Script-style degrees

References

1. Beier, S.
   (2017) Type Tricks: Your personal guide to type design. BIS Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beier, S., Bernard, J. B., & Castet, E.
   (2018) Numeral legibility and visual complexity. DRS Design Research Society. 10.21606/drs.2018.246
   https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.246 [Google Scholar]
3. Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A.
   (2022) Closed letter counters impair recognition. Applied Ergonomics, 1011, 103709. 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103709
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103709 [Google Scholar]
4. Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T.
   (2021) High letter stroke contrast impairs letter recognition of bold fonts. Applied Ergonomics, 971. 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103499
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103499 [Google Scholar]
5. Beier, S., Sand, K., & Starrfelt, R.
   (2017) Legibility Implications of Embellished Display Typefaces. Visible Language, 51(1), 112–133.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bernard, J. B., & Chung, S. T.
   (2011) The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target–flanker similarity. Journal of Vision, 11(8), 1–16. 10.1167/11.8.1
   https://doi.org/10.1167/11.8.1 [Google Scholar]
7. Brumberger, E. R.
   (2003) The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical Communication, 50(2), 206–223. 10.1109/47.7818
   https://doi.org/10.1109/47.7818 [Google Scholar]
8. Celhay, F., Boysselle, J., & Cohen, J.
   (2015) Food packages and communication through typeface design: The exoticism of exotypes. Food Quality and Preference, 391, 167–175. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.009 [Google Scholar]
9. Chanceaux, M., Mathôt, S., & Grainger, J.
   (2014) Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification. Journal of Vision, 14(6), 7–7. 10.1167/14.6.7
   https://doi.org/10.1167/14.6.7 [Google Scholar]
10. Childers, T. L., & Jass, J.
    (2002) All Dressed Up With Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 93–106. 10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_03 [Google Scholar]
11. Choi, S., Yamasaki, T., & Aizawa, K.
    (2016) Typeface Emotion Analysis for Communication on Mobile Messengers. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia Alternate Realities – AltMM ’16, 37–40. 10.1145/2983298.2983305
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2983298.2983305 [Google Scholar]
12. Chu, X. Y. M., Tok, D., & Gui, J. J.
    (2021) Why Not Set Pen to Paper? How Typeface Design Influence Charitable Behaviors. ACR North American Advances.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dai, Y.
    (2021) Comparison of Emphasis Point Towards Marketing Strategies Between Pepsi & Coca-Cola:6th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2021), Sanya, China. 10.2991/aebmr.k.210319.015
    https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210319.015 [Google Scholar]
14. Dehaene, S.
    (2009) Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. Viking New York.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A.
    (2004) Font appropriateness and brand choice. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 873–880. 10.1016/S0148‑2963(02)00487‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00487-3 [Google Scholar]
16. Fiset, D., Blais, C., Ethier-Majcher, C., Arguin, M., Bub, D., & Gosselin, F.
    (2008) Features for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1161–1168. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02218.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02218.x [Google Scholar]
17. Grohmann, B., Giese, J. L., & Parkman, I. D.
    (2013) Using type font characteristics to communicate brand personality of new brands. Journal of Brand Management, 20(5), 389–403. 10.1057/bm.2012.23
    https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.23 [Google Scholar]
18. Hudson, J.
    (2016) Introducing OpenType Variable Fonts. Medium. https://medium.com/variable-fonts/https-medium-com-tiro-introducing-opentype-variable-fonts-12ba6cd2369
    [Google Scholar]
19. Izadi, A., & Patrick, V. M.
    (2020) The power of the pen: Handwritten fonts promote haptic engagement. Psychology & Marketing, 37(8), 1082–1100. 10.1002/mar.21318
    https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21318 [Google Scholar]
20. Keage, H. A., Coussens, S., Kohler, M., Thiessen, M., & Churches, O. F.
    (2014) Investigating letter recognition in the brain by varying typeface: An event-related potential study. Brain and Cognition, 881, 83–89. 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
21. Kesten, H.
    (1958) Accelerated stochastic approximation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(1), 41–59. 10.1214/aoms/1177706705
    https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706705 [Google Scholar]
22. Kim, M. J., & Lim, J. H.
    (2019) A comprehensive review on logo literature: Research topics, findings, and future directions. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(13–14), 1291–1365. 10.1080/0267257X.2019.1604563
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1604563 [Google Scholar]
23. Kulahcioglu, T., & de Melo, G.
    (2018) Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts. 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), 115–122. 10.1109/ICSC.2018.00025
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2018.00025 [Google Scholar]
24. Lanthier, S. N., Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D.
    (2009) Not all visual features are created equal: Early processing in letter and word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 67–73. 10.3758/PBR.16.1.67
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.67 [Google Scholar]
25. Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J.
    (2012) OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0168‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7 [Google Scholar]
26. Mirchandani, S., Zheng, L., & Gong, J.
    (2018) Typeface Semantic Attribute Prediction from Rasterized Font Representations. 61.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Park, J., Velasco, C., & Spence, C.
    (2022) “Looking sharp”: Price typeface influences awareness of spending in mobile payment. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1170–1189. 10.1002/mar.21651
    https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21651 [Google Scholar]
28. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C.
    (2006) Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023 [Google Scholar]
29. Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A.
    (2007) Parts, wholes, and context in reading: A triple dissociation. Plos One, 2(8), e680. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000680
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000680 [Google Scholar]
30. Petit, J. P., & Grainger, J.
    (2002) Masked partial priming of letter perception. Visual Cognition, 9(3), 337–353. 10.1080/13506280042000207
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280042000207 [Google Scholar]
31. Puškarević, I., Nedeljković, U., Dimovski, V., & Možina, K.
    (2016) An eye tracking study of attention to print advertisements: Effects of typeface figuration. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(5). 10.16910/jemr.9.5.6
    https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.9.5.6 [Google Scholar]
32. Reichle, E. D.
    (2020) Computational models of reading: A handbook. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ren, X., Xia, L., & Du, J.
    (2018) Delivering warmth by hand: Customer responses to different formats of written communication. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(2), 223–234. 10.1108/JSM‑04‑2017‑0133
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-04-2017-0133 [Google Scholar]
34. Rosa, E., Perea, M., & Enneson, P.
    (2016) The role of letter features in visual-word recognition: Evidence from a delayed segment technique. Acta Psychologica, 1691, 133–142. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.016 [Google Scholar]
35. Schroll, R., Schnurr, B., & Grewal, D.
    (2018) Humanizing Products with Handwritten Typefaces. Journal of Consumer Research. 10.1093/jcr/ucy014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy014 [Google Scholar]
36. Thiessen, M., Beier, S., & Keage, H.
    (2020) A Review of the Cognitive Effects of Disfluent Typography on Functional Reading. The Design Journal, 23(5), 797–815. 10.1080/14606925.2020.1810434
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1810434 [Google Scholar]
37. Thiessen, M., Keage, H., Hwang, I., Astley, J., & Beier, S.
    (2022) Effect of typeface complexity on automatic whole word reading processes. Visible Language.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Thiessen, M., Kohler, M., Churches, O., Coussens, S., & Keage, H.
    (2015) Brainy Type: A look at how the brain processes typographic information. Visible Language, 49(1/2), 175.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tinker, M. A.
    (1963) Legibility of Print. Iowa State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Treutwein, B.
    (1995) Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research, 35(17), 2503–2522. 10.1016/0042‑6989(95)00016‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00016-X [Google Scholar]
41. Wang, H., He, X., & Legge, G. E.
    (2014) Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 6–6. 10.1167/14.8.6
    https://doi.org/10.1167/14.8.6 [Google Scholar]
42. Wu, R., Han, X., & Kardes, F. R.
    (2021) Special fonts: The competing roles of difficulty and uniqueness in consumer inference. Psychology & Marketing, 38(1), 86–100. 10.1002/mar.21414
    https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21414 [Google Scholar]
43. Xiong, Y. Z., Lorsung, E. A., Mansfield, J. S., Bigelow, C., & Legge, G. E.
    (2018) Fonts Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 59(10), 4182–4189. 10.1167/iovs.18‑24334
    https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24334 [Google Scholar]
44. Žarko, J., & Nedeljković, U.
    (2020) The effect of controlling the weight variable on the typeface attribute assessment. Proceedings – The Tenth International Symposium GRID 2020, 707–717. 10.24867/GRID‑2020‑p80
    https://doi.org/10.24867/GRID-2020-p80 [Google Scholar]