    (2015) Information design as principled action: Making information accessible, relevant, understandable, and usable. Illinois, USA: Common Ground Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gray, D. , Brown, S. , & Macanufo, J
    (2010) Gamestorming: A playbook for innovators, rulebreakers, and changemakers. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gobert, I. & van Looveren, J
    (2014) Thoughts on designing information. Switzerland: Lars Muller Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Heller, S. & Landers, R
    (2014) Infographic designers’ sketchbooks. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones, C.J
    (1992) Design methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Katz, J
    (2012) Designing information: Human factors and common sense in information design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kennedy, M.M
    (1987) Inexact sciences: professional education and the development of expertise. Review of Research in Education, 14, 133–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Klanten, R. , Bourquin, N. & Ehmann, S
    (2008) Data flow, visualizing information in graphic design. Berlin: Gestalten.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Klein, G. , Phillips, J.K. , Rall, E.L. , & Peluso, D.A
    (2007) A dataframe theory of sensemaking. InExpertise Out of Context: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making (Pensacola Beach, FL, May 15–17, 2003) (pp.113–155), Expertise: Research and Applications Series. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lawson, B
    (2008) How designers think. UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lupton, E
    (2014) Beautiful users: designing for people. USA: Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mattelmaki, T
    (2008) Design probes. 2nd ed. Helsinki, Finland: Publishing series of University of Art and Design.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McQuaid, H.L. , Goel, A. , & McManus, M
    (2003b, September). Designing for a pervasive information environment: the importance of information architecture. In Proceedings of the British HCI Conference , Bath, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2003a, June). When you can’t talk to customers: using storyboards and narratives to elicit empathy for users. In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (pp.120–125). ACM. doi: 10.1145/782896.782926
    https://doi.org/10.1145/782896.782926 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mueller, V
    (2009) Conceptual design tools: Establishing a framework for specification of concept design tools. Proceedings of Arab Society for Computed Aided Architectural Design (ASCAAD) . Manama, Bahrain, pp.103–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Parnes, S.J
    (1967) Creative behaviour guidebook. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Patton, M.Q
    (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pontis, S
    (2012) Guidelines for conceptual design to assist diagram creators in information design practice. PhD Thesis. University of the Arts London, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2014) A guided approach to conceptual design in the information design process. Information Design Journal, 21(2), 115–128. doi: 10.1075/idj.21.2.04pon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.21.2.04pon [Google Scholar]
  32. Pontis, S. & Babwahsingh, M
    (2013) Communicating complexity and simplicity: Rediscovering the fundamentals of information design. 2CO COmmunicating COmplexity. Alghero, Sardinia, Italy, 25–26 October 2013, pp.244–61
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2015) Start with the basics: Understanding before doing. InProceedings of Visual Plus 2015 Symposium: Information + Design = Performance – IIID, IDA. Birmingham, England, 3–4 September 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pontis, S
    . (In Preparation). Information designers at work: A closer look at their process.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Roam, D
    (2008) The back of the napkin: solving problems and selling ideas with pictures. New York: Portfolio.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Russell, K
    (2002) Why the culture of academic rigour matters to design research: Or putting your foot into the same mouth twice. Working Papers in Art and Design, 2. [Available fromhttps://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/12310/WPIAAD_vol2_russell.pdf, Accessed on12 April 2016] ISSN1466-4917.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schriver, K
    (1996) Dynamics in document design: Creating texts for readers. Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Senechal, A
    (1997) It’s all in the PROCESS. Adobe Magazine, pp.34–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sibbet, D
    (2010) Visual meetings: how graphics, sticky notes and idea mapping can transform group productivity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Siegel, A. & Etzkorn, I
    (2013) Simple: Conquering the crisis of complexity. USA: Twelve.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Simon, H.A
    (1995) Problem forming, problem finding and problem solving in design. InDesign & Systems ( Collen, A. & Gasparski, W ., Eds.), pp.245–257. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Stickdorn, M. & Schneider, J
    (2012) This is service design thinking: basics, tools, cases. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Treffinger, D.J. ; Isaken, S.G. & Stead-Dorval, K.B
    (2006) Creative problem solving. An introduction.4th ed. USA: Prufrock Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Waller, R
    (2011) Technical Paper 14. Information design: how the disciplines work together. Simplification Centre. University of Reading.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, L. , Shen, W. , Xie, H. , Neelamkavil, J. , & Pardasani, A
    (2002) Collaborative conceptual design—state of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design, 34(13), 981–996. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑4485(01)00157‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00157-9 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ware, C
    (2008) Visual thinking for design. USA: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wood, J
    (2000) The Culture of Academic Rigour: Does Design Research Really Need It?The Design Journal, 3(1), 44–57(14). doi: 10.2752/146069200789393599
    https://doi.org/10.2752/146069200789393599 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wurman, R.S
    (1989) Information anxiety. London: Pan Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (1996) Information architects. Zurich: Graphics Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Zahner, D. , Nickerson, J.V. , Tversky, B. , Corter, J.E. , & Ma, J
    (2010) A fix for fixation? Rerepresenting and Abstracting as Creative Processes in the Design of Information Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(02), 231–244. doi: 10.1017/S0890060410000077
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060410000077 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/idj.22.3.06pon
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error